Jul 21, 2014 2:34 AM

Thanks Kent :)

Maybe you could INSIST for a response ? :D

You have no idea how much you are HELPING by doing so... ;)

You guys knows that, if you ask this question, three times, via registered mail, and you receive no respond, these public trutees are in BREACH OF "TRUST" ? :/

And then jumping in a MEGA-PERSON project is definitely NOT YOUR FAULT ? :D

I'm about too give it a shot. After three or so months in The Tender For Law and of watching my brain rock back and forth on the floor, in a puddle of drool, muttering incoherent ramblings, I'm finally beginning to see through the haze. So I think it's time to start..

Council rates notices will be sent out soon so why not have a shot at that

Yes iI have. I should have realised you had to say it three times. Fecking trinity is in everything. They will not care if they do create a breach Pete.

Is faxing the question to these TRUSTEES three times acceptable instead of Registered mail Pete?

REGISTERED MAIL. it's clear.

You may use faxes, as well, but REGISTERED MAIL is the preferred way.

I have asked a phone company that was privatized. I asked by registered mail. No response they kept my remittance voucher.

I have my receipt for registered mail.

It seems that one must expect that these TRUSTEES will not answer. This has been my experience too so why bother to use our DEBT NOTES (that $10/letter = $30) then when we know they do not behave HONOURABLY and prefer to BREACH the TRUST? Just my thoughts.

Because you will have PROOF, solid PROOF, of it... ;)

Yes that I know Capitaine Pete. So is a FAX TRANMISSION report not SOLID proof? Or just less solid :/

The first one I have sent to HQ, was by fax, the 2nd and 3rd, was by registered mail.....

I think by registered mail, is a good INVESTMENT, in a sense that no one can say you haven't done your DUTY, or due diligence....

The POST OFFICE is where you POST BILLS. When you POST a BILL using NOTICE via REGISTERED MAIL is, in fact, a TENDER FOR LAW.

Ahh yes I recall this Mackximus Minimus. A VERY important distinction!

I know they will NOT care, Lee Edgely, and that's EXACTLY "WHY" we have to do this.... :D

I am not sure on where Scott is going with this MEGA-PERSON, but I think that these PROOF of "We don't give a shit about you" attitude, can be useful ...

David-Paul Sip, Scott says REGISTERED MAIL. Do you know the #1 rule? :P REGISTERED MAIL is not a FAX. There is no come back to this one.

What I am doing is sending a FAX of the NOTICE, the same day I send it REGISTERED MAIL, that way they will get the FAX immediately, and the NOTICE a couple of days after is delivered. But I ALWAYS send EVERYTHING REGISTERED MAIL.

If it is written, it is LAW.

I am reviewing and came across this thread: https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/546408238728446/

It is a post by Derek Moran, maybe you are blocked or you blocked him? I can see the thread, Kent.

No one else ? :-(

Bankruptcy does not count, correct?

What ? :-\

That's what I thought.

I have asked my congressional representative and one senator this question albeit only on their Facebook pages. I am going to do this registered mail and all. Nice solid proof that they do not give a shit.

It's time to get started then...I will be faxing the CRA this week regarding their ARBITRARY Notice of Assessments and following up Registered mail.

Pete, I have. Over a month ago....time for a follow up!

The ATO (equivalent of CRA) were asked this, along with the question 'Who owns the Tax File Number (equivalent of SSN/SIN)?

They kept referring to 'your Tax File Number'...so I asked, if it's mine, can I give it away or sell it?

No answer to either question, which I only followed up once :D

I whipped this up real quick. Would appreciate some input. Should I keep it even simpler?

Representative Cheri Bustos (IL 17th CD) 1009 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congresswoman Bustos, Thank you for taking the time to read this correspondence and good day. I have in the course of seeking truth and answers to the many issues we as a nation face today come across some very shocking information and as such I REQUIRE that you my elected representative kindly answer some questions. I have been informed that law as we know it applies to PERSONS and there are many types of PERSONS in law. It has been revealed to me that I as a man have a PERSON, it is not mine, and I am not SURETY for it. I believe I have been misled along with the rest of the general public into thinking this PERSON was me! It seems to me I am a man, I have this PERSON and it’s not my fault. So can you please tell me is this true?

It has also been revealed to me that I can use the SURETY of the PERSON I happen to have to DISCHARGE public debts sent to that PERSON. Is this true? If so how does one accomplish this? I canât help but think of all the struggling families that would be helped by this information immediately. I’m sure you are eager to help them as well.

