Let me paraphrase Marc Stevens...citizens pledge their allegiance to the state in exchange for protection...However, the various supreme courts have ruled that the state does not owe a duty of protection to the public.
Ergo, if the state cannot/is not obligated to provide protection, then doesn't it follow that there now an invalid contract as one party is not fulfilling its obligations?
Consequently, isn't the concept of citizens/citizenship also invalid, thus removing the right to search the vehicle, in much the same way they can't search Santa Claus, the Easter bunny or Jeebus' vehicle?
If this is a shitstain pulled from the dictionary of my arse, please forgive me and delete the offending post
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 328Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 328 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.