The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 13

Mar 23, 2016 6:25 PM

Jo Xappie

I don't think we answered Scott Duncan's 2nd question: Does the Law Society claim OWNERSHIP of all INDIVIDUALS?

Scott Duncan said look at the LEGAL DEFINITION ALL WORDS!

When you look at the legal definition of INDIVIDUAL, Black's Law states: Individual. As a noun, this term denotes a single person as distinguished from a group or class, and also, very commonly, a private or natural person as distinguished from a partnership, corporation, or association; but it is said that this restrictive signification is not necessarily inherent in the word, and that it may, in proper cases, include artificial persons. See also Person.

The last statement says it all. If an INDIVIDUAL can be considered to include (not includes, so not limiting) an artificial person, then when the Crown representing the government comes forward making a claim, it is PRESUMED that they OWN THE INDIVIDUAL, and by default are presuming the individual is the artificial person. That's where you need to break the presumption and clarify your status. So when the LSUC states they own ALL INDIVIDUALS, it is true unless the presumption is broken.