Jeff interviews Marc Stevens an amazing non-lawyer defending the persecuted in the statist law courts, topics include: the government has no duty to protect,...
Filter by poster
Read Comments 8
Matthew Gundry
For those who don't know, Larken Rose and Marc Stevens are philosophically close - Larken wrote The Most Dangerous Supoerstition, Marc wrote Government: Indicted. One particular difference, though, is that Marc has more court room experience and specifically seeks to help people deal with mala prohibita accusations. marcstevens.net has a huge (and often very entertaining) collection of Calls of Shame and previous No State Project radio show recordings.
Pete Daoust
Logic ? ....yes, I can do that ! :)
Pete Daoust
Fuck, there's a guy smoking cigarettes in that video !!!! :D
Is this LEGAL :-o
Steph Boucher
He saying that everything is up to the judge; Isn't it because he hasn't ''reserved all rights''
Matthew Gundry
Where do rights come from?
Matthew Gundry
See... He can't very well simultaneously accept and reject their notions of jurisdiction - that would make him as schizophrenic as the control freaks.
Sirwade Firsbey
Matthew Gundry there is only one right and that is contract so rights come from the fact that there are many with this right of contract
Matthew Gundry
If someone makes a claim like that in a court room (or elsewhere), they take a burden upon themselves to prove it. That is not Marc's objective - he seeks to keep the burden upon the person who made the allegation. All of these allegations begin with the notion that some people have 'jurisdiction' over other people. A successful attack on that claim topples all other claims balanced on top of it.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 8
Matthew Gundry
Pete Daoust
Pete Daoust
Steph Boucher
Matthew Gundry
Matthew Gundry
Sirwade Firsbey
Matthew Gundry