Volume 7

More attacks.

Hello everyone,

I received a toll violation on Friday. Tomorrow morning I am going to attempt an experiment. I am going to the toll bridge office to pay the ticket if they can provide 2 witnesses to the violation. Hoping to get them to dismiss it.

If it does not go down as planned, I need to administrate, but I am unsure how to put it to paper, I am visual so an example would greatly help as this would be my first attempt.

What is the story with being born around or before 1960(ish) and having a long birth record. I do not know if it states on the Long Birth Record: Birth Certificate. If it does not state Birth Certificate on the Long Birth Record, would that mean you can not use the Long Birth Record as CONSIDERATION? If this question is a shit stain, please forgive me.

Remember the day Dean was Arrested? Lou Manotti went off to the seminar (NO he DIDN'T PAY!) to chat with Dean Clifford, but ended up making sure Norah Holloway didn't get swept up in the mayhem...

...he's really heroic when it comes to women, but the guy will totally bail the helm, when we are careening toward a million-dollar yacht. (Save us Admiral!) :D

Anyway I announced the seminar a THE PLACE TO GO if you wanted to avoid me. Aquilae had 2 OFFICERS there that you DON'T know too, so even though I wasn't there... I was there.

But THE NAME OF THE DOCTOR was playing that day, so I thought to myself, "Fuck their rights and personal liberties! They'll still be stupid after, and I know what's important"!

So, now that the "shock" has died down, you might want to experience that day from my perspective :D

Here is THE NAME OF THE DOCTOR. Watch it before the thing gets pulled :D

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByAyYx2cx8NDXzYtb2FrVU1mS00/edit

The "end" that gave me the "feels", for the TL;DR crowd:

Clara: Who's that? The Doctor: Never mind. Let's get back. Clara: Who is he? The Doctor: He's me. There's only me here, that's the point. Now let's get back. Clara: But I never saw that one. I saw all of you. Eleven faces. All of them you. The Doctor: I said he was me. I never said he was the Doctor. Clara: But I don't understand. The Doctor: My name, my real name, that is not the point. The name I chose is the Doctor. The name you choose, it's like, it's like a promise you make. He's the one who broke the promise. {Clara collapses} Clara? Clara! He is my secret. The Old Man: What I did, I did without choice. The Doctor: I know. The Old Man: In the name of peace and sanity. The Doctor: But not in the name of the Doctor.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByAyYx2cx8NDXzYtb2FrVU1mS00/edit

So another speeding fine issued... A Notice of Mistake was issued in response to it to remove surety and place the burden of proof upon the claimant.

Today Pat Costello (same guy from the last incident about 9 months ago) sent back a response to the Notice of Mistake in which he "wishes to acknowledge receipt of your letter concerning the fixed charge notice"...

Last time he wrote that he is writing in reference to the notice of mistake, this time he wishes to acknowledge his receipt of it...! That's fine by me! :D

By doing so whether he accepts it or not, he has acknowledged that he has now been notified of my position as a party without SURETY...

So as before, I authorised the process of the Bill and will return it for him to present it to The Central Bank for payment by the surety...

So I received a parking ticket. Which thread would help explain how to administrate this. Or would refusal for cause be more appropriate?

Can we discuss this please...? Taken from Scott's page... I can't comment on certain posts on it so thought I'd share it here...

When you say Tara and yourself use Facebook as your (I presume there was a typing error hence the "or" ONLY presence) only presence since 2000 I don't understand. Did Facebook not only become available from 2004?

When you say you can only be ACCESSED through TOR what do you mean?

I'm just trying to keep up with "where you are leading us"... :/

Are we slaves or are we free? Read this article and lets discuss. BTW....Scott Duncan is only mentioned once!

This was sent to me today....I found the OJ Simpson point interesting. This article does not mention Scott, mentions Accounting once, Surety once, and rips on God a little bit.

TT4L tshirts thread.

I need new tshirts. We all need tshirts. I hate to shop for clothes - cant recall the last time I actually PAID for a tshirt...

Shopping centers are full of zombie slaves whoring for the latest majority fad, working more to spend more to look more "majority" at work because they're too brainwashed to have an opinion and want to avoid being associated with the majority because... THE MAJORITY IS ALWAYS WRONG (and that I've know for 17 years now, #1 thing I learned in college)

Anyways : i'm a graphic artist. I have a good silkscreener friend. I've been thinking about getting tshirts made for a while, but qtys are an issue.

Would you guys and girls jump in if we could produce tshirts, maybe 5 different prints, different colors, on high quality tshirts / tank tops (tbd)... Usually front and back one color incl. top quality fit/fabric is under 15$...

Throw in ideas !

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF: LEGAL TENDER

There has been quite the kafuffle lately hereabouts, what with the ongoing chat battles regarding guru vs. guru, legal tender vs. "harmless" coloured paper, and lions vs. Christians. For the purposes of this article, there are no purported "gurus" in this forum, Christians believe they have an invisible companion, and money is a TENDER FOR LAW. On a personal note, theists could, I suppose, park their imaginary friends at the door, but as the saying goes, "If you believe that, you'll buy these shoes". That level of credulity, which by its very nature permeates every aspect of your existence, simply does not coexist well with critical thought.

Although all of these things are connected, only one of these things interests me today - money as LEGAL TENDER. I'm really confused as to why this concept seems so difficult to the average person. Our lives revolve around the concept of tenders.

Basically, a tender is an offer that can be accepted or rejected.

From childhood, we put out tenders for affection, acceptance, or stuff, to our parents and strangers, by being cute, or funny, or disingenous. If the "cuteness" is accepted we may get affection, candy or a new bike. In this system we are subject to the whims of these adults, their oversight and their rules.

In adulthood we continue to put out tenders for affection, financial or material gain, and even copulation. Here too we have made the transition to bigger acceptance and better toys, and are now subject to larger oversight and different rules.

If someone "offers" you a flower on the street, you'd better believe it's a tender for pointless conversation or a "charitable donation".

If you're a woman sitting alone in a bar and someone sidles up to you and offers to buy you a drink, what you're really dealing with is a TENDER for SEX. In this country at least, there are penalties for simply forcing yourself on another person. You can, however, raise a tender with dinner, a drink, a fur coat, or a trip to Disneyland; and few people are ultimately confused at the expected outcome.

Why then should the concept of LEGAL TENDER be so obtuse? Money is something you don't own, and didn't make. In fact you can't make it - it's a closed system. You can possess it or use it (see debt in transit), but only if you observe the terms and conditions set by others (not you again) for its use. The fact that everyone uses and values it, doesn't make availing yourself of this luxury any less a tender. If you "owned" the money you could set your own terms and conditions for its use. As you don't, the terms and conditions are set by other controlling entities. By using others' property you agree to be bound by certain rights and obligations - why else would you be participating in this system? The use of institutionalized money benefits you when you colour inside the lines, and makes you accountable for non-performance when you don't. There is, in fact, a fairly mature and far-reaching web of systems all working in concert to reward or punish depending on the profit you generate, and how well, or poorly, you perform.

Let's look at a practical example. If I have a car, and I let you use it, I might tell you that it must be returned in pristine condition, or with a full tank of gas. Those are just some of the terms I might set. I might tell you to pick up my aunt Flora at the doctor's office as well. If you agree to the stipulations I have set, you can accept the loan of the car. Let's say you forget to collect aunt Flora, and return the car on empty with garbage in the back seat. I might be angry, I might want you to pay for cleaning the car, or I might send burly men to beat you up. The only sure thing is that it's probably the last time I'll loan you the car.

Using conventional money has benefits, no doubt about it. It's more convenient than working directly for food or shelter, and more socially acceptable than bringing a chicken or pig to exchange for a new outfit. People have been conditioned to believe that money makes you happy, money buys everything you need, and money offers you legal protections that not-money never could.

It's hard to solicit a tender for affection, and one drink may not be an adequate or enforceable tender for sex. But money...different thing altogether.

Caveat emptor - you'd better read the oh-so-tiny writing on every bill. For money is a TENDER FOR LAW.

ATTENTION ON DECK:

...sorry that shit just never leaves you.

Astute officers and crew from different vessels, and now, different Navies, have all approached me with the same concerns. I normally let these things play out, because I like to show off how I deal with these ill-prepared "surprises". Often you'll find that when I do something that appears "Godlike", closer examination reveals that I'd simply altered small things in the past to engineer my way out of future problems.

I've done this all my life and it makes for some interesting experiences, not the least of which is infiltrators.

Today we're going to talk about infiltrators.

I want to discuss the behaviour, dialogue, and the "red flags" that alert you to an infiltrator.

One of the great things about being me is that you don't know how much I know about you. You barely understand the technology you use, and the same is true with infiltrators. I often do things deliberately "sloppy" and even let the odd "warez" group onto our network, just to act as a "Honey Pot" and to take a bunch of NSA agents out of commission. For as long as they're looking at the shiny objects I leave around, they are not looking at you.

An officer, and crew member, of the Tyson were using the Lou Manotti and Roguesupport Nx accounts, and reading THE TENDER FOR LAW, which is baffling because they have direct access to my entire library...but no accounting for taste. Contrary to what you may think, THE TENDER FOR LAW is not my best work.

Anyway, officers and crew of the Tyson noticed a member whose posts consist almost exclusively of wrong answers, erroneous conclusions, out-of-context quotes and numerous calls to violence. At this point I would like to state that if you're doing anything under the banner of AQUILAE you do not cause or inflict violence. That is a RIGHT reserved exclusively for officers. The rules are very simple. If you're going to inflict violence make sure you're an AQUILAE officer first. If you check and you find out you are not an AQUILAE officer; DON'T.

Now I try to give all of you the benefit of the doubt. The poster in question is a regular contributor to THE TENDER FOR LAW, but he only showed up late in the second phase.

...I'm talking about you, Jason Moreland.

So as is my way, we're going to drag you out onto the deck, and disect this problem piece-by-piece.

The default position it that Mr. Moreland is simply dumb and angry because of what he has discovered. If no other answer comes up, then that will be the position henceforth. If this is in fact the case, I remind Mr. Moreland that he thinks wrong, and values the wrong things; which means any intent and/or plans he forms at this point are 100% guaranteed to be based on the wrong things, and the wrong thought-process. This also means there is a 100% chance of failure...

...SO STOP!

If this is the case I can "leverage a negative", and can use Mr. Moreland's many posts as "red flag indicators" when hunting down infiltrators. You can find many writings on this subject, however we're just going to deal with the basics.

The first indicator of an infiltrator is somebody who is just a little too enthusiastic about the cause in question. You'll often find them repeatedly asking questions about very basic things while skillfully using their feined ignorance to switch a few words around. You'll also find Robert Menard doing this shit too, so it's not a hard, fast rule - rather an indicator. Look for phrases like, "Are you saying *insert bullshit here*?", and the presumptuous weasel-word questions that are prefixed with "Don't you think..." (I preemptively answer "NO" to those).

Second indicator are calls to violence. Nobody understands the urge to inflict violence on these pieces-of-shit more than I do. If you intend to inflict violence, do it right. Homicide is very, very easy. It's stupidly easy. I guarantee that any one of you could kill ten people with a steak knife before anyone could even form the intent to stop you. In my books, that's stupidly easy. If you fuck up killing somebody, you deserve your fate. Many murders are meticulously planned, and go off without a hitch, but the perpetrator still gets caught. Never plan FOR violence; plan for AFTER the violence. The violence itself is just a formality. It's surprisingly easy to do; and a lot of fun. It solves a problem, gives closure, and let's you move forward. I speak from experience. I can even say right here on this open forum to all the cops watching that I killed that fat piece-of-shit that is your colleague. I garotted him myself with a guitar string. I even left a note. So why aren't I sitting in jail with a bunch of gomers chanting "cop killer"?

The reason I can say this is that they would have to reveal that the dead land-whale in question sent an Islamic Sand-Nigger out to kill my child; and that's not something your masters want attention drawn to. Look what I've done since then! You're not bright enough to put it together, but I've already won. And now I've got nothing to do with the rest of my life but hunt down those who dared write their signatures endorsing harm to me and to those I love. You can send all the infiltrators you like. You can use all the blackmailed confidential informants that you like. You could spread disinformation...hell you can even call me crazy! But that's not really going to change anything. I taught a bunch of idiots on the Internet how to build their own fucking banks. On Facebook of all things. Ask yourself what I've done with people who have sworn to live and die at my command.

To Jason Moreland: If you are an infiltrator, take pause and reflect on what you're doing. The problem with all infiltrators is that when they read what I write, they know it's true. It's not opinion, it's not hypothesis, it's not even an expression of feelings. I strip away the bullshit that most infiltrators exploit. The many adults that have imaginary friends have learned by watching many examples of what happens to people who don't keep their evil, ignorant, mysogenistic idiology to themselves.

All belief is evil. An infiltrator will laugh with his cop buddies quoting "Scott is always right", but you'll never hear them quote, "All belief is evil". As a matter of fact I have it on good authority that they are stricly prohibited from quoting it, even in police reports. I wonder if you can figure out why.

This is the only life you get. I had mine planned out from age nine. It never occurred to me that the Rule of Law would become corrupted too soon. Before the year 2000, my only problems with the judiciary was their baffling technological ignorance.

I wish I'd prepared better for the collapse of the judiciary, but I work with what I have; and even my "Plan B" gives me a significantly better standard of living than all of you combined. All of my actions from 2005 onward are to engineer what I like to call "Destructive Benefit". Like THE TENDER FOR LAW itself all of my long-term plans eventually come to fruition. You can look back to the older posts and see how foolish you sounded, and since you're on the rollercoaster, you don't really see how fast you're going. There was going to be a stereotypical "star pupil" and a stereotypical "class clown". They just turned out to be exactly opposite of who I thought they'd be. So when it comes to predictions regarding people as individuals, I am rarely right. I know how you'll all behave in large numbers, but individually you're all very confusing. I have women figured out in a very "low res" way, but that's as close as I've ever gotten after years of study. The little I do know is true; the rest is a big question mark for me; and whenever possible I try to engineer that gaping variable out of the equation. It doesn't matter if you think I'm right or not, in the end...we'll all find out soon enough, just as we always do.

