Volume 15

We (still) get letters ...

Pete has been banned for 24 hours because of this post

Oh man, Pete Daoust see "MONEY" here :-o He said he was forced to sign this to get his electricity back......he tried very hard for 5 days to get his bills of exchange back from Hydro, without success, Pete has 4 women and one other man that lives with him, and these guys, after 5 days, were fed up.... So Pete bended over....with rage in his heart :P Anyhow, this "TRANSACTION" (it says so on the document) was sent to Pete, for him to sign. So Pete signed it, by qualifying his signature with BY:____ And also noticed Hydro Quebec that this decision was taken because it is now evident for Pete today that Hydro-Quebec don't have to respect and/or recognize Pete's fundamental rights, and Pete is now scared that Hydro-Quebec will remove from him this electricity. Anyhow, Pete Signed and sent this to HQ, in TWO copies.... Hydro-Quebec returned one of the two SIGNED by this AUTHORIZED representative of HQ. Now, Pete has this in his hands.... :/ TWO signatures, the title of this document is: "TRANSACTION" So Pete can't see anything else than MONEY :-o TRANSACTION, contracts, civil law. An agreement between two or more persons, who for the purpose of preventing or putting an end to a law suit, adjust their differences by mutual consent, in the manner which they agree on. It is explicitely said on this that Pete makes this decision based on FEAR. FUCK, I can't see ANYTHING but "money" when I look at this :( Pete have all the good reasons to believe he needs to make NOTARIZED copies of this......send it to Bank of Canada and demand CASH in return :/ HELP !!!! :( Ceit Butler, Tara Duncan, Scott Duncan, Erich Kirov, Gilberto de Piento, Daniel J Wentz, Sino General, Will Bed

YOU THINK WRONG: You are running a program that doesn't serve you. It serves someone else. YOU VALUE THE WRONG THINGS: You place value into bullshit because it is easy and feels good. That is all!

I'm a man, i have a person, it's not my fault. This video is very valuable to me. :D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBeisBoeK8w

:P .....

This is just the beginning....Oh, and they can still laugh at me all they want, REALITY won't change .... :P

