David Johansen
looks like somone needs to author an article that rebuts those presented within the salem newspaper...
i need PIERE? oh PETE? seems a week or so back, i came across a post of yours, which quoted somthing, in it the last sentance i believe ended with "person of the man". which if i am correct would identify the 'person' as being the chatel property of the man, therefore the MAN can not be subservant to the 'person'.
I WISH you would recover that piece of info, so i can research it a bit more at length.