The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

Apr 25, 2014 2:54 PM

Jody Riddell

ive been reading through a bunch of threads and a few people are referencing buck 0 5. can someone point me to the thread that explains this reference please?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 355
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 355 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 14

Jody Riddell

thats right team america freedom isnt free theres a hefty fukin fee freedom costs a buck 05. .... awesome !!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 356 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 356 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Stuart Stone

As there is no lawful money in circulation, only debt notes (fiat currency), the buck is offered as valuable consideration on any statement/demand...the 05 (5 cents) is considered the stamp duty for that transaction.

This value/valuable consideration & stamp duty is provided using postage stamps because they are still considered lawful currency.

(A certified copy of the Birth Certificate may also be offered as valuable consideration and/or sufficient evidence as to who is acting as surety for the person).

Using the stamps (apparently) then brings international postal law (as well as the inference of mail fraud if false claims are made through the post), bringing the possibility of seeking remedy in the international courts of the Hague ie: a higher jurisdiction bound by international treaty.

This information is all presented here as theory only, for educational purposes.

WHY?

Because I have no firsthand knowledge of this process working, nor have I seen the specific references in the various clubhouse rules and how it applies to the person and/or the man seeking remedy.

Acting as Sole Authorised Administrator and/or using the clubhouse rules as explained in the various Bills of Exchange Acts and comprehending the principles of accounting, surety and the Notice of Mistake should be more than enough to become a most excellent administrator for the person and deflect surety...several of us here have firsthand knowledge and experience using one or more of those processes.

I hope that helps ;-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 357
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 357 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

No Stuart....you have that ALL wrong. For starters, there is NO fappity fap fap. Secondly not a single derogatory term for woman. Third, there is no mention of the red ink stamps used.... :-P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 357
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 357 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top