The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Aug 31, 2014 1:12 AM

Scott Duncan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

What follows is probably going to be the most informative thread ever posted on THE TENDER FOR LAW. I have come up with the ultimate format.

You see, dear members, a disgruntled AGENT with a prefabricated Facebook page that would make the most seasoned spammers blush, keeps messaging me privately talking about all the "harm" I'm doing; and keeps citing lies and half truths and a bunch of presumptions. He then brought Gail Marie into it. I'm not sure if anyone remembers Dan Wilson [ https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100006985755010 ]

For thirty years I've dealt with different flavours of this ilk, but this is the first time I have ever been able to do THIS.

I'm going to respond to absolutely everything he says in private messages, in a useful, succinct and productive way so all of you can follow along...

This type of AGENT wields a double-edged sword of half-truths. The dialogue is long and is ongoing, and to neutralize any accusations of "editing" I shall be posting screen captures of each bit of the conversation that I'm replying to. This will teach all of you how to respond to "ass-hats" who use the same methods, and most of all it will show when a government agenda is in play.

Let's start with his very first message to me:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1022689467797525&set=gm.714163491952919&type=3
Unique ID: 462493170453287_714163491952919
Unique Facebook User ID:
927379467328526
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
photo
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 383

Scott Duncan

This is where he drops the ball. He uses "freedumbers"! That is INDISPUTABLY MY INVENTED TERM! He's using slang I INVENTED!

...but he hasn't read ANYTHING I have EVER published, as you can tell by HIS OWN WORDS.

Scott Duncan

...and we're all caught up. I will post the dialogs that follow, as they come in... I am NOW going to teach you how to PROPERLY respond to the bullshit position posed, so all of YOU know how to counter it.

Anibal Jose Baez

Haha! I was not wrong about "Dan Wilson." He tried to take a dump in a sucess thread about administration of the person I posted, and I called him out right away. He was blocked just a few days after by his own actions.

Scott Duncan

Thank you Patti, but I am destined to be ripped off again. :(

Beverly Berta Braakschmack promised to do "An Ode To Paul F. Little (Volumes 1-9)", and she has YET to engage in filmed pukesex with me... and this guy isn't going to suck off a black guy.

I keep getting stiffed for porn. I can SELL that shit, you know!

Stuart Stone

I have a question:

He comments that 'the security agreement must be authenticated by the debtor'...

Ok, so using the example of liening the person into the private trust, wouldn't one create the security agreement in one capacity (creditor) and authenticate in another capacity (the one deemed as debtor/surety/government agent)?

Stuart Stone

similarly, the one deemed to be surety in the case of GAIL BLACKMAN et al could authenticate the security agreement, acting as debtor, prior to it being liened by the holding corporation for the private trust

Scott Duncan

Yes. It's your choice to engage in commerce with such an entity. you have NO LEGAL remedy.

Think of a Self-signed certificate. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-signed_certificate] Your browser will flip out, but if you TRUST the source, you can proceed on your own accord. I teach the legal equivalent.

Gail Marie

GAIL et al authenticating the security agreement acting as the debtor...is that why GAIL and LARRY were listed on the notice of application, rather then just the corp? It didnt really make sense to me that he named the 2 persons and the corp

Gail Marie

In his submission for the notice of application, he has spouted alot including naming all as "sovereign man"...about the (fraudulent) default judgement.....all that is just distraction and causing confusion? In my defence would I just acknowledge it and ask for relevance and or proof of his claims..and focus on what you've shared this evening as a defence..then do a counter claim against him for his fraud?

Gail Marie

ok that is where Im at now...i conditionally accepted his offer upon receipt of a prepaid amount...that was part of my response before I knew he was going to go ahead, so I will create another one specific to this and send a copy along to the court file as well

Scott Duncan

If the Liar addresses any PERSON that is not in the context of the corporation, then respond (as a courtesy) that "This Corporation does NOT provide delivery service to third parties. We are returning your property, having inspected it for anthrax and/or letter-bombs. We open the mail FOR YOUR SAFETY"! :D

Scott Duncan

This is, of course, the slogan of TODD, THE SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION LEMUR, who is of course, a much beloved Public Service Announcement (PSA) character, found on safety literature distributed throughout the AQUILAE Navy. Todd is endorsed by ALL the captains, INCLUDING THE WOMEN (Who are the only captains who really matter! There! I said it!) so you know he's good enough for your daughter.