I think it's a safe bet that I'll be right again.

Jason, if you're an infiltrator, go back to your masters and say you've been caught. If you're not, then less speaking and more reading. Pretend you're a Christian. Pretend that if I discover your imaginary friend, you'll be banned; and all the benefit you get here, you'll just have to wait for.

I've been going through my vast video collection, and I've discovered what I think are videos of both Menard and Clifford acting all "you're crazy" and dismissing cryptographic currency. Menard was sitting in the middle of a fucking mine when he was saying it. I really like making people who oppose the right answer look really, really stupid. That's something the cops and I have in common. Anything you say will be used against you later on.

Everyone who hasn't watched the Naomi Wolf, End of America video, please do so now. It's time to pick sides. The days of warning are over. It doesn't matter what you say/think/feel/believe. Reality doesn't care; and very soon, neither will I, for you will no longer be of any use to me. I'm giving you the keys to the future. I'm giving you understanding now, and I ask nothing in return. All I ask is that you share your knowledge with others. Make sure they know how you learned, because then they'll know when they see an AQUILAE Battle Standard, they should stop what they're doing and walk away, knowing that by doing so they will never be harmed by anyone acting under that banner. An example of the AQUILAE Battle Standard is on Lou Manotti's profile, and if you see it anywhere else you should stop whatever you're doing, and walk away - because shit's about to get real. I'm talking about actual, real-life, bikini girls with machine guns.

Take it away guys!

Scott Duncan, is it possible that someone can deactivate the TOTALRECALL software recorder on my cell, before he/she calls me ?

:(

Hydro-Quebec decided to CUT PIERRE DAOUST's electricity service, this morning at 10:00am.

Now, how does little Pete will handle this ? :D

From the Surety article:

Scott Duncan Make LOTS of NOTARIZED copies of your BIRTH CERTIFICATE. The court has the name there. March 23, 2013 at 11:43am — Like · 1

Scott Duncan ...they already have the "person". Kelleran Holman has it right. If I'm asked I tell them JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN is ALREADY in the court's custody.

You only need make NOTARIZED COPIES because you are identifying the security of the name. The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is NOT THE NAME, it's PROOF of the SECURITY OF THE PERSON. The number of copeis is irrelevant. March 23, 2013 at 12:32pm — Like · 2

Then I thought you said they need an original to create a bond...

Scott, why did you say this?

Pete Daoust mentions about finding your Act of Birth. Is there anyone on british columbia who has found theirs? Any ideas where to locate this? Thanks.

THE TENDER FOR LAW - SITE PRE-LAUNCH PHASE!

THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about.

SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY.

You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law.

TENDER - tender verb tendered ten·der·ing Definition of TENDER

transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century

THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW

This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST:

http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM

NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned.

Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so.

Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected.

Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN.

And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D

...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted.

Unless otherwise stated, BY DEFAULT, anything Scott. and/or Tara Duncan publishes, in THE TENDER FOR LAW, is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License:

1) You MUST say where it came from (Tara, Myself, or THE TENDER FOR LAW group)

2) You CANNOT derive works from it

3) You CANNOT MAKE MONEY off it.

Make all the money you like off of "Scottisms"

TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES.

As I was perusing the Internet looking for some articles on ink color for negotiable instruments, I came across this on the FDIC website.

What happens when there is a conflict between state law and the Check 21 statute? Massachusetts, for example, prohibits check truncation. Response: Section 13 of the Check 21 Act provides that the Act shall supersede any provision of federal or state law, including the Uniform Commercial Code, which is inconsistent with this Act, but only to the extent of the inconsistency. State laws such as those prohibiting check truncation will become void and unenforceable beginning on the Act's effective date of October 28, 2004.

I had already known that the Check 21 Act is a license to steal (as evidenced by the increasingly larger banks and national debt), but I didn't know this Act was written to SUPERSEDE ALL other law! Basically, wouldn't this mean that this Act now governs Negotiable Instruments? If so, why have we never had a post on this?

http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/resources/21actfaq/

I just killed $23,000 of the national debt by switching to 12 USC 411 and 95a(2). That's over $100,000 in the year that I have been making the DEMAND.

I have become aware of a curious phenomenon on THE TENDER FOR LAW.

Some of the principal members (don't get your knickers in a knot thinking there's a hierarchy, which there totally is), have mentioned being "blocked" by other TTFL members.

Disclosure: I don't know if anyone has blocked me - I'm sorry I don't pay that much attention. I don't recall ever blocking anyone. I have eventually virtually ignored the comments of some people as being functionally "clutter", but I'm not a big fan of censorship so I comment, or move on. Also, FYI, I reject all friend requests to my personal Facebook page even if I like your name, your profile pic, your writing, the cute dog or cat on your wall. Nothing personal - xenophobia is my bag, baby :D

But does anyone else see a problem here?

If you're in this forum it makes no sense not to be able to read the comments of regular contributors. If you disagree with people's opinions and can't read a thread in context is there really much point in being a member?

I know how I'd solve this problem, but I'd like to hear comments from other contributors.

Do you think members should block other members? If a moderator or regular contributor is blocked by a member, is there any point in the "blocker" remaining in the group? If more than one member finds a particular member offensive (that is actually sort of funny), should a moderator remove him/her from the group?

Again...not a big fan of censorship or dismissal in general, so I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/106226872/Retired-Judge-Spills-the-Beans

I came across this today, and, although I am only halfway through reading it, I find a lot of similarities between what he has written and what Scott has. I am curious if anyone would care to comment on it, and perhaps pick it apart?

As with everything you all post here, I value your insight greatly. Please forgive me if this is just crap and a waste of time.

Fun tread shaping up on Kawni Gilroy's Mobile uploads.

I was called a "fool" for presuming a `roid-shooting douche was a cop...

...it turns out I had my douche scale set too low! HE'S AN "ATTORNEY" so I have taken his "fool" declaration as an invitation to ASK QUESTIONS so I may be "enlightened". :D

A friend told me about this. I'm interested to read any comments, insights and observations.

I see the NOTICE OF MISTAKE as a simple solution.

Scott, some obviously 'psycho' man sent back an Invoice my landscaping corporation sent him with all these stamps all over it. It says "authorized by:", MGL ch 106, Bill of Exchange, etc. I am not sure what to do with this crazy piece of paper, but he says I am to deposit it at my bank. Do I take this to my business bank? Or something else?

Thoughts?

Finally got my stamps. Thank you Scott and Pete for the teachings

Thanks for the acceptance. Like another member said, I have no pending charges. Just trying to grasp this info just in case lol. Is there a US version of the notice of mistake? Thanks again.

6.8Lbs healthy baby. They want to know her NAME. I said she doesn't have one yet. They said you'll need to come up with one before you leave the hospital for the RECORDS haha. If they try to force it I'm signing the birth record VOID!

Yes. That's the idea!

Ummm....did anyone catch this?

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/receiver

further...this...

http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/receiver

How's this for avoiding JOINDER?

This was posted by a user...who has apparently BLOCKED me.

You don't get to do that here.

So here is the CONTENT, without the third-party restrictions (See what I did there? :D ):

Pardon the interruption. Are you curious about how to look up the value of your birth certificate? 1. Go to http://www.fidelity.com 2. Click on 'Research' 3. Click on 'Quote'. 4. Click on 'Symbol Look Up'. 5. Type in your Birth Number on the Birth Certificate with the dashes (e.g. 156-88-102939). 6. Make sure the top two drop-down menus are 'MUTUAL FUND' and 'FUND NUMBER' BEFORE you perform the search to find out who is trading on the FUND for the Birth Certificate. Click on the Initialed Trading Company name under 'SYMBOL'. This will give you all of the trading information about who is trading on the fund that the birth certificate is a part of. This document was created when you were an infant. Commercial laws allow for you to cancel and rescind this simple contract—UCC3-203 and to make a Claim in recoupment (Reparations) for fraud committed upon you when you were and infant (See UCC 3-305).

Thanx for the add

My son went to Central America for a month and when he was there, his phone got stolen.

Where he was, the internet connections were not available. So as soon as he got back, he called Telus and told them about it.

They said: "you should have called when you lost it"! despite the fact that he explained that it was impossible to do so where he was, they said he owed them — 3000$ for the account! :(

So he dealed a settlement with them reducing the debt a little bit. But at the light of what he learned, he then sent a letter asking for the different methodes of payments available to him to take care of the debt, in the delays required.

Today he got cut off.

He called Telus and asked WHY they had cut off the phone since (explained what he had done) and of course they did because he hadn't PAID.

So he went down to his mail box and saw that he had a coupon from the postal office saying that he had received a Registered Mail Letter and that it would be available for him to pick up tomorrow. ___________________________________

So we are wondering, since he want to PAY what he used (his package price) but doesn't want to mix the PAYING part and the ADMINISTRATION part, can he call them and PAY what he used and deal with the rest by Mail?

Also, can he fax them a NOTICE saying that they do not have the right to cut him off because he was in his delay and that he will pay, the usage he did of it by Credit Card?

Can someone guide me on this?

The person I happen to administrate received a signed a letter from a TRUSTEE, the Comptroller of the State, acknowledging the fact her Office had received notice that I was acting as the Administrator for the Person. :O

The letter (not the envelope) is address to the Sole Authorized Administrator for the Name, and here is just some parts of what is says:

<<July 2, 2014

Sole Authorized Administrator for Mackximus Minimus Address XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear Administrator:

We received your communication. In brief, you notify this Office that you are the Sole Authorized Administrator for The NAME...

We understand that the information and documents you sent us should be sent to the P.R. Treasury Department...>>

They also sent everything I sent them back to ME, the notice, the copy of the BC, the affirmation, and the envelope. Hahaha! But I have a SIGNED LETTER from a TRUSTEE. :D

The good thing is that I have already NOTICED the PR Treasury Department. All I want is for the person I happen to administrate, and everybody else, to obey the law.

Hey guys...look at this

http://m.salemnews.com/TSN/db_325372/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=8VSgZV9Q

I see some libel

Just need to clarity. I've got my stamps to administrate my persons alleged debt to Cra. Now who do I appoint to be what in the letter I will send to them ? And do I mail it to Cra or bank of canada?

I'm thinking joe Oliver as trustee as he is the new minister of finance for canada. Cra as beneficiary? Anything else I'm missing?

Jessamee Hundley, there are rumors floating around that you have may blocked Scott Duncan from your view...

Is this true ? :/

Thanks for the add, it's nice to chat with like minded ppl!

Alright, assholes. :) I previously had posted a status to the page of a message that I had received from a tard named Allen Ott. I made an UH-OH! I clearly forgot to title that status, leaving room for ridicule. I was posting that status for everyone to get a good laugh, alas....my mistake lead me to the direct center of that. So, laugh it up some more, have fun with it. Just thought I would make my point. If you must know, I have learned my lesson. And, Scott Duncan, I did not/do not have you blocked.

Admiral, if you could author one law, getting it shoved in, implemented immediately, what would that be?

OH my.

seems someone thinks the Admiral is an Agent provocateur.

Another one... :-/

http://m.salemnews.com/TSN/db_325481/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=vMphHDQy

Scott, when you say you "paid your taxes", what form of payment did you use? :D

Ha! I didn't mean to post that here! :D

LOTS AND LOTS OF "PERSONS"!

Can Australian society, and indeed other world societies, expect to see the same as the following?

How many have entered a court-room identifying them-self to the court as being a man/woman of body, mind and spirit, and not the called charged PERSON, then being told by the Magistrate that as the court cannot see or recognise a man or woman, therefore the man/woman was "FREE" to leave, yet the hearing continued against the PERSON charged, in absentia, and the PERSON found guilty? Consequently, if this is to be envisaged for the future, then it would very seriously compromise Govt's policy of encouraging'/'forcing' the unemployed into the work-force, as there only so many instances where dishes require washing. Furthermore, it could extend to tertiary-level education admissions, which, in turn, could affect generating course-fees and, consequently, tertiary institutions viability.

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/what-should-you-do-when-you-get-an-offer-from-government/

A Notice of Mistake with a price under it....hmmmm

Meet Trent Goodbaudy, [https://www.facebook.com/trent.goodbaudy] freeloader-on-the-land, and general theist parasite. This piece of shit takes the work of others and sells them, and now he's selling NOTICE OF MISTAKE...

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/what-should-you-do-when-you-get-an-offer-from-government/

This piece of garbage was kicked out of the Tender For Law for declaring that it's his "right" to sell my works, because "he did all the research"... No really.

NOW he thinks it's his right to SELL my works (as his, no less) while calling me names publically. All of you are OK with that? He seems to be.

...except that LEGAL NOTICE has a LICENSE attached to it, as do ALL MY WRITINGS, which are BY DEFAULT under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. This means you CAN'T MAKE DERIVATIVE WORKS, and YOU CAN'T SELL IT, and WHEN distributed (like on a website) ATTRIBUTION MUST BE GIVEN. I do this so EVERYONE IS PROTECTED LEGALLY from PEOPLE WHO TRY TO MAKE MONEY OFF OF LAW. PEOPLE WHO CHARGE MONEY FOR KNOWLEDGE MEAN YOU HARM. I attach these licences to STOP THESE PARASITES.

He doesn't think these LEGAL matters are important on a LEGAL NOTICE.

Because there is a LICENCE attached, and being on the spam-and-scam site http://freedomfromgovernment.us/ is a CLEAR VIOLATION of that licence, and there's MONEY involved, LET'S WATCH THIS BACKFIRE! :D

Let this serve as PUBLIC NOTICE and/or TENDER to ANY AND ALL LEGAL DOCUMENTS PRESENTED BY ROGUESUPPORT INC., and/or ITS OFFICERS, FOR INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ARE, IN FACT, UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS NON-COMMERCIAL NO DERIVATIVE UNPORTED LICENSE.