LOOK Scott, Tara, Pete, Ceit, Erich, Daniel, and everybody...I'm sailing!!! (and smiling like an idiot) Guess who very recently arranged to have an LLC organized in Delaware? ;) Warning: This is likely one of the longer posts ever submitted/posted here at THE TENDER FOR LAW and will almost certainly be the longest post I will ever make/submit. My head is spinning at all the legal possibilities. They seem endless almost. I have many questions and have to go revisit/find some old threads so I'm not too much of a pain/shit smearer, but I thought I'd post this and a few questions and "curious" observations for now. My main goal/objective is to create an AFTER document, with the document provide below as the BEFORE document. My hope is that as a group we can together transform this very ordinary and average template (an average boat not much better than a dingy) and using what we have learned here, transform it into a thing of beauty - a magnificent rough ocean worthy "battleship" capable of taking on the most formidable opponents and coming out on top. I'm thinking it might be a good idea to create two kinds of members. Some with more "rights" than others (such as voting rights) so as to protect the company from sharks that may get on board. I'd like one of my person to have the power to toss anyone overboard that might endanger the sheep or attempt to steer it in a direction I don't approve of. I want to be the ADMIRAL and make sure I remain the Admiral as long as I want to be. [Yet some of those things seem to conflict with my ethics/or programming (unsure which in some cases)]. ****** I humbly suggest it could be FUN FOR EVERYONE and a great way for the newbies to put together the gold nuggets and help them get rid of a bit of the confused look they likely have on their faces all day long. I know it is a lot of work, but think of all the fun we can have while doing it. :) ****** The Scoop: I hired a corporation down there to assist me with the process. An AGENT of theirs submitted an application indicating the INTENT to be an ORGANIZER of an LLC in the STATE OF DELAWARE and provided A NAME for the new PERSON to be created. FIAT currency was given to pay FEES. The SECRETARY OF STATE then IDENTIFIED the AGENT as the ORGANIZER of the LLC and provided the ORGANIZER a CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION from the SECRETARY OF STATE. It has two numbers, a FILE NUMBER and another number with SR in front of it. (? guessing State Registration) :/ It appears that the very next thing that the AGENT did was CREATE SOME LAWS. :) They sat at their computer and typed out a few of them (most likely a template) in a document they created and titled INITIAL RESOLUTIONS wherein her PERSON OPERATING AS an ORGANIZER of the LLC indicated her wish to RESOLVE some things. BUT, before those things could be resolved, as the ORGANIZER with SIGNING AUTHORITY, her PERSON had to state that she wanted to ADOPT a few things - these things called RESOLUTIONS. So, then her PERSON resolved to RELINQUISH SIGNING AUTHORITY to the MANAGERS LISTED. Then this ORGANIZER resolved to name names and named me MANAGER of the LLC and signed this LEGAL document that stated that my PERSON will SERVE as MANAGER. (Isn't that nice of PERSON?) BUT, there is a catch, my PERSON will only SERVE as MANAGER until "the Members(s) vote otherwise. Here's the other things this organizer RESOLVED in this one page legal document with a whole bunch of LAW in it that the ORGANIZER just made up. 2) The DATE, the STATE, the ASSIGNED filing number. 3) That the COPY of the ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION is COMPLETE. 4) That the general PROVISIONS of an OPERATING AGREEMENT be ADOPTED and included as OFFICIAL RECORDS of the LLC. If the MEMBERS choose to adopt a more detailed operating agreement, then it will take precedence over general provisions in the ORIGINAL operating agreement. 5) The MEMBERS have formed (not my person which hired the agent/organizer-not me ACTING as a PERSON/MANAGER of the LLC) the LLC, and (get this) THEY (still not one of MY PERSONS :/) are ENTITLED (ooh that sounds like someone who is privileged) to the FULL EXTENT OF THEIR LIMITED LIABILITY pursuant to State Law. (Somebody who has never lied to me told me that Delaware would be his choice if he were going to start an LLC because it's the best place IN THE WORLD if you enjoy LIMITED LIABILITY and want a lot of it) And talk about LIMITED LIABILITY, #5 goes on to say that even if the MEMBERS (utterly and completely) FAIL to MAINTAIN FORMALITIES of an LLC they are still entitled to all the LL anyways (isn't that nice). So I guess that if a MEMBER gets some maple bacon grease on some documents, or loses some, or has to use some important documents to wipe their ass with because they run out of toilet paper, it's not a problem as far as the STATE of Delaware is concerned. My person also received a blank template entitled LISTING OF MANAGERS and another template (i'll post a pic of it when I get a chance), namely a LLC MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE. It looks like it's printed on that stuff that is often referred to as "BOND PAPER" and, to be valid, and, or, complete, it requires signatures in a few places by people with different TITLES. It also appears to me that even though this CERTIFICATE looks like a MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE, it's not a MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE until the LLC CAUSES ("caused this certificate") "to be EXECUTED by its MEMBERS", or it can be BOTH a MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE and a SHARE (until it's cut along a provided dotted line). Here's where I am a still confused (i am likely being an idiot), as far as I can tell, the LLC doesn't have any members yet. It had an organizer who resolved to name me a MANAGER with signing authority. But no MEMBERS in sight anywhere. I guess my person had better MANAGE this since it's the manager of this "MANAGER MANAGED" LLC. For clarification, the top portion of this certificate seems to require the following fields filled out: LLC NAME, Where it was organized, Total amount of members at X date, What PERSON is (is being) CERTIFIED to be a MEMBER, What % of INTEREST they HOLD (stating that they are ENTITLED to FULL BENEFITS of such memberSHIP), Date, and two final fields : Named Member and witness AND/OR member (not sure if it is noteworthy but the title of the final fields is exactly as written - i capped the AND/OR - with a capital N and M while the other field employed a lower case w and lowercase m) I see that the witness and/or member must sign, and I conclude for now that the Named Member field does not require the new members signature, but should be written in all caps. It could be another LLC person after all. Here's my first question, and if it's any consolation I feel stupid asking it... What MEMBERS are there that could cause another member to be named? It seems like the chicken and an egg riddle. As a Manager, I need to find some "members" to EXECUTE this certificate so the LLC can get its very FIRST member. I'm guessing that since I now have signing authority as the Manager, that I can now create a RESOLUTION resolving to make my PERSON be known, identified, recognized as a MEMBER and/or MEMBERS, print my PERSONS name in the second last field (Named Member) and sign the last field as a "member", or get someone else to sign it as a witness. I'm probably complicating things here and need one of those zen ruler swats in the head. :/ Enough of me blabbing...here is my little dingy they sent my person that was just put in the seas of commerce on the shores of Delaware... *************** LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENT This Company Agreement of this MANAGER MANAGED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY organized pursuant to applicable state law, is entered into and shall become effective as of the Effective Date by and among the Company and the persons executing this Agreement as Members. It is the member's express intention to create a limited liability company in accordance with the Act, as currently written or subsequently amended or redrafted. Therefore, all provisions of this document shall be construed consistent with the afore described intent of the Members. Accordingly, in consideration of the conditions contained herein, he/she/they agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 Company Formation 1.1 FORMATION. The Members hereby form a Limited Liability Company ("Company") subject to the provisions of state law as currently in effect as of this date. Articles of Organization shall be filed with the Secretary of State. 