Jun 03, 2014 8:29 PM

Our PERSON was found guilty of alleged offences, ex parte. Offences, by the way, being false. We identified ourself in court as a man and not the PERSON, consequently, the Mag stated that the court cannot see or acknowledge a man, therefore, we were free to leave. However, the case continued against the PERSON ex parte.

Oh ok, thanks, in this case it would be a trustee corporation with a private agreement as the claimant...the defendant would be the agent for a larger corporation...if I'm correct in my understanding

Because of our ignorance of law at that time (our first ever appearance before a court), we failed to advise that, although being a man, we were the sole BENEFICIARY of the PERSON estate and that the Mag, being an agent of the CROWN, was the TRUSTEE and SURETY. Declaring that would have ensured the dismissal of the case. We will know next time, if there is a next time, of course.

THAT is the purpose of LIENING. It removes the presumption AND the government's ENTITLEMENT.

KnownAs Colin not sure I would agree with your statement "we were the sole BENEFICIARY of the PERSON estate" If you're receiving a benefit, then you would have a tax obligation for that benefit. All you should be doing is Administering the obligations put on your PERSON. If you're the BENEFICIARY of the PERSON, then shouldn't you also be the beneficiary of the charges?

Administrating a liened PIERRE DAOUST seems to be more and more ATTRACTIVE.... :D

I REALLY feel like liening PIERRE DAOUST :D

do I hear a PPSA in the works?

I will sleep in a few minutes, but tomorrow seems to be the DAY :D

Scott Duncan, does Aquilae have ALLIED ? .....

Yes.

Allied?

Is that frenglish for allies?

Yes, sorry :/

ALLY, international law. A power which has entered into an alliance with another power. A citizen or subject of one of the powers in alliance, is sometimes called an ally; for example, the rule which renders it unlawful for a citizen of the United States to trade or carry on commerce with an enemy, also precludes an ally from similar intercourse. 4 Rob. Rep. 251; 6 Rob. Rep. 406; Dane's Ab, Index, h.t.; 2 Dall. 15.

I bucked my teeth today, no kidding :(

I really wanted to say, I brushed my teeth, but wrote bucked ! :/

I blamed it on Adam Thomas.... :P

It's better than "Chemtrails".

What chemtrails ?

Norah's ? :D

the ones coming out of my ass

:)

People are blaming their stupidity on Chemtrails these days. Here in reality, they started out stupid, and are just realizing it.

Notice that NONE of the Chemtrail Crowd have EVER flown a Jet turbine powered aircraft.

They DID flunk high-school science.

There was SCIENCE in high school ? :-o

ALL of them say "It was never like this when I was a dumb-ass kid" (Paraphrased)... ignoring that there are 30 TIMES the number of aircraft now, than there was 20 years ago.

Shit, I have missed science in high school, and the 1992 referendum :(

I miss Jacques Parizeau. :(

Jacques Parizeau hates Haitians :P

...and jews. ...and pretty much anyone who speaks English.

Yep.

:D

HAHAHA!!!....he speaks English, and when he does, he hates MOHAWKS :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAlzJnaETg0

ChiefRock, I have good reasons to believe that Jacques Parizeau hates you :P

I'm Cayuga not Mohawk :p

OOOOOoooo... awkward! :P

Oh, sorry :( .....I thought you were ALL Mohawks :(

oooooooooooooooooo MORE awkward!

You want more ? :D

Because I definitely can....

...but don't worry Sino! Jaques hates EVERYONE who isn't from Quebec, and speaks ONLY french.

Yep

I hate everyone from Quebec.

Me too :D

THIS JUST IN: Jacques Parizeau hates (and I quote) "those fucking Cayugas".

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :D

Oh fuck !!!!! :-o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVZOopTpG88

Scott Duncan; re your earlier comment about LIENING. Do you mean to take out a lien against/on the Govt created ens legis PERSON?

Yes

In the capacity of the BENEFICIARY and/or ADMINISTRATOR?

You need another PERSON, KnownAs Colin, a person you TRUST.

Like me ! :)

I mean PIERRE DAOUST :-o

Another PERSON to take out the LIEN?

Yes, like RogueSupport, per instance... :D

RogueSupport could even keep the PERSON in trust, I've heard they are trustee for a certain Aquilae trust or something like that ! :P

Are suggest that we are a rogue and need support?

Up to you !!

Yes, that makes sense ... we require the services of a PRIVATEER .

That is why you set up a corporation.

A corporation needs to be registered with the corp govt, yes?

Unless there's another way ? :/

We do not know.

Me neither, so yes....

As we understand it, the object is to play the system at it's own game while divorcing ourselves from corp govt control.

You could appoint PIERRE DAOUST as the MANAGER, of this corporation, and put his phone number, in case anyone would want to call the corp, in regards with some administrative shit.... :D

PIERRE DAOUST can speak Frenaussie :P

Is that an offer, Pete Daoust? I appoint you manager of MIMI MANAGEMENT INC. :D Phone number, please?

I don't work for Women :P

If I want something done right, I do it MYSELF. :D

Oh yes, we saw that !!! ?

The 9111-1111 Quebec Inc's manager's name is Gilles Daoust, a real mysterious Manager :D

Is there any MANAGERS at RogueSupport, Scott ?

Pete Daoust, is not PETE DAOUST, already liened? I like the Ideal of liening TOMMY ATHERTON, but I have good reason to believe it has already been liened, you know being "married" and all!

Oh right Pete Daoust.....what about that?

Cara and Tommy finally have a trustable trustee created.

Just stay married, and everything will be fine.....

what kind of corporation should i set up? there is a lot to choose from.

http://business.belgium.be/en/managing_your_business/setting_up_your_business/

The great thing about a marriage is that, if the 2 are in the same boat, the government cannot do crap. The government could only interfere if a controversy among the marriage arises and cannot be solved by the couple. Then one, or both of the parties could petition for "help" to a "guardian mediator" to basically decide for them.

I am beginning to see how marriage it's a stronger position (for the persons we happen to have), with more "benefits," than not being married.

With Ethereum, we may TRANSFER our marriage agreement to a new TRUST of our creation, and leave the old abusive relationship behind.

Ok, what was the question again, Gail Marie ? :-\