THEREFORE LET THIS SERVE AS NOTICE THAT ANY DERIVATIVE WORK AUTHORED BY "TRENT GOODBAUDY", AND/OR REGARDING "TRENT GOODBAUDY", ARE IN FACT FRAUDULENT.

SWORN AFFIRMATIONS TO THAT EFFECT, ARE AVAILABLE ON DEMAND. ROGUE SUPPORT INC - 416-994-1700

Jason Lerato, I have found this !!! :D

Jason Lerato: I was once Iin that tender group and every time I tried asking a question Scott and his right hand dufus pete would slam me and cuss me out. So tired of being treated like shit in that group

:D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/trent.goodbaudy?fref=ufi

Admiral Scott, may the Sole Authorized Administrator make orders, judgements, sentences, just like unauthorized administrators?

To give my hard-working staff the illusion of accomplishment, I am publishing this in its DRAFT FORM. :D

THIS WILL CHANGE/EVOLVE. There are a LOT of gaps, and we need to flush it out when I get everyone together! Until then, at least 2 very tired people would like feedback. :D

The end is getting closer and closer

Here is a bit of a twist on the "Gas Bill" thing. I got home and this was hanging off my door knob. (see pic)

The "service" to be disconnected is the meter presently on this house however we do not have any account and it has been dormant for several years.

I called and asked what it would cost for hook up and monthly fees etc. $25.00 application fee + $0.35 per day rental of the meter + gas usages at rate. I told her to mail to the house a contract offer stating all fees.

"The only thing that uses gas in this house is the fireplace and today was almost 40C degrees", I told her. The house is going up for sale before winter and we want the equipment here for the next owner. She said if we want to keep the meter we have to apply for service. She also explained when they remove the meter, they cap it at the main, for "safety" so it will be very expensive to re-install it.

I asked her if this was a "Pay me now or Pay me later" scam. :)

It really irks me but if I contract with them and then cancel it one day later I am on the hook for around $35.50++ and I don't have any stamps either. :( By applying, it will give the new owner a couple of years to decide if they will use it or not and wont effect the sale price of possibly thousands.

Of course, there is the principal of it all but until this house is sold "the show must go on".

I should add, there should not be any problems with the meter as it was swapped out in 2013 and has not been used.

Unless I can find a way to delay this action until the sale, I see no other choice. Oh Bother! :(

Anyone familiar with estate law? My question is, as executor of my mother's will I wish to sell the real estate to a buyer. There are 6 beneficiaries to the will myself included. Do I need to register the beneficiaries as owners first then sell it on or can I transfer ownership directly from my Mother's name to the buyer along with a notice of assent from the beneficiaries...

I know the legalities will differ from country to country so I've added the section from the Irish act that pertains to it... The legalese confuses me though so if someone could translate please... :/

Has anyone ever been arrested for a Failure to Appear while standing in front of a Justice?

Funny, received this letter today from HQ, basically saying that they are finished with this and it's up to me if I want to COMPLAINT to the regie of energy.

The subject of this letter is: YOUR BILLS OF EXCHANGE AND THE SERVICE CUT OFF FOR NON PAYMENT.

Of course they haven't sent back the negotiable instruments, and this envelop was sent regular mail, so of course I videotaped myself while opening the envelop, to make sure no one will affirm that the instruments was in it.

And this wet ink signature of a no name agent caught my curiosity, Scott, WHY a no name agent would sign this without his name written on this thing ? :-\

Ethereum is here !!

Scott Duncan, I posted this on another page...is this a stain shit?

I also think that when Scott says we think wrong and VALUE the wrong things, he means we are looking for discharge rather than VALUE. We are looking to go from a negative to a zero rather than our natural state of zero to a plus. It seems to all about shifting the assets and liabilities to benefit ME

A friend of mine is being shaken down by his x wife for more child support. The original issue was settled out of court. The agreed upon amount was 450 dollars per month. When my friend is working he has volunteered to pay 700 when he is not collecting Employment Insurance. Now his x wife has hired a lawyer and is demanding he pay 900 a month. The lawyer is demanding that he submit his tax assessment from 2013 and 2014. The criminal Fuck is claiming it has come to his attention that my friend has earned more than is expected. He is being threatened with a motion in a competent jurisdiction. I have some ideas but I'll wait for feedback from the group.

If one would need to send an invoice to, lets say Hydro-Quebec, and follow all the process; Account Statement, Notice, Final Notice, Default Notice......and still receives no payment and no answer after all the legal process, could one lien this thing ?

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=630992853594328

I'm still pretty new to the whole Tor network browser, but noticed this today as I am reading over the latest from Infowars.com. I know that its a popular browser amongst everyone I know, but I have only been using it for a short time and am still working out the kinks to it on my end. I am only a beginner c++ programmer, and still learning the use of the language as well. I have used Linux (Slackware, Mandrake/Mandriva, Red Hat) in the past, and am thinking about switching my Mac over to Ubuntu or Mint in the near future.

Any thoughts on the article?

http://www.infowars.com/almost-everyone-involved-in-developing-tor-was-or-is-funded-by-the-us-government/

I don't really get a lot of time to spend on here, but I have been reading all the nuggets (and idiots articles, which are very informative by the way. thank you on those. I would rather read something I can learn from than, drab bs or other non-relevant material.) that I have saved to my (cheap, pay and talk) phone, which I usually read on my way to work on the bus in the mornings (and on my breaks).

Thanks in advance for the input.

In other news...

"Toronto constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati said the blanket order shrouding the vast majority of investigations into complaints against judges is “an abuse and excess of power” and is an example of “judges protecting judges.” Galati...said allowing secrecy in the courts carries serious consequences.

“In the darkness of secrecy, sinister interest and evil in every shape have full swing,” he said, quoting 18th-century British jurist and philosopher Jeremy Bentham. “Where there is no publicity there is no justice.”

Funny, I see all kind of post on facebook about what's going on in the middle east, Russia and bla bla bla.....all these posts from North Americans believing they have figured out what's happening in these regions.

Why not Focusing in what's happening in OUR OWN BACKYARDS ? :-\

Maybe that will be productive ? ...no ? :-\

Idle curiosity ( got that one from Tara :-D ), WHO in this group, have asked at least once, a public trustee, if you could use the person's SURETY/SECURITY to discharge a public debt sent to the person ?

Thanks for your fast reply Admin Pete. :-D

Hello and thank you for allowing me to join this group. I am here to gain more knowledge on these legal topics, and specifically if they pertain to child custody and child support. Any suggestions, links and articles are appreciated. Thank you.

Thanks Leigh OftheHouseof Collins for the add here. hope to learn much from everyone and vice versa. my main focus now is discharging debt which i have been unsuccessful at. my contributions are the documents ive put out there. some.may have seen the Quebec Proof.pdf I will surely post it here and would love some feedback. nice to meet you all!

Hahahahahaha...Awesome! “I don’t think you should be able to fall back on judicial independence for demonstrated judicial incompetence”

Boy these lawyers are afraid of this gag-ORDER imposed by the Judical Council to not comment on the matter.

For my birthday I was given a speeding ticket in South Carolina. What is the best course of action to show them I do not consent?

From the "Waiting for the MEGA-person's department" :D

THE TENDER FOR LAW — LEGALESE FOR IDIOTS (c) 2013 ROGUESUPPORT INC. under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

It's feast or famine around here at THE TENDER FOR LAW. This is article number two in as many days!

Derek Moran says that he finds it difficult to believe that I will be able to top the SURETY article...CHALLENGE ACCEPTED.

It is almost midnight on Sunday, I'm on the bridge of the Tycho-Brahe, and as I look out onto the lake the water is like a sheet of glass...and it's not even frozen. How can I not produce a superior article tonight? So today, with all my "God" complex, "arrogance", and the knowledge that a host of "pseudo radio" is reading my superior work, and knowing that all he can do is tremble in impotent fury. Things are so good I can cover the bad aspects of law, namely its language.

Some of you may have already started to figure this out, but every single word in a legal document is designed specifically for the purpose of trapping you. Even words like AND, OR, IS, MAY, SHOULD...all of these are traps! And law dictionaries use them perfectly. You may have noticed words like UNDERSTAND don't mean what you think they mean. This is the lowest of the low-hanging fruit in the legal world. What I am about to teach you here is the legalese equivalent of "code breaking".

Let's jump back to the 1500's...

This is the time in our civilization that we often refer to as the Renaissance. The reason the Renaissance occurred is that whole shitloads of people were dying of various forms of plague, and rat-shit-covered scientists were baffled as to why this virulent disease was spreading everywhere.

The practical result of all this was that a whole shitload of people died, and the ones that made it, inherited all their possessions. Efforts to communicate more efficiently became a social priority, because there was lots to do to maintain all this new property, and not enough people to do it. For nearly 800 years "God" was everything, despite his demonstrable lack of assistance in this era. You see the age where "God" was everything was called the "dark ages". Every time I hear an adult with an "imaginary friend" talk about how "ignorant and closed-minded" I am, all I see is an individual that wishes to return to that horrible time.

As there were fewer people in the 1500's, and the Renaissance was just getting underway, inherited art was often used as currency. The next generation had a higher literacy rate than the previous, and so administrative rules were born. It doesn't take a "Rocket Scientist" to see how useful slipping Shakespeare in around the latter half of the 1500's would be to those few who don't actually do any work. The false profession of "law" was born.

You'll notice that nobody ever "does" law. They only "practice" it. They keep practising and practising, but they never quite get it right (that's what you get for not subscribing to the TENDER FOR LAW!).

From the 1500's to the present, there has been an odd phenomenon regarding language. English is a Germanic language that merged with the language of the Angols (we will discuss the Angols and the Picts in another article). Germanic influence on the language of the Angols resulted in the English written in the MAGNA CARTA. But if you try to learn German today, you'll notice an interesting phenomenon. Though the words you use sound startlingly similar, and the really observant can actually pick out the words when German speak and get a general idea of what they're saying, even if they don't speak the language. Except further study shows that the Germans speak "backwards" grammatically. Jumping to the south-west, Spanish, a much simpler language, where every vowel is a syllable, and words say what they mean, but once again, "grammatically backwards". Head north-east in our mental European map...to France...well France is filled with French people so we needn't bother with them. Those French have a different word for everything, and their language is, you guessed it, "grammatically backwards".

Those of you noticing the pattern here will not be using too much intellect when they start posing the question, "Maybe we're the ones that are backwards". And that is almost, but not quite true.

Like a virus, legalese infected the English language. It's encouraged to this day to use legalese to appear "smart". This is done on purpose. It is an insidious piece of social engineering.

The want you to try to use these words without knowing what the little words mean.

IT'S ALL ABOUT THE LITTLE THINGS.

When you read, you read from left to right on a page. The small words actually exclude part of the sentence. You will notice in my now famous, NOTICE OF MISTAKE, that I always use "and/or". I do this on purpose, because I like to keep my options open.

Maxims of Law say it plainly. The inclusion of one thing excludes all others. The definition of a PERSON in the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA is the most hysterical example of this. The definition of PERSON is hidden in the larger scope of "every one". The common law maxim, "The INCLUSION of one is the exclusion of another" means in the context of the CRIMINAL CODE INCLUDES "Her Majesty" AND an "organization". See for yourself:

*** THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA*** “every one”, “person” and “owner”

— quiconque —, — individu —, — personne — et — propriétaire —

“every one”, “person” and “owner”, and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization;

**********************************

You will find this by searching for R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46 under the Interpretations Section.

In reality, what this says is that a "PERSON" is "HER MAJESTY". Unless you are "HER MAJESTY" people answering to these acts and statutes are simply "performing these acts" (remember Shakespeare) on "HER MAJESTY's" behalf, much like the GOVERNOR GENERAL PERFORMS royal duties on the Queen's behalf. This is why the GOVERNOR GENERAL is always a chosen CITIZEN, and not an elected official.

The GOVERNOR GENERAL ACTS as the Queen when the Queen is not in town. This of course has nothing to do with "HER MAJESTY".

When dealing with the LAW, in CANADA anyway, you are always dealing with "HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA", which as we all know is a CORPORATE ORGANIZATION.

"OR" means you have a choice, "one" OR the "other", but not BOTH.

So, in the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA, a PERSON can be "HER MAJESTY". A PERSON can be "HER MAJESTY", but a PERSON must also be an "ORGANIZATION". Notice it does not say "OR" an organization in the above interpretation. Confused yet?

That happens in Legalese. Let's, instead of looking at this dry, depressing CRIMINAL CODE stuff, look at something happy, exciting and real.

I can say with absolute certainty that no woman on the planet has loved me more than Tara. However, no amount of love would compel her to JOINDER herself to a "BILL OF LADING", and hand it over to the GOVERNMENT. That means "getting married" (for the stupid amongst you). I'm sorry if that sounds condescending (that means talking down to people).

Now think about this marriage transaction. The marriage INCLUDES "Scott" AND "Tara", not "Scott" OR "Tara". This means marriage makes you effectively ONE PERSON UNDER THE LAW. Since the marriage actually consists of THREE ENTITIES, "Scott" AND "Tara", which by its nature EXCLUDES the GOVERNMENT, still remains an "ORGANIZATION". A marriage ORGANIZES these "entities" into their respective roles. If "Scott" AND "Tara" remain "Scott AND Tara", the GOVERNMENT HAS NO STANDING. However, if Tara sought a divorce, the MARRIED PERSON is no longer "Scott AND Tara", and the GOVERNMENT gets to intervene.

This most certainly wouldn't be the case if it was "Scott" OR "Tara". Therefore, the above CRIMINAL CODE definition of "PERSON" defines HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ***INSERT PROVINCE HERE***, which is both "HER MAJESTY" AND an "ORGANIZATION".

