The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 7

Jul 02, 2014 9:03 PM

Chris Evan

Are we slaves or are we free? Read this article and lets discuss. BTW....Scott Duncan is only mentioned once!

Google Drive Viewer

docs.google.com

Unique ID: 462493170453287_688808207821781
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
link
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 127

Scott Duncan

This reveals that I am the biggest threat.

Sino comes in a VERY close second (One could argue that I'M in second place when contract law is applied) but they try to lump us in with the "failures".

They do NOT want people looking at my work, or Sino's work, but they can't draw ATTENTION to it. (Google "Streisand Effect") They can only lump us in with the freedumbers.

...except I'm right. Sino is right. Reality doesn't care.

Gail Marie

some back up where the courts have acknowledged the existence of a person being separate from the petitioner ....am I comprehending this correctly?

"...It cannot be bought, sold or alienated. It creates a record, not a property interest. No proprietary right having been created, such an entry neither expands nor diminishes the bundle of rights and responsibilities which inhere in the PERSON OF THE PETITIONER" http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2008/2008bcsc648/2008bcsc648.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAmQ2VzdHVpIHF1ZSB0cnVzdCByZWdpc3RyYXRpb24gb2YgYmlydGgAAAAAAQ

Chris Evan

"Note: Though Martin appears to have abandoned OPCA strategies, a third party from Alberta has entered the fray and unilaterally offered to discharge Martin’s obligations via his OPCA “birth bond” secret bank account:"

ummm....what?

CJ ML

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=person&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1600&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=7&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2Cperson%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bperson%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BPerson%3B%2Cc0

Scott Duncan

Massachussetts (which is what I used to call boogers that are sneezed out. It's from the Meaning of LIFF by Douglas Adams. It's a dictionary that defines undefined things using city/state names) is the PROVING GROUND. This is where they try their shit to see what they can get away with.

Ireland is Britain's proving grounds.

CJ ML

"You then have to power to demand, the court PROVE they are NOT acting under fraud." I think this would have to be very planned and thought out. I don't see them allowing ANYONE to come into their house & beat them.

Anibal Jose Baez

I KNEW it! I always said to myself "Names are for LEGAL PERSONS! How can a Man "have" a name? I know in COMMERCE, NAMES are ACCOUNTS. If I MUST say/have a "name," then that is slavery. I am ME, a Man. The Man has NOTHING to do with this LEGAL/COMMERCE stuff. I can only administrate for the person. And all this, it is not my fault."

Chip Douglas

Is ultimately Scott the 'security of the person' as Mary Croft alluded to, the PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY for the Government to be able to say- "Oh no- we havent had you performing in slavery/servitude this whole time, we've been holding these SECURED FUNDS for you 'in trust' all along- we even GAVE you a Birth Certificate, you've just decided this whole time not to do anything with it...besides- YOU'RE the one who decided to go out, get a SIN-number and go get a JOB/WORK instead"

?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Its funny if you read through some of these you can see exactly why there was a problem. For instance, "R. v. Tyskerud, 2013" regarding evasion of taxes. He tried to use “Statutory Declaration Truth of Identification”, to avoid SURETY.

Think about it... a STATUTORY DECLARATION?? ok then...

These are actually kind of funny but a good read to see how "free-dumbing it" goes wrong...

Michael Atkins

So in all the cases where folks are asking questions about CRA tax agents requiring an oath of office or similar questions..... Are they being ignored due to joinder having been established? Or are they just steam rolling through because as Chris says they are not following due process ? Slaves?

Scott Duncan

***POST DELETED***

Zerox Mi, I have FORGOTTEN more about OPEN SOURCE than you will EVER know.

Keep your ideas to yourself. This is not a forum for ideas. This is a forum for SHUT THE FUCK UP AND READ.

The fact that you think you have ANY ideas I haven't means you did not bother to participate in the aforementioned SHUT THE FUCK UP AND READ, policy.

This forum exists for one thing: MY AGENDA.

It is not your own little recruitment centre for your ad-hoc ideas. I actually have the answer. I don't want yours. You aren't qualified to have an opinion on the subject.

You WILL be qualified, if you SHUT THE FUCK UP AND READ!

Back to top