1.2 REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT. The location and name of the registered agent shall be as stated in the Articles of Organization. 1.3 TERM. The Company shall continue for a perpetual period. (a) Members whose capital interest as defined in Article 2.2 exceeds 50 percent vote for dissolution; or (b) Any event which makes it unlawful for the business of the Company to be carried on by the Members; or (c) Any other event causing dissolution of this Limited Liability Company under applicable state laws. 1.4 CONTINUANCE OF COMPANY. Notwithstanding the provisions of ARTICLE 1.3, in the event of an occurrence described in ARTICLE 1.3(c), if there are at least one remaining Member(s), said remaining Member)s) shall have the right to continue the business of the Company 1.5 BUSINESS PURPOSE. The Company shall conduct any and all lawful business deemed appropriate to execute the company's objectives. 1.6 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS. The location of the principal place of business of the Company shall be as stated in the Articles of Organization or at a location as the Managers select. 1.7 THE MEMBERS. The name and place of residence of each member are listed below at Certification of Members. Members are the owners of this company. 1.8 ADMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MEMBERS. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Agreement, no additional members may be admitted to the Company through issuance by the company of a new interest in the Company without the prior unanimous written consent of the Members. ARTICLE 2 Capital Contributions 2.1 INITIAL CONTRIBUTIONS. The Members initially shall contribute to the Company capital and the company shall keep record of the amount each contributed. 2.2 ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS. Except as provided in ARTICLE 6.2, no Member shall be obligated to make any additional contribution to the Company's capital. ARTICLE 3 Profits, Losses and Distributions 3.1 PROFITS/LOSSES. For financial accounting and tax purposes the Company's net profits or net losses shall be determined on an annual basis and shall be allocated to the Members in proportion to each Member's relative capital interest in the Company, and as amended from time to time in accordance with Treasury Regulation 1.704-1. 3.2 DISTRIBUTIONS. The Members shall determine and distribute available funds annually or at more frequent intervals as they see fit. Available funds, as referred to herein, shall mean the net cash of the Company available after appropriate provision for expenses and liabilities, as determined by the Managers. Distributions in liquidation of the Company or in liquidation of a Member's interest shall be made in accordance with the positive capital account balances pursuant to Treasury Regulation 1.704-l(b)(2)(ii)(b)(2). To the extent a Member shall have a negative capital account balance, there shall be a qualified income offset, as set forth in Treasury Regulation 1.704-l(b)(2)(ii)(d). ARTICLE 4 Management 4.1 MANAGEMENT OF THE BUSINESS. This company shall be manager managed. The initial elected managers are set forth in the articles of organization filed with the appropriate State agency. If the appropriate State agency does not require the Managers names be set for the in the articles of organization, or the organizer elects not to set forth the names of the Managers in the articles of organization, the Members may elect the Managers in this agreement in the certification of Managers. Members holding a majority of the capital interests in the Company may elect Managers as the Members determine. Managers listed in the articles of organization and/or this agreement will serve as the Managers of this company until a meeting of members is held and new Manager(s) elected. 4.2 MEMBERS. Members shall not take part in the operation of the Company's affairs, unless they are elected Managers. 4.3 POWERS OF MEMBERS. The Members are authorized on the Company's behalf to make all decisions in accordance with ARTICLE 4.2 as to (a) the sale, development lease or other disposition of the Company's assets; (b) the purchase or other acquisition of other assets of all kinds; (c) the management of all or any part of the Company's assets; (d) the borrowing of money and the granting of security interests in the Company's assets; (e) the pre-payment, refinancing or extension of any loan affecting the Company's assets; (f ) the compromise or release of any of the Company's claims or debts; and, (g) the employment of persons, firms or corporations for the operation and management of the company's business. In the exercise of their management powers, the Members are authorized to execute and deliver (a) all contracts, conveyances, assignments leases, sub-leases, franchise agreements, licensing agreements, management contracts and maintenance contracts covering or affecting the Company's assets; (b) all checks, drafts and other orders for the payment of the Company's funds; (c) all promissory notes, loans, security agreements and other similar documents; and, (d) all other instruments of any other kind relating to the Company's affairs, whether like or unlike the foregoing. 4.4 NOMINEE. Title to the Company's assets shall be held in the Company's name or in the name of any nominee that the Managers may designate. The Managers shall have power to enter into a nominee agreement with any such person, and such agreement may contain provisions indemnifying the nominee, except for his willful misconduct. 4.5 COMPANY INFORMATION. Upon request, the Managers shall supply to any member information regarding the Company or its activities. Each Member or his authorized representative shall have access to and may inspect and copy all books, records and materials in the Manager's possession regarding the Company or its activities. The exercise of the rights contained in this ARTICLE 4.6 shall be at the requesting Member's expense. 4.6 EXCULPATION. Any act or omission of the Managers, the effect of which may cause or result in loss or damage to the Company or the Members if done in good faith to promote the best interests of the Company, shall not subject the Managers to any liability to the Members. 4.7 INDEMNIFICATION. The Company shall indemnify any person who was or is a party defendant or is threatened to be made a party defendant, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the Company) by reason of the fact that he is or was a Member of the Company, Manager, employee or agent of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the Company, for instant expenses (including attorney's fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if the Members determine that he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Company, and with respect to any criminal action proceeding, has no reasonable cause to believe his/her conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit, or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of "no lo Contendere" or its equivalent, shall not in itself create a presumption that the person did or did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in the best interest of the Company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his/her conduct was lawful. 