Every one who is CHARGED in CANADA is usually CHARGED by their PROVINCE. For instance, if I were to take the ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD lawyer "Heather" and bash her skull into jelly with a ball-peen hammer (as she so richly deserves), I would likely be CHARGED with HOMICIDE in the JURISDICTION where I chose to do this "skull-bashing". As I'm a profoundly lazy man I probably wouldn't travel, so ONTARIO would be the JURISDICTION. This makes "HER MAJESTY" AND the "ORGANIZATION", "HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO". Since all ACTS and STATUTES fall to PUBLIC SERVANTS who are ACTING on behalf of "HER MAJESTY", this makes all PUBLIC SERVANTS who are ACTING on behalf of "HER MAJESTY" effectively "HER MAJESTY". HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO is in fact, an "ORGANIZATION". You now have the qualifications for a "PERSON" as defined in the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA.

Just as the "marriage" consists of "Scott AND Tara", which effectively creates an "ORGANIZATION", "HER MAJESTY" and the organization defined as "IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO" create a "PERSON" which YOU are presumed to be a PUBLIC SERVANT of. This effectively means all CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS are simply administrative processes for that "ORGANIZATION". The NOTICE OF MISTAKE effectively removes that presumption.

You now see how powerful the words "and" and "or" are. If AQUILAE says the CAPTAIN of the TYCHO-BRAHE is "Scott AND Tara", this would mean neither of us individually could act as CAPTAIN, but "Scott and Tara" could BOTH be CAPTAIN. This means that all ORDERS from the CAPTAIN must come from BOTH Scott AND Tara. However, the AQUILAE TRUST is not a stupid document, and the CAPTAIN of the TYCHO-BRAHE is, in fact, Scott OR Tara. This means that when Tara speaks, everyone shuts the fuck up...including me. It's Scott OR Tara - not BOTH!

"AND" refers to BOTH. "OR" does not. This is why putting "and/or" gives you the options; and since the AQUILAE TRUST is pretty much perfect, here in reality, the CAPTAIN of the TYCHO-BRAHE is, in fact, Scott and/or Tara.

This means I can ACT as CAPTAIN, Tara can ACT as CAPTAIN, and we can BOTH ACT as CAPTAIN. Recipients of this POLICY have NO STANDING to contest when we assume and/or drop the role of CAPTAIN. Why do we do this, you ask? Because FUCK OFF, THAT'S WHY! If you're even looking at the AQUILAE TRUST, you're a fucking TRUSTEE; and the only reason you should be looking at the AQUILAE TRUST is to find the best way to "Shut the fuck up and do what you're told" for Scott and/or Tara....

And that is how you make a powerful LEGAL document with the words "and/or", and the reason why we write things this way. Use AND & OR to restrict other parties. Use BOTH (and/or) to free yourself.

If your document is stating the terms, make it as open as possible for YOU, and as restrictive as possible for every OTHER PARTY. If somebody is thought of as a "good lawyer", it means they have mastered this skill. Were I to be practising law, I would be a very, very good lawyer.

One of our loyal readers made the horrendous mistake of using different words, in another post. Instead of NOTICE OF MISTAKE he said, NOTICE OF "ERROR", which means something completely different. If you look up the legal definition of "mistake" you will notice amongst other things (inter alia) the legal definition of "MISTAKE" ends with ", or error". If you are going to learn from the TENDER FOR LAW, you must always remember the Number 1 Rule of the Universe:

SCOTT IS ALWAYS RIGHT!

You can save yourself a lot of time by NOT second-guessing Scott, and proceeding to figure out WHY Scott is right.

This also means that when I present a document you should presume it's perfect, and that changing it will fuck you over in ways you don't even understand. "NOTICE OF ERROR" is not "NOTICE OF MISTAKE". You don't change the document because you think it "sounds cooler". You don't change the document because you think another cooler-sounding word means the same thing; and I will always interpret such changes as TENDERING AN OFFER to amuse me, by allowing me to berate you for your stupidity, and to laugh at you when a court kicks your ass. This is a TENDER I will gladly ACCEPT and volunteer for, with the added bonus that I will execute my duties in this TENDER to the best of my abilities. I'm really good at that too.

Taking what you have just learned here and reading through ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD, will reveal some very interesting and insidious things. You're better off serving me as a slave, because unlike ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD, I won't lie to you, and I'll tell you exactly what I mean.

So there you have it, AND & OR - two hidden keys to legalese and the knowledge that "include also excludes"...and before you ask EXCLUDES includes all that remains. Use EXCLUDE to get rid of everything else; use INCLUDE to restrict to a single point/item.

The guy with the fake "charity" seeking legal advice actually asked what TENDER means, and it occurs to me that those who AREN'T lying to me might wonder too. TENDER in the context of Law means, "to present to PERSON, an unconditional offer, to enter into a contract". Look at those words, then look at a bank note. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER means, "THIS NOTE IS AN UNCONDITIONAL OFFER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR LAW". That is why the group name is so clever. This group is ABOUT that UNCONDITIONAL OFFER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR LAW. It's ALL money.

Money is JOINDER. JOINDER MAY (Read as: "ALWAYS DOES") INCLUDE SURETY!

THIS is the LEGALESE you need to know. NO MORE. Your ONLY goal should be to REMOVE and/or AVOID SURETY when dealing in commerce and/or LAW. WHEN YOU SIGN A CHEQUE, you are TENDERING SURETY. A BANK NOTE does NOT THENDER SURETY as the SURETY is signed for, by SOMEBODY ELSE.

-Scott Duncan

"I'm not going to kill you! My friend is going to kill you, I'm just going to watch".

in case you missed it.......................

You won`t believe how desperate the US gov`t is getting . More proof its aal about money This time the adversaries are battling each other using what ultimately affects everyone: money. .........................................

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: IT'S TIME FOR OUR SEMI-ANNUAL PURGE!

A sizeable portion of you are cops, infiltrators, and/or just plain delusional sacks-of-shit who listen to FRAUDULENT sacks-of-shit, like Trent Goodbaudy and Robert Menard.

So it's time to cull the herds.

As you examine the events of the past month, you'll notice there is a lot of anti-Scott sentiment in the FREE-DUMB movement. Their complaints appear to be either "shit they made up" or that I in some way "hurt their feelings"; so much so that Robert Menard has gone from lying through ommission to just plain flat-out-lying about what words mean. He supports his position with his really compelling "Peanut Butter Theory", which appears to be far more compelling than telling you what the actual words mean. If you think the courts don't take you seriously now, wait until you wander into court with the "Peanut butter theory".

So, as usual, adults with imaginary friends will be purged. If you think you can read "auras", and that spirits are real, you will also be removed. If you're a member of three hundred groups, there's no fucking way you're reading this one, so you probably won't even notice that we're missing. Seriously, if you are a member of 300 groups, you're not reading ANY of them.

I started the next phase of your education with AGENCY and the "ARTIFICIAL PERSON". If you don't know what I'm talking about, please inform an administrator so you can be immediately ejected. It was the last article I posted so it's either fresh in your mind...or you're gone. We're going to reduce the group back down to 90 members or so, and then I'm going to teach you some serious LEGAL weaponry. It's time to start shaking the foundation of the system.

To those of you being "banished", here are a few of the upcoming items you simply aren't good enough to read:

AGENCY AND LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS MONETIZING SECURED BONDS SECURITIZING DAMAGES FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND HOMICIDE FOR FUN AND PROFIT CHICKS FOR FUN AND PROFIT PROFIT FOR FUN AND PROFIT PROPHESY FOR FUN AND PROFIT TACTICAL WEAPONRY WITH OFF-THE-SHELF EQUIPMENT TOTAL SPACE-SHIP GUY CUTTING ONES CHEESING PEOPLE OFF DOING SOME OTHER THINGS

... all this and more!

Those of you who survived the FIRST WAVE don't need to worry about this. If you made it through the last purge there is no reason you should worry about this one, although it's nice to hear from you in the threads. Only "the regulars" actually post here so, with a membership of over 600 people, I am afflicted with the same question as most late-night DJ's: "Is anyone listening"? These purges are the only time I get to find out, and if you are actually listening to what I'm saying, then you're the ones I'm doing this for. The value of what I publish here won't truly be recognized for at least another five years, but some of you are seeing the value now. All I need is evidence that you exist. As you may have guessed I'm not a Christian...I'M BETTER THAN JESUS! I promise to answer an equal or greater number of prayers than your current Jesus.

I hope those who are about to be purged will enjoy not reading these fabulous literary masterpieces, or any other gold in the comments. For everyone else not wishing to be purged, make a post here, and justify your existence.

It should be noted that those who are members of our Battlefield 2142 resurrected group enjoy special immunity from all of these purging policies, as this places you at a level of "coolness" which makes these purges beneath you. Plus, we get to metaphorically "shoot you in the head".

This purge will take place over the next 10 days as I am blessed with extra staff, all of whom need the serious stress relief that booting members seems to provide.

Is everyone seated comfortably?..LET THE PURGE BEGIN!

http://youtu.be/EO1061QisVs

As the Admiral has clearly stated a Justice of the Peace is NOT a JUDGE. "For most Ontarians, a justice of the peace is the closest thing to a judge they will see. Yet, unlike a judge, no legal experience or education is required to be one.They decide who gets bail and whose homes police search..." Some proof of the #1 Rule in the universe ;)

http://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/whats-behind-canadas-troubled-relationship-with-its-aboriginal-peoples/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&smid=fb-share&_r=1&

I chose not to spend time digging deeper into this "discovery". Something is lacking. I am sure some of you would like to comment on the article :D

What a surprise. NOT!

I am not sure why, but for some reason, I found this humorous. Maybe because of its RAW ridiculousness.

http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-05-unelectable-atheists-us-states-that-prohibit-godless

Anyone buy some Ether yet? :D

If my person buys a boat and registers it (in fear of it being stolen), but my person is held in trust and not for commerce, does the act of registration imply that the CARGO may be for commerce? Would additional notice be required

"Defeating the Delphi Technique" The delphi technique and hegelian dialects are heavily exposed at www.freedom-force.org

Peter: The following are our preferred search engine sites: "Google academy". This site sorts results by academy/institution. "Google scholar", & This site sorts results by author(s). "Eccellio science". This site sorts results by sites.

"...footage of the tragedy has emerged as a character in its own right, stoking public outrage, shaping legal tactics and raising questions about the power of technology to shape the relationship between governments and the people they govern."

“Increasingly, the public is aware that there is a serious police failing in this area. And they’re now getting a first-hand view without the filter of a police account or the filter, frankly, of lawyers.” -Julian Falconer

“Most of the time when people have been killed by police, there aren’t witnesses other than police, and bystanders who don’t see very well . . . Police officers don’t often testify against each other . . . so there might well not have been charges had there not been a video.” -Peter Rosenthal

Alright.. To make sure I am thinking RIGHT I've had to ask myself: am I "ALL IN" OR NOT...??

So I am posting this for the group..

The NOTICE of MISTAKE acts like a "KEEP OFF THE GRASS" NOTICE.. right? My first question is: Must it include some evidence such as the Birth Certificate? (Proof of who is SURETY) Also, does it serve a second function of offering a form of CONSIDERATION??

If ever someone needs an AGENT in a corporation, acting as Director, with a few whiplash, I can supply Pierre Daoust. :D

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! :D

Was wondering, with all the idiots running around in court, not a clue on what to do or say in front of a court. Would it be best to just start creating case law that can be referred to during all trials ... like meads v meads. At least a group of 20 people pair up and bring cases in civil court against one another. Work out the case prior, like the lawyers and even tender payment to opposition in front of judge. Write up a promissory note, tender it and the other party examines it and says well you forgot the Canada post stamp. Which Is supposed to be tribute to the Queen as per Promissory note act (for those apart of that club house) I think, it's so many cents per 100. 20 to 40 cases start poppin up with the tools everyone needs to bring these case laws into their own situations. That is, for those who wish to play in that sand box. Yeah-?

I am about halfway through reading a book titled "Banking and negotiable instruments" by Sir Frank Tillyard, and I have a question. Hopefully someone here might be able to help me with it.

The chapter I am currently reading is about personal security, or collateral, and it is covering letters of credit, bonds, etc. My question(s) are, can a person, issue a bond against the surety (Bank of Canada via the Birth Certificate) to another person (corporation) that can then be deposited into a trust? Would that trust then be able to declare it as an asset of the trust and borrow against it to perform whatever day to day obligations that the trust may have?

Is this how to move my person into the private trust realm and out of the public/government realm?

Saw this on a friends status.

"What the **** is going on with Montreal? Metro's are unreliable alsways stopping and inappropriate delays, Bus drivers are not in uniform, Police are in army pants, & the police cars are filled with stickers."

Pete Daoust, any idea about this in Montreal? Martial Law on it's way?

http://www.silverdoctors.com/why-the-legal-tender-law-targets-lenders-gold/ ...legal tender laws force lenders to accept fiat as payment regardless of terms and/or conditions mutually agreed upon by lender and borrower. The Government is then a 3rd party in all transactions irregardless of whether or not they've been invited to contract? Or... is the Gov implicitly invited as a 3rd party when any exchange of value is taking place on their "tax farm"?

I am posting with regards to internet services that have been stolen from me.

The past 2-3 weeks I have been unable to discuss the account via telephone, as I do not identify as a name and the agents are unable to answer any questions I have. I identify myself as sole authorized administrator for the name. They asked if I can/did/will ( or something like that) provide confirmation of same.

July 22, 2014, I completed the inchoate instrument sent to the person I happen to have in my pocket and attached a letter regarding the same to which I identified myself as SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the name, via regular mail.

On July 28, services were suspended. I called and told them the check was in the mail. They said services would be re-instated as soon as they receive the check. I informed them of possible legal action being taken against them for extortion of monies.

On July 29, I received a phone call to which they asked to speak to whoever called yesterday. I said I do not know who that would be. The call ended.

Upon return to my abode yesterday, I was delighted to see that services were reinstated, and thought the matter was settled.

Today, July 30, 2014, I received a hand delivered URGENT NOTICE, a FINAL NOTICE dated for July 30. 2014. Services are to be DISCONNECTED Aug 1, 2014.

This is the letter I sent, stapled to the bill of exchange which I completed.