...we also have a "Pedo-bear" version (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedobear) for those who refuse to take Todd seriously, even though they want gay threesomes with Smokey the Bear and Elmer the Safety Elephant. :P ...and christian closet-cases. Ok that was gratuitous. Sorry. :(

Still though... TODD!

Tara Duncan

We had such high hopes for Todd - what with his swarthy good looks and sexual assault prevention superpowers. It's likely the world wasn't ready to embrace this altruism, what with not giving a Tinker's damn for the well-being of women in general. Perhaps Todd will come into his own as a TENDER FOR LAW mascot. Todd! Todd! Todd! Gooooooooo Todd!

Pete Daoust

But before you thrown this Todd thing, which I have none a fucking clue what it is, I was just thinking, and I thought WHY serial killers don't just focus on lawyers ?

I mean, it would be giving consideration in exchange for, well....giving consideration ? .......ok, let me think more, will try to get back with a clearer idea :/

Ahhh...these thoughts that flying in this brain... :(

Stuart Stone

Well they have a specific skill set Pete Daoust, they have an efficiency with their craft, ability to evade capture, often for years and years...very professional in many ways...maybe they could specialise, some just the garden variety and some focusing on specific groups like pedophiles...of course any seminar would require break out sessions for the various specialties...of course this thinking out loud is for 'entertainment puroses' only ;-)

Scott Duncan

The perfect defence to a "fraudulent Lien" APPLICATION (Notice it's not a CLAIM; They are BEGGING): "The lien exists because the fucking deadbeat didn't pay his fucking bill, and now YOU can take a bill for wasting my fucking time".

Scott Duncan

I do not tolerate even a HINT of collecting personal information of ANY sort. You aren't qualified to understand that yet, so I know there is no hostile intent, but this WILL be an upcoming Article subject.

Pete Daoust

Residence vs Domicile :D

Personal presence at some place of abode.

Although the domicile and residence of a person are usually in the same place, and the two terms are frequently used as if they have the same meaning, they are not synonymous. A person can have two places of residence, such as one in the city and one in the country, but only one domicile. Residence means living in a particular locality, but domicile means living in that locality with the intent to make it a fixed and permanent home. Residence merely requires bodily presence as an inhabitant in a given place, whereas domicile requires bodily presence in that place and also an intention to make it one's permanent home.

This distinction is relevant for members of the military, who may move frequently during the course of a typical career; college students, whose state of domicile may affect whether they are eligible for scholarships and grants from a state university; and retired individuals, whose domicile will determine where they pay taxes. Domicile determines where a person votes and where a person's driver's license is issued.

Pete Daoust

Fun question....

Fucktard: Are you a resident ? Me: No, I am a man, and I HAVE a residence.

Fucktard: Where are you domiciled Me: I am NOT domiciled, idiot, but my person has one.

Fucktard: Are you (insert whatever you may think here) ? NO. I am a MAN.....fuck, what's so hard to grasp in this ? :/

Fucktard: Are you an INDIVIDUAL ? Me: *sigh* .... I AM A FUCKING MAN...NOTHING ELSE !!!! :(

Pete Daoust

:D

citizen n. person who by place of birth, nationality of one or both parents, or by going through the naturalization process has sworn loyalty to a nation. The United States has traditionally taken the position that an American citizen is subject to losing his/her citizenship if he/she commits acts showing loyalty to another country, including serving in armed forces potentially unfriendly to the United States, or voting in a foreign county. However, if the foreign nation recognizes dual citizenship (Canada, Israel, and Ireland are common examples) the U. S. will overlook this duality of nationalities.

Tara Duncan

Well that was long. With the thinly veiled threats, the unwillingness to acknowledge or respond to queries, the point-counterpoint exchange was strangely similar to a conversation with my mother. It has been my experience that lawyers, police officers and my mother rarely answer a direct question with a direct answer. Odd really.

Pete Daoust

This Dan Wilson guy dosen't seem to understand the fact that Gail Marie NEVER wanted to contract with this criminal lawyer, and that lawyer kept pushing his bullshit on Gail, and FORCED her to contract, he literally used FORCE, INTIMIDATION, and acted in bad faith, plus he lied to the justice about it....

At one point, what else is there left to do than, to send a fucking INVOICE ?

Now, by his fault, there is an UNPAID fucking bill, and HE FUCKING ASKED FOR IT.....now pay and fuck off :P , next time, think twice before you try to use your imaginary super powerzzz on me, you criminal piece of shit :D

These fucking piece of shit lawyers are not less than vampires.....they really believe having some super powers,

Dan Wilson.....NO CONTRACT WAS WANTED, there was NO BUSINESS WANTED...