4.8 RECORDS. The Managers shall cause the Company to keep at its principal place of business or at another location agreeable by the Members, the following: (a) A current list in alphabetical order of the full name and the last known street address of each Member; (b) A copy of the Certificate of Formation and the Company Operating Agreement and all amendments; (c) Copies of the Company's federal, state and local income tax returns and reports, if any, for the three most recent years; (d) Copies of any financial statements of the limited liability company for the three most recent years. ARTICLE 5 Compensation 5.1 MANAGEMENT FEE. Any Manager rendering services to the Company shall be entitled to compensation commensurate with the value of such services as all members agree upon. 5.2 REIMBURSEMENT. The Company shall reimburse the Managers or Members for all direct out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in managing the Company. ARTICLE 6 Bookkeeping 6.1 BOOKS. The Managers shall maintain complete and accurate books of account of the Company's affairs at the Company's principal place of business or at another location agreeable by the Members. Such books shall be kept on such method of accounting as the Managers shall select. The company's accounting period shall be the calendar year. 6.2 MEMBER'S ACCOUNTS. The Managers shall maintain separate capital and distribution accounts for each member. Each member's capital account shall be determined and maintained in the manner set forth in Treasury Regulation 1.704-l(b)(2)(iv) and shall consist of his initial capital contribution increased by: (a) Any additional capital contribution made by him/her; (b) Credit balances transferred from his distribution account to his capital account; and decreased by: (a) Distributions to him/her in reduction of Company capital; (b) The Member's share of Company losses if charged to his/her capital account. 6.3 REPORTS. The Managers shall close the books of account after the close of each calendar year, and shall prepare and send to each member a statement of such Member's distributive share of income and expense for income tax reporting purposes. ARTICLE 7 Transfers 7.1 ASSIGNMENT. If at any time a Member proposes to sell, assign or otherwise dispose of all or any part of its interest in the Company, Member shall comply with the following procedures: (a) First make a written offer to sell such interest to the other Member(s) at a price determined in writing. At this point exiting member may not make this intention publicly known. If such other Members decline or fail to elect such interest within sixty (60) days, the exiting member may advertise its membership interest for sale as it sees fit. (b) If a member has a buyer of member's interest, the other current member(s) have first right of refusal to purchase the exiting members interest for the agreed purchase price. If there are more than one current remaining members, remaining members may combine funds to purchase the exiting members interest. Exiting member must show that potential purchaser has full certified funds, or the ability to get full certified funds before the first right of refusal period starts. Current members have 60 days to buy exiting members interest if they so desire. (c) Pursuant to the applicable law, current members may unanimously approve the sale of exiting members' interests to grant full membership benefits and functionality to the new member. The current remaining members must unanimously approve the sale, or the purchaser or assignee will have no right to participate in the management of the business, affairs of the Company, or member voting rights. The purchaser or assignee shall only be entitled to receive the share of the profits or other compensation by way of income and the return of contributions to which that Member would otherwise be entitled. Exiting member must disclose to buyer or assignee if current members will not approve the sale. 7.2 VALUATION OF EXITING MEMBERS INTEREST. If a member wants to exit the LLC, and does not have a buyer of its membership interest, exiting member will assign its interest to current members according to the following set forth procedures: (a) A value must be placed upon this membership interest before assigned. (b) If exiting member and current members do not agree on the value of this membership interest, exiting member must pay for a certified appraiser to appraise the LLC company value, and the exiting members' value will be assigned a value according to the exiting members' interest percentage. (c) The current members must approve the certified appraiser used by exiting member. Current members have 30 days to approve the exiting members certified appraiser. If current members disapprove the certified appraiser, they must show evidence to support their disapproval of the certified appraiser as a vendor qualified to make the LLC business appraisal. Current members may not stall the process by disapproving all certified appraisers. (d) Upon completion of a certified appraiser placing a value on the LLC, a value will be placed on exiting members' interest according to exiting members' percentage of membership interest. (e) If current members disagree with the value placed on exiting members' interest, current members must pay for a certified appraiser to value the LLC and exiting members' interest according to the same terms. (f) Current members' appraiser must be completed within 60 days or right of current members to dispute the value of exiting members interest expires. (g) Upon completion of current members certified appraiser, the exiting member must approve the value placed on exiting members' interest. Exiting member has 30 days to approve this value. (h) If exiting member does not approve current members' appraiser value, the value of the LLC will be determined by adding both parties' values, then dividing that value in half, then creating the value of the exiting members' interest according to the exiting members' percentage of membership interest. 7.3 DISTRIBUTION OF EXITING MEMBERS INTEREST. Upon determination of exiting members' interest value, the value will be a debt of the LLC. The exiting member will only be able to demand payment of this debt at dissolution of the LLC or the following method: (a) LLC will make timely payments. (b) LLC will only be required to make payments towards exiting members' debt if LLC is profitable and passed income to current members. (c) LLC must make a debt payment to exiting member if LLC passed income of 50% of the total determined value of the exiting members' interest in one taxable year. (Example: If exiting members' value was $100,000 and current member(s) received $50,000 taxable income in the taxable year, the LLC would owe a debt payment to exiting member. If current member(s) only received $90,000 in passed income, there would be no payment due.) (d) Debt payment must be at least 10% of the value of the passed income to current LLC members. (e) LLC must make payment to exiting member within 60 days of the end of the taxable year for the LLC. (f) Payment schedule will continue until exiting member's debt is paid by LLC. (g) If LLC dissolves, exiting member will be a regular debtor and payment will follow normal LLC dissolution payment statutes. (h) Exiting members' value of membership interest it assigned current members may NOT accrue interest. (i) LLC can pay off amount owed to exiting member at any time if it so desires.