July 22, 2014

RE: Account #265-XXXXXXXXXXX AMY COLLINS

Rogers,

I have received the debt you sent to the person AMY COLLINS regarding Account # 265-XXXXXXXX with your company for your services, dated July 12, 2014.

I am the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for AMY COLLINS.

I wish for you to disclose ALL methods available to administrate this debt/bill of exchange regarding AMY COLLINS.

I have asked for remittance advices from numerous agents in your company via telephone and no one can answer my questions.

Am I able to use the SURETY of the PERSON to ADMINISTRATE this debt?

If you do not advise me on ALL methods available to discharge this debt, I will remit, to my best knowledge and ability, as per the Bill of Exchange Act (1985).

Kindly advise if there are any defects in the instruments I have completed and enclosed.

No one is above the law.

With honesty and integrity,

By: Sole Authorized Administrator for AMY COLLINS S.I.N. 1XX XXX XXX All Rights Reserved/Without Prejudice

Any comments?

. . . I searched for and found numerous sites with key words "bogus" and "bad" liens, There are numerous sites of lawyers magazine offering tips for their readers for dealing with "bogus" commercial liens. The stories talk of judges, prosecutors, lawyers and politicians as victims of "paper" terrorists. The so-called terrorists established liens against these hardworking, upstanding people and thus cause the "victims" plenty of legal and financial harm that is very difficult to diminish. The only "defence" for the so-called victims is to petition for a jury trial, restrictive legislation (which seems to fall short) and settling lien.

I am in the Hospital, for a chiurgical operation, the health insurance card is expired, they want me to PAY, they have no idea how much though :-D

This is freaking funny :-D

I received this yesterday and wish to deal with the original agency. I am thinking it is best to accomplish this by returning the paper to the attorney with a notice that it is my wishes for no third parties involved in this matter and that i have no contract with them in this matter, offer declined. Am I thinking wrong? Is this the best way to handle this?

"In a press conference after the talks ended, Argentine Economy Minister Axel Kicillof described the group of creditors as “vulture funds” and said the country wouldn’t sign an accord under “extortion".” Someone should ask this HONOURABLE MINSTER what else he would expect but EXTORTION from these international banksters?

Please correct me if I am wrong.....

It is my understanding that a corporation is a type of company or business entity which is entitled to treatment as an artificial person which can sue and be sued in a court, and which has liability protection for its shareholders and officers. When I look at information on a Limited Liability Company though, it looks like a much better setup to me in terms of privacy etcetera, but I am not seeing anywhere that it can be treated as an artificial person and able to sue/be sued. Is it the case that an LLC is NOT an artificial person? If it is NOT a person, then it follows that it cannot create a trust?

85 Pages, covering basic info on forming a company in Delaware. Perhaps it is of use to someone.

. . . Any and all demands on me for service by dictators/policy-enforcers must not be forced on me without my consent. That would be slavery. Slavery has been abolished therefore forced service under threat and intimidation is criminal yet still billable. My right to bill for my services rendered whether delivered according to my free will . . or delivered by me against my free will . . is still worthy of my bill to the dictator/policy enforcer for payment by the dictator/policy enforcer. I am unaware of any enforceable law, policy, code, statute, by-law, act or rule that limits what I can charge for my services rendered. . . SLAVERY HAS BEEN ABOLISHED !

Exciting times ahead. It's moving day :) out from under the many thumbs that would stear my vessel to shallow shoals. No lease, no utilities to pay, studio/bachelor in the market of my berth.

I will first get comfortable. Then I kill my person, resign via extreme detachment. New accounts for ESC CTRL and FAR ARDEN. I never want to hear THAT name again. Then I gather the folks I need to build a wireless mesh network, no permits, everything off the shelf pirate radio style, encrypted. Running in the back ground, the answer to everything. Learn and apply, Ethereum, Maidsafe, TOR and coding.

This is the greatest adventure I have ever been on, and its just beginning, thank you all, forward we go

john “quincy: adams = a living American endowed with all his natural rights John Quincy Adams = a foreign situs trust used in commercial shipping JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = a foreign estate trust John Q. Adams = a public transmitting utility company John q. Adams = a public foundation JOHN Q. Adams = a cooperative JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = a boat or ship used in public commerce JOHN QUINCY Adams = a commonwealth trust J. QUINCY Adams = a slave owned by Exxon Corporation J.Q. Adams = a foreign pauper forbidden to own land Adams, John Q. = a taxpayer ADAMS, JOHN Q. = a soldier adams, john q. = a slave

Is this right?

Today I received this response and they actually answered one of the questions. I have one more Notice to send (3rd) on the issue of the Surety and Security of the PERSON LEE EDGELY. Is this an incomplete Bill, that I have to complete?

This is the link to my last post on this Local Property Tax (LPT) https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/618967074805895/

. . . . It's reported by a few so-called journalists writing for the judicial industry that clerks that provide the service of receiving, registering and archiving commercial liens cannot refuse to provide that process to anyone including "terrorists" as all commercial liens presented to them at the registry office must be so registered by them. Such clerks (public servants) are considered unqualified, by their colleges in the industry,to determine whether any specific commercial lien is legitimate or illegitimate.

The "victims" of "bogus" or "false" commercial liens established and presented for registry by the very scary and highly dangerous paper terrorists, seem to be frantically scrambling for relief from the dire circumstances these very fine and honourable "victims" find themselves.

I'm thinking these poor "victims" either don't remember the various notices they would have received or they are refaining mentioning those documents and communications from the "terrorists" as a means of better preserving their angelic and innocent radiance.

This information I found of value as it enlightens me when considered as a strategic "indicator" regarding the power, scope and robustness of commercial liens as a lawful and legal remedy for those in need . . . even for the lowly terrorist.

. . . . WANTED BLACK'S . . ONLINE OR DOWNLOADABLE . . Can you help me find?

Sounds like a big fat bully hypochondriac thing to do.

Can the private international banking monopoly at the top of the FRAUD CHAIN be subdued with the BLOCKCHAIN?

Too funny thought it would get us a good laugh.

Private message received from Will Zewe...

Will Zewe

Hey man i know you don't like private messages but I just wanted to ask to be accepted back into the tender for law. It's the only page I check daily and I don't comment or say anything because I'm still very new, learning, and a lil nervous to comment and say something that'll get me banned. I go back and read through the comments and posts Scott's made as much as possible as well as trying to keep up to date with the ongoing processes you guys are doing like with Quebec hydro and yourself. I would really like to be accepted back and remain a member. If you guys want me to show that I'm listening and reading and actually putting in effort to earn my worth I can definitely ask questions and like more things to show I'm there and listening. I have some questions about OID's that I've heard about. Id just really like to show you that I am trying to learn and TTFL really is the only source on Facebook I've found so far that's telling the truth and how it really is unlike the freeman crap.

hey guys thanks for accepting me back in this group! I enjoy reading all the info found with in and regard as valuable . I don't comment because i am still learning to researching all info I receive.

When this came across my timeline all I could think is "The CREATOR is the OWNER of that THING".

Posted by Robert Menard: "People who claim the government owns your name because you are registered as a person with them, cannot point to a claim made by the government to support that position.

People who claim that using a registered name is fraud cannot point to anyone ever being charged with fraud for using their own name.

People who claim it is a slave name and you have been enslaved do not understand the legal status known as 'bonded'.

If you listen to Kate of Gaia, you MAY become more confused than they."

So I am now the owner of a brand new LLC :)

I feel quite excited.

Published on Jul 22, 2014

Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:00 (Manning)

Government and private entities are working to shred privacy and warehouse personal, relationship, and communications data. Once unimaginable surveillance technologies are being perfected and implemented. The most intimate details of lives are routinely and unthinkingly surrendered to data-gatherers. Is it still possible to be an anonymous whistleblower? Is it still possible to be anonymous at all? Your physical location and activities for the past ten years are known and have been logged. If you attend a church or synagogue or mosque or a demonstration or visit an abortion clinic or a "known criminal activity location" or meet with a "targeted person" or a disliked political activist, it is routinely recorded. Your finances, sexual orientation, religion, politics, habits, hobbies, and information on your friends and family are gathered, indexed, and analyzed. Facial recognition, camera analytics, license plate readers, and advances in biometrics allow you to be de-anonymized and remotely surveilled 24/7/365 by machines. Forensic linguistics, browser and machine fingerprinting, and backdoors substantially eliminate the possibility of anonymous Internet activity. Thanks to "The Internet of Things," your thermostat and electric meter report when you arrive home and your garbage can reports when you throw out evidence to be collected by the few remaining human agents. "Predictive profiling" even knows what you will do and where you will go in the future, so the data collection bots can be waiting for you. Data collection now begins at birth. And no data gathered will ever be thrown away. And none of the data gathered belongs to you or will be under your control ever again. An internationally-known private investigator and longtime HOPE speaker, Steve will describe in frightening detail how the last shreds of everyone's anonymity are being ripped away. Real world examples will be used. Surprises can be expected.

Speakers: Steve Rambam [Steve Rambam is the founder and CEO of Pallorium, Inc. (http://www.pallorium.com), a licensed investigative agency with offices and affiliates worldwide. He has coordinated investigations in more than 50 countries and in nearly every U.S. state and Canadian province. Steve has conducted or coordinated numerous foreign insurance-related investigations, including hundreds of homicide and "death claim" investigations, and a significant number of these cases have resulted in confessions, arrests, and prosecutions. He is perhaps best publicly known for his pro bono activities, which have included the investigation of nearly 200 Nazi collaborators and war criminals in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia. He has also coordinated efforts to expose terrorist groups' fundraising activities in the United States and has conducted investigations which resulted in the tightening of airport security in eight U.S. cities. Steve is currently co-authoring a non-fiction book, Stealing Your Own Identity, and he is the subject of a second non-fiction book, Rambam, P.I.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNZrq2iK87k#t=57

Hey, Chris Evan :P

Interesting vid on exponential growth.

From the WE GET LETTERS, Dept:

It seems the purge has hurt some feelings. :D

. . . Scott Duncan, Pete Daoust . . et all . . . Invoking contract law by conditionally accepting offers (tickets, letters demanding payment, statements and other presentment). What do you think?

UPDATE: I can not find the post about the driving licence I posted, anyway, I kept signing my name and added the Sole Authorised Administrator for the Person. They would not issue the licence unless the signature matched the name, it could only be Lee Edgely and nothing else. I notified them about everything and they didn't give a shit. It was either sign it or no licence, I ended up using the three ellipses and then signed, it was accepted. On the foundation document and the Licence.

Scott, does it happen, once in a while, that Roguesupport issue an invoice to a person, and that person settle the debt by sending Roguesupport a Bill of Exchange, with Bank of Canada as the drawee ?

8-|

Anyone have info on traveling abroad without a passport?

THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about.

SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY.

On the subject of liars:IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN, YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE! YOUR DELUSIONS ARE WHAT CAUSED ALL OF THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE. YOU HARM OTHERS WITH THOSE DELUSIONS. ADULTS WITH IMAGINARY FRIENDS ARE NOT ADULTS! THIS IS NOT A CHILDREN'S FORUM!

You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law.

TENDER - tender verb tendered ten·der·ing Definition of TENDER

transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century

THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW

This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST:

http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM

NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned.

Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so.

Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected.

Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN.

And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D

...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted.

Unless otherwise stated, BY DEFAULT, anything Scott. and/or Tara Duncan publishes, in THE TENDER FOR LAW, is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License:

1) You MUST say where it came from (Tara, Myself, or THE TENDER FOR LAW group)

2) You CANNOT derive works from it

3) You CANNOT MAKE MONEY off it.

Make all the money you like off of "Scottisms"

TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES.

PEREMPTORY NOTICE:

ALL WRITINGS PUBLISHED HERE BY AQUILAE AND/OR ITS TRUSTEES AND/OR ITS GRANTORS, ARE, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, PUBLISHED under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

There is/was a post about "Jason Moreland" being allegedly arrested/charged. I cannot see that thread now, because the one that posted the thread either BLOCKED me, or left/deleted his Facebook account, after I made him a simple question: ("Profile name" that I cannot remember now), are you Bildo Schmildo?

The account in question was created just one day before posting the "Jason Moreland" thread. Bildo Schilmo was the only friend this other profile had. Bildo is friends here with the accounts of Chris Evan, and Dean Clifford.

Who the fuck is this guy posting all this out of the blue? Anyone has the profile name? Can anyone still see the thread?

I am just letting everyone know what is going on.

Pete Daoust: Your purging techniques require a little refinement. There was only ONE rule to follow to avoid The Purge: COMMENT IN THAT THREAD. I've just received a message from a second member whom you have removed, despite their compliance with the guidelines laid out.

Anyone who commented there, stays. Anyone who survived the last purge, STAYS. Feel free to remove the rest. Is that clear enough?

I have been trying to find a thread in the old posts that discusses employment and contracting. I am sure it has been covered here somewhere, (if someone can find it, perhaps a bump please?). If it has not, could we start a new thread? I have a few questions, and I am sure they are already answered here somewhere :)

MOST of you didn't get this back in 2011... Look at it again.

' Under the terms of the legislation that took effect last month, banks must share all personal and joint account details of anyone DEEMED to be a “U.S. person.” ' The can't steal enough from their own CITIZENS to pay their debts so they must steal from other country's citizens lol! Just another sign that the end is near for the greenback!

Alright Pete thought I should share this :)

This is after a third letter to QRA about using the PERSON'S SURETY vs income tax...

Talked to 2 ladies at QRA over the phone yesterday, who both seemed pretty lost, even though they DID seem to understand that I was NOT the PERSON, that I wish they dont call me MISTER "FIRST NAME LAST NAME TITLE" (one of them even said "ok William but this call is being recorded and I must say "VOUS" and "MISTER", to which I replied "then each time I'll have to correct you on this"), that I HAVE a tax payer but I'm not the tax payer... I even had that girl lookup the legal definition of SURETY and read Article I of the Qc Charter while over the phone, I literally explained EVERYTHING to her... and at some point she said "I dont think I'm able to answer this question, but here's the number to talk to an agent who will be qualified to do it..." (Second lady)

Some times I wonder what those ladies tell to their man and kids when they get home about that guy who called and said he was not the person ?

