May 20, 2014 4:35 PM

Do they have PROOF that they are ENTITLED to this information?

What is SFC Inc.?

If that PERSON is an EX EMPLOYEE, CRA must have that PERSON's latest info on file ? If they're looking for that PERSON, why dont they just call their police instead of asking SFC to help them ?

That PERSON is an EX employee. SFC inc doesnt have anything to do what that PERSON anymore, right ? Why would SFC inc even wanna accept a partnership offer from CRA in that matter ?

They are reffering to article 126. (14) of the :

Employment Insurance Act

S.C. 1996, c. 23

Requirement to provide documents and information

(14) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, but subject to subsection (15), the Commission may for any purpose relating to the administration or enforcement of this Act, other than Part IV, by notice served personally or by confirmed delivery service, require that any person provide, within such reasonable time as is stated in the notice,

(a) any information or additional information, including any information return or supplementary return; or

(b) any document.

Scott Duncan ^^

What does subsection 15 say?

:D ....I know :D

But I don't completely get it, :(

(15) The Commission shall not impose on any person, in this section referred to as a “third party”, a requirement under subsection (14) to provide information or any document relating to one or more unnamed persons unless it first obtains the authorization of a judge under subsection (16).

What the fuck is an UNAMED person ? :-o

Doesn't matter, as you would be the third party it clearly states that there would be no requirement to provide info without the order of said Judge.

PEREMPTORY !!!! :-D What a beautiful word, I will use it EVERYDAY :-D WWWWEEEEEEE !!!!

I Should suspect the meaning behind "UNAMED Persons" would likely be referring to a employee number. Herein which they would be seeking INFORMATION about to name said Person.

Well, they named the person on which they seek information on...

I guess its time for fucks the puppy to ask them if there's a law stating that a man MUST make the person he administrates do that stuff for them, for free.

No worries Will Bed, no worries.... :-)

As the CEO, my number one DUTY is to protect the INTEREST of SFC Inc, and SFC Inc can COUNT on me :-D

Do your kids have the least idea that their father is such an awesome man ? :p

I have an OATH on this, and I will stand under that oath to death :-P

I have no idea :-\

Is Pierre the MAN the CEO ??

No, pierre the Man is pierre the Man :-\

Did you just identify yourself as a PERSON, Pete Daoust !?!?!!?

No, as a CAPACITY...

When PIERRE DAOUST the person, is on DUTY at SFC Inc, he is under OATH, and bounded by STRICT rules. :P

He has some crazy stuff to follow... :D

So CEO is a CAPACITY for a MAN, not a POSITION for a PERSON ?

CEO is a capacity for PIERRE DAOUST the person, the same person I happen to be the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR of....

Alright, I just wanted to make sure you didnt let that one slip through ;)

Which one ?? :/

"As the CEO, my number one DUTY is..." The PERSON is the CEO.

"As the Sole Authorized Administrator for the CEO, my number one DUTY is..."

PIERRE DAOUST has no right to spend 1 minutes at SFC Inc, other than for SFC Inc INTEREST... :(

If PIERRE DAOUST needs to spend time for ANY outside duties, SFC Inc have to bill at $3000.00 per hour rate, paid in advance, that's the LAW at SFC Inc. :(

If ever PIERRE DAOUST gets caught not following this rule, he will be find for a sum of $250,000.00 :(

Will, when I am on duty for SFC Inc, I AM THE FUCKING PERSON, the fun part is, I GET TO DECIDE WHEN I am the CEO, it could be from 8:00am to 8:10am, or whatever I DECIDE so....that can get a little bit fucked up, for ANYONE who is NOT in my head :D

Do you "feel" a little bit more POWERFUL, Will Bed ? :D

How's that for "CONTROL" :D

Muhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

Hellosss ?? :/

I was reading something else... ;)

Why ? :(

Why not ??

Fuck off :P

Next time you need some insight, ask Dean Clifford :P

Or Derek Moran :D

It's SFC Inc, first, and it's SFC Inc who will send the bill to PIERRE DAOUST......hellosss !!! :/

And OF COURSE, I, as the sole authorized administrator for PIERRE DAOUST, I will have to administrate that bill...

It's written, somewhere :/

And it's not my fault :(

When I am PIERRE DAOUST the CEO, my hands are tied, there is no room to fuck around ......a slave with HUGE responsibilities :(

What a life ?

Ha well.... :/

Actually, I just no longer see myself as THE FUCKIN PERSON... That's why I kinda tripped on that one... Using the right words is important :p and reading back it may seem as if I did think Pete the MAN was the CEO...

When the PERSON is working, I make it work, but I'm not it... I can make a bicycle work, but I'm not a bicycle...

ACTING in the capacity of.....it's a ROLE Will Bed, it's not me, it's a ROLE I play, in some very specific moments......A ROLE....

I "have" a person.....I can use it to ACT in the CAPACITY of.....the trick is to cover ALL angles....that's what CONTROL is all about....I think :/

PIERRE DAOUST can ACT in the CAPACITY of CEO. Pierre the MAN is not acting. He's not the CEO. He makes the CEO and PERSON work when he wishes to... I totally understand that and I dont need DC to fuck my mindset...

When I said "So CEO is a CAPACITY for a MAN...?" I actually meant "huhhh WTF since when ???"

Again, my eyes/mind got stuck on your : "As the CEO, my number one DUTY is..." I just have this weird feeling that you tell that to CRA, and all of a sudden they have reasons to believe they have THEIR PERSON ;)

That is a complete different thing Will....

I just read that back... I think I'm getting the source of what caught me up there...

The way you say it, you are Pierre the Man, and you have a PIERRE DAOUST suit you can put on when you wish to, and that suit comes with different pairs of shoes depending on which ground you wish to make PIERRE DAOUST walk/dance on...

I was actually seeing WB THE PERSON more as a tool... Let's take a hammer as an example. I can carry the hammer. I can use it to bang nails, I can also use it to bang other things. I need it to build stuff. But I'm not the hammer. Does that make any sense ?

The important point Will, when I ACT as the CEO of SFC Inc, I really don't have much "flexibility" (marge de manoeuvre)

I can not go against SFC Inc, under ANY circumstances :)

I totally understand that ;)

SFC Inc has the POWER.... :D , me, I only CONTROL it :D

they specifically named someone?