Jul 11, 2014 10:34 AM

You can only account for CHRIS. ;)

I think they are scared of something. I am going to add this guy here!!!

https://www.facebook.com/chris.noone.50?fref=ts

This is his brother, Jay. He is also interested in obeying the law. Apparently, Chris's incident occurred back in Nobember of last year.

https://www.facebook.com/jay.noone.9

https://www.facebook.com/jay.noone.9/posts/10201760372545289

I think I'm friends with Jay

Looks like it.

So...this guy doesn't have a Drivers Licence Person....but they charged him anyway??

If that is true, there has to be a way that they are fabricating joinder.

I added them here...Chris Noone

Bring them ALL here. :D

I did!!!

Back to basics. The joinder comes from attachment of the name derived from ANY PUBLIC DOCUMENT CREATED FROM THE CONTACT. No driving license necessary, that's just an excuse.

I said "by what authority do you attach a name derived from a public document" 8 times the day I got arrested.....

^^^ They just force surety on you regardless, as we know RULE OF LAW and due process = ZERO :-(

I avoid contact like the plague. If I was contacted immediately out of my mouth would be the words "I wish to make a statement please write this down" " I do not consent to any name derived from a public document being attached to me for the purpose of surety" I'd repeat the first part until the cop took out his notebook or dragged me away. He's most likely taking you anyway unless you accept joinder.

Yeah....that's about how it went. They sent 11 cops...

Here's a question. If you could move to any country in the world, where would you go (I am in a position now to do so)?

I think Mackximus Minimus leads the page in blocked members

Maybe, so. Who's important opinions am I missing? :D

Joelle Spirit, I unblocked you. I just could not live any longer wondering what your thoughts about life were! :D

Why would you block Joelle Spirit?

I have blocked a few members that I have found are constantly posting none sense, but I honestly do not recall why I blocked Joelle. As soon as it was brought to my attention, I looked at my blocked list to see if she was blocked, and unblocked her.

No problem, Joelle. I apoligize for this incident.

If anyone else is not seeing my posts/comments, please bring it to my attention.

looks like somone needs to author an article that rebuts those presented within the salem newspaper...

i need PIERE? oh PETE? seems a week or so back, i came across a post of yours, which quoted somthing, in it the last sentance i believe ended with "person of the man". which if i am correct would identify the 'person' as being the chatel property of the man, therefore the MAN can not be subservant to the 'person'.

I WISH you would recover that piece of info, so i can research it a bit more at length.

In an additional note: Chris, have you spoken with that reporter, and asked her if she were willing to correct her false statements?

the creator of a thing can not be servant to that thing.

was the government created or instituted? you know they are using the sepperation of State from UNITED STATES inorder to railroad you. I THINK an affadavit/apostiled that lays claim to your not being a united states citizen, and that the records reflect a fradulent act done to you against your will without WHOLE disclosure, voids the whole thing from the beginning, and that the State has a duty to protect your interests, not fight you.

a thing done by me against my will is a in invalid thing.... When the common law and statute law concur, the common law is to be preferred. 4 Co. 71.

play their game against them. find somthing to disrupt them from being able to do anything by binding them to their own rules.

http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/bouvier/maxims.shtml

i know, they are not following their own rules. if they do not then the rule of law is corrupt and must be invalidated.

they called a slave, and your stuck because i think you answered the call... mr shulte.

what was that thing pierre posted in the newspaper that declared he is not a person.... do that, post public notice in that same newspaper. see who rebutts it if any can... then use it against them.

David, ffs....Did you not remember the 2 fucking times I was arrested because I told them I wasn't a fucking slave. What the fuck are you talking about I am answering to Mr Schulte? I told them where to find the SURETY. Do you think you would have performed better in the circumstances? Why don't you go test them and see how you make out? Fuck!!!

'Mackximus Minimus: If that is true, there has to be a way that they are fabricating joinder.'

That word 'deemed' seems to have a lot of power, or at least presumed power...

It also seems that liening a vessel into a private jurisdiction only has as much power as the vessels around you...ie: private navy...one lonely vessel becomes easy pickings for privateers.

I recall the Admiral saying something about safety in numbers.

On an unrelated but kinda related topic, I just watched the Monuments Men...interesting movie: It talked about the recovery of approximately 5 million pieces of art, from the Nazis, by the monuments men...

Woo hoo, happy days, those priceless pieces of art then get returned to their rightful owners:

Grade A grand lie of omission coming up, under the heading 'spoils of war'...check where 97% of the art found/recovered by Harry Ettlinger's team got returned to, ie: who the 'rightful owners' were: see 1:55 onwards

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG0J4m-NT6M

I get the feeling that this resembles your current situation Chris Evan

YOU will hold the next session, and wait for me to arrive, as your next friend. as soon as the offer of accepting the next friend doctrine is made you will have them in a common law court, where all Maxims should be considered and my argument that because there lacks whole disclosure this meeting should be rejected on the basis that the commonwealth must have accepted a mistake rather than forgiving one...