Long story short, they left a voice message this morning : "Unfortunately, we cannot handle your request"

What's so hard ? "Is it TRUE that I have the RIGHT to administrate those public debts through the PERSON's SURETY ?" Yes or no ??

So I guess I'll soon be preparing a preremptory notice... Just after I'm done writing up to Heath Insurance "hey which date of birth they want on your form ??"

And I know I know I need a new phone with a recorder app :/

Morning Mates

I did a release of Claim and interest for a simple traffic case, ever since I filed it the Prosecutor won't talk with me....thoughts

Well just had some ahole come to the door saying he was the sherriff and I have 1 week to get out...how do I secured party creditor inforce the UCC that I submitted 2years ago with this property listed on the UCC

ii. The Security of the Person Interest

[97] I turn now to consider whether as the crown contends the trial judge erred by expanding the scope of security of the person on the facts of this case. http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/CA/14/03/2014BCCA0322.htm

A financial agent of the federal Marijuana party has the right to freedom of association and contracr, to remit a 10% party tax (jest not) to a vested body in that electoral district, For example the Algonquin band have not ceded their lands upon which Bytown/Ottawa is built., by accepting this federal tax they regain rights to administer and defend this territory, where the funds are collected (MJTickets and/or potcoin) and remitted within the federal electoral district.

Holy Fuck. I have slowly trying to de program my wife. She listens to this fucking fraud named Bashar. He claims to be able to channel an alien consciousness. However the fucker makes shit loads of fiat currency for his seminar. Fuck what a brutal fight we just had. She swears she is gonna lawyer up and divorce me. I kindly explained we are not really married that was the point of declining the marriage contract. Fuck her programs run deep. She had this lash out at me yelling in my face. "Do you want me to kill myself, just like Robin Williams you want me to kill myself." So I asked her how she got so confused. Fuck. Sorry basically just wanted a rant. I love my wife and kids. But the reality we are all looking dad in face she somehow is unable to see. Keeps insisting it's not her reality. And the accuses me of bringing this reality to her door. What the Fuck am I supposed to do next. Is this maybe a good part of the de program process. Oh Fuck

Really? Wow! The Toronto Star is FINALLY catching on. This is so FUCKING obvious you'd have to be a complete IDIOT not to see it. The only gang that threatens my saftey is the LEGALized gang also known as POLICE.I am BELLIGERANT and in TRAINING because what will inevitably unfold will not play favourites and will take no prisoners.

Maybe one last shot before I freeze PIERRE DAOUST ?

Thoughts ??...this shit comes right from my brain, and it's not legal advice, and not a recommendation of some sort....

I just use logic, and spew it out of my brain :D , so BE CAREFUL.

Ok, there’s a lot of UNANSWERED questions, from the Sole Authorized Administrator, addressed to the TRUSTESS.

1). Can I use PIERRE DAOUST’s surety to discharge public debts? 2). What birth date should I put on this health care card renewal form? 3). Where are all these Bill of Exchange I have sent to Hydro-Quebec?

So, this cause a situation where PIERRE DAOUST has no health care card, no driver’s license and, me, as the sole authorized administrator for PIERRE DAOUST, I am having a hard time to use PIERRE DAOUST to do commerce with :D , AND IT’S NOT MY FAULT”.

So, I am planning on sending a PROPER NOTICE to all these PUBLIC TRUSTEES who refuses to answer my SIMPLE questions.

_________________________________________________________

Dear PUBLIC TRUSTEES,

Since you are NOT doing your job, by not answering my SIMPLE questions, I have no other choices but to BELIEVE that you don’t want me to use this person, I happen to have, to do commerce with, so you are putting ME, the sole authorized administrator for PIERRE DAOUST, in a situation where I just CANÂT administrate correctly, and in good faith, the person named PIERRE DAOUST 119XXXXXXXXXX.

Be advise that from this day, I will send you ALL the administration duties concerning PIERRE DAOUST, because I just CANÂT take care of these duties, without these ANSWERS.

And since YOU are the party with SURETY in regards to the person named PIERRE DAOUST 119XXXXXXXXXX, I am sure you will know what to do with it.

With all my love.

Sole Authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST 119XXXXXXXXXX

BLOCK CHAIN vs BANKING FRAUD CHAIN

George Soros Goes Short the US Stock Market and Buys Gold Stocks

So I renewed an expired driving license today... Very difficult to consciously request permission from the club to do something having learned so much here and being of a nature that loathes the presumption of authority over me ... :/

It also got me thinking about checkpoints/road stops by cops on the roads.

The legislation that they are acting upon is all passed by "The Oireachtas" (The Irish Houses of Parliament). It is then signed into "law" by their president "The President of Ireland"...

The OIreachtas is a company listed with Dunn & Bradstreet...

So, are all state departments merely a form of sub-contractor for the Oireachtas? Carrying out work as per the legislation and taking a cut for their services? i.e. A Guard/Cop checkpoint...

(I've also added a snippet from the application form for the license... You can imagine how it felt so wrong filling this thing out but I need to have no hassle on the roads for my job)...

As far as "property taxes" go... would not one BILL for the maintenance of the city's part of the property, such as upkeep of the lawn and maintaining the snow/ice on the sidewalks? Would that not be worth (in labour) approximately $6000 of credit per year?

We do not work for FREE? Correct? Since that is what fiat monetary system is worth, our labour/time?

Also in that respect, could you not bill, then lien said property for the time you have spent on this said upkeep? Scott?

I had an interesting interaction today with some guy trying to serve a summons on a person named 'STUART G STONE'.

From memory, the exchange was very similar to this:

Him: Are you STUART G STONE?

Me: Who are you and what do you want?

Him: I'm (name) and I need to serve some papers on 'STUART G STONE', are you STUART G STONE?

Me: At times I administrate matters for that name. What is this regarding?

Him: These are documents from Pioneer Credit (debt collection agency), for STUART G STONE. Are you STUART G STONE?

Me: Isn't that a name derived from a public document or an account or something? I may have that but how can I be that?

Him: What do you mean? I'm just here to serve these papers.

Me: Do you have a birth certificate?

Him: Yes

Me: Is it yours?

Him: Yes

Me: Are you sure? I mean, if it is yours, you can sell it right?

Him: Well no.

Me: Then how is it yours? Can you sell the shoes you are wearing?

Him: If someone wants to buy them, yes.

Me: So you can sell them, but not the birth certificate.

Him: Correct.

Me: So you can't sell the birth certificate because it is not yours. In fact it says on the top who created it. It is signed on the bottom by the registrar, being the only signature on the thing, so I suggest you deliver whatever it is you wish to deliver to STUART G STONE, to the people who created the birth certificate.

Him: I understand what you're saying, so you're saying that you're not STUART G STONE then.

Me: I'm a man. How could I be STUART G STONE? If I claim to be that, wouldn't I be attempting to claim something I'm not?

Him: I understand what you're saying, so you're not STUART G STONE then?

Me: I have already answered your questions.

With that, he left...this was on a Sunday morning.

I doubt this is the end of this. I'm now waiting for him to show up where STUART G STONE is listed as working.

My concerns: It seemed all too polite and too easy so far. Is it because I kept answering a question with a question? Is it because he didn't have guys in magic blue suits to back him up and coerce me into accepting joinder? What, if anything did I miss?

Also, from those with experience: What can I expect next? Is there likely to be an enforcement order in the future that will need to be dealt with? Is there likely to be a visit from the men with the magic blue suits?

The matter seems to be related to a debt recovery agency claiming to be the assignee of an alleged debt. They were requested, by registered mail, to provide a copy of the deed of assignment and/or a copy of the original contract and/or a bill, so that the alleged matter may be dealt with.

They failed on 3 occasions, made a false entry on the credit score, which I challenged successfully and had the false entry removed.

This seems to be the next card they are trying to play. Any critiques/suggestions/observations are welcomed for learning purposes,

Thanks.

As promised.

...Sorry Chase ;)

Just an example of a form, I don't recommend RBC and not sure which institution will hold the Accounts. Any input Scott would be great :)

I fucking love this group! I've really come to enjoy the benefits of being a member here. I've still got a lot of freedumb to forget about, and a mountain of learning to discuss.

I am eternally grateful to the admiral, his good captains and all the participating members here. Thank you.

This is a fun one - SO i had a friend administer my 2011 tax return a few years back in Holland. The tax return paid out 10.x. in my favor since one box for "double tax" was clicked in the online application (having paid tax in Holland and in my home country) The calculation was made by the software, online for this amount and was stated that this is what i would receive.

The person received this amount in bank account. The person used this money to survive for a year without work. Since, returned account to state of zero!

The Tax office somehow thinks there was some kind of "MISTAKE" and sent a letter 2014 - Te Betal (To Pay) 10,500 Euros - Asking for said 'tax-back-mistake' money back.

How to administer such a request ? given that: 1. Person is Expat living in Holland - without dutch skills 2. Person is broke, without assistance from government

I've been told to Administer that shit ... I expect to: 1. Notice of mistake 2. Bill for goods and services 3. ask if surety covers the debt

is this correct? Do i need to have a registered company to administer the person?

We thought we would share the following.

The Australian Government is trying its best to kill Bitcoin which is the biggest threat to its survival since its inception. If they make it difficult for people to use because they want to tax it twice, then they will find it backfires because people will just not declare it instead.

Nothing can stop the Bitcoin Users Org, it is here to stay, and cryptocurrencies are the future of money whether they like it or not.

The Australian Tax Office has issued guidelines on how it will tax bitcoin,...

Question in private from Adrian Thomson....

Pete, If I may ask you a question please... After I have incorporated, a Delaware LLC, how do I open a bank account for this new company without linking it to the person in my pocket? I was in to a CIBC here in Nova Scotia, and they want shareholder information, but I don't see how I can show them that it is the MAN that created this thing, not the PERSON. Do you have any thoughts on that?

I just had a "eureka" moment today. The word PERSONNE in french litterally translates to NOBODY... Since a PERSON is NOBODY (NO BODY) it REQUIRES a BODY to act as surety for it! That BODY can be our own, or a BODY POLITIC such as CANADA. I think I'm starting to get that "hidden in plain sight" thing Scott keeps rambling on about.

Now please remind me how stupid I am so I can further educate myself.

:D

Ok, WHO is Kevin Nomoreninetofive Freeman ?

And WHY do you invite Eudeen Henry in here ? :/

Alert !!!!!

I think I figured out the ACCOUNTING thing....

If there's a credit, a debit must be.

If there's a debit, a credit must be.

The End :/

I regretfully ask that the Admins remove me, or I will leave the Group. As an Honest Man, I'll not hide the fact that I believe that without God the creator, I the the Human would not be here. As much as I learn, and now begin to realize The legal side of things, The actual "freedom " I can have. I'd rather not be "found" or thought to be an agent or "spy" or law enforcement or any other enemy. Merely seeking The truth of my actual "rights" as a Human as well as being able to break free from the Name. Thnx.

Notice of Resignation....please critique...

It has recently come to my startling attention that due to my behavior in previous exchanges with the government that I may have lead you to believe that I am one of your employees, persons, subjects, and/or agents. For the record, I HAVE some of your persons, but I AM NOT one of your persons and it is not my fault. The party with surety for the persons can be found on the Certificate of Live Birth held by the Department of Vital Statistics.

If by: applying for and/or using a Drivers License; registering for and/or Voting; “acting like a” Citizen; applying for and/or using a Social Security Number; applying for and/or using Health Insurance; filling out any paperwork and/or remitting payment to any taxing department; exhibiting any other such behavior that may be construed as being an employee, and/or subject, and/or agent of any government entity, it has lead anyone to believe that I am an employee, a subject, and/or an agent of any government entity, and/or accepted subject and/or citizen status, that would be a mistake, please forgive me.

As such, I wish to resign from all presumed, implied, expressed, and/or construed government employment, service, and/or agency effective on January 16, 2014 (A notarized copy of UCC 201409xxxxxx is enclosed). I wish to waive any benefits of said employment, service, and/or agency. I no longer wish to be presumed to be a “citizen” and/or a “subject” of the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS nor the UNITED STATES.

A Trustee Corporation, PBIDDY, Inc. 300 Andover Street Suite 120 Peabody, MA 01960, has been entrusted to perform any further administration regarding CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE (Birth Registration Number 4921xxxx and Social Security Number xxx-xx-xxxx) and/or any derivative of said accounts.

If you have any questions regarding this NOTICE please contact the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE, ONLY IN WRITING, at the administration offices of: PBiddy, Inc 300 Andover St. Suite 120 Peabody, MA 01960.

If they do not receive a response from you or your Organization within 10 days, it will be accepted that there are no objections to this resignation.

Should this be more specific to each department? DMV? SSA? etc....

What the fuck is that means.....really :(

If a man by his receipt acknowledges that he has received money from an agent on account of his principal, and thereby accredits the agent with the principal to that amount, such receipt is, it seems, conclusive as to the payment by the agent.

Admiral, Would I be welcome in your navy if I showed up with this ready for duty? I would be able to administrate the fuck out of anything with this!

I have questions about resignation. Since I don't want to hijack Chris's thread with them, I will ask on a fresh one. As someone who does electrical work, I have gone through the system and acquired "red seal" licenses for that trade. In order to get those licenses, I had to show "government ID" in the form of a drivers license. So, these licenses have been issued to my person, and not to ME.

In order to resign, I would have to send those back, correct?

If I intend to operate in commerce through the use of a fresh person (corporation) that I control, how would I do that without those licenses?

The license does not change any of my abilities/knowledge/skills in the field of electrical work. The problem as I see it boils down to insurance. If the customer wants a job done, they call a guy to do it. He then gets a "permit" and does the work. The work then gets "inspected". If there is no "permit" the customer risks their insurance being void.

In order to get around this, the corporation could simply "hire" a person with a license to satisfy the customer's permit requirements. That would allow ME to practise electrical stuff. But, this seems cumbersome.