That's exactly what I would say in court....very loud :D

Pete Daoust

What do you think is going to happen, if a stranger knocks on my door, wants to get in to do some business, I say no, and he forces the door to come in ?

I WILL FUCKING KICK HIS ASS.....and that's exactly what you are doing... :D

David-Paul Sip

I remember this Dan Wilson...so he was a fucking lurker. Now we know that he thinks he knows more than the Admiral and "teaches" a better way? Even if he was removed from the group without cause it is clearly a good thing he was given his now "not-so-private" chat with Admiral Scott.

David-Paul Sip

Reading his comments is hurting my brain. Unilateral contract? The lawyer in Gail's case had an opportunity to fuck off peacefully or PAY. This sack of shit was given fair warning and still chose the PAY option. It's simple fucking programmming logic. IF you fuck off THEN nothing further will happen ELSE you agree to PAY. When credit cards change their terms and conditions is this not done unilaterally? Even though you entered the agreement under different terms and conditions. At least the lawyer and his firm had a choice.

Gail Marie

every letter to the lawyer was started with "WHO ARE YOU?"...funny when I went to the JP, i had to educate them as well. When I brought this up to them, they said "he says here who he is..and its on letter head"...I said it doesnt provide proof of anything Im looking for....he says he is doesnt prove anything...and the letter head simply proves he works at this law firm...that still does not prove anything to me

Pete Daoust

Here's my composition:

FUCK OFF YOU STUPID IDIOT........THERE WAS NO FUCKING CONTRACT, I DID NOT WANT TO CONTRACT.....I WAS FORCED TO CONTRACT....and now I just sent a small invoice for my service... :P

Scott Duncan

To all the infiltrators: The second you try to convince ME (Of ALL PEOPLE) that the courts aren't corrupt, is the second you start harming people. YOU ARE SIMPLY SELLING A LIE, and ANYONE SELLING THAT LIE MEANS YOU HARM.

...and they can be muzzled.

John Gessas

Hey Dan, have you ever had a meeting with your mind? I bet you didn't spend much on ink and paper writing up those "minutes'! Someone should throw you in the garbage as doing so won't "bind" any more than we are apparently! I should put you on a busy street corner and see if you charge fee's for your services rendered! you had better or I can't guarantee your security...Agreed!

Mike Lamb

Wow. I would not have even conversed with him (seems like a waste of time). I would have started charging him my 'fee' from the get go . My knowledge of certain topics is still limited, but his communication did not make any sense to me. OBAMACARE is voluntary. I am not aware of any EMPLOYEES (USA Inc.) who have NOT lied. Of course, some of THEM are not hiding THEIR intentions/agenda, and still the CITIZENS are not outraged.

Anibal Jose Baez

Notice the Vermin wants to associate Scott with "freeman," "sovereigns," and even Scott's own "free-dumb" slang. I also see he is trying to get Scott to admit somehow being involved in Gail's situation. Trying to place Scott in a position of SURETY for the actions of Gail. Little does he knows... :D

Gail Marie

In the previous claim made against GAIL, the documents sent to the court by the corp were returned to without cause and a default judgement awarded to him as if I didn't respond. Anyone have any tips to ensure that the notice is accepted into the court file and not returned as if I didn't respond and then a default awarded against GAIL et al?

Damian Zwamborn

That is scary shit. Dan Wilson is clear example of 'belief' (aka talking out of your ass). Cognitive dissonance is probably too kind a term to describe that stupid asshole (that suggests he might come around).

Gail Marie

So he would want this dealt with quickly...a hearing is just to find out if there is a case if im comprehending correctly, which means even if the justice thinks he has a case....the trial will be down the road....he may be on an extended unpaid vacation with his strategy

Gail Marie

thinking on the experience I've had to date with the court returning documents of value...he may expect (believe) me to "not" respond and get a default award thinking he will be able to get back practicing quickly...hmm

Pete Daoust

Mat takes care of that shit for me, I am too old for that stuff, and no more patience for it..... :(

Here is Mat....strong,extremely fast, no fear and has the "may as come" motto, which is a HUGE advantage ... :D

Scott Duncan

The ONLY reason to LIEN THE NAME is to SECURE it.

The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is now YOURS. The TRUSTed party liening it, has endorsed this. It is now a FACT IN LAW (No legal authority exists, outside of yourself, to challenge it) that you own your name. Look at the relationship between you and your BANK when you have a MORTGAGE. It's the same thing.

