Jul 16, 2014 10:15 PM

It's FRAUD. Send it back to them with a letter asking the squiggly line to IDENTIFY ITSELF.

Ok...thanks

Send the envelope back too. REGISTERED.

Will do... :)

Tell them you FOUND what you believe is their property, but the AGENT could not be IDENTIFIED, so you are RETURNING the PROPERTY to the RIGHTFUL OWNER.

But Scott, WHY would they do that ? (wet ink signature without the name underneath) ...LIABILITIES issues ? :/

I NEVER complaint, they swang the file in their complaint department because they couldn't deal with it.......as soon as I realized what they have done, I right away sent a fax saying: I NEVER FILED A COMPLAINT, I DON'T WANT TO FILE A COMPLAINT, I AM NOT COMPLAINING....I just want what's mine, either ELECTRICITY, or these negotiable instrument you say are NOT payment.... :P

I also said, I do not AUTHORIZE anyone to complaint on the behalf of MY person :D

They are simply lying to you now.

And how will this end ? :D

Well I'm HOPING for a massive purge of government, like the Italians did with Mussolini! Something between "nothing" and "public hangings", I'd guess. :D

HAHA!! :D

I have seen this same thing Pete from the ONTARIO COURT of INJUSTICE (OCJ) regarding a date for trial in TRAFFIC COURT. There are three possible TITLES beneath the signature line but no name, no one specific title and a squiggle for a signature. I imagine that HQ like the OCJ does not want its agents to be identified lest they end up being sued personally. Makes you wonder what they're afraid of?

Pete Pete Daoust HAHA!! :D 1 hour ago Unlike

That weird feeling you get when you realise you're actually reading, from someone else, what your brain is commanding your mouth to say at this very moment !

From the "I don't know what the fuck else to do" department, I really think this bass woman is getting ready to get weaponized.... :/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1OGQQk5HpM

Liability, liability. That's what its all about it in the wild west :D. Gotta get that PROFIT baby! by any means possible :).

When you send this letter back to the do you finish it with :

Authorized by: The Sole Auth........

or just

The Sole Authorized Adm...... ?

JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN has SEVERAL authorised administrators. I prefer to delegate that shit :P

Sorry but this is not dumb down enough for me ! :/

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/authorized

"...gives the authority to ACT."

So that would be the way to go. ALWAYS end your letters with

"AUTHORIZED BY:..... "

Ok, here is what I see”.

PIERRE DAOUST is a PERSON.

That person is liened by the person named 9111-1111 Quebec Inc (not done yet, but it's coming :D )

“MEGA-PERSON” hold 100% of 9111-1111 Quebec Inc

There could be 100 share-holders for “MEGA-PERSON” My son, Samuel, could be one of them.

There could be hundreds of Directors in “MEGA-PERSON”

Pierre Daoust could be one of them….taking care of KENT BARRET, the person, is shit for example….because 123456 Canada Inc, which has a lien on KENT BARRETT, is 100% owned by “MEGA-PERSON”.

I see this in my mind….and IT’S NOT MY FUCKING FAULT :P

Well, that doesn't help! :P

Still confused where we're heading with all of this, but eager to wake the fuck up !

Well, he said a MEGA-PERSON, so the only thing I can think of is a huge amount of persons, forming a MEGA-PERSON....

But you know me, I might be wwwaaaayyyy in the bushes with this brain of mine :D

looking for the comparable Quebec-Canadian Act UNCLAIMED MONEY ACT 2008 - SECT 14

Unclaimed trust property (1) Subject to subsection (2), if a trustee holds any property that has not been claimed by the person entitled to it for the required period, the trustee must, within 12 months after the expiration of the required period”

(a) sell, call in or otherwise convert the property into unclaimed money within the meaning of paragraph (b) of the definition of unclaimed money in section 3(1); and

(b) pay the unclaimed money to the Registrar; and

(c) lodge a statement with the Registrar giving details of the estate or trust to which the payment relates and of the details as known to the trustee of the person entitled to the property in respect of which the payment is made.