Does anyone have anything that they could comment on this? Am I not thinking of the right questions? If so, please comment...

We are winning!

I have a question: Is "The Tender for Law" set to become a DAO once Ethereum launches?

I Came across this GREAT video this morning -

Batman has a discussion with a REAL fucking ass clown.. a FAR bigger clown than the joker

I know I shouldn't be surprised but I'm actually amazed. Pretty much EVERYTHING Menard says is fucked up in some way. This chimp is ACTUALLY a guru??

Between Menard and Clifford, no wonder the FREEDUMB movement is in such shambles...

As far as I'm concerned, the one with a brain in video is Batman. He knows to ask questions and request proof of claim. Very wise advice.

I dedicate this one to Scott - enjoy the laugh, Me and Bev sure fuckin' did!

Shepard Smith forwarded this. The LACK of Free-Dumb is refreshing. He just walked the viewer through the path he took.

He still misses the THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW (Code?) part though. WITH that knowledge, this makes for VERY informative viewing.

Has anyone ever heard of peacemaker society? This guy in winnipeg named Marcel Bassett. He is freedumb to the max. Actually sells freedom packages for 1500 a piece. His freedumb packages are premade notice of claim of right. I asked him what rights he is claiming from a corporation that does not provide rights. I keep asking if he uses legal tender and he says he disagrees then he banned me from his group. http://www.peacemakersociety.org He is also on Facebook.

Scott told me on the phone once that the District Attorneys have one job...to ATTORN me out of my natural SUI JURIS status and into the jurisdiction of the DISTRICT. Of course it has taken me 2 months to think of this next question, but....what DISTRICT?

It occurred to me that Massachusetts has counties, Towns, Cities, all of which are encompassed within a State. But, there are no DISTRICTS. So which DISTRICT exactly am I being ATTORNED to? As I think about this, I notice the DISTRICT of Columbia and the 12 Federal Reserve DISTRICTS. The DISTRICT of Columbia is in fact synonymous with the UNITED STATES. As we know, "these notes shall be obligations of the UNITED STATES", so we have the SURETY. The Federal Reserve of course, provides the ACCOUNTING, along with the IRS which uses the ZIP Codes for their DISTRICTS.

Then, I started thinking about your CROWN Attorneys. WTF exactly is the CROWN to which they attorn you to?

Just started a French facebook group called "La sûreté de SA personne"

For those who understand French...but The Tender for Law is my preferred group :P

Monday, August 25, 2014 Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce, Hold the Taxes Burger King is working on a whopper of a deal, the acquisition of the Canada-based Tim Hortons restaurant chain. The acquisition would create the world's third-largest fast-food and fast-casual restaurant company, with more than 18,000 outlets in 100 countries and about $22 billion in system sales, the companies said in a statement.

The deal would be considered an inversion, that is, Burger King would become a Canadian company as far as U.S. taxes law is concerned. Specifically, inversions allow companies to transfer money earned outside the U.S. to the parent company without paying additional U.S. taxes, in this case the parent company will have a Canadian address.

I say Burger King should go for it. As Ludwig von Mises noted, capitalism breathes through loopholes.

Note the names of anyone who decries Burger King's use of this loophole, they are apologists for the state.

Anyone ever read this ???? The Supreme Court discusses the issue of slavery and peonage quite succinctly in the case of Alonzo Bailey v. State of Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, (1911). Suffice it to say that the court held that contracts of peonage may be breached by either party at any time with impunity because contracts for peonage are unconstitutional. This is a landmark and very important case and the authors recommend that the readers obtain and study it. It is available http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=219&page=219

I have a question. When I asked for the Live Birth Registration, I was NOT asked for MONEY in return, and I even received it REGISTERED MAIL.

WHY ? :)

Pete.

2004 - they figure it out. I figured it out at 13 :P

This...

This showed up in my hood this morning

Seems like a legalization of Breach of Trust. They don't seem to care for hiding it any longer

Copyrighting land? What do you make of this Scott N Tara?

Hey... your not allowed to say silence is agreement but corporations can...got it now fuck off and stop trying to foist contracts on them ... lol ..

Dear Sirs,

Bobis sorry.

Bobis did not mean to omitt or make errors. Bobis did not mean to fuck up or demean anything. Bobis meant to say "hay... I know something.. but, feck not everything." Bobis was verifying. ( back bone supplements) Bobis will carry on.

Me.

going to be administrating my first debt soon, water charges in Ireland coming out in January..packages been delivered on prices soon have to be signed and returned, which is the contract agreeing and consenting , im only in this group since may so I've took in as much as possible since but i do no not to mention the imaginary friend to scott , anyway id like to get the right formula together for this bullShit debt..captain Pete i need your help

So I am planning to order a seal so that I can ADMINISTRATE for my lady and am wondering what information I use on the seal since she does not possess a Canadian Birth Certificate (being born in another country). I recall reading that the number on the Citizen-SHIPCard would be used in this case(can't find the thread however). Is this correct Admiral Scott?

I also noticed that unlike the Birth Certificate (which has two signatures the back of this citizenship card only has one signature (which reads MINISTER) and that her signature is on the front. This lead me to ask "Who exactly is surety?" since it is clear that this card is evidence that a new person was created. Is this similar to the scenario with the Driver's Licence where the woman IS PRESUMED to be the person because of her photo and signature and does this make her SURETY?

I recall the recall reading that the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA becomes surety when that PERSON is tranferred from the old jurisdiction. This seems like an opportunity to provide deeper insights for those who were born in a jurisdiction different from where they currently live especially when it comes to ADMINISTRATING such a PERSON.

Talked to a nice man yesterday. He informed me that in Detroit there are kids with semi automatic weapons that are apart of gangs that roam the streets and scope out on rooftops.

I replied "You're kidding..."

Also, the city shuts down power to blocks and blocks of homes at night. Because the city is "so broke".

I guess I didn't know how bad things were really getting in the US.

From Norah Holloway.

Hey Chris, “Demand for the service has increased dramatically"

Come Back Lindsey! Everyone is welcome at THE TENDER FOR LAW.

Scott Duncan added Lindsey Davis to the group. 14 mins Lindsey Davis Lindsey Davis's photo. Lindsey Davis LikeLike —

Scott Duncan ...Joined Facebook 5 DAYS ago.

...and joins THE TENDER FOR LAW. (A SECRET group)...See More 12 mins · Edited · Unlike · 2 Tara Duncan I don't know. Seems perfectly fine to me. Hot blonde with what looks like an alcoholic drink. Locked down Facebook page. Yep, nothing to see here. 9 mins · Like Scott Duncan So... Trap, then? 7 mins · Unlike · 1 Tara Duncan Trap! 7 mins · Like · 2 Tara Duncan Let's not get too carried away just yet. Everybody knows alcoholic party girls can keep a secret, no? 7 mins · Like · 1 Scott Duncan They really need to work on figuring out my taste in women... Watch more of the works of Paul F. Little, for my "type", guys! This one doesn't do it for me. 4 mins · Like Scott Duncan ...plus the fact that she joined facebook 5 days ago, and "stumbled into" the SECRET group, THE TENDER FOR LAW... as "party girls" do. 2 mins · Like David-Paul Sip Hmmmm...the picture is fine in appearance but the substance seems to be lacking. Must be a blonde thing. Could also be a case of your reputation preceding you. Maybe this Lindsay joined Facebook just for you Admiral Possible and yet me thinks definitely a trap. 2 mins · Like · 1 Tara Duncan Do they EVER! Perhaps Lindsey will drop by and regale us with the fascinating story of how she came to join the group. I'll wait. 1 min · Like · 1 Lindsey Davis Why'd you invite me to this retarded group?

Ladies and Gentlemen:

What follows is probably going to be the most informative thread ever posted on THE TENDER FOR LAW. I have come up with the ultimate format.

You see, dear members, a disgruntled AGENT with a prefabricated Facebook page that would make the most seasoned spammers blush, keeps messaging me privately talking about all the "harm" I'm doing; and keeps citing lies and half truths and a bunch of presumptions. He then brought Gail Marie into it. I'm not sure if anyone remembers Dan Wilson [ https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100006985755010 ]

For thirty years I've dealt with different flavours of this ilk, but this is the first time I have ever been able to do THIS.

I'm going to respond to absolutely everything he says in private messages, in a useful, succinct and productive way so all of you can follow along...

This type of AGENT wields a double-edged sword of half-truths. The dialogue is long and is ongoing, and to neutralize any accusations of "editing" I shall be posting screen captures of each bit of the conversation that I'm replying to. This will teach all of you how to respond to "ass-hats" who use the same methods, and most of all it will show when a government agenda is in play.

Let's start with his very first message to me:

In anticipation of my CITIZENSHIP article, I remind you that if you are AMERICAN, you must PAY TO RESIGN!

...seriously.

And they just bumped up the rates.

We're being blocked by FB ... pls acknowledge if this comment is posted.

This sounds familiar!

I guess they are just "Arrogant" and "Crazy" too, huh? :D

Jadran Od Obitelji Pu—ar

Hi man! I'm interested why there is no group ''tender for law'' on facebook profile that I use, so as you were played the administrator role for that group, would you please explain to me, did you just expelled my user profile from it or did you erase the group? Thank you in advance.

:(

"The new ONTARIO BAR ASSOCIATION president has also lived with the torment of depression, the sense of bone-deep worthlessness and lacerating self-disgust. He came close, in fact, to taking his own life." Sounds like he had it right!

This documentary is going to cause some anger and might get stuck in your craw. It is full of examples of what not to do as parents or accused. It also shows the "railroad" procedures of not just cops and judges but some of the accomplices who go along - pretending nescient - for a paycheck. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2925642/

If I had children, I'd want to know how to be able to protect "them" from being Stolen, Abused, and/or Killed by the state's mob. I realize this is a large subject but am compelled to ask... Can I administrate a child's person? Can that person be in the same trust I have my person?, Would I need to create a separate trust for that person? Do I qualify as an administrator or am I about to be cannon fodder. :/

Forgive me for this. This really happened. I want off of this moronic planet.

No fucking way.

So I just spoke with a liar and asked if three signatures on an affidavit would be accepted by the courts as a sworn affidavit. NO, was the answer I was given.

Having fun with some freedumbers here. I have not received any answers to my questions, I received one piece of advice though, Endthe Roman cult said: Pol watch some Robert Menard, he will unconfuse you", hahahaha what a joke :)

:P

Further to our previous post about Facebook being suspect of accessing data from Facebook users iPhones. With the exception of celebrity nude photo hacks, the following has just come to light, which "may" provide support:

The major leak of nude celebrity photos last weekend was made possible by software designed to let law enforcement lift data from iPhones with ease. The software is used in tandem with a tool made public recently that can crack Apple iCloud passwords.

According to Wired, hackers talk openly on the anonymous image forum Anon-IB about their use of EPPB, or Elcomsoft Phone Password Breaker, to download data from iCloud storage backups.

EPPB and like programs work to reverse engineer smartphone software to access a device’s data, but only with the aid of iBrute, the password-guessing software for iCloud. The iBrute software, recently released by security research Alexey Troshichev, was made to exploit a flaw in Apple’s 'Find My iPhone' feature to lift users’ iCloud passwords, running through numerous attempts to crack the account before eventual success.

Used in tandem with iBrute, “EPPB lets anyone impersonate a victim’s iPhone and download its full backup rather than the more limited data accessible on iCloud.com,” Wired reported. This provides far more data for hackers, including videos, application data, contact information, and text messages, according to Jonathan Zdziarski, a forensics consult and security researcher. http://rt.com/usa/185452-hack-celebrity-photos-police/

ok once again from the dept of learning as I go along....this was included in the liars package for the hearing related to his application to have the lien removed. I'm trying to figure out exactly what is going on with this. It appears based on the court clerks comment that they have filed a notice of bankruptcy for GAIL AND LARRY. If this is the case, they have done so without the consent of GAIL AND LARRY. Of course this is yet another charge to the liar for unauthorized use of the name.. is anyone aware of a "law" that makes this action by the liar and the court clerk legal?

Anyone have information related to this site to educate and help others Dean Clifford mentioned that we already have insurance when we travel but I still need more info on this matter Thank you all please post information and join the this page and share to others, Insurance is a scam you pay and pay and when you need to collect they fight you tooth and nail I know this for a fact i was seriously injured and i was in court for years with little or no compensation at all

Thank you

https://www.facebook.com/travelordrive

If, hypothetically of course, I happen to know someone who is in federal jail, for a 2 year sentence, and I explain to him SURETY, would it be a good idea for him to send this ? :/

Dear Attorney General of Canada,

I am in jail now, in a federal prison for two years, and I just been explained by a friend, what is the SURETY of the person.

I have no problem staying here for two years, but do I have the right to ask for $150k from the surety of my person, for my time passed in here ?

I really wish I'd new about the surety sooner.

Thanks

No Surety Jack. Sole Admin for JACQUES.

Question: Where does a municipality get their authority and or jurisdiction to impose by-law(s) from?

Backstory: I have to do some repairs to this house I am in, and according to the by-laws here I have to ask permission via a permit application, and then subject myself to inspections which I find to be a bit invasive. In this town the by-law inspector/building code guy is pretty nosey, and I know that he will be visiting me... :)

I had read that it derives from the municipalities act (which I've read quickly and didn't find the answer), and I've reviewed my purchase agreement, but I can't seem to find where I've agreed to it so that I can fix it. Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction.

Thanks in advance for any and all comments guys :)

Not that these guys are particularly relevant but they claim to have blocked Scott. I'm sure he's just devastated. Ha! Oh and there's this Brad Morrison asshole making some bullshit claims too.

I've been blocked from the Dean Clifford's page, by an AGENT, not Dean but an ANONYMOUS AGENT.

I wonder WHY ?? ....EVERYTHING I have wrote on his page was TRUE !! :/

I've read (because I read everything :P ) that some Aquilae Vessels might float in waters near Quebec......for a mission of some sort.....now, that is fucking exciting !! :D

This is just the beginning of RECEIVERSHIP. NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN.