Holy fuck, I feel like I had a fight with a lion :/

We now have our own communication network. So we can say anything we want without having Dan-Lien-The-Jews-Wilson doing the rat stuff that jews does.... :D

I wasn't able to make much of the Discord last night, but I heard Derek Moran was there. I don't have a say, really, but I think he is more of a detriment to learning than Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson. Derek thinks wrong and values the wrong things and he is getting worse. That's all. :D

Had to catch up on some sleep before posting, sorry for the delay. What I remember from court. Note: This all took place in French. So, these are legalese translations from memory, certainly not direct quotes. PIERRE DAOUST was called up. Pete explained that he isn't PIERRE DAOUST, he's a man that happens to be the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the PERSON PIERRE DAOUST Inscription Number #####. JUSTICE: Ok Mr. Pierre. From then on they refer to Pete as Mr. Pierre. Two other cases then went up before the court. After which, back to Pete. The JUSTICE then started to read the 'instructions/rights'(not sure what to call it) out for 'Mr.Pierre' as he had 'chosen' not to have a lawyer. Pete began to interrupt but the JUSTICE told him not to interrupt, so Pete let him continue. Pete then insists that he doesn't UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. He points out that he WOULD hire a lawyer to provide the best possible defense to his PERSON, but he must first have access to the SURETY. WHERE IS THE SURETY? Mostly blank stares from everyone. JUSTICE says that they'll get to that. Pete continued to insist that he needs to know where the SURETY is, and doesn't UNDERSTAND. JUSTICE just repeats that they'll get that for him. Pete says he needs it now. JUSTICE asks the CROWN if they've provided (Not sure about this, discovery or evidence). The CROWN says they have, so the JUSTICE turns back to Pete and tells him that their (discovery?) will include the SURETY. JUSTICE finished reading the 'instructions/rights', and asks the CROWN to call their first witness. CROWN calls the cop, and starts questioning him. Pete interrupts, insisting that he doesn't UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. That this makes no sense. That his rights are being violated. That what's happening isn't RIGHT. JUSTICE repeats that they'll get to the SURETY part and insists that Pete sit down. Pete keeps standing, and reiterating his position. The Bailiff calls for backup, and begins approaching Pete. Pete continues to insists that this makes no sense, that his rights are being violated, and that this makes no sense. He asks the approaching Bailiff if he's the JUSTICE's bodyguard or something? Pete finally sits down when the JUSTICE further insists, and tells him he won't ask again. (Second bailiff arrives) Cop begins testimony. Just running through all of the 'FACTS' about the night he intercepted Pete. Pete objects many times during the testimony. Objections include: -He doesn't UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. -He doesn't have a lawyer here, and needs one to defend himself. He needs to know who the SURETY is to pay for one. -He himself isn't a JUSTICE, or a lawyer. This isn't his field/profession, so doesn't know what's going on. -The cop's testimony is inaccurate. -The cop is lying. Every time Pete objects, the JUSTICE simply says that those aren't objections, they're more like comments, but that they're noted. As for the testimony being inaccurate, Mr. Pierre will have a chance to cross-examine. ((I could easily be mistaken about this, as Pete doesn't remember it this way. But from memory:)) Pete said that he had no bad intentions. He then asked the cop if he thought Pete had bad intentions. He then sort of asked everyone if anyone thought he had criminal intentions. During that, Pete reiterated his position again. The JUSTICE then admitted that the CROWN had NOT answered Pete's question as regards the SURETY. The JUSTICE then asks Pete if he wants to recess(?) to have the time to find a lawyer. Pete says that if they tell him who the SURETY is, then sure! The JUSTICE then said that no one in the courtroom has any OBLIGATION to divulge who the party with SURETY is. Furthermore, he said that he will not ORDER anyone to divulge who the party with SURETY is. Pete again reiterates his position: He insists that he doesn't UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. He points out that he WOULD hire a lawyer to provide the best possible defense to his PERSON, but he must first have access to the SURETY. WHERE IS THE SURETY? WHERE IS THE INJURED PARTY? JUSTICE: There is NO INJURED PARTY. It is the STATE that is pursuing you. JUSTICE asks if Pete wants a new court date, to give him time to find a lawyer. Pete asks for a few minutes to think about his answer. JUSTICE agrees. Once back in court, Pete repeats again that he doesn't UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. He says that not having access to the SURETY to hire a proper defense for his PERSON is UNACCEPTABLE. For these reason, he asks that the case be DISMISSED. CROWN says that the testimony of the cop is evidence. JUSTICE says that to dismiss the case, there must be NO evidence, but the cop's testimony IS evidence, so case is not DISMISSED. JUSTICE asks again if Pete wants time to find a lawyer. Pete says that he would like time to CONSULT with a lawyer. JUSTICE recessed for 10 minutes to decide, then agrees and grants Pete the time to find a lawyer. Pro Forma date set for the 24th of August.

From the surety and accounting department.

Let's make a LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENT together. (Presume it's a LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY in DELAWARE) What ARTICLES would you create? (Shutting up for a while and i hope this thread goes viral).

SURETY and ACCOUNTING..... At one point, ACCOUNTS needs to be settled. One way or another...... :/ ...it seems like when LAW isn't delivered to whom paid for it, NEW laws are being created....

August the 24th, It's a fucking put-on. Come and join the party and DRESS YOURSELF TO KILL :P

Look at this "Piece-of-Shit-Christian" :D I'll BET you that JESUS will ACCOUNT for this:D Fucking stupid "Piece-of-Shit-Christian" :P

Is it me or something is wrong with this scene ? :/ Or, do I INTERPRETE this article 117 wrong? :/ This is me, with cops. These cops has been called by a BAILLIF Of course, I have asked the assistance of these cops, three days before the event, IN WRITING. But hey..... :/ chapter P-13.1 POLICE ACT CHAPTER II INCOMPATIBLE FUNCTIONS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 117. The function of police officer is incompatible with the functions of bailiff, collection agent or representative of a collection agent, and with functions for which a licence is required under the Private Security Act (chapter S-3.5). The function of police officer is also incompatible with the holding of a direct or indirect interest in any business that pursues an activity mentioned in the first paragraph, an activity related to the administration of justice or an activity for which a permit issued by the Régie des alcools, des courses et des jeux for the consumption of alcohol on the premises is required, with the exception of a restaurant sales permit or a restaurant service permit described in section 28 or 28.1 of the Act respecting liquor permits (chapter P-9.1). Any contravention of the first paragraph of this section shall entail the immediate suspension without pay of the police officer concerned. If the second paragraph of this section is contravened, and the situation is such that the impartiality or integrity of the police officer concerned may be compromised, the director of police must immediately take whatever steps are necessary with respect to that officer. In all cases, the police officer's situation must be regularized within six months, on pain of dismissal. If the interest devolves by succession or gift, the officer must renounce or dispose of it with dispatch. 2000, c. 12, s. 117; 2008, c. 10, s. 13; 2006, c. 23, s. 127.