(2) The Registrar may, on an application made under section 15 by a trustee for an extension of time, extend the time for”

(a) selling, calling in or converting property under subsection (1)(a); and

(b) paying the unclaimed money to the Registrar under subsection (1)(b); and

(c) lodging a statement with the Registrar under subsection (1)(c)”

if the Registrar considers that there is good reason to grant the extension.

(3) Subject to subsection (4), a trustee is not required to comply with subsection (1) in respect of any property at any particular time if, at that time, the trustee (or an officer of the trustee if the trustee is not a natural person) knows or has reason to believe that the person entitled to the property wishes the trustee to continue to hold the property.

(4) For the purposes of subsection (3), a trustee does not have reason to believe that a person entitled to property wishes the trustee to continue to hold the property because the person does not respond to a communication from the trustee (or does not respond as specified in the communication), even if the terms of the communication suggest that the person's failure to respond indicates such a wish.

(5) Division 1 does not apply to a trustee who is required to pay unclaimed money to the Registrar under subsection (1).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/uma2008161/

A MEGAlodon was a HUUUGEshark... Not MANYsharks...

I'm also MEGAconfused... Not MANYconfused ;)

As I said, Will Bed, I might be wwwaaaayyyy in the bushes with this...

This might be a dumb question. What effort has HQ taken to get the "outstanding debt"

My guess Michael is....NONE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA. They're hoping, probably praying, this annoying SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR called Pierre goes away in the bushes for a long long time

I told them MANY times, Michael Atkins, via registered mail, via telephone, via fax......SEND THESE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS BACK to me, AND I WILL PAY.....

None a sound :/

Except for the transfer to the complaints department.... and telling you to file with that 3rd party. I wonder if they can sell the debt again.

I am literally BEGGING them, for "ME" to PAY, and they just don't answer :D

We all think that they were originally paid by Bank of Canada. Then you filled out the Bills of Exchange correctly and those were also sold. So now are these con artists going to somehow sell this presumed debt to HQ to a 3rd party.

I wish they would !! :D

At this point it seems to me. That HQ cannot respond in any way. Due to operating in dishonor

Another thing that my brain keeps trying to think. You have sent them an invoice. If they pay you in fiduciary notes does that create joinder.

Operating like criminals, what they are doing, is ILLEGAL, and CRIMINAL.....

I HAVEN'T sent the invoice so far.... :P

Too many options in my brain right now, and I just CAN'T decide which one to go with.......I AM THINKING :D

I'm going to stop worrying about a shit stain and a potential ban. Why would you want them to give you debt notes? Your invoice asks for 10,000 dollars a few times. But doesn't that just put you in debt and give you money to hoard?

I don't want them to give me debt notes, if an invoice is sent, it will be sent by a PERSON, not "me"

And IF they decide to PAY that invoice, it won't be with debt notes, it will be with MONEY of ACCOUNT, to PIERRE DAOUST, not to "me"

That's what I assumed. But money of account I thought money of account was still debt in motion. My bad

Michael Atkins : "We all think that they were originally paid by Bank of Canada. Then you filled out the Bills of Exchange correctly and those were also sold. So now are these con artists going to somehow sell this presumed debt to HQ to a 3rd party." Michael forgive me I'm new but that is only presumption. Why would HQ collect twice on this transaction and then cut of PETE (THE PERSON)'S electric? This is a great deal for them so far according to that presumption and if Pete also payed on top of this as surety for the PERSON it would be win win win for HQ so cutting him off would have been a stupid move? I don't know but there is something sinister going on here perhaps??

Well if we are making assumptions. It is usually assumed that these utility companies are already double dipping. By getting paid through surety and then getting paid in debt notes or money of account

Agreed but we don't know for sure and I'm saying that if they were getting paid twice then why cut Pete's electric? isn't that called shooting yourself in the foot? just saying that they must be stupid cunts to give up a nice little earner like that?

I think Pete had made it very clear to HQ he does not buy public debt. Meaning he would not give money of account or exchange to pay for this debt.

It's not complicated....

Some bills of exchange were offered to settle the debt.

Some NOTICES was also sent with these bills of exchange, giving HQ the opportunity to REFUSE and to send these bills of exchange BACK, if they decide to refuse, and I WOULD PAY.

