The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

May 27, 2014 3:31 AM

Will Bed

Let’s say Chris the MAN went to the grocery store and got a RECEIPT for goods, that RECEIPT is a proof of DISBURSEMENT in an ACCOUNT in which EVERY SINGLE FUCKIN CENT was DEPOSITED in exchange for Chris the MAN’s time sweat and blood.

That RECEIPT is a VALUABLE SECURITY. Its VALUE is the AMOUNT which it PROVES has been paid.

Let's say the RECEIPT has a $100 VALUE. If you can PROVE CHRIS EVAN has a VALUE of $100, then CHRIS EVAN’s SURETY must be AT LEAST $100, right ?

Let’s say CHRIS EVAN used $100 of MONEY OF ACCOUNT which was DISBURSED from his checking ACCOUNT”

Chris the MAN is the one who worked his ass, time sweat and blood, to give CHRIS EVAN that value. Chris the MAN is the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRIS EVAN. Chris the MAN has the right to CHRIS EVAN’s SURETY. What’s Chris the MAN gonna do ? Act like a slave ?? Why would he do that ?

You are the creditor. Without you, there's no MONEY. The Birth Certificate is an UNLIMITED CREDIT LIMIT. Your signature gives VALUE to ANYTHING you sign. You can GIVE VALUE and you can CREATE MONEY !

From an administrative point of view, it only seems like a logical decision to send that VALUABLE SECURITY over to CHRIS EVAN’s SURETY, which isn't you, so it can do what it’s supposed to do !

Now the scary part : It all seems to make sense”

And you know what they say : ALWAYS KEEP THE RECEIPT :p

The only thing I don't get is when Pete Daoust says “CASH as a beneficiary”..?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 543
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 543 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.