Oh man :D ....I am here, sitting on the passenger side of a delivery vehicule, a commercial one :D A "delivery guy" is driving :D ....and the corporation who happens to own this delivery vehicule does everything I order it to do :D WHY IN THE FUCK DO I NEED A FUCKING "DRIVER'S LICENSE" FOR? :D Why did I had this car for? ....fuck did I was fucking stupid!!!! :D

Scott Duncan pointed me to an ugly reality. The TERMS OF SERVICE on anything connected to the internet, has "the force of law". In theory, you could be literally "Facebook Jailed".

Just so it's VERY clear, Quatloosers. It is demonstrably TRUE that I am WINNING. ALWAYS. EVERYTIME I open my mouth in these court room, I AM WINNING…. The ONLY thing they can do is VIOLATING my fundamental RIGHTS. The RECORDS shows it CLEARLY…..so yes, EVERYTHING Scott Duncan ever taught me is TRUE. I am making it PUBLIC RECORDS. Ask ANYONE who witnessed these INVITATIONS, yes, EVERYTIME I show up in these places is because I have been INVITED. I have WON everything so far…..it's PUBLIC RECORD. If you don't BELIEVE me, you can always VERIFY ! :D Ask… Justice André PRÉVOST Justice Pierre LABELLE Justice Sylvain LÉPINE What's next for littler Peter, WHIPLASHES? :D ALL this shit will hit the fan, soon. And it's NOT MY FAULT :P Suck it up…..and go fuck yourself :P Pete. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

On June the 17th, I said to the justice…. WHY is it, only CRA seems to RESPECT my fundamental rights? Guess WHO called this morning? :D Yes, CRA :D , first time these guys shows up.... The guy wanted to talk about PIERRE DAOUST's file. I said: IN WRITING PLEASE, because you might be a FRAUDSTER, and I have NO trust for you on the phone. He said: Well, it will be to your disadvantage then :/ I said: WHY DO YOU START THIS WITH THREATS AND INTIMIDATIONS ? What the fuck is WRONG with you? The End….(Recorded, of course) Now, I have an audio that proves that CRA have HOSTILE intents, right from the start :/ WHAT DISADVANTAGE HE IS SPEAKING OF ?

Just in case some of you would like to NOTICE Colonel Delaney of some shit that's happening somewhere :/ He is PROVOST MARSHAL....in Canada :/ Lieut. Col. Rob Delaney National Defense Canadian Forces Provost Marshall 2200 Walkley Road Ottawa, ON K1A 0K2 Phone: (613) 949 1000 Fax: (613) 949 1117 delaney.rp@gmail.com Committee Role: Member

Ever since the Meads Obiter case, the pretend "legal" term "OPCA Litigant" is starting to appear everywhere. They literally made up a name and now "You're one of these". This is why it is VITAL that you pay very close attention to Pete Daoust and Will Bed, and what they are doing.

9th time this question is posed :/

Lets learn from this idiot DAN-LIEN-YOUR-NAME-WILSON :D This idiot wrote in a thread: "I did liened my name and still, IRS seized MY bank account anyways… :D Ok, the ONLY reason a bank account would exist is, I presume, this idiot has a JOB. I can't see any other reasons WHY a "BANK ACCOUNT" would be needed, even though there's lots of "Money Exchanges" like Money-Mart or "Insta-Cheques" that could be used instead of a fucking commercial bank. So, lets presume PIERRE DAOUST has a job with Coca-Cola, and 9111-1111 Quebec Inc has liened PIERRE DAOUST for $52 million. One thing is for sure, if CRA would SEIZE PIERRE DAOUST, CRA wouldn't have any problems to contact Coca-Cola and to ORDER them to send a portion of the pay cheque that PIERRE DAOUST is entitled for, right? So tell me, WHAT fucking difference there is? What prevent 9111-1111 Quebec Inc to SEIZE PIERRE DAOUST'S pay-cheque?, or PIERRE DAOUST'S bank account?, or PIERRE DAOUST's car? :D If PIERRE DAOUST is being liened by 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, you better believe that 9111-1111 Quebec Inc will make sure that ALL "moneys" that PIERRE DAOUST is entitled with, end up in a bank account under the name: 9111-1111 Quebec Inc "IN TRUST" How in the fuck this tard can say something like: "I did liened my name and still, IRS seized MY bank account anyways…"? It's either a LIE, or he is a complete idiot :D Hellos!!!! :D

I am in a process of creating a PUBLIC BENEFIT CORP. in Quebec. WHO would like to be a MEMBER? :D We need a huge amount of MEMBERS :) "VOLOUNTEERS" members :P

:D ....Kent Barrett is getting busy :D

Terrebonne's MAYOR. Look, he has his little pin on his jacket :D

"The changes would also do away with the THREAT of jail time for anyone who refuses to fill out a mandatory survey, such as the long-form census." So it is a "threat"...doesn't sound that lawful. :/

I just talked to a friend of mine. The City of Peabody was giving him a hard time about parking his trucks...rightfully so, there is an ordinance against what he was doing. They City didn't like the way the discussion went, so the following Monday, the SWAT team paid him a visit and raided his house. This place is like a war zone

http://www.thejournal.ie/man-sentenced-jail-harassing-garda-2898204-Jul2016/ 5 years...