I PROMISED I would pay, if they REFUSE and send these VALUABLE instruments back, I did that MANY times.....

HQ, NEVER refused, and NEVER sent these bills of exchange back.

On top of it, HQ cut the electricity.

On top of it, PIERRE DAOUST owns that electricity.

On top of it, I am the sole beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST

I just thought it was a common practice to sell debts to a 3rd party collections company.

They CAN'T do that, that would be a HUGE mistake :D

on the bills they sent you was there ever an amount shown as past due

Yes, but I sent some notice to balance their books, they never did, and never answered these notices, so I have completed these bills of exchange, and sent them to HQ anyway.... :D

Sometimes GREED and other times COCKiness results in "Stupid cunt Syndrome" Gerry lol! They probably get away with sooooo much they try pushing it a little more not thinking that this may be the time someone, say, I dunno, a French Fucker named Pierre, puts their balls in a vice and starts to CRANK that shit.

Right so the assumption is now down to one Michael and that is that: "We all think that they were originally paid by Bank of Canada." I don't think that because in my opinion if those greedy fuckers collected off the Bank Of Canada they would still be giving Pete electrons and hoping for the bonus that Pete mIght claim surety for and cough up the seven grand THE PERSON owes them into the bargain; so cutting him off would be like DUMB as in ADUMB OR CHRISTENDUMB OR FREEDUMB...

David-Paul Sip: you might have hit the nail on the head there mate...

Don't forget guys, they've waited 2 years before they cut the electricity.....

Yeah they don't have a leg to stand on after 2 fucking years. They can only hope and pray Pete gets lost deep in the bushes lol!

Well, that is impossible...!!! :/

If they were as is presumed by some, paid by the bank of canada; then where is the problem for them? There is none and they could still hope (and pray like the children of ADUMB do) to get the big bonus if the captain was stupid enough to go as surety.... am I right or just shitting all over the place?

Gerry, they know EVERYTHING I know......they know WHO I am, and WHO I am not......

The issue is DEEPER than this.....

If they let me do what I do, and ACCEPT, it will be a mess for them....the TRUTH will hurt them badly....

If they REFUSE, it will also be a mess.....they will stripped me from my right to the SURETY of the person, and will automatically call me a SLAVE, literally a SLAVE.....

The only option I see for them, is to show me this mysterious "social contract", and point to me where is my signature on it......

I had a feeling it was deeper but can't as of yet grasp the depth, but I'm trying captain and I can't wait for you to expose them.. Keep it up though you're a captain that leads by example; no bullshit.

Well Gerry, if, indeed, I am a free man, and NOT a slave, and I am right with this......HQ will drop from 4 millions CUSTOMERS, to 1 million customers....

If I am WRONG, and indeed I am a SLAVE, HQ will drop from 4 million customers, to 1 million customers and 3 million SLAVES.... :D

The only reason WHY every human being has the right to the surety/security of THE person is because slavery was abolished....

They CAN'T use the Man/Woman as SURETY, that is SLAVERY, unless Man/Woman ask for it....and we have been PROGRAMMED to ASK for it...... Scott Duncan just fucked up the whole software infrastructure :D

I wonder if AGENT monitoring this group, realize that ? :/

Ah is that why my computer is acting like a snail....

Ya I saw what you are saying the whole time gerry I was just speculating out loud. HQ has been paid at least 1 time already. Either through the sale of the instruments or through the surety.

That is NOT the issue, Michael Atkins, you are MISSING the whole issue :/

No I see what the issue is I just wanted to flush that one out.. I see how it's about who is surety and where is surety.

Oh and how it's not your fault

Pete Daoust "The only option I see for them, is to show me this mysterious "social contract", and point to me where is my signature on it"

Pete, what if they just shut up and ignore you? How can you get around silence? Would getting progressively louder and louder in public do any good?

I'm thinking back to your comment in another thread about having a "legal weapon"....

Something like "Oh, I see that you don't give a shit Mr. Trustee" then bam, hit them with said legal weapon, and then "What do you think now Mr. Trustee, do you give a shit now?"

Did anyone notice the subject " YOUR bills of exchange?" They even told you that the property is YOURS and they won't give them back.