The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

May 28, 2014 5:40 PM

Anibal Jose BaezMackximus Minimus

Will, I have a very specific case.

It's a private debt with a bank. Party A is the Person. Party B is the bank. Party A takes a loan from Party B, and promise to pay back in X of money, in X amount of time.

Some years later Party A gets into a financial hardship, and cannot continue making payments to Party B. Party B can only ascertain that Party A owes some money. Party B CANNOT obligate party A to pay in a one and only specific way, that would be ILLEGAL. There was no prior negotiation about how Party A would get the money to pay Party B. There was no negotiation about how much VALUE does Party's A TIME was/is worth.

Since TIME is MONEY, Party A makes Party B an offer to settle the accounting with TIME, which is MONEY. Isn't MONEY also just a measurement of our time? But by exchanging our time for a currency, we LOOSE CONTROL of how much VALUE our time is worth. They give us NO OPTIONS. And they know it.

Am I the only one that can see this? :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 554
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 554 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.