Shepard Smith
Good Morning Folks,
Ryan is the Kentucky AG, we have been debating issues over two years now, he has given me many insights on how the government will respond to disputes and issues.
I know you folks have no love for such persons, however that said, keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer. The debate and issue is the Birth Certificate and driver's license. I was denied a driver's license by the KY DMV....this is his response and my response....not a word since I sent this.
Ryan Asst. KY AG stated: Well they are operating on the wrong information. You have a birth certificate and you are a citizen of the U.S. and the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Ryan
You are stating the (BC) is mine...,Alrighty then....lets do it your way my friend, but I don't think your going to like it....
The next time I go to Court for this traffic case and they ask for the NAME, I'm Going to sound off with "United States".
Administrator/Judge, Excuse me who do you represent in this matter?
Administrator, I represent the United States in this matter,
Administrator, the Kentucky Attorney General has issued a "Legal opinion and determination" that this document contains this man's personal and private information, and that it is in FACT a public document that belongs to the United States. Are there any objections to what I just stated?
Administrator, I am here to protect and defend the United States the holder-in-due-course of that document. I am acting as the Registered-Agent and have an Office and address for service of process for the United States, concerning that document. Are there any objections to what I just stated?
Administrator, The United States, places Exhibit A Kentucky Birth Certificate before the court.
Administrator, This document is placed into the Court record and given to the Court as Fact, Evidence and Proof that the United States holds Ownership and is in FACT the holder-in-due-course, of that public record. Are there any objections to what I just stated?
Administrator, the Commonwealth Prosecutor has and is making false claims and statements, further this Bar Attorney is acting like an idiot, further he is making claims against the United States, and entity he has taken an oath to protect and defend.
Why is the Commonwealth Attorney bringing claims against a interest belonging to the United States?
What Facts does the Commonwealth Attorney have supporting his "legal opinion or Determinations" that this document belongs to this man and Not the United States?
Ryan, You have given my some Grand Ideas on how to proceed with this issue and ownership of this document, Thank You.
OK that was fun, now lets move on to the Real Facts brother,
If I had such a thing called a (BC) that would have to mean that thing is my property not the states. That is a Fact.
What the hell is the State doing with MY (BC) it if it is indeed mine? How can I even have it if the State actually has it?
Are you suggesting one document can be in two different places being held by two different entities all at the same moment in time?
Ryan, as you are well aware, I only deal with facts and positive law mate, not "Legal Opinion or Determinations". And those fact don't support you legal opinions.
FACT: There is a BC that exists. We're in agreement with this fact FACT: It is in fact held by the State in the State's custody. We're in agreement with this fact. FACT: The State having custody of it makes it impossible for me to have it.We're in agreement with this fact. FACT: Therefore, this man has no such thing as BC and there are no facts to support that I have or own such a thing. We're in agreement with this fact.
More facts to look at,
FACT: the State does in fact have and hold custody of, does not have my signature on it. We're in agreement with this fact. FACT:This man is not a signatory to it. We're in agreement with this fact. FACT: This man did not create The Birth Certificate. We're in agreement with this fact. FACT: This man did not authorize anyone to create it. We're in agreement with this fact. FACT: It does in fact have nothing at all to do with this man.We're in agreement with this fact. FACT: On the other hand, the two signatories on that document are in fact by two people who are in fact agents of the State and who did in fact sign that document for the State. We're in agreement with this fact.
Now can you provide any facts to the contrary or to show that I actually have that document when in fact the State has that document?
WHO OR WHAT owns all the "interests" in that "legal entity/fiction" Who is the holder-in-due-course of that "legal fiction"?
FACT: United States owns all the interests in it. We're in agreement with this fact. Fact: United States received the interest in it and United States used that interest in it to support its government and military. We're in agreement with this fact.
These are facts. Without that interest there could be no such thing as United States because there would be nothing for the United States to support its existence with.
WHY are those agents of that local government bringing claims against interest belonging to the United States?
Ryan, am I going to have to Act like a Bounty Hunter and issue a 14th amendment bounty on those people?
Have all their personal assets seized to repay the public debt they are creating for the sole purpose of embezzling funds for their own personal profit and gain? Or would they rather correct their mistake in this matter and I will forgive them?
What really ticks me off with all of this, IS I am well within my rights to do what I am doing. I am not asking for anything that any Man or Woman can't claim for themselves...even you could claim these rights....however you would have to give up your office and job to do it...the point being you could do it, if that was your wish.
Chase