The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

Jun 13, 2014 2:45 AM

Janick Paquette

My person has a bank account with my boyfriend's person. When they froze my bank accounts last year, they emptied the small balance of 600$ that was in one of them and froze the rest of them.

Even the one that is shared with another person.

There was a balance of — 750$ in that shared bank account that they are leaving there except for the administration fees that are deducted every month.

So my boyfriend tried telling them that it was his money not JANICK's (he's still learning!) So the Bank Director said that if the money wasn't JANICK's she just had to write to REVENUE QUÉBEC to let them now and to ask to release the money to the other partie.

So this is what I wrote:

Vendredi le 25 avril 2014

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/WITHOUT PREJUDICE

AGENCE DU REVENU DU QUÉBEC a/s Mélissa Corriveau 4, place-Laval, bureau 500 Secteur L462P1 Laval, QC H7N 5Y3

N” N.E.Q. : 226xxxxxxx N” de référence: 101xxxxx

REGISTERED MAIL: RN 001 175 XXX CA

NOTICE OF CLAIM

Bonjour Mme Corriveau.

The accounts under the name JANICK PAQUETTE, who is the person I administrate with the SIN 26x xxx xxx —...., have been frozen.

The funds from (account number) at BMO in Mont-Tremblant, is a joint account under the names (both person's names)

The funds in that account belongd to the person (other person's name) and the funds are not accessible since that time.

I am advising you to unfreeze the total amount of this account so it can be available to the person (other parties name).

Please act accordingly !

Regards !

Authorised by: The Sole Authorised Administrator for the person JANICK PAQUETTE 26x xxx xxx / —..

address of the person here.

-------------------------------

I never got a response and the account is still frozen!

So what's an Administrator to do? :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 36
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 36 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 26

Rick Hiltz

so your boyfriend has just cause to file a claim because the CRA has harmed him and stolen his property he should send a letter of demand requiring his property be returned immediately using section 337 of the criminal code of Canaduh

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 38
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 38 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

I wouldn't do that, I would first CLAIM what they took from my person, and advise them what will be invoiced if they do not give back what they've took from the person, and give them 3 days to act.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 38
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 38 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Will Bed

Mmmmmm... Can you PROVE the money is not yours ? Or can you PROVE that under marriage, a female person becomes property of the male PERSON and - I guess - all her property becomes his ?

On a side note... Why do all you guys have accounts and/or credit and/or loans and/or whatever in both names ? See, I never knew you could be victim of whatever bullshit another party claims on your partner, but I always thought I'd make it clear : I'll never get into marriage I'll never buy a house under 2 names I'll never buy a car or furniture or whatever shit with a "shared responsibility"...

:(

And we know "money" isnt safe in a bank. I never liked to let others get control of whats mine... Say what you want, if the system comes crashing down, you'll need cash. Even if it's technically worth nothing, the average idiots will, after a few days, trust nothing but cash, because that's all they've ever known and cash will still be valuable... So keep the minimum you NEED in a bank account but store enough outside a bank so that if page 144-145 of last year's Flaherty's budget comes effective, you're not fucked...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 39 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 39 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Janick Paquette

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/WITHOUT PREJUDICE

AGENCE DU REVENU DU QUÉBEC a/s Mélissa Corriveau 4, place-Laval, bureau 500 Secteur L462P1 Laval, QC H7N 5Y3

N” N.E.Q. : 226xxxxxxx N” de référence: 101xxxxx

REGISTERED MAIL: RN 001 175 XXX CA

Bonjour Mme Corriveau.

I have sent a letter on the 24th of April 2014, advising you to unfreeze the account # xxxx-xxx under the name JANICK .... . Unfortunatly I didn't get a response from you.

You have taken $$$ from the person JANICK PAQUETTE'S account. I am advising you to give back the ???$ to this account and unfreeze it within 3 days or you will be invoiced.

See the Administration fees attached.

Please act accordingly !

Regards !

Authorised by: Sole Authorised Administrator for JANICK PAQUETTE 26x xxx xxx / —..

address of the person here.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 39
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 39 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Will Bed

And I think he should make it clear that since april jhes been wIting for them motherfuckers to fix that shit up, and 2 months without access to his person's money affects his person's integrity so they better get their shit back on track, fast

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 41
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 41 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Janick Paquette

I'm on it ever since.

What I can comprehend so far is that a "PROPER" NOTICE is all about

- identifying WHO you are and remove all possible variables.

Variables being: a) Where the Notice is sent b) Who sends the Notice (WHO is saying this) ------> so you remove the consequences of ignoring the Notice.

....to be continued... :D

Back to top