The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Aug 14, 2014 1:35 PM

Shepard Smith

Morning Mates

I did a release of Claim and interest for a simple traffic case, ever since I filed it the Prosecutor won't talk with me....thoughts

Unique ID: 462493170453287_706971612672107
Unique Facebook User ID:
1650647491845660
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 297

David Vilaca

shit balls, I will dutifully read it but come on, what about MONETIZING SECURED BONDS SECURITIZING DAMAGES FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. See what you did you Christian Shit Stain, if I had a ban hammer I would beat you to a pulp with it!!!

Scott Duncan

Proper Notice is simple: If somebody signed a legal document with your name on it, you NOTIFY them. Period.

NOTICE IN THE POST OFFICE DOES NOT NOTIFY YOUR FUCKING GRANDMOTHER OF ANY NOTICE I POST, AND NOR DOES IT THE GOVERNMENT. THE AGENT MUST BE NOTIFIED. THAT IS WHY I'S LEGAL TO LIEN THE SHIT OUT OF THEM; THEY HAVE NOTICE/SURETY.

David-Paul Sip

As the Admiral said "He has several successes... He's just here to learn WHY he did." I think it would be good for all of us to learn WHY he did. No? Similar to learning WHY the Admiral is right instead of asking if he is. I appreciate you sharing this Shepard Smith. Took some balls.

David-Paul Sip

As per the Admiral...1) "It DOES qualify as a RELEASE , but I'm not seeing where SURETY is removed." 2) RED on a LEGAL DOCUMENT means there is a MISTAKE. NOTHING ELSE.

So how does this need to change in order for SURETY to be removed? This is the question in my head :/

David-Paul Sip

Yeah I thought that too. That's the obvious answer. But when the Admiral metioned that "RED on a LEGAL DOCUMENT means there is a MISTAKE. NOTHING ELSE." This made me think about the NOTICE of MISTAKE and wonder if Shepard Smith's doc could be changed to remove Surety.

Scott Duncan

There is quite a bit of free-dumb bullshit to scrape from him, yes.

He's aware that this might be true. Don't beat him up until he gets the whole picture.

If he's STILL a Free-Dumber/Christian aftarward, then, give him your worst, because he's just asking for it then. :P

Chris Ó Súilleabháin

In his release of claim & interest, among the rest of the nonsense. He mentions release, liable, administration

He does mention FAITH and other belief nonsense. I'd dare say the mention of release, liable & administration of the person is what may of stopped the pursuit of surety & accounting of the person.

Rick Carne

.... California Civil Code section 1195 prohibits the use of a proof of execution by a subscribing witness for a power of attorney, grant deed, mortgage, deed of trust, quitclaim deed, security agreement or any instrument that requires a notary public to obtain a thumbprint in the notary public’s official journal from the party signing the document. The law also prohibits the use of a proof execution for any other document affecting real property; however, proof of execution of a trustee’s deed and deed of reconveyance are permitted.

Pete Daoust

Shepard Smith, sorry but I am a bit slow on the brain, when it's complicated like that, especially in English language, my question for you is:

By doing all this, are you telling them something like, Hey, here is your stuff (the person), and you can do what the fuck you want with it, bye.

Is it something close to that ? :/

Pete Daoust

Ok, Shepard, forget my first question, it's surely not of my business anyway, but please answer the second question :D

So when you say, Christ is my witness, do you realy mean it, or it's just some kind of decorum for the document ? 8-|

Jim Hebin

Any evidence that points to the bifurcation of the NAME as bifurcated from the living man must not be exposed in open court. That attacks the root of the perceived integrity of the court system itself, which those BAR members have sworn to protect at all costs. It ruins their ability to generate revenues, so the system will strive to avoid proving the remedy in the public arena. This would probably work best if served privately on the Clerk and serve the magistrate Judicial Notice and let them settle the matter honorably in private.