That's also means the TRUST has first rights of refusal, and that is LIMITED TO THE TERMS SET OUT IN IT.

That's why NOBODY will give you credit. Until COMMERCE trusts your TRUST (Or the corporation holding it) you had better have value to sustain it.

Scott Duncan

Here's the thing, Chris; 2016 is around the corner and I need to up my game,as all of you PEOPLE are FAR too slow putting the pieces together.

The authorized rate for me telling the truth in 2016 is $480 dollars per hour, with a minimum 4 hours.

Payable up front.

Please make Cheques, bank Drafts, and/or Money Orders out to Rogue Support Inc. IN TRUST.

This allows me to buy things for the fleet without AQUILAE oversight... like, first aid kits, life jackets, tools, Arduino-powered areal death robots, and things like that.

...and you don't have a cunt, so that's about the only way you will get anything out of me next year.

I gave you EVERYTHING you need.

I'm invading the north coast of the mediterranean and nobody has noticed.

I'm invading China, and they are LETTING me (Seriously! They totally don't care! It's not like I'm subtle, either!) only the chinese noticed (Do NOT underestimate the Chinese Elite!).

That's the shit you (might) know about. There's a shitload that you DON'T. That's not because I've hidden anything; It's just that you are incapable of grasping it (yet?) and I can't really discuss it without a common frame of reference.

I spent three years in what was likely a failed venture here. I have built riches beyond your shockingly limited mind's capabilities.

I'm changing everything, and I think I deserve to "ring the register". I've done my bit for Queen and Country, and I got shit on for my trouble. 2015 is where I tally up my final accounting, and on December 31st 2015 at midnight, I start the life I fucking earned.

I will collect my debts... through AGENCY. :D

Pete Daoust

Fun Fact: Elizabeth speaks French better than me :P

Elizabeth Windsor C/O :Her Majesty The Queen Buckingham Palace London SW1A 1AA

Chére Reine,

Je suis Pierre, je suis celui qui possède la personnalité juridique nommée PIERRE DAOUST ayant le numéro d’inscription 1196604XXXXXX

Je suis celui qui a droit à la sûreté, l’intégrité et la liberté de cette personnalité juridique nommée PIERRE DAOUST ayant le numéro d’inscription 1196604XXXXXX.

Hors, je souhaite vous aviser que l’Agence du Revenu du Québec, la Ville de Montréal, Hydro-Québec et la Ville de Terrebonne ont tous décidés de me violer ces droits que j’ai, donc, par le fait même, décidé de déclarer la guerre à ma personne.

Je souhaite que vous sachiez que je vais me tenir belligérant devant l’agresseur, et que je vais défendre le Commonwealth, ainsi que ma personne.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

Par : Pierre. Seul Administrateur Autorisé pour la personne légale, et/ou la personnalité juridique, et/ou l’entité légal nommé PIERRE DAOUST ayant le numéro d’inscription 1196604XXXXXX.

Pete Daoust

Dear Queen,

I am Pierre, I'm the one who possess the judicial personality named PIERRE DAOUST registration number 1196604XXXXXX

I am the one who has the right to surety, integrity and liberty of this legal person named PIERRE DAOUST registration 1196604XXXXXX.

I wish to notify you that the Agency Revenue Quebec, the City of Montreal, Hydro-Québec and the City of Terrebonne have all decided to violate me from these rights that I have, therefore, decided to declare war on my person.

I want you to know that I'm going to stand belligerent in front of these aggressors, and that I will defend the Commonwealth, as well as my person.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

By Pierre. Sole Authorized Administrator for the legal person and / or judicial personality, and / or legal entity named PIERRE DAOUST registration number 1196604XXXXXX.

Anibal Jose Baez

I have read from Scott the term "wage war" or "waging war on my person." A DECLARATION of war, I do not think means the same.

In another topic, it's interesting... "GOD SAVE THE QUEEN" Save, in legal terms means "To except, reserve, or exempt; as where a statute saves vested—fixed—rights. To toll, or suspend the running or operation of; as, to save the Statute of Limitations."

Pete Daoust

TO WAGE, contracts. To give a pledge or security for the performance of anything; as to wage or gage deliverance; to wage law, &c. Co. Litt. 294. This word is but little used.

verb

carry on (a war or campaign).

"it is necessary to destroy their capacity to wage war" synonymes: engage in, carry on, conduct, execute, pursue, prosecute, proceed with

That's all I could find, and there's nothing I can find that would make sense in French....

