The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Aug 14, 2014 2:02 AM

Will Bed

Alright Pete thought I should share this :)

This is after a third letter to QRA about using the PERSON'S SURETY vs income tax...

Talked to 2 ladies at QRA over the phone yesterday, who both seemed pretty lost, even though they DID seem to understand that I was NOT the PERSON, that I wish they dont call me MISTER "FIRST NAME LAST NAME TITLE" (one of them even said "ok William but this call is being recorded and I must say "VOUS" and "MISTER", to which I replied "then each time I'll have to correct you on this"), that I HAVE a tax payer but I'm not the tax payer... I even had that girl lookup the legal definition of SURETY and read Article I of the Qc Charter while over the phone, I literally explained EVERYTHING to her... and at some point she said "I dont think I'm able to answer this question, but here's the number to talk to an agent who will be qualified to do it..." (Second lady)

Some times I wonder what those ladies tell to their man and kids when they get home about that guy who called and said he was not the person ?

Long story short, they left a voice message this morning : "Unfortunately, we cannot handle your request"

What's so hard ? "Is it TRUE that I have the RIGHT to administrate those public debts through the PERSON's SURETY ?" Yes or no ??

So I guess I'll soon be preparing a preremptory notice... Just after I'm done writing up to Heath Insurance "hey which date of birth they want on your form ??"

And I know I know I need a new phone with a recorder app :/

Unique ID: 462493170453287_706699879365947
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.01541127535701E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 19

Pete Daoust

Me: "Is it TRUE that I have the RIGHT to administrate those public debts through the PERSON's SURETY ?" Yes or no ??

Public TRUSTEE: Unfortunately, we cannot handle your request, because if we say YES, we are cooked, and if we say NO, we are cooked too.....so, we choose to IGNORE the question... :/

T?lis B?auns

Criminal breach of trust 336. Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole or in part, of another person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a use that is not authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. R.S., c. C-34, s. 296.

Public servant refusing to deliver property

337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-165.html#docCont

T?lis B?auns

Arrest without warrant by any person

494. (1) Any one may arrest without warrant (a) a person whom he finds committing an indictable offence; or (b) a person who, on reasonable grounds, he believes (i) has committed a criminal offence, and (ii) is escaping from and freshly pursued by persons who have lawful authority to arrest that person. Marginal note:Arrest by owner, etc., of property

(2) The owner or a person in lawful possession of property, or a person authorized by the owner or by a person in lawful possession of property, may arrest a person without a warrant if they find them committing a criminal offence on or in relation to that property and (a) they make the arrest at that time; or (b) they make the arrest within a reasonable time after the offence is committed and they believe on reasonable grounds that it is not feasible in the circumstances for a peace officer to make the arrest. Marginal note:Delivery to peace officer

(3) Any one other than a peace officer who arrests a person without warrant shall forthwith deliver the person to a peace officer. Marginal note:For greater certainty

(4) For greater certainty, a person who is authorized to make an arrest under this section is a person who is authorized by law to do so for the purposes of section 25. R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 494; 2012, c. 9, s. 3.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-285.html#docCont

Scott Duncan

"who is authorized by law to do so for the purposes of section 25."

FUN FACT: Section 25 was repealed in the 1980s. The irony: Menard and his "Peace Officer crap, would have been valid. They simply REPEALED the "right".

Tara Duncan

Other fun fact: Woman who seem "pretty" over the phone are frequently overtly ugly or hugely obese. If I had to guess I'd say it involves over-compensation, or some kind of weird resonance like that of a base drum. Many people who talk to me by telephone assume they're talking to a man. This is mildly encouraging :D

Back to top