Shepard Smith

Comments good or bad are welcomed, as Scott said I'm new to this group, lots of old crap to be rid of, new thoughts and ideas from young minds...is a good thing, with that said mates....let talk changes to the document, or complete re-write...if that is needed. I can't fix a problem unless I know what to fix. After reading Scott's Proper Notice...I see changes are needed...Jim's comments on the allonge was the only good comment...I think he see where I'm going with all this. All that I really know is I'm going to get an earful from Scott next time we talk, which makes me feel like I off to the Principle's Office...Flashback!! Thanks to all, give this ole dog a little time to learn new tricks please.....Till next time...G'day

Pete Daoust

I only need to say shit like”.

Hellozzz !!!

I RESERVE ALL RIGHTS, any objections ? “no ?....ok, so I am a Man, and I HAVE that person, well, as of yesterday, I had it. Now you seem to have it for some reasons, so, as the sole authorized administrator for that person, I need the court to point out to me WHERE is surety for that person, so we can settle the matter—so, dear court, WHERE IS SURETY ?

WHERE IS THE SURETY OF THAT PERSON WHICH I, AS THE HUMAN BEING, HAVE FULL RIGHTS TO USE to DISCHARGE any CHARGES put on that person”.

WHERE IS SURETY, WHERE IS SURETY ?

Hellozzzz!!! ?!?!?!....I am INSTRUCTING this court to point out to “ME” WHERE IS SURETY, I am pretty sure that we NEED it right now :P

Hellozzz !!!! :D :D

And if, in this scenario, some Christ fucktard wants to be a witness, well so be it, I just don’t give a shit :D

Pete Daoust

Oh, the court presumed I was SURETY in this matter ? ?

Well, if I led the court to believe that I was a government agent, and/or a government employee, and/or a government slave, that is a MISTAKE, and please forgive me.

Now, WHERE IS SURETY ?? :D

David-Paul Sip

I am paying attention to what Captain Pete is saying with great interest Admiral. It makes so much fucking sense to me and yet my mind keeps asking why is using the Notice of Mistake not appropriate in traffic court?

David-Paul Sip

Arrrrrgh! "Well, if I led the court to believe that I was a government agent, and/or a government employee, and/or a government slave, that is a MISTAKE, and please forgive me." Capitain Pete

This is the NOTICE of MISTAKE. And EVERY time I read this I still ask why is using this notice not appropriate where a traffic ticket is concerned? I can't wrap my fucking brain around this :/

Pete Daoust

Because the fucking driver's licence is a fucking EMPLOYEE card, and when you show that card, you are saying: Hey, I am your employee, so their fucking employee rules apply to you, because YOU DECIDED it....

David-Paul Sip

Whoooah! I fucking think I get it now! The PERSON on the Diriver's License is not the PERSON on the Birth Certificate. Ahhhhhh! Every different piece of GOVERNMENT ID is a different PERSON. And anything that I applied for I accepted SURETY for also. Fuck me :/ I see the Admirals article on all the different PERSONs a lot more clearly.

Pete Daoust

But I don't think the surety matter can apply, I think I can remove surety from me still, unless they can point out to me WHERE this surety thing was explained in this contract, and since they don't want to talk about it, there's a way to put them on the hook with this, if you follow the steps....

David-Paul Sip

Thanks for the CORRECTION Admiral. I fucking know this too. :( I think the fact that it is a FOUNDATION document is why I've heard it is not not be used as ID. Excuse that avoidable shit stain.

I know that Capitain Pete. I resisted providing the Driver's Licence. I even advised the officer (and recorded it) that the driver was not operating in the capacity presumed by the driver's licence, is not a government agent or employee and did not wish to contract today BEFORE providing the licence. His reply: "I don't care what capacity you are operating under". Another officer showed up and tried to force her way into the car. Then of course began to force compliance with threats of taking my property, kidnapping my little boy, and even arresting me when I would not return to my car.

Pete Daoust

The first thing to do, I THINK, with a traffic matter is to send a registered mail letter saying:

Hi dear whoever,

Can I use the surety of the person to settle this public debt, or am I automatically surety in this matter because I have shown the driver's licence ?

