The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 13

Feb 01, 2016 4:57 PM

David-Paul Sip

This is a LIE that I consider to be of the same magnitude as JUDGE = JUSTICE. Members in the Tender fo Law would have never become aware of this had it not been for Scott. So perhaps this article will make for a fun eye opening discussion that will point other's to where to look for proof that WOMEN do not have "rights". Just writing that still leaves me shaking my head :/

Don’t forget that women’s rights are a recent invention: Mallick | Toronto Star

thestar.com

A celebration of a few exceptional women who courageously fought to make Canada a more just and inclusive country

Unique ID: 462493170453287_937637329605533
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
link
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 5

David-Paul Sip

WHERE might I begin to look for the evidence and/or proof that women do not have "rights' and never obtained any of these rights? This is something I must be able to explain to my wife and our little girl one day.

Scott Duncan

I think they already know. It's self evident. :P

Your evidence is in this very article. The act TALKS of "rights" then states the PRIVILEGES a woman has that match the RIGHTS of a man, making them EQUAL UNDER THE LAW. read the wording of the act. It's all there.

Back to top