David-Paul Sip
Everywhere I look it seems I am reminded of Scott Duncan :)
"The decision states that there was no evidence to suggest why Kan did not activate his camera, but Weidmark wrote that “IT IS REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE” he was trying to conceal his actions. "
A parasitical lying sack-of-shit is the focus of this article, and there are other significant aspects deserving of comment but “it is (or is not) reasonable to conclude” is one of my favourites when constructing an affirmation.
Toronto cop preyed on vulnerable people in fake ticket scheme | Toronto Star
thestar.com
Disciplinary decision notes that those ticketed included “the homeless and others with mental illness.”