The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 12

Nov 13, 2015 5:18 PM

Eamonn O Brien

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3307965/Laughing-law-Rioters-refuse-names-police-court-set-free-asked-come-year.html

Lots goin on in this article... Where does one start?!

Rioters refuse to give their names to police or court

www.dailymail.co.uk

The trio had been arrested after clashing with police in violent student protests in Westminster. Officers were unable to identify them because they were not carrying any documentation.

Unique ID: 462493170453287_902642449771688
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated:
http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2015/11/04/758773072333785004/1024x576_758773072333785004.mp4
Type of Post:
video
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 37

Chris Evan

A guy that works for me literally just got a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt while in the passenger seat of a car (nothing to do with SGMI). I asked him, how did they do that? He gave them a name. :D idiots....

Anibal Jose Baez

I have a legal axiom. It is my person's right to remain silent, because I can reasonably believe that any interaction with some "authority" it's to commit a crime against my person! Yes, that is a fact!

So, if "anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law", the name, or any other information, is part of that. I know giving a name can ONLY be used to HURT ME, and my persons! So why would ANYONE give any information?

That's my axiom. All burden of proof it's in the accuser. Let HIM prove/fabricate EVERYTHING!

Scott Duncan

Look how they try to make POLICE look like VICTIMS "This is another crushing blow to police morale after a very difficult few weeks. This will only encourage others to withhold their identities." DAMN FUCKING RIGHT!

It would be better if they said "I have an IDENTITY for you! Scott Duncan, who says HI"!

Scott Duncan

Oh wait. It's Westminster!

"I have an IDENTITY for you chaps! Scott Duncan, who, while we find ourselves on the subject, sends his rather childish yet endearing giggles which are interspersed among his kindest regards"!

To which the other "accused" would say "Yes. Quite. Quite" while nodding sagely.

Anibal Jose Baez

I have another legal axiom. My person it's incapable of identifying figures that try to claim authority over me, with one exception... Unless my person it's driving. Other than that, they will be ignored, wont even acknowledge their presence. Why would I answer questions from strangers? I don't say it, I just remain silent, and walk away.

Back to top