This is unbelievable yet all the illegal aliens get let go and don't have to have a license. ..

and to rebut your questioning my question, unless you HAD answered a call for Mr. Shulte, in SOME WAY shape manner and/or form, you wouldnt have gotten as far as some shady trial in the first place.

David you're talking to Chris like he's a rookie. He tried everything he could and they still took him. That's the point here. You're not telling him anything he doesn't know and you're coming across as very patronising.

Max, i have a friend who's brother Thomas Senuta lives in venesuela and works out of NY part time. he loves it, except that smoking weed is not as acceptable there as here. the cost of living there is really cheap and gas is almost free.

Thanks David. I'm not worried about weed as I don't smoke. I'll check it out. A pre - requisite for me is good Internet.

I'll maybe look Thomassenuta up for some advice.

well max, without the transcript there is no way to recall exactly how the situation went. when the call for the person went out, was there an immediate objection to that presumption? I am here on that matter by special appearance as administrator for... as the surety has previously been deposited within the court.... I Wish to question the validity of proper jurisdiction in the matter... since this matter has not obviously been settled...

then i would stroke my beard a few times...

Is the State denying that it is currently holding surety in this matter? as the certificate thereof has been deposited for settlement by the comonwealth. and/or if not then their may somewhere be a mistake, and please forgive me if such has occured, allowing me such time as required to correct that.

which can not be corrected without the court accepting the BCert as surety. checkmate.

Or thats a total shitstain and i am silly off my fucking rocker.

Yes I get what you're saying. Again the point is they just ignore everything you say and carry on with the utterly corrupt process of extracting profit from their victims.

Maximus Legis, Costa Rica does NOT have an army. It has the smallest police force in the whole Americas. Minimal, but decent infrastructure, Internet, and is friendly to foreigners that settle there. There is a good number of Americans, and others living there. Fresh food, low cost of living, and access to land.

Venezuela is not a place you want to be in the next few years, as a foreigner.

Thanks mackximus minimus for the input. I may discuss with you further after some research when I have time

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/retire-here-not-there-costa-rica-2013-07-16

http://internationalliving.com/countries/costa-rica/move/

http://internationalliving.com/2013/06/where-to-live-in-costa-rica-five-top-expat-havens/

You do not need me, you have the Internet! :D

Wait a second.....Clerk of Courts are appointed by the Justices here and Justices are appointed by the Governor??? What the fuck is that?

and the governor was elected by the united states citizens. it is all company policy under martial law.

Chris, to clarify on your statement.....are you saying State of Massachusetts Governor "appoints" ALL the Justices? THEN, the Justice "appoints" the Clerk of Court? WTH?

That's why a JUSTICE is not a JUDGE.

A JUSTICE is APPOINTED, and a JUDGE is NOMINATED by the community to hold the public trust.

can a proper judge 'appoint' a clerk? if not then there's our test.

your honor, have you appointed any clerc's? oh? then you are not a judge then, just a justice of the peace, correct? (and therefore this is just the mickey mouse club!)

and wait for the silence...

A clerk is an administrator for process, and has NOTHING to do with a PERSON.

Free-dumbers are lying when they say "clerk has all the power". That's like saying that the cashiers at Wal-Mart have all the power in the store. It's just a stupid lie that has no basis in reality.

when you say administrator for process....in the example of a default judgement....if they see no correspondence from the party being sued...signing the default would be considered part of the process and within the scope of the clerk duties?

I think administrator for process means the one that registers something in some jurisdiction, in some accounting ledger, following some rules. But I might be mistaken.

In the case of the person i have in my pocket..default judgement, it was the court clerk that signed it...no justice was ever involved according to the court clerk. I found that strange, but I also am limited in my court experience

I have seen in a few jurisdictions that, in specific instances, a clerk may sign an order, or grant a "judgement," following the "procedure" rules. But limited to specific instances, again.

UPDATE:This vanished! :D

Really?

:D

Where was I, during thread ? :/ing th

Oh yes, I was busy getting my electricity back, it was stolen from me :D

I need people to keep going back. I want to find the FIRST POST!

The first post was Tom Davies testing, wasn't it?

Or the first 15 posts. :). I went back once

Yes, he was posting these tests, I wonder if I could pass one ? ...

<<Or the first 15 posts. :) . I went back once>>

Pft... Amateurs.

:D

I tried to go back. Both Firefox and Chrome failed to go further than march 2013. The amount of info in this group is staggering