Had a court appearance today and was escorted out of the court by their bully officers cause the judge didnt want to answer my questions about SURETY and that was after he left me for last. Since 830am fuckers called me and when I started to speak they interrupted me and told me to sit cause they needed to talk. So Monday will be another day abroad their ship.

Liening the municipality ?

OK so last year, before I was on TT4L, I delivered a notice, to the municipality, because they blew snow from the public way onto the private walkways of the property...

I'm taking care of removing the snow myself, but in september last year I exploded a shoulder, a very serious injury, which took 3 months before I could even start training it again, so I really didn't wanna have to clean any unwanted mess from the municipality.

They were served a letter/notice from William Bedard - which I didnt sign - that if that ever happened again, they would be invoiced.

The clerk at the front desk signed it when she received it and the first line said "Please inform every person concerned with this notice".

Of course, a few weeks later, they blew 3 ft of wet snow on the private walkways of the property on a icyrainy day, and I had to clean that mess.

I called the municipality to get an idea with their fees were if a private person were to blow snow from the private property to public ways, and I invoiced accordingly, $600, using the PERSON I have, which his registered with a business and tax #'s...

Took them a few months to follow up on this, claiming the Cities and Towns Act removes any responsibility from the municipality when a contractor they hire causes damages, and I should direct any claim to "the wrong contractor"...

Took another 2 months before "the wrong contractor" informed us that they weren't in charge of that area, so the municipality FWD the claim to the "actual contractor"... That's roughly 6 months after the municipality were initially invoiced...

This contractor made a counter offer of 150$ "in good faith", on the phone, which was obviously refused, saying the municipality never fwd'ed the original notice to them... They say even though I have photographic evidence snow was blown from the street to the private ways all the way along the property and they are the only ones with a contract to remove the snow from that street, there's no proof they did it.

Now the municipality claims no responsibility whatsoever, and that any claim should be handled though the small claims court vs their contractor...

I never contracted with those mofos, nor was ME or the PERSON ever informed that the municipality hired a contractor for that...

Apparently, there's a letter in the mail officially saying they don't give a shit, which they say they sent yesterday... Good to hear there will be one more proof of their dishonour and/or breach of public trust in my records...

Obviously, I have no fuckin intention of taking this to small courts. there's no contract between the PERSON and the municipality's contractor, the municipality is the party which must honour the public contract they have with their citizens, they received the notice and the invoice and never rebutted any of those 2.

Would this be enough to go ahead and lien the fuckers ? Should I lien them using the PERSON I have ? I still don't have a PERSON I can trust. Should I meet a justice to explain everything before moving fwd with this ?

There's the municipality, then there's a bank in my scope... I wanna make sure I don't take a bite at something I cannot chew...

Scott ? Gail ? Beverly ? Anyone else has any input on this ?

Frenglish translation of "God save the Queen".

"Pierre save PIERRE DAOUST."

hahahaha !!! :-D

Now and then a penny drops here and there... A dot finds another dot friend and joins forces...

Just this morning I joined the obvious dot of one's own crypto currency being the self issued credit vouchers from the money as debt marketplace... Took me a while but there it is...

So my "Eamonn-coin" will be worth 2 hrs of live music as opposed to a monetary value, the 2hrs being what money IS... This new system of trade is the ultimate goal...

Thinking out loud here...

All Govt employees are personally responsible for their actions.

Fucking awesome just got a call from the state attorney office! Cased closed State will not prosecute. I said I know they never did answer my questions of SURETY. Bitch ask me on the phone oh how you doing like she meant it.. Yeah yeah yeah AGAIN NOTICE OF MISTAKE VICTORY.

Council rates have just come in so time to ask the question. This is the body of v1.0. I'd love to hear your input to determine if its a shit stain or not. Thanks

RE: Council Rates

Dear Cr Nunn,

As you, Cr Nunn, are Mayor for Hume City Council, I thought it appropriate to correspond directly with you regarding a question I have.

Regarding the Rates Notice for the 2014/15 financial year, addressed to the above named Person, can the Surety/Security of the Person be used to settle this public debt?

My wish is for a response within 10 days from date of this Notice

Without ill-will, vexation or frivolity

Sole Authorised Administrator for MR A M DAY Registration Number 81123/XXXX TFN 214 XXX XXX

I got around to finishing this. Point out errors in the here, NOT on my timeline. :P

Thoughts?

:)

“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life.”......................................Osama bin Laden

(October 2001), as reported by CNN

Hey Scott, how does one having the understanding of Law and self-governance relate to your understanding and application of Anarchist ideologies, such as Larken Rose's; I see you share some of his comments and thoughts.

How does one "navigate" in something as hierarchical as legal jurisdictions and something as complex as Legalese, wanting to restore the Executive Power of the Monarchy while on the other hand not wanting to be governed by anyone. I am to "ignorant" and "clueless" to see the connection and to point it as contradiction therefore I don't me to be an ass about it. I'm only starting my studies with the group. Yet, asking question will be my access to knowledge and understaning. Cheers!

(As I see it) With the signing of the FIPA, seeing how it is meant to "ultimately" coerce "citizenry of CANADA", as ignorant taxpayers, to eventually act (as public opinion) against the Treaty contracts with First Nations due to the inevitable and insurmountable tax funds extorted through "secret" courts and settlements, I have a question for Scott Duncan...

Entity A has a contract with entity B first, then entity B makes another contract with entity C. If the B&C contract caused the contract of A&B to be devalued in someway, wouldn't entity A have recourse against entity B?

Ask yourself "Pourquoi?"

I'd like to take a moment to remember the members of days past...

...I'd like to say that we miss you, but I can't seem to find the energy required to formulate such a lie convincingly.

In that spirit, I dedicate this post to LaNi Black.

Our "Black Chick" demograph has never recovered since she left.

FOR YOU LaNi!

Nolle Prosequi!! Again. Latin for Do not Prosecute. Notice of Mistake. Fuck yeah. Here is the proof. Friends be strong and stand your ground. This time I didn't mail it, I had to read it in court on the record while firing my so called bulllshit Lawyer. I was terrified but I overcame. Then after speaking I reminded thr court on the record that the Judge did not answer my questions. His only funny answer was oh you responded to your name when called, I said yes cause I am the sole Administrator for the Legal name. Then the bullies threw me out and locked the courtroom doors on me. Cop said I didnt have the right to talk to the judge anymore. Heard the judge complain to the state and his coworkers why wasnt he warned that I was a sovereign man. Hahahaha

I did good? I did good Meg?

From Dan Wilson, in private mail :D

Dan Wilson

By the way have you ever actually googled Security of the Person? You sound like an idiot talking about what you don't know.

For the first time while dealing with threatening letters from lawyers representing a toll road company, or any company for that matter, I'm actually quite annoyed... Before I may have been excited to try this or that and see what the outcome was, but now I'm pretty pissed off with their shit.

Making threats of legal action with no fucking evidence of surety in the matter... I've asked 3 times to provide evidence of surety and they've failed and now they threaten legal action?! I'm fuckin insulted!

If they can't show ME any evidence then what grounds are they gonna have to bring any legal action?!

Muppets...

OK...I'm considering sending a praecipe to have the court clerk issue a rule to have the NATIONAL BANK file a valid complaint...in relation to the claim/default judgement the liar got against 2 persons who have a zero balance account...any thoughts?

Interview between Marc Stevens and Jeff Berwick, just over one hour.

WHO is Bryan Parker ?

And why do you invite Brian something in here ?

Are you a LAWYER ? , or an ANTIScott Duncan ? :D

....Pssst!

THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A CERTIFICATION THAT A CROWN ORGANIZATION WAS ORGANIZED!

...pass it on!

Scott, projects like BitNation are on the go already. They offer governance services, for marriage, insurance, among other services. What happens to folks that use the LEGAL NAME that belongs to the old system, to IDENTIFY themselves as the NAME? Surety???

I just have problems seeing how a name that does not belong to the government can be used there. :/

I wonder how much violence would occur if folks realized they have that PERSON and it was lawyers that ATTORNed their bodies as SURETY for the PERSON?

Seems there is more crime occuring in Ontario prisons where the police aren't needed.

'Between 2001 and 2012, the number of police officers per 100,000 Canadians increased nearly 9 per cent — amidst a crime rate decline of 26 per cent...the number of Toronto police officers per 100,000 declined five per cent over the same period, while crime in the city dropped 41 per cent — making it “an interesting example of how more police doesn’t always mean less crime” '

Some of you guys may remember, back in april, I requested that the bank return the 20 000$ promissory note which was created when the PERSON contracted a car loan, a contract which was fully honored in may 2009.

It's taken a full 6 months, 5 or 6 registered letter communications, reminding 2 of their uncooperative agents what the law says, but it seems the last communication, sent directly to the Director of the bank's branch, made them comply :D

I just got a short, 6 lines letter, sent to the PERSON by the General Director, explaining who to contac in order to go get that promissory note back.

Is there anything I should be aware of and/or make sure they do or dont do when I go there to pick it up, except of course not ID ing as the PERSON ?

Or would it be a better option to have them sending it back to the PERSON, registered mail ?

Scott Duncan, could you give me some advice on this topic...irish water packages are been sent to all homes in Ireland ...Some people are sending them back with no Consent No contract ..there's even a site advising people to do this ...seemingly a woman posted saying she had 30years experience in law and that this is the wrong solution..I'd be grateful if you could help ?

The question is no longer whether Big Brother is watching us. The question is how many of his sibling state agencies are covertly tuning into our private communications?

Stock Market down 264 points, everybody go home !!! Apple screwed it up for everybody!!!...lol Didn't I warn you? Take care I said!!, for the evil one never rests....

Ok, the liar is demanding payment from GAIL BLACKMAN. As was previously suggested, the OWNER will be sent the endorsement to settle the account. I've put together a notice for the owner and would love any feedback (additions, deletions, misunderstandings that I may have)

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SETTLE COURT FILE CV-14-511026

Attention: Jacques L'Abbe, Deputy Registrar General of Ontario CC: Court File CV-14-611026 CC: Justice Graeme Mew, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Toronto

We are an agent of the Sole Authorized Administrator (PPSA Registration Number: xxxxxxxxxxx) of the person known as GAIL MARIE BLACKMAN. I write this in good faith with the intent to balance the Accounting of Court File CV-14-511026.

The Account, GAIL MARIE BLACKMAN, was charged and found liable. The woman, gail blackman, does not wish to act as the party with surety in the matter and has notified the Court (file) and Justice Mew. (See enclosed Notice of Mistake). . It is our understanding that you are the PRINCIPAL DEBTOR, and as a gesture of good will and good faith, we are forwarding Justice Mew's Endorsement to you with instructions to settle/set off the account.

It is our understanding that to proceed against a party who doesn’t have surety in the matter is, in fact, fraud. If we have made a mistake in this procedure and/or our understanding, please tell us, in writing, what we can do to help YOU settle the Accounting for this Account and we will be happy, willing, and able to administrate the matter.

Authorized by:

I have picked up a bill in Pierre Daoust's mail box from the hospital who refused to repair my body.

A bill of $1160.00, for having used their hospital to repair my body.

:-D .... Hahahaha !!!!

Can anyone pull this apart for me. I welcome all criticism. I came up with this after a long discussion with freedumb indians trying to demand there human rights from the government by petition. I told them to stop wasting their time and do something constructive. Like figuring out what joinder is.

This is in regards to so called treaty rights. So called Indians and retards who think the court gives a shit about any rights. The government holds our lands in trust under the various treaties. It doesn't have to honor those treaties any longer for the simple fact that the decendent of the signers have all been assimilated and integrated. Meaning there are no longer any people who can reserve treaty rights. You are a Canadian citizen first and a signatory treaty person second. So the group or race of people who can reserve treaty rights technically don't exist. They have been assimilated by joinder thru birth certificate and if there was any wiggle room the Indian act was created to flush it out.

. . . . . WHITE COLLR CRIMINAL HARASSMENT . . https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vXr-2hwTk58

JUST A QUICK REMINDER ABOUT WHAT THIS GROUP IS ABOUT/FOR.

LAW and MONEY are connected. When LAW is made from MONEY, it is "LEGAL". ("It's all surety and accounting").

MONEY is basically "favor vouchers". (The Admiral HATES that term!) You do something for someone and they give you some item (gold, beads, signed piece of paper, etc.) that society agrees gives you the right to call in that favor owed to you, but the cool thing is it doesn't even have to be from the person you did the original favor for! THIS IS KEY! TRANSFERABLE VALUE based on "laws" of MONEY.

The way BLOCKCHAIN CURRENCIES work, is instead of actually passing around gold or pieces of paper to record who did what for whom, a globally synchronized accounting ledger records this data in a cryptographically secure way. Since no tokens have to be physically transported, it is global and fast. But since no central authority controls it, it cannot be politically messed with, inflated, confiscated remotely, etc.

It's like gold that weighs nothing, that you can carry in your brain without anyone knowing, and that you can teleport anywhere in the world for a tiny fee or even no fee. You can do this with a few cents or a few million dollars just the same way.

What do you think of this situation? Have you heard of her?

. . . . . THE BANKS NIGHTMARE . . . . https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tR4e8zwnR6w

From the "WHERE IS THE SURETY" department :P

They came back yesterday, to my FRIEND Denis’s place.

Their goal was to steal and sell stuff, that happened to be sitting in a company, even though it’s the WRONG address, and the WRONG company.

The bailiff came with his BUYERS, there were at least 12 of these buyers” :D

So my friend Denis told them: “WRONG ADDRESS”, and this bailiffs started his usual threats, and he said he will call the cops :D

The problem is, the cops needs to ACT as “peace officers” if they want to come to Denis’s place, they already have a $5millions invoice in regards to their last fuck up”.

Plus, if they want to show up as “PEACE OFFICERS”, they will have to bring Denis’s SURETY with them, because Denis will REQUEST it. :P —.they know he will” :D

So the cops decided to stay at their cop’s shop, and tell the bailiff to go fuck him self” :/

The “End (for now) :D