Aug 24, 2014 11:39 AM

He came to the conclusion that the note is authorisation to create the money... So close!

Here is a link to all the docs he uses:

http://privateaudio.homestead.com/Dan-Benham.html

Eamonn, you have NO idea how many people get "so close". There is NOTHING I can do.

The LAST "so close" guy I tried to save was Dean Clifford, and we all know how well THAT worked out!

That chap Dan got there through his own research. I'd probably still be chasing my tail if Tender for Law wasn't set up...

I was waiting for him to realise that if the note is not a debt then it must be a.... CREDIT! :/

He DOES get it, but fails to articulate it.

Do I need to watch that video ?

Not really. Derek Moran would totally jizz to it, though.

Thanks :-)

The one question this young fellow asks is damn good "What facts do you have that support your Legal conclusions or opinions? This one simple question has the traffic case prosecutor and the Asst. KY AG madder than hell. The second thing he does is his use of the Statutes-At-Large as positive law, when the code comes into conflict with the Statutes-At-Large, the Statutes-At-Large are controlling law, the intent of the Congress.

His suggestion of giving Judicial Notice first, then making them abide...then going back to the Statutes-At-Large was a good idea.

This kid gets the banking problem, not quite "Money as Debt" but darn close.

I'll take the hit for missing the groups "Code" however I e-mail this to Scott for review and thoughts, he posted it I believe, so it must have some merit somewhere.

His paperwork is geared towards being a state citizen, his arguments comes from that position.

We will be covering the whole "Citizen" thing in the next article

:D

Lets PUNISH these Citizens :D

Dan does not get it nor articulate it. Evidence is on my wall. I've been trying to show him, but he won't listen.

Fun Fact though, Dan claims to be the author of the book "The UCC and You"

However, this guy got an extended stay at the PenFed for failure to file income taxes for a corporation that he never had an interest in. (He refuses to discuss surety with me). So when he got out, he claimed all the losses from this corporation on his persons taxes.

Not how I'd deal with it...but interesting.