The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

May 28, 2014 1:15 AM

Pete Daoust

:-( Folks: You don't want to pay ? Me: It's not that, I just don't want to buy. Folks: What ?? Me: You need to buy before you can pay. Folks: Wow...I don't follow you here.

I am not sure anymore about teaching folks .... :-(

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 776
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 776 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 45

Stuart Stone

I have had a similar conversation recently...

THEM: Your account is overdue.

ME: a bill of exchange was tendered by me and accepted by you. It seems that you haven't presented it for payment. It appears that the fault lies with you, not me.

THEM: ?!?????!!!!!????

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 777
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 777 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Bills of Exchange Act 1909: (Administrative zone for Australia)...

50 Rules as to presentment for payment (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a bill must be duly presented for payment. If it be not so presented, the drawer and indorsers shall be discharged.

I don't write the clubhouse rules, I just administrate debts according to them ;-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 778
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 778 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

CJ MLJason Moreland

I have never found any of this money. Perhaps, we are the money because we agree to continue to fund the BS. Thus, the people become surety to the debt created by the Government. This explains why Governments all spend way beyond their means. The banks purchase the treasury securities because they have to effectively put NOTHING up.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 778
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 778 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

CJ MLJason Moreland

The term "People" can be defined many different ways. Second, money of account is very simple ledger accounting. Double entry bookkeeping. Would you like to discuss how depreciation works?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 779
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 779 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

CJ MLJason Moreland

I can specifically prove the above statement in Rule 144A of the SEC. Securities and Exchange Commission. Which conveniently superseded by rule 72. How interest compounds over time. The time value of Money. Now imagine what a .25 of a point means when they purchase 1 trillion in new T-bills.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 779
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 779 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Who granted the right to NOT be recognized as a PERSON or PERSONS...and what does it have to do with ME? (Yes, I know the bit of paper to which you refer, but what has it got to do with ME)....similarly, using the same logic, you have the right not to be recognised as a brass candlestick either.

The converse, being recognised as a person would be a negligent or fraudulent act and would probably end up with an insanity evaluation....same as claiming to be a brass candlestick.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 780
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 780 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Saying having the right to not be something I never been is a LIE, only a newbie could write such of a stupid thing like this here, or a fucking LAWYER who wants to create confusion......so shut up, don't write NOTHING in here....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 781
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 781 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top