Via questioning through an affidavit, and notice of mistake, Ceit had defaulted the court on proof of claim. They didn't prove it by answering her questions. There is no UNDERSTANDING if there are questions unanswered, correct?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 1082Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 1082 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.