If your answer is that I am automatically surety because I have shown the driver's licence, I will pay right away.

If your answer is, yes I can use the surety of the person, I will transform this remittence into a completed bill of exchange, and will send it to you asap.

With love

Sole authorized admin for the person

:D

Pete Daoust

Ok, so do this .... :D

Hi dear whoever,

Can I use the surety of the person to settle this public debt, or am I automatically surety in this matter because I have shown the driver's licence ?

If your answer is that I am automatically surety because I have shown the driver's licence, I will pay right away.

If your answer is, yes I can use the surety of the person, I will transform this remittence into a completed bill of exchange, and will send it to you asap.

With love

Sole authorized admin for the person

David-Paul Sip

I have asked for a proper bill from these TRUSTEES in parking ENFORCEMENT and all the do is IGNORE it. They say PAY and we can give you a receipt but can't give you a BILL. I point out that their notice meets all the requirements of a Bill of Exchange and ask them to provide the Bill. They just IGNORE my registered letters and tell me the only option is to request a court date. I refused, they IGNORED and voila the result is a "conviction". I think it is also called a default judgment.

Pete Daoust

If you choose to go anyway, these should be the only words that should come out of your mouth....

Can I use the surety of the person to settle this public debt, or am I automatically surety in this matter because I have shown the driver's licence ?

If your answer is that I am automatically surety because I have shown the driver's licence, I will pay right away.

If your answer is, yes I can use the surety of the person, I will transform this remittence into a completed bill of exchange, and will send it to you asap.

PUSH THEM TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION as hard as you can.....if they don't understand, they are simply incompetent, so ask them to bring someone who is competent :D

David-Paul Sip

Staying away from their meeting is the goal. After the parking ticket I was pulled over for an expired tag (could not renew because of the unpaid parking ticket). I return the NOTICE marked in red "No Consent, No Contract". This likely meant nothing now that I understand the whole driver's licence trap and surety. So a court date was requested by filling out a form as the representative, by SPECIAL APPEARANCE, crossing out the word defendant (which they also IGNORED and listed the PERSON as defendant anyway), and signing V.C. (Vi Coactus). No matter they still scheduled the PERSON as defendent for their business meeting, lol!

David-Paul Sip

Love this "Can I use the surety of the person to settle this public debt, or am I automatically surety in this matter because I have shown the driver's licence ?" Merci Capitain Pete. I will ask this of the COURT CLERK (or the CROWN). Wait! I think folks can schedule a meeting with the CROWN before the court date lol! :D

Shepard Smith

G’day Mates,

Let me bring you up to speed on what I have done so far, back in 2001 "done in the ole way", (said in my best Kung-Fu voice) I filed a Claim of Right and Notice of Intent 14 day response time. No response, Second notice, Notice of Fault, 7 days, no response, Notice of Default, filed into the Public Record—most of you remember the Drill.

I gave Notice in the form of a Notice and Demand to the powers that be. All property Federal and State belonging to Cesar was so returned to their agencies and departments. Driver’s license, plate ect. a photo-copy of my new license plate was sent, same as the above….never a response.

As of late I have filed a resignation letter, resigning as the Registered-Agent for service of process for that “name, instrument, entity ect”, sent Registered-Mail, to the Kentucky Secretary of State, Vital Statics and the KY. AG.

BTW mates, did I mention I did it all by Registered-Mail, the kicker is, I did it on 1 or 2 three cent stamps, not to sound like a braggart mates, leave that to Captain Scott, friend, pal and all around good egg—G.

IF, Jimmy Stewart in miracle on 34th street can use the “Post Office” to get Santa off and save Christmas, why canât I use the "Post Office" to get me the hell out of United States Jurisdiction? I am attaching Self Address postmarked three cent Registered-Mail to this location. The Group thoughts are most welcome.

In closing mates, give me a little time to read Scott’s “Must Reads’ and members posts to catch up with the doings of the group, ole dogs and new tricks—don’t you know.

