The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 11

Jul 11, 2015 4:06 PM

Scott Duncan

And they LIE about me!

---------------------------------------------------------- Hmmm, personally I would just call him a rather nasty little man with an over-inflated sense of his own importance. Let me see, a Toronto boy, been around long enough that he can recognize the area down around the old Tip Top building and Front Street. Believes he is God's gift to computer science but from what I can tell has only audited a few CS 101 courses. Stirs up trouble on various FMOTL sites by claiming: a. they have stolen his ideas; b. they aren't radical enough; c. various people are agents of the government or CIBC bank. Basic strawman/natural person arguments with one novel self addition - the "affidavit of mistake". Self appointed admiral of his own fleet under mercantile law. Somehow he has obtained a small group of followers who enjoy being abused by him.

------------------------------------------------------------

REALLY? They REALLY think that this is how people's minds work?

...and what the fuck is this "Claim" I made?

a. they have stolen his ideas; An advocate of open source, and the creative commons is worried about his ideas being stolen?

b. they aren't radical enough; What?

c. various people are agents of the government or CIBC bank. <---additional bullshit you are supposed to believe? What IS that?

And they will just discuss it as if it's fact.

They even lie about NOTICE OF MISTAKE, by calling it "AFFIDAVIT of MISTAKE". <--this is a deliberate attempt to deceive.

Does everyone see the casual lie this whole thing is?