The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

May 07, 2014 5:24 PM

Will Bed

Thanks Eamonn ! What a read ! Took me quite a few reads actually to wrap my head around the whole thing, but I think I’m getting it and feeling stupid about it... Typing this sounds so much like what is explained in Money as Debt III” though I kinda never saw the whole picture” or is it even the whole picture yet ?

So when a PUBLIC DEBT is sent to a PERSON, and we use the Bill of Exchange to discharge that debt, that debt is actually being paid with the unlimited credit / value available to the PERSON which has already been securitized - as an unlimited ever increasing debt - with the Birth Certificate, and we have the RIGHT to allow for it’s unlimited increase, in that sense we not only ARE the only VALUE/CREDITORS for the PERSON, but we have the RIGHT to create DEBT, we are CREDITORS for the Govt and the overall sum of all those debts - a huuuge negative amount - is accounted for in the Consolidated Revenue Fund and when we use the Birth Certificate to extinguish a PUBLIC DEBT, it’s extinguished by ANOTHER PUBLIC DEBT which did not exist before, and they’d like us to keep RE FUNDing their shithole with INCOME tax ?

So the overall PUBLIC DEBT is ever increasing no matter what we’d like to do about it” It was designed to be that way... And the ONLY WAY to break the system - and eliminate PUBLIC DEBTS - would be for everyone to administrate those debts through the PERSON’s SURETY, until the system implodes by itself due to all those PUBLIC DEBTS only increasing THEIR OWN CRF DEBT to a point where there actually is no positive amount deposited at all to keep their scam afloat ?

So when a PUBLIC DEBT is sent to a PERSON, and we administrate it through the PERSON’s SURETY, it turns into ANOTHER / A NEW PUBLIC DEBT. The original one has been accounted for, and the new one will be sent around again eventually, and it’ll keep spinning forever and ever increasing but everyone will be happy”

If I'm getting this right, whoever thought about this entire thing were indeed a bunch of beatable arrogant fucks.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 351
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 351 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.