I just killed $23,000 of the national debt by switching to 12 USC 411 and 95a(2). That's over $100,000 in the year that I have been making the DEMAND.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 15
Age Thomson
As I am still pretty new to the group, could you expand a bit on this? I'm interested in the backstory leading you up to this point Chris Evan.
Chris Evan
Are you in the States?
Age Thomson
No, I am not, but I'm still trying to read everything here regardless :)
Chris Evan
If you are in the States I can explain it to you up to and including back until 1791. If not, I don't think it works unless you controlled a VESSEL in the States. :-D
Chris Evan
This isn't worth your time....but it started with Clause 9 of the Judiciary Act of 1791, includes the Legal Tender Acts of 1862 and 1864, which made the language of Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act necessary. It changed slightly in 1933, 1964, and finally in 1971. Its access to sovereign money pursuant to 31 USC 5115.
Chris Evan
Off the top of my head.....
Chris Evan
Section 16 is codified at 12 USC 411...discharge of the obligation is found at 12 USC 95a(2). And its not my fault
Chris Evan
It doubles as a RESTRICTIVE ENDORSEMENT thereby damaging third party usage to the instrument pursuant to the Check 21 Act. :-D
Chris Evan
Sovereign money = INELASTIC.
Chris Evan
Scott Duncan....what exactly does this TENDER? Just my right of beneficial usage correct?
Mike Lamb
So Chris, you recommend that I pull up this information and research it with due diligence? I currently "inhabit" North Carolina.
Chris Evan
Definitely!! David Merrill is the best source
Chris Evan
Scott Duncan, I was reading the Check 21/act and I see it is applicable to United States dollars...further research shows that there is no statutory definition of USDs. That would make the Act outright theft and operating under the Color of Law...do you have anything to add to this statement??
Sue Rakestraw
Michael, here is a link for David Merrill's info on the Suitors Clause:
http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/content.php
Mike Lamb
Yeah, like everything else, I have to research this further. It is ironic, because I do not "sign" checks. I stopped doing that a couple years ago. I simply write ONLY DEPOSIT REAL LAWFUL MONEY TO ACCT # - So, I may have been doing that incorrectly then. One interesting thing the audio mentioned was the "signature card". I do not get "paychecks". All of that is direct deposit, so I need to go to payroll and review what I have on "file" with that dept.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 15
Age Thomson
Chris Evan
Age Thomson
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Mike Lamb
Chris Evan
Chris Evan
Sue Rakestraw
Mike Lamb