The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Jul 05, 2014 1:28 PM

Chris Evan

As I was perusing the Internet looking for some articles on ink color for negotiable instruments, I came across this on the FDIC website.

What happens when there is a conflict between state law and the Check 21 statute? Massachusetts, for example, prohibits check truncation. Response: Section 13 of the Check 21 Act provides that the Act shall supersede any provision of federal or state law, including the Uniform Commercial Code, which is inconsistent with this Act, but only to the extent of the inconsistency. State laws such as those prohibiting check truncation will become void and unenforceable beginning on the Act's effective date of October 28, 2004.

I had already known that the Check 21 Act is a license to steal (as evidenced by the increasingly larger banks and national debt), but I didn't know this Act was written to SUPERSEDE ALL other law! Basically, wouldn't this mean that this Act now governs Negotiable Instruments? If so, why have we never had a post on this?

http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/resources/21actfaq/

Unique ID: 462493170453287_689935141042421
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 12

David Johansen

i see that, but a few years ago before it became implimented i had learned about it and at that time it was called, i had thought, bank 21 AND what it did was allow photocopies of cancelled cheques to be considered adequate to return to the account holder, that a scan can be transmitted & processed, and the original destroyed.

i thought the clearing house could use them (the paper checks) in a wood stove to heat the building....

David Johansen

why would that be negotiable? except to let them just have it all back? unless ofcourse if your thinking if they wanted to administrate then they can take whole responsibility from the man, they took it back, so let them have it?

Back to top