Chris Evan

This sums it up nicely: "War is not only an act, but a state or condition, for nations are said to be at war not only when their armies are engaged, so as to be in the very act of contention, but also when, they have any matter of controversy or dispute subsisting between them which they are determined to decide by the use of force, and have declared publicly, or by their acts, their determination so to decide it. "

Lei Gh

~Office of the Queen's Governor General for Canada ~Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada ~The Senate of Canada ~Lieutenant Governor of NL. ~Ministry of the Attorney General, NL. ~The Chief Justice, NL.

and a few others.

Nope, no address for the Queen. Just her minions.

Anibal Jose Baez

I thought that the Admiral was replying to your comment, but then I noticed he was addressing Pete. Hence, my joke read as some random comment. I decided, for the sake of the thread, to delete it.

I wish "Me Lady" may find strength to forgive me! :D

Lei Gh

It is My Lady.

Now, my Betty picture looks like a random comment. For the sake of the thread, you should have not removed your comment. I got your joke. ;) I can not forgive your actions. Now it looks like I am telling the Admiral to suck my dick. :/ YOU know deleting comments is a NO-NO. Feed him to the carps, Admiral. :P

Lei Gh

Sorry for using the great library of my ass earlier. I found what I was looking for. :)

"I'm invading the north coast of the mediterranean and nobody has noticed.

I'm invading China, and they are LETTING me (Seriously! They totally don't care! It's not like I'm subtle, either!) only the chinese noticed (Do NOT underestimate the Chinese Elite!). "

Scott Duncan

The Chinese totally don't care! We have one of the largest ASIC mines in history there. They KNOW it's there. They know what it is, and they KNOW WHO OWNS IT!

...and they don't care. Seriously! It's weird.

David-Paul Sip

This Satoshi fellow is somewhat reclusive. Poor fella! To read this some will BELIEVE he is telling the truth...others will know that he is and will be able to prove it :D

Newsweek issued a statement about this article on March 7, 2014

*** Dorian Nakamoto's Statement Recieved on March 19, 2014:

My name is Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto. I am the subject of the Newsweekstory on Bitcoin. I am writing this statement to clear my name.

I did not create, invent or otherwise work on Bitcoin. I unconditionally deny the Newsweek report.

The first time I heard the term "bitcoin" was from my son in mid-February 2014. After being contacted by a reporter, my son called me and used the word,which I had never before heard. Shortly thereafter, the reporter confronted me at my home. I called the police. I never consented to speak with the reporter. In an ensuing discussion with a reporter from the Associated Press, I called the technology "bitcom."

I was still unfamiliar with the term.My background is in engineering. I also have the ability to program. My most recent job was as an electrical engineer troubleshooting air traffic controlequipment for the FAA. I have no knowledge of nor have I ever worked on cryptography, peer to peer systems, or alternative currencies.

I have not been able to find steady work as an engineer or programmer for ten years. I have worked as a laborer, polltaker, and substitute teacher. I discontinued my internet service in 2013 due to severe financial distress. I am trying to recover from prostate surgery in October 2012 and a stroke I suffered in October of 2013. My prospects for gainful employment has been harmed because of Newsweek's article.

Newsweek's false report has been the source of a great deal of confusion and stress for myself, my 93-year old mother, my siblings, and their families. I offer my sincerest thanks to those people in the United States and around the world who have offered me their support. I have retained legal counsel. This will be our last public statement on this matter. I ask that you now respect our privacy.

Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto

Temple City, California

March 17, 2014

http://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/face-behind-bitcoin-247957.html

Scott Duncan

"He was the kind of person who, if you made an honest mistake, he might call you an idiot and never speak to you again," Andresen says.

Wow. Good thing there's nobody like THAT around here! That'd totally suck! :D

Scott Duncan

For the record, we're still sure we aren't committing any crime by giving everyone the ability to create their own money.

...and we're still sure that we'd be killed if anyone in government knew we had anything to do with the blockchain's creation.

Dan taught me that all of you are too dumb to do anything with that knowledge, and that after the Dan-in-a-satoshi-suit episode with Newsweek, I doubt anyone's going to be in a hurry to "chase this down" :D

Scott Duncan

BTW

"Lindsey Davis" = Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson

https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10660262_1026151217451350_3429499170601617368_n.jpg?oh=2389b0cbc8de8b9f697ab83cb2757b4b&oe=57537280

Back to top