The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 8

Dec 19, 2014 4:05 AM

Stuart Stone

Ok, I'm going to have a stab at the question:

WHY IS SCOTT ALWAYS RIGHT?'

As a prorogued noble, (ie: one of them- no disrespect intended), his thinking is structured the same way, totally lacking in belief, because as we know, ALL BELIEF IS EVIL...this gives a massive headstart to the deprogramming we are collectively undergoing & challenging, which is in part, why we THINK WRONG AND VALUE THE WRONG THINGS...

We start the 'game' with the distinct disadvantage of faulty programming & the time drain of deprogramming/reprogramming & whether it is even possible to fully discard this programming.

So, what is the alternative to belief?

Question/hypothesise, test, validate or discard....repeat cycle ad infinitum.

This requires a significant amount of self discipline, a lack of bias, the ability to consistently apply the scientific method/computer algorithm ie: a very specific way of thinking, which explains the statement:

COMPUTER SCIENCE IS THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING.

This in turn raises another question:

IS SCOTT THE ONLY ONE WHO IS ALWAYS RIGHT, OR IS THERE A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO THINK THE SAME WAY, THAT THINK CORRECTLY AND ARE CONSEQUENTLY ALWAYS RIGHT?

My thinking is that there is a group/entire community of people that can also be 'always right'.

IF Scott is the ONLY one who is ALWAYS RIGHT, then I am only able to imagine one scenario where that would be the case:

WHERE ALL THE PARAMETERS ARE UNDER HIS CONTROL, which would explain why the 'game' has already been won.

I'm sure I'm only just scratching the surface here...