The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Oct 07, 2014 10:10 PM

David-Paul Sip

"Asking the question of SURETY negates the possibility of understanding. If one does not understand, one must not proceed." Mackximus Minimus This is what is supposed to happen and yet depending on the "Justice" they may proceed without you.

I will post on this in more detail later but my recent experience in traffic court was similar to what Gail Marie expierienced with the "Justice" referring to "Meads vs Meads" and then contradicting himself by having the name/person paged DEEMing that DAVID PAUL SIP was not in the courtroom. This despite 1) ME informing the court that I am the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the person DAVID PAUL SIP 2) I am a MAN and have the person and use the name and 3) there being a question before the court regarding SURETY (Can I use the surety of the person to discharge this public debt, or am I automatically surety because I have shown the driver's licence?)

It seems that the courts BELIEVE that the opinion from Justice ROOK gives them the authority to ignore questions they deem to fall within the MEADS vs MEADS ruling. It seems that the standard to make this interpretation is very broad.