Back to basics.

Will Zewe, you appear to be having success with Steemit! I'd like you to share your experiences, if you could. :D

I still love this...hahahaa https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/statreg/fraud/fraud_alert99-10.txt

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatoon/sask-charged-online-justin-trudeau-1.3706249

Their money. Their rules. Don't want to pay taxes? USE DIFFERENT MONEY! Despite what the government, law society, Quatlosers, and Dan Wilson stalker IDs say, I do not, and never have taught and/or endorsed the "natural person" crap. That's Freedumber bullshit. The money you "earn" is NOT YOURS. Money is DEBT in transit. With DEBT there is SURETY, and you have it, when you have the money. Look at the money in your pocket! Notice there are names and signatures on it? NONE OF THEM ARE YOURS. MAKE YOUR OWN MONEY! I SHOWED YOU HOW IN 2009! Don't want to pay taxes? DON'T USE THEIR MONEY! NATURAL PERSON is a LEGAL definition, and when it comes to BANKS, or GOVERNMENT then ONLY THE LEGAL DEFINITION APPLIES! Also: I'm the only one on the whole fucking internet that tells the WHOLE truth about this. ALSO: LIEN YOUR NAME.

have no fucking clue what I am doing :D HAHAHAHA!!!....ok, relax, I'll learn :P https://steemit.com/introducemyself/@petedaoust/the-public-debt

In case you all missed it: THEY ARE ONLY WORRIED ABOUT PEOPLE CHARGING MONEY. Charge MONEY and you have LEGAL JOINDER as you ACCEPTED THE TENDER FOR LAW attached to that money.

:-o

Here we go! We're off!

Craig Simpson, what's your story? Why are you here?

Wow! Brilliant strategy but there is some irony in who is targetting lawyers there. :D

Anne Brown! Are you studying to be a LAWYER? :D HEY Pete! We have a live one!

Hello TTFL members, my name is Richard and since I like to go straight to the point, here's my humble contribution to the agenda. It turns out that my sweet girlfriend Dominique Bilodeau is part of a "September '15 Mums" Facebook private group. Here's an intriguing conversation that occurred last week between Dominique and a Revenu Québec agent. Plz excuse the poor translation!

Cindy Barnes! how did you find this group?

willbed25 · 43 minutes ago Hi @steemship ! It's rather interesting to see a guy who claims to be a former lawyer doing a post about living beyond government control... If you are indeed honest and really care about good honest hard working men and women to not be victims of that corrupt system, I'd be curious to hear what you'd have to say about this, as it does seem reasonable to believe that, as a former lawyer, you'd be able to answer the following question : Considering that it seems to be TRUE that a person is a legal entity, a tool, that's created by the state, after a man or woman baby started living, without his/her consent, for that man or woman to use and/or exist and/or be abused, in the commercial / legal / public debt slavery world ; And considering that it still seems to be TRUE that every man or woman has the right to his/her person's surety/security, as recognized by any charter of rights, pretty much everywhere in the world ; And considering that it still seems to be TRUE that a surety/security has everything to do with the performance of an obligation vs a debt ; http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/surety http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/security And considering that a signature is proof of surety, and that my signature doesn't appear anywhere on the person's birth certificate ; I'D LIKE TO KNOW : Is it TRUE that public debts and/or charges addressed and/or brought up against a person, can be discharged by that person's surety/security ? YES or NO ? Also, is it TRUE that the words "This note is legal tender", written on USD notes, mean that these notes are an offer for law, and that any person using those dollars is deemed to have accepted the fact that all government acts, codes and statutes apply ? YES or NO ? And is that part of what "the consent of the governed" is based on ? And finally, can you disclose what it is, that an attorney actually attorns ? Thanks a lot ! I'm pretty confident many will be awaiting your answers to those questions ;) https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemship/creating-liberty-island-my-perspective-on-steemit

Hey, Jamie Redman, WELCOME !!! :D

Embracing the Revolving Door of Doomsday, Code, and the Thunderdome Do you ever feel like Doomsday is coming? It's hard not to think it is this day in age. When everything is so crazy and the world seems to be in an uproar. Individual country's economies are crashing and it's seems as if there is no hope for humanity. But the question is has humanity always been facing the Doomsday scenario?

:D

There's a lots of FUNNY "affirmations" on this CD. Affirmations made by the JUSTICE..... I will make lots of copies, and send them out, especially Bank of Canada, who has no idea right now that they are NOT a real Bank :/

Where may I find Pete's video on how to complete a Bill of Exchange? Thank you.

OH FUCK!!!!!!....being where I am right now, IS FUCKING AWESOME :D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!........learning HIGH FUCKING LEVEL legal shit :D WE ARE COMING !!!!!!

"Lawyers are not recognized as "employees" under Ontario's Labour Relations Act, and so are excluded from its collective bargaining system. But the government has VOLUNTARILY recognized the associations representing its own lawyers and bargained with them, such as the association that represents Ontario's Crown attorneys." Lol! What? :/

As said by Justice Sylvain LÉPINE, case 700-01-133003-148, a "debt-free" transcript has been received via regular mail. I will make photocopies of each pages, and upload it in the group's file.

Lokis Maliki is busy, in this shit hole called Newfoundland.