I eagerly await your timely response regarding this matter.

With love and regards,

With CRA I sent in several instruments and asked about settling a tax account "without the use of public funds" with multiple collection agents, the Minister of National Revenue, filed a Service Complaint, appealed to the Ombudsman, and was met with ignorance every time. "A review of your file indicates CRA staff have clearly articulated what constitutes a negotiable payment over the years, both verbally and in writing. In addition, the methods of payment are public knowledge and can be found on CRA's web site."

Did you asked them this SPECIFIC question, John ?

I asked similar, and none of the collection agents had a clue about what I was talking about. Sometimes they put me on hold and spoke to a supervisor, but still no luck. I like to think it's possible but I just haven't found the right agent yet...

So you didn't asked through REGISTERED mail ?

Not registered, but I've sent instruments, demands and inquiries via Xpresspost, regular mail, fax or a combination. Either they ignore them or send them back saying I didn't send an instrument that can be used for payment or that they don't understand the request. Maybe if you know negotiable instrument law and can enforce it something might come of it, but "asking nicely" didn't work for me.

Every situation will be different and an opportunity to learn, though.. and there's really no substitute for personal experience. Give it a shot and let us know. :)

Lol....I gave several shots so far, QRA and CRA seems to be the easiest one for me, I also went over two traffic tickets, and now, I am very busy with Hydro-Quebec utility bill.... :-D

You haven't seen my videos, John ? :-D

No sir

...so you accepted full liability...why? :/

Hey, it's an "opportinity to learn." :D

Pete. This is just a thought.. but perhaps CRA criminal investigation division should be notified. Quebec Hydro may have been unjustly enriched. Pete these videos you speak of are they on this forum?

I have heard you mention these videos in the recent past Capitaine Pete. Please share the again :) I am currently dealing with the CRA and traffic/parking tickets at the moment and given your success in ADMINSTRATING these it seems your the man to ask

I have the personal cell phone number of a public trustee here in Manitoba. I just texted him the question " Can I use the person's SURETY/SECURITY to discharge a public debt sent to the person?" so now I await his dutiful response. I've done some work for those parasites in my recent past and we got along great so maybe he would answer me more honestly than someone else.... we shall see.

Nothing yet, but he said he would look into it. You would think that this would be a simple question with a simplified answer, yet here we are...

Bruno Hiller, you are about to see first hand how your time working for these "parasites" was nothing but a waste of your time. You will find out that they do not want to talk or associate with you anymore because you are a threat to them with your questions. There are many others who will gladly take your place and walk throughout their whole life in ignorance just to be seen as someone of some importance.

David-Paul Sip, I can't comment in the other thread, this idiot blocked me :D

But yes, these are the rubber stamps I have...

Here are the stamps that you suggested in another thread: Accepted by: (in black) Bank of Canada (in black) See back for endorsement (in red) Bill of Exchange Act (in black) Account number 26X-XXX-XXX (in black) Inscription number 1196604XXXXXX (in black) Date: ________ (in black) VOID (in red)

I can't comment on that thread, Jason Moreland.....here in Quebec, the person has an INSCRIPTION number.....you guys I think it's a REGISTRATION number....

Sorry.

Every corporation also has an INSCRIPTION number, here in Quebec, instead of starting with 119, it starts with 116....

Is that like the Social Security # here Pete Daoust?

No Jason Moreland! The Insription # is the number on the Birth Certificate. I found another stamp thread started by Gail Pete so to keep everything together let's continue there :)

Gotcha, this is like Frogger with threads. Thanks David-Paul Sip & Pete Daoust ...

Responding to Pete Daoust's question that started this thread, I have asked via registered mail over 15 times, with no answer from anyone.

And I am not stopping, until I confirm the truth.

I've asked but yet to get a response. I doubt I will.

Fax is for BUSINESS. REGISTERED MAIL is a TENDER FOR LAW! :P

:D

You POST a BILL at the POST OFFICE, using the POST MASTER as WITNESS. A NOTICE sent via REGISTERED MAIL, is IN FACT a TENDER FOR LAW. You may "thank" Scott for everything.

It's amazing that after all this time, you are still not used to that "fuck" moment :D

POST means you are TENDERING LAW. That is correct.

Listen to that kids! Stop sending your questions over e-mail, fax, and/or phone. There is a LEGAL reason you send your NOTICES via REGISTERED MAIL. Yes, Scott did not teach that because it's "cool." There is a LEGAL reason behind everything this man has taught us.

^^^ THIS ^^^