Chase

Scott Duncan

Poor Shepard Smith. He has discovered after two years, that I might just have a clue...

...and he has repeatedly demonstrated that he's read NOTHING here. If I didn't know him personally, I'd have banned him by now. :D

Sue Rakestraw

Hey Shepard, aren't you the one "CHASE DATILLO" that was on the Redemption By Method Yahoo group? You know, the same one that Ralph Fisher INFORMED you of how to do things?

If I am mistaken, please forgive me.

David Vilaca

In Internet culture, a lurker is typically a member of an online community who observes, but does not actively participate.[1][2] The exact definition depends on context. Lurkers make up a large proportion of all users in online communities.[3] Lurking allows users to learn the conventions of an online community before they actively participate, improving their socialization when they eventually de-lurk.[4] However, a lack of social contact while lurking sometimes causes loneliness as there is a ban hammer in a french mans hands

John Gessas

funny thing happened this morning. My woman was lurking under the sheets and found a hammer. Being the sole authorized administrator of said hammer I decided to administrate it to her. I probably should have given her proper notice as to my intentions and placement of said valuable instrument but because no meeting of the minds or mutual consideration was established I had to give her my notice of mistake and ask for forgiveness...

Pete Daoust

If you really want to merci beaucoup me, ask CRA if you can use the security/surety of your person, to discharge public debts with. :P

That will merci beaucoup me a lot :D .....other than that, I have no interest in any of all of your merci beaucoup shit, from you or anyone else in this group :D

Pete Daoust

This supposed elite is super powerful, but is afflicted with weak strength, in fact they are few and must rely on accomplices from the people. Some are aware as they enjoy enormous privileges, as bankers, military leaders, politicians, top officials religious leaders, bosses of multinational etc. Other accomplices are unconscious, it is the mass of people who choose to believe lies rather than reassuring Truths, who refuse to challenge their limiting beliefs and further propagate preferring to remain in the comfort of nickname ignorance. So we are all responsible for this state of affairs, the minority of rulers and the majority accepts that consciously or not to be dominated.

Pete Daoust

We are at a moment in human history where the consciousness of the human need for minority bring about change that will liberate humans from servitude is high enough. More and more people now know that the world is run by a small group of people who control all the media, education, health and illness, war, mafia, drugs, religion, politics and governments, commodities, energy, trade, food, patents, science, money, spirituality etc. This group are the human families who own cartels banks, pharmaceuticals, armaments, energy drugs etc. monopolize almost all the resources leaving only crumbs for the people of the earth. They feed on the work and creativity of the human body using misinformation to create, maintain and reinforce popular beliefs and fears able to keep the people in ignorance. They do this through religion, media, education, science, government, and recently by the major unions are all vehicles of misinformation. These families are themselves controlled by beings that feed on human energy, especially our emotional energy.

John Gessas

I have asked cra , I have written cra. They lie and don't know or don't want us to know the truth . They respond with bullshit generic response letters . They don't follow their own rules Pete . We are not in the club , nor do I want to be !

Pete Daoust

This has nothing to do with THEIR own rules, the RIGHT to the security/surety of the person IS NOT A RULE, it is the only RIGHT I have, as a MAN.....I repeat, IT IS NOT A FUCKING RULE, I don't give a damn shit about ANY of their rules.....

NO ONE can remove that RIGHT from me.....so.....

Lets INFORM these fuckers that we KNOW, and we will SHARE this information.... :P

Pete Daoust

Tell them John Gessas, that the ONLY thing that prevent you from being a SLAVE, is this RIGHT to the security/surety of the person......and tell them that YOU KNOW you can discharge public debts with this RIGHT, and that's what you want to do, and tell them that THEIR job is to explain to you HOW to use that security/surety... :D

Pete Daoust

I was THINKING a lot, these past 2 to 3 weeks, and I KNOW everything I need to KNOW, to use a PERSON I trust, to lien PIERRE DAOUST, and keep it in a private trust, and let the person I have full trust in, administrate the shit out of PIERRE DAOUST, and live my life....

