Pete Daoust
But it's better to Buck-o-Five than BUYING back debts like a fool....
So therefor, the Buck-o-Five is NOT wrong, the guy that should explain it, is maybe retard, but not the Buck-o-Five :)
And the buck-o-five brings this idea that, as a MAN, you have NO OBLIGATIONS to use LEGAL TENDERS to PAY for debts.
With Buck-o-Five, YOU are still SURETY but can use LAWFULmoney to pay.Almost look like the QUEEN is surety :D
That's how I see it. :)
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 383
