The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 12

Maximus LegisNov 11, 2015 12:52 PM

Maximus Legis

I am still free, these fuckers are curious types . Not done yet but I smell victory. I'll explain later. 😀

Read Comments 58

Scott Duncan

OMG you've never been to a gay bar! Why do you think there's a Glory Hole?!? OK, listen carefully... They are NOT being friendly because they're "nice friendly guys". ...or is that not where you were going with that?

Maximus Legis

Scott Duncan I Was too messed up to type upon returning home at fuck knows O'clock and have been dying all day . Here it is, it's not spectacular but I am still at large unencumbered . ---------------------------------------------- Okay guys , court yesterday. This was a Diet where I understand they state what evidence they have and move forward to trial or not. Arrived at 9:30am very early for 10am start and got sent over to a different Justice of the Peace Court from the original. From here on Justice of the Peace = JP Procurator Fiscal (Prosecutor) = PF Clerk of Court = Cunt I went with a couldn't give a fuck attitude, fuck the suit it was jeans and hoody. If they were going to throw me in a hole again I was going to be comfortable. The whole fucking place was a shambles. Same Cunt , different PF and different JP. The PF was a cripple who had a fixed smile and literally laughed every time he spoke, I couldn't quite see but he may even have been a hunchback. That was me I couldn't stop grinning myself and must have looked like the fucking village idiot myself . It wasn't his fuckedupedness but his general behaviour I found hilarious. Anyway the name was called and I went up. And decided to wing it so as I'd at least get a chance to get more out unlike the last time whilst being highly aware I could hit them with Notice of Mistake any time and multiple times. I was also ready if anyone came at me to make clear I didn't consent to them touching me, I was fucking blindsided last time . So, I go up and the Cunt says are you James Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, I replied "Aye" stepping immediately into their jurisdiction fuck it. They revisited the charge etc. JP scanned the room and asked where was my lawyer. I told him I didn't have one. He said that I had to have one from this point forward. I said I regarded myself as the best Man to handle my affairs. He said you must have a lawyer to proceed to trial and turned to the PF who stood up automatically it seemed . The PF said that he had statements from 2 cops who'd be available on the trial date (I guess that was him stating what evidence he had to secure a successful prosecution). I said point of order (don't know if that was right but it got the attention of the JP) And the JP looked at me. I said "I reserve all rights and am now the only one with any standing here , I am the Sole Authorised Administrator for the Juridical Person James Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, If I or anyone acting in my interest has led the court to believe I am surety in this matter then that would be a mistake and please forgive me. I said that there were exhibits in the file one of which was an unrebutted affirmation that secured agreement between the parties that the matter was settled and closed back in August. This caused looks of confusion all round and the cunt stayed silent (remember the cunt is the clerk who caused all the shit the last time.) I offered JP copies which he took and read. He hadn't a fucking clue as he's probably a fucking greengrocer by trade and had no idea where to go from here. I repeated that I consider the matter closed . JP passed my exhibits to the PF whom I reminded had no standing , he glanced over them and asked to set another diet instead of sticking to the original trial date so he could go over them in detail.. I said my business was done and as I walked away a date was mentioned. It's not over yet so I'll keep an eye on the courts roll of business to see if they indeed set another diet. It's not much folks but it felt good. Please excuse any typos etc as I'm still Dog ruff!

Chris Evan

Well this is interesting: Pro [Latin, For; in respect of; on account of; in behalf of.] CURATOR, persons, contracts. One who has been legally appointed to take care of the interests of one who, on account of his youth, or defect of his understanding, or for some other cause, is unable to attend to them himself. 2. There are curators ad bona, of property, who administer the estate of a minor, take care of his person, and intervene in all his contracts; curators ad litem, of suits, who assist the minor in courts of justice, and act as curator ad bona in cases where the interests of the curator are opposed to the interests of the minor. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 357 to 366. There are also curators of insane persons Id. art. 31; and of vacant successions and absent heirs. Id. art. 1105 to 1125. 3. The term curator is usually employed in the civil law, for that of guardian.

Eamonn O Brien

Why did you say you were the PERSON? You asked for forgiveness for making the mistake granted, but dunno why you said yes initially? They'll set another date and go again. They're stealing your TIME and thus your VALUE

Maximus Legis

I fucking explained why, to get the chance to talk! Notice of Mistake can be used any time as often as required to step back out of their jurisdiction. Do you fucking think that's how I wanted to play it?

Maximus Legis

Pete Daoust where I come from we have a trait, good or bad , it depends how you see it. When we or those we care for are attacked on any level, we go into overkill, we want to storm around plucking heads arms and legs off the horrible cunts doing the attacking. Conversely, walk into our camp without harmful intent and you will be given all we have in the world. It's a fact. I apologise for being hot headed, it's the genes.

Anibal Jose Baez

"Masters ask questions. Slaves answer." That was one of the first things that stuck in my brain when I first read it from Scott, sometime back in 2012. Second thing was, and I paraphrase, "You always answer a question with a question. Like in Jeopardy." I am glad you are not kidnapped, and able to still get drunk at will. :D Good to have you back. These are questions that I thought of, when I read your court experience. So, it is not that you have to answer to me. Is an exercise of me "thinking out loud." I share what went thru my brain. <<Why did Maximus responded to the question about if YOU had a lawyer? Why did he kept responding to YOU? Why did he responded to being HIM (fraud), when the name was called? ("You are either HIM (The PRINCIPAL), OR his AGENT.") Why did he let them proceed (accounting)? I know at one point later he reserved all rights, presented himself as the AGENT (Administrator), deflected surety at one point, and a diet, instead of a trial date is a possibility, but why wait until the middle of proceedings to try to clear things up? Can't that cause confusion?>> I am not trying to be a dick here, I just have this fucking program that gives all these flags when things do not match the data. :/ Data meaning "Scott is always right!" Again, I am not posing you questions, just sharing what is on my mind. And again, good to have you back, Maximus.

Maximus Legis

Anibal Jose Baez I get your thinking. The reason for different tactics was the immediate arrest last time and 4 days in a hole. And also as you pointed out to cause confusion. I wasn't confused in what I was doing. The hearing wasn't to set a trial date although I said it was to decide whether to continue to trial. The Trial date had already been set along with Wednesday's evidence Diet date, the effect of my actions was that it placed them in a state of indecision as they've set another evidence Diet before the trial date(which still stands at this point) to decide if they will go to Trial, Wednesday's Diet should have simply confirmed the Trial was actually going ahead as set. The are obviously reconsidering there can be no other reason as far as I can see.

Back to top