But there is something inside of me that prevents me of pressing the send button, I really feel I have NOT pushed as hard as I could to make these FUCKING PUBLIC trustees to do their FUCKING job....

I hate it when this happen, I fucking feel like I haven't done EVERYTHING that needs to be done, I really hate that shit.....is it fucking BELIEFS that still sit in me ? ....or is it REALITY that tells me, HEY PETE, you can do more.....

You see the dilemma ?? :D

David Vilaca

You have "noticed" near "every one", who is left that will admit and/or honor that the person is yours to administrate, that the Bank of Canada IS Surety for that person and that none of this is your fault. Stop having a case of the feels, there is no new angle, just the question you so eloquently put forth which creates the breach of trust. All you need for extreme detachment is already there :) What is the definition of insanity?

John Gessas

the government employees know that if they tell you the truth and show you how to do what you ask they are out of a job and finished as far as their power trip is concerned . They behave like they are the master and we are the slaves. 99% of the time they don't know what we are talking about because they are brainwashed to believe the authority they have was given to them by a higher authority... things will change, we will all make sure they do.

John Gessas

I know you are Pete, I wish I had an answer but people lie to protect their bullshit jobs .I know what you are saying is true and we all have to demand that our rights are not ever violated. the bastards in the government and courts that are higher up on the food chain know this and that is why they protect it or they would be the ones starving and sitting in the dark. (For the record that was not meant to be a shitty joke either) I really get angry when some stupid dick shit tries to tell me I am wrong and I need psychiatric evaluation for the way I think . I am still learning and have a long way to go but I know for a fact now after trying different approaches that the freedumb ideology is just a waste of time and effort and will get you a room at the psych ward. the tender for law group and Scott have brought me further in my journey for truth than the last 5 years have listening to the likes of menard and the rest of the bullshit pay as you goer's. I know by the outcome of my trials that this group is where I will learn the truth and I have deleted myself from all the other bullshit groups for that very reason.

Pete Daoust

My last registered mail letter.... :P

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HARASSMENT

Marie-Aliette Forges and Revenue Agency of Quebec.

Be advised that we recognize and accept in full your oath of office.

You called me on the phone today, August 14, 2014

You wanted to talk with Pierre Daoust, and I have explained several times that I am NOT the person named Pierre Daoust, but I HAVE that person, as stated in Article 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Quebec.

Article 1: Every human-being is entitled to life of His person, surety of his person , integrity and freedom of his person.

If you are too stupid and / or ignorant, and / or incompetent and / or in bad faith, to UNDERSTAND that I know WHO I am, and WHO I am not, it's not my fault.

I have the audio recording of our phone conversation, and it's clear that you are trying very hard to make me say that I am the person named PIERRE DAOUST having the registration number 119XXXXXXXXXX.

I am a Man, and I have a person, and I am the SOLE Authorized administrator, whether you like it or not, if you want to communicate with PIERRE DAOUST, you should do so in writing, and I will administer these communications.

The government knows VERY WELL what I mean, and all that you do with the tone that you had on the phone today, is to demonstrate your bad faith, and your attitudes scammer, do you have any authority over ME ?

If I do not have the right to be a man and to have a person, put it simply in writing, and I put my slave chains right away”

David Vilaca

If we want something better for all of us then the fence sitters and Administrators had better realize that extreme detachment is the only solution, killing fiats by exchange and creating value to be held in a private trust and Administrated by a 3rd party IS the only option. Thereafter, understanding the new systems BEING PUT IN PLACE will ensure the survival and value of the Trust. Scott needs bodies for specific actions, it is THESE ACTIONS that will forward our evolution and usher in an age of logic and reason. Build a mining Rig, DETACH and PORT OVER as soon as everything is in place.

John Gessas

If they tell you the truth Pete , then the money comes out of their pockets and back to where it belongs (in your pocket) they wont give that up without a fight because they are lazy , good for nothing assholes that don't produce anything but conflict.

