The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Sep 18, 2014 4:36 AM

Steph Boucher

Hey Scott, how does one having the understanding of Law and self-governance relate to your understanding and application of Anarchist ideologies, such as Larken Rose's; I see you share some of his comments and thoughts.

How does one "navigate" in something as hierarchical as legal jurisdictions and something as complex as Legalese, wanting to restore the Executive Power of the Monarchy while on the other hand not wanting to be governed by anyone. I am to "ignorant" and "clueless" to see the connection and to point it as contradiction therefore I don't me to be an ass about it. I'm only starting my studies with the group. Yet, asking question will be my access to knowledge and understaning. Cheers!

Read Comments 33

Scott Duncan

I made no such claims. You just presumed.

You only assume I have Anarchist Ideology. I just point to what is TRUE.

I don't think ANY of you could survive in a voluntarist society, and I do not think any of you are bright enough to know what to do with it if you had it,.

MOST of you are ADULTS with IMAGINARY FRIENDS, and will ALWAYS have a slave mentality.

I did everything RIGHT. I didn't get what I paid for, and the cost of that is:

I collapse the banking system and kill 2/3rds of you.

Notice "freedom" and "anarchy" have nothing to do with that?

I am keeping a promise, and teaching you is simply a means to an end.

Personally, I think NONE of you DESERVE any freedom. I think you should all be in cages or hooked to the "Wheel of Pain/Fitness" generating power for my massive electricity needs.

I don't actually care if ANY of you are "free". I don't give a shit. Care Factor=0.

I am teaching all of YOU, in order to HARM OTHERS. Nothing else. When the streets flow with the blood of Government workers, I will have succeeded in my goal.

Scott Duncan

Pay close attention to the NEXT THREE PEOPLE you encounter today!

Think about their lives, their dreams, their beliefs, and ambitions...

Think about the next 3 people you encounter, in that manner...and know I intend to kill 2 of them. I hope that clears up any "peace/love/freedom" misconceptions that you may have.

I promised to tell you the truth. Nothing more.

Steph Boucher

Lol.

Isn't that slightly eugenics. Moraly, I give "0 Fuck" that people who justify killing/torturing others because they were given "ordered" to do so, die.

Is that what you mean, or simply stupid people deserve to die?

Scott Duncan

If you think, you live. If you "believe" you die.

Slap any label you like on that.

Message to ALL: Breach any contract/treaty with ANYONE but me. If you do, you asked for it and sealed your neighbor's fate. Maybe next time you'll keep your promises.

If you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being a party who's breached a contract with me or the TRUSTS I serve, then all you need do is explain to everyone you care about, why the horrible things that are going to happen to them, are coming, and why you made that decision for them.

Steph Boucher

If you have time and feel it would be benefiting, it would be interesting to bring up some knowledge on the relevance of intellectual property, if it has any in the actual context Scott Duncan and Pete :)

Steph Boucher

I know the tread was about a few thing so far, including if he thought us anything about "AGENCY". I asked if he could talk about "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" and if there is value in it in what we learned so far.

Steph Boucher

Who can administrate a claim to "intellectual property"? Is there any "Truth" to intellectual property or is it a "belief". Is it an Instrument ?

I'm trying to choose the correct grammar, I wonder if the question make sense. :)

Back to top