I think I have reached the point where I need to PUBLISH.... :/ Je pense que je suis rendu au point ou je dois PUBLIER..... :/ I have put a little bit of "determination" for the "verification" part. I intend to put twice as much for the PUBLISHING part :P Pete. Tous Droits Réservés. All Rights Reserved p.s. Picture of me, with "just some guy" :D

This will be the place where I will store ALL documents I have ever sent. Most are in French, but I am ALWAYS very specific and to the point when I am sending a Notice, or DEMAND, or anything else.... So it will be easy to use google translate to translate these documents. It might not give you the EXACT words all the time, but you will get the point.... Oh, and there,s a LOT :D For technical questions, contact Ricardo Mastas :P

THIS GROUP IS FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES and is no longer active. Join requests will be ignored. See: http://thetenderforlaw.com for updates, or join the group chat on DISCORD [ https://discord.gg/pKHFyg3 ] CENSORSHIP KILLS ALL THAT IS WORTHWHILE AND SHOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED. DELETE YOUR FACEBOOK ACCOUNT.

THE TENDER FOR LAW is NOW CLOSED. Censorship drove the founder out, and without Scott Duncan, this group is only valuable as an archive. This group was an examination of what you needed to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about.; MONEY, and the hidden-in-plain-sight contract that is tendered daily. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten·dered ten·der·ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D ...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted. Unless otherwise stated, BY DEFAULT, anything Scott. and/or Tara Duncan publishes, in THE TENDER FOR LAW, is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License: 1) You MUST say where it came from (Tara, Myself, or THE TENDER FOR LAW group) 2) You CANNOT derive works from it 3) You CANNOT MAKE MONEY off it. Make all the money you like off of "Scottisms" TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES. PEREMPTORY NOTICE: ALL WRITINGS PUBLISHED HERE BY AQUILAE AND/OR ITS TRUSTEES AND/OR ITS GRANTORS, ARE, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, PUBLISHED under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Have you tried to join and been IGNORED? GOOD! That's what's supposed to happen! If you don't have a ROGUESUPPORT BATTLEFIELD 2142 SOLDIERNAME, YOU DON"T GET IN! You had 2 years. Go fuck yourself. WORK for it. Read the group and figure out how. EARN YOUR VOICE HERE! Also: Jimmy Hoffa; Call your office.

The Frenglish is Epic! :D

Transcript Court Case 700-01-133003-148 Where the justice says: Yes, you have the right to the SURETY, and we will PRESENT it to you (page 16) .....And then, wopppssss...he changed his mind :D

interview with justice Sylvain Lépine, the justice who said YES, and then said NO, in case no. 700-01-133003-148 :/

http://www.droitsfondamentauxquebec.com/

TRANSCRIPT case no. 700-01-133003-148 Me : OBJECTION !! The Court : I am listening to you Me: I wanted to Identify, I want them (the cops) to tell me WHO will be surety for that debt he wants to create, because I don't want to buy back these debts, do you understand?. My opinion is that City of Terrebonne is a corrupt organization, and I don't want to pay for Tony Acurso's gasoline for his yatch, so BEFORE I "give" my name, because it's my name, I always demand WHO is surety :P Erich Kirov, Daniel J Wentz, Gilberto de Piento, Ceit Butler, Tara Duncan

TRANSCRIPT case no. 700-01-133003-148 The Court : Mister, your objection, it's to me that you talk. Me: Ah, excuse me Mister Judge. I am not an INDIVUDUAL, I am a man, and I am the man who possesses the juridical personality named PIERRE DAOUST inscription number 1196604112851. This is who I am Mister. I am not an individual, I am not a legal person, I am not a legal entity, I am not a juridical personality, I am not Her Majesty AND an Organization, I am nothing of these, so please…. The court: It's ok, I UNDERSTOOD. Me: Good. Erich Kirov, Daniel J Wentz, Gilberto de Piento, Ceit Butler, Tara Duncan

TRANSCRIPT case no. 700-01-133003-148 ME: Before I « give » my name, I want to know WHO is the party with surety, because I don't want to be robbed no more, that's all there is…. The Court: Ça va :D …it flies, or it's ok, or it goes….. whatever :P Me: That's all there is Mister Judge, and now, today, I demand AGAIN where is the party with surety, and again this fundamental right is REFUSEDit's a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. I don't understand what is happening in here. Honestly, I don't understand absolutely nothing. Erich Kirov, Daniel J Wentz, Gilberto de Piento, Ceit Butler, Tara Duncan

Listen up everyone, I'm giving you pearls: EVERY LAWYER IS LYING TO YOU. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RULE. IF YOU POINT IT OUT, THOSE SAME LAWYERS WILL DELIBERATELY SEEK TO HARM YOU. ...AND ONLY THEY CAN LIE, YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT, IN THEIR EYES. Life lesson No. 1: You are on your own. I took this from Scott Duncan, and I replaced the word "adults" for the word "lawyers". And the word "kids" for the word "everyone" I suggest that before you react, think about it :D ....if you have the ability to THINK of course :D

....Not my FAULT :P

:-o !!!!!

https://motherboard.vice.com/read/dakota-pipeline-protesters-claim-facebook-censored-video-of-mass-arrest

LOL :D

Is this where Scott wanted to go with this "PROPER NOTICE" thing ? :/

New Trend here in Quebec. I have no fucking clue who started this. But receiving it as change from Tim Horton is just PRICELESS :D