David Vilaca

Doxing is a technique of tracing someone or gather information about an individual using sources on the internet. Its name is derived from “Documents” or “Docx”. Doxing method is based purely on the ability of the hacker to recognize valuable information about his target and use this information to his benefit. It is also based around the idea that, “The more you know about your target, the easier it will be to find his or her flaws”

John Gessas

They can't fight at all, they are all too stupid to fight. What they don't do is their fucking jobs and they won't hand over the power that is yours to begin with .They don't want you to administrate your own affairs, this makes them irrelevant and jobless!

John Gessas

You are administrating for the person Pete, they have no choice but to talk to you about the person in your pocket. They have to investigate why your questions are not being answered and they need to be for you to understand how to deal with your person.

Ceit Butler

Shepard Smith : Congratulations, you have succeeded in ticking me off! This is NOT a position that you want to find yourself in...

In earlier comments, you stated this:

"...not to sound like a braggart mates, leave that to Captain Scott, friend, pal and all around good egg—G."

Let us take a moment to delve a little deeper into that sentence, shall we?

—"Braggart, adjective: a loud arrogant boaster." -Merriam-Webster

Hmm, that doesn't sound good! Shall we dig further?

-"Arrogant, adjective: exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one's own worth or importance often by an overbearing manner <an arrogant official>." -Merriam-Webster

-"Arrogance, noun: an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions." -Merriam-Webster

Out of those three options, I'd like to focus on this one: "Arrogant, adjective: exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one's own worth or importance".

This is how you describe the man that you then, in the same sentence, refer to as "friend, pal and all around good egg"? If you feel that Scott is "exaggerating his own worth", then why are you wasting your own—and the rest of the group'sétime here?

Assume that that last question was rhetorical, as I already possess the answer. You are here for the same reason every other NON-infiltrating member is: because you recognize that there is VALUE. You are here because of your recognition that Scott's knowledge, intellect and abilities PROVIDE that value.

So, here is a question that I must insist that you answer: Why is that other people's awareness and acknowledgment of Scott's knowledge and insight is a sign of their intelligence and good judgement, yet his own awareness of who he is, and what he is capable of, is labelled "arrogance", "ego", and "conceit"?

This is not the first time that I have witnessed this rather slimy behavior from you. You are quite adept at disguising incredibly offensive comments under a steaming pile of "Good Ol' Boy charm". This demonstrates a tremendous lack of character, and reveals you to be a disingenuous man.

Might I suggest some personal reflection; examine the close relationships that you have formed, decide which you truly VALUE, and why, and start VALUING them more! Actions speak louder than words, and your words are so smothered in spurious charm that they are barely audible.

You are either someone's friend, or you are not. You are either WITH them, or AGAINST them. Until you demonstrate ANY evidence that you actually ARE Scott's friend, I have just one thing to say: Fuck your easy-going, laid-back, Southern-thing!

Pete Daoust

I just have some problems with tagging a Man with this "person" word, a disingenuous person is NOT the same thing as a disingenuous Man for me.......in fact, I am UNABLE to call a Man with PERSON anymore :(

Ceit Butler

Shepard Smith, you have not answered my question yet. In case you missed it, I'll re-post :

"Shepard Smith : Congratulations, you have succeeded in ticking me off! This is NOT a position that you want to find yourself in...

In earlier comments, you stated this:

"...not to sound like a braggart mates, leave that to Captain Scott, friend, pal and all around good egg—G."

Let us take a moment to delve a little deeper into that sentence, shall we?

—"Braggart, adjective: a loud arrogant boaster." -Merriam-Webster

Hmm, that doesn't sound good! Shall we dig further?

-"Arrogant, adjective: exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one's own worth or importance often by an overbearing manner <an arrogant official>." -Merriam-Webster

-"Arrogance, noun: an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions." -Merriam-Webster

Out of those three options, I'd like to focus on this one: "Arrogant, adjective: exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one's own worth or importance".

