The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

Jun 11, 2014 5:31 PM

Will Bed

So a few weeks ago, the internet account for WB was victim of a fraud. almost 150gb of internet transfer per day for almost 2 weeks, so I picked up a unusually high debt in WB's mailbox... I called them and try to work something out, nothing possible on their end...

Since this was the result of a fraud, I decided to administrate that private debt through the PERSON's SURETY...

First I picked up a communication saying something along the lines of : "Here are the accepted methods of payment" (bank transfer was listed as one)... And "BTW this is from the Bank Of Canada's website : we do not offer banking services blabla..."

I sent them a new communication, asking by what authority they could give advice in regards to Bank Of Canada's activities, and explaining every detail of the law and giving them ALL the information they needed to proceed, because clearly, by their first communication, they proved they were either incompetent, ignorant, or acted in bad faith...

Got the bill for the next monthly period, paid the balance owed for the current period, but added something saying "for the outstanding balance for the month where the fraud occurred, THIS LADY has received everything you guys need to proceed and get paid... So talk to her my time is valuable and it's not my job to help you guys do yours"...

Got a call this morning from the internet company : They REFUSE to collect the SURETY and get paid the total amount they claimed was owed by the PERSON ; instead they decided to just clear the extra debt off from the PERSON's account !!??? They just spit on 4 times their normal internet connection fees !!???

Would you fucking believe that ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 252
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 252 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_679521892083746
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.01541127535701E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 13

Anibal Jose BaezMackximus Minimus

I think lawyers try very hard not to leave evidence, and/or PROOF that men, and women can discharge public debts via the surety. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 253 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 253 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Anibal Jose BaezMackximus Minimus

I am kind of glad the is no proof for this stuff. Think about it. You will have all the Dean Cliffords, Santos Bonaccis, Robert Menards, and all those characters charging money for this information. Here it is FREE, and Free-dumb proof!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 254
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 254 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Dear Hydro-Quebec, :D

It’s almost 2 years now that I complete ALL bill of exchange you send to the person I happen to be the SOLE administrator of, and you keep AVOIDING on presenting these completed bill of exchange to the payment, which is Bank of Canada.

I did explain several times what I was doing, and WHY I was doing it….you NEVER dared answering ANY of my communications. You’ve sent numerous threats to disconnect the service, and again, you failed on them. You have been given the opportunity to OBJECT to what I do on several occasions, you have been advise that if you would say that what I do is wrong, I would stop doing it and PAY, again, no answer…..

So I came to these conclusions. :D

1). You are extremely incompetent, and still trying to figure out all this after 2 years.

2). You ALREADY collected on these debts, before sending them to PIERRE DAOUST, without waiting on my decision on weither I want to buy back these debts or not.

3). WHY NOT JUST PRESENT these completed Bill of Exchange to Bank of Canada ? Completed Bill of Exchange is “MONEY”. “money” “money” includes negotiable instruments; “negotiable instrument” “negotiable instrument” includes any cheque, draft, traveller’s cheque, bill of exchange, postal note, money order, postal remittance and any other similar instrument; *Financial Administration Act R.S.C., 1985, c. F-11

BY: SOLE AUTORIZED ADMINISTRATOR

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 254
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 254 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Will if you're mining through that account, your shovel[s] is probably responsible for all the data transfers. Here "in" Ontario service providers are capped at a maximum of $80 for overages. Don't ask how I know, I refuse to answer. :P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 255
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 255 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Will Bed

I do have a shovel on the network, but it's not responsible for the peak, we monitored it, but thanks for pointing that out...

Consequently to that fraud, I upgraded to their unlimited fastest internet service anyways, so no more of that fucking around in sight ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 255
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 255 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top