This is how you describe the man that you then, in the same sentence, refer to as "friend, pal and all around good egg"? If you feel that Scott is "exaggerating his own worth", then why are you wasting your own—and the rest of the group'sétime here?

Assume that that last question was rhetorical, as I already possess the answer. You are here for the same reason every other NON-infiltrating member is: because you recognize that there is VALUE. You are here because of your recognition that Scott's knowledge, intellect and abilities PROVIDE that value.

So, here is a question that I must insist that you answer: Why is that other people's awareness and acknowledgment of Scott's knowledge and insight is a sign of their intelligence and good judgement, yet his own awareness of who he is, and what he is capable of, is labelled "arrogance", "ego", and "conceit"?

This is not the first time that I have witnessed this rather slimy behavior from you. You are quite adept at disguising incredibly offensive comments under a steaming pile of "Good Ol' Boy charm". This demonstrates a tremendous lack of character, and reveals you to be a disingenuous man.

Might I suggest some personal reflection; examine the close relationships that you have formed, decide which you truly VALUE, and why, and start VALUING them more! Actions speak louder than words, and your words are so smothered in spurious charm that they are barely audible.

You are either someone's friend, or you are not. You are either WITH them, or AGAINST them. Until you demonstrate ANY evidence that you actually ARE Scott's friend, I have just one thing to say: Fuck your easy-going, laid-back, Southern-thing!"

Shepard Smith

Good Morning to the Mob, one and all

I see that you good folks have issues with what I have done, with that said these documents were already filed into the case before I got the Groups or Scott’s Input. These two documents were 1. Release of all claims and interest and 2. Rejection of Appointment. Court was on 19th of August.

I was present at court in a suit, I am a magician, been one for over 40 years, if I have learn anything, it is not what they see, but what they perceive there seeing….they saw a Lawyer in traffic court or thought they did.

When the Name was called, I walked up and said “Good Morning Ms. Burke, I never address them as Judge or your Honor; I am here on that matter. I have some paperwork for the court, Bailiff, would you hand these to Ms. Burk? The Bailiff gave the Judge the paperwork, and she started to read it, her body language changed, I had hit a cord or something….Scott has a point, sometimes things work, right or wrong—not saying I did this right, just saying the way Ms. Burke looked showed something had happened—long story short, she stated she wanted to look over the paperwork and set a hearing for October—I asked her if I needed to be there since the release was filed with the court, she respond Yes Sir, I would like you to be here.

I know you good folks don’t like these “Persons” and with good and just reasons, there is an old saying, that appears to work for me, Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer.

Good or Bad, right or wrong, we’ll find out come October, until then, I am way pass due on reading group posts and Scott's must reads—IF this bugger goes South, then its my own fault and responsibly, which I accept—If it goes the other way, then I got lucky, either way I’ll keep the group posted on the outcome.

BTW, as to the statement, Christ is my witness, has no bearing on this man’s beliefs, however it does have meaning before the court, besides I believe were all on/in a Holodeck—G.

Until next time, best wishes to us all.

Chase

Pete Daoust

He is waiting on this INSURANCE salesman to back him off on this, Ceit Butler. Because without this Jesus Christ beside him, this man can't answer anything....the SURETY is Jesus the Christ....you see ??... :-)

Ceit Butler

Wow, are you sure you're not a theist? Ignoring anything that I say while responding to the men's comments tends to be a Christian tactic...

You have reiterated that you "consider him a friend", so answer my question on that VERY subject.

Shepard Smith

comments tends to be a Christian tactic... Not at all, you write well, and have good thoughts, just been busy the last few days and have not been able to answer. The truth be known I would like to talk with you sometime....

Ceit Butler

Aaaaand he's STILL dancing around the issue. Your insincere "Southern Charm" is pointless here, we prefer hard truths. So, ONCE AGAIN, the question is:

"So, here is a question that I must insist that you answer: Why is that other people's awareness and acknowledgment of Scott's knowledge and insight is a sign of their intelligence and good judgement, yet his own awareness of who he is, and what he is capable of, is labelled "arrogance", "ego", and "conceit"?"

Ceit Butler

If someone is your friend, you don't bad-mouth them. You don't do it behind their back, and you CERTAINLY don't do it IN THEIR OWN FORUM where you have come to reap the benefits of said-friend's knowledge and experience.

Ceit Butler

Shepard Smith:

Who doesn't love a good carnival or fair? A fond memory from everyone's childhood, I'm sure. The bright lights and loud music from the rides mingling with shrieks of delight; the cotton candy, the caramel corn, the mouth-watering smells eminating from the various food stands.

And everyone's favourite: The Midway. In every direction something new is vying for your attention. Flashing lights, bells and buzzers; and of course, the Carnies.

They lure you in with a fast-paced, sweet-talking promise of fabulous prizes that only you, with your obvious intelligence and physical prowess, could possibly hope to acquire! They seduce you with a melodic siren's song, merging with the dizzying lights and cacophony of other sounds to draw you into an almost hypnotic trance. Sometime later, you find yourself coming out the other side, bleary-eyed and somewhat dazed, with an empty wallet and your arms full of "fabulous prizes" that wouldn't make the grade to stock the shelves of your lowest-quality dollar store.

The magician gig has honed your carnie-salesman skills well, but I suggest you leave them at the door when you enter this arena as they will not help you here. No one here is fooled by artificial charm, and you will find yourself called out on it each and every time you try. That's what I am referring to when I say "easy-going, laid-back Southern-thing".

I think I'll close with a shameless, self-promoting plug for an article that covered this point! :D

https://www.facebook.com/notes/ceit-butler/political-correctness-or-the-art-of-being-nice/10152180673318263

Tara Duncan

Perception is a funny thing, isn't it?

If you type you are "this" tall, people might simply take it as a statement of fact. If you type you are "this" tall using capitalization and an exclamation mark, does your perception of the true statement change your interpretation? Perhaps.

If you insult a man on his Facebook page there are those that may agree, and some who may not. It is generally considered bad form to "defame" the primary contributor to a forum and you may be "invited" to correct or recant. Interestingly your response will likewise influence readers' perception on the nature and veracity of YOUR character.

Stating a fact does not make you a braggart any more than a graceful retraction of words ill-received, diminishes you in the eyes of the viewing public.

Choosing your words carefully, and the forum in which you express them, is all about perception; or so I perceive.

Gerry Odonothing

Tara Duncan;"It is generally considered BAD FORM." When Maggie (the witch is dead) Thatcher visited An Taoiseach (a term accorded to the sovereign prime minister by the sovereign constitution of 1919, but who was in actual fact the chairperson of the King and his successors, Oireachtas according to the Government of Ireland Act 1922) Charley Haughey, he asked her: "How's the form" she later reminised "I thought he thought I was a horse."

Scott Duncan

There's a large debate here now.

One side says "Derek Moran will NEVER learn, and this is just evidence supporting that".

The OTHER side says "True, but it's like kicking a retarded kid if you turf him out like a Piece-of-Shit Christian" (I paraphrase).

We'll keep you updated as to how its unfolding.

Tara Duncan

It always starts innocently enough. First a little nudge with one innocuous-looking piece of punctuation. Then perhaps a letter or a hyphenated word. Before you know it you're reading "War and Peace". Oh the humanity!

Scott Duncan

TRANSLATION FOR PIECE-OF-SHIT CHRISTIANS: Tara and I DON'T think "irregardless" is a word. All of those posts were making fun of your collective ignorance.

The fact that I have to explain that shows how pervasive your collective ignorance is.

Fuck all adults with imaginary friends.

Anibal Jose Baez

In other topic, concerning the original post, I wonder if the Good Shepard got his claim, and interest released, from where ever they were trapped. "Jesus" probably worked things out for him, I guess.

Back to top