The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 6

Apr 03, 2014 1:02 AM

Jessamee Hundley

I have a debt that has been sold to a debt collection agency. I have NO contract OR business with these STRANGERS so here is my reply!!

CONVERGENT HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES, INC

04/02/2014

P.O. BOX 5435

Carol Stream, IL 60197-5435

Dear sir or Madam,

This letter serves to provide NOTICE of your unsigned anonymous claim of a debt in the amount of $444.80. I am not aware of any business and/or contact with your agency that would substantiate such a claim.

A maxim of law states that one should know whom he/she is dealing with. Therefore any further correspondence from yourself must include a wet ink signature as well as identification substantiating who you are and your position within the agency you represent. Any correspondence lacking this basic requirement has no credibility and will be considered harassment.

I conditionally accept your offer upon the completion of the following terms;

1. Please provide a certified copy of the contract which validates the debt claimed to be owed to your agency.

2. Please identify yourself to me as outlined above. I require government issued photographic identification. This measure must be taken to prevent fraud.

3. Understand that I DO accept phone calls regarding the matter at a rate of $3500 per call attempt.

4. Understand that unsigned offers shall constitute harassment and an administrative fee of $1500 shall be imposed for each unsigned offer received.

5. Understand that, as I am acting in good faith, any negative reporting to any agency/credit bureau is unwarranted and tantamount to FRAUD. Any reporting to an agency/credit bureau shall incur a fee of $5500 applicable to you.

6. Provide me with a BILL as well as specific instructions as to how to execute the provided instrument and DISCHARGE the debt via the PERSONS SURETY.

Failure to provide me with a valid CONTRACT as well as identify yourself will leave me with no option but to assume you are a third party interloper making a FALSE CLAIM against me. I will and have made every attempt to handle this in good faith to resolve this matter for JESSAMEE HUNDLEY. Your cooperation and assitance is much appreciated.

With love and regards,

Jessamee Hundley Sole Authorized Administrator

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 726
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 726 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_648089835226952
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.01534055198697E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 23

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I have a hard time answering the phone because of that, for instance:

"Good afternoon (PLACE WHERE I ENJOY A LIVING)" "Oh hi! Is this Beverly?" "Eeeer... ahhhh. who's asking?"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 728
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 728 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

(phone rings) Me: Hellos !!! Fuctard: MISTER PIERRE DAOUST PLEASE Me: Who's calling ? Fucktard: BLABLABLA Me: Wait please (put on hold) ME:: Administrator can I help you Fucktard: Mister DAOUST ? Me: I am its Sole Authorized Administrator, if you want to speak to PIERRE DAOUST the person, they only method to do it is "IN WRITING"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 728
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 728 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

But on the other end, what's the big deal of ADMINISTRATING a communication sent to the person via regular mail ?

Other than to PROVE, I am in GOOD FAITH, I don't see the big deal there :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 729
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 729 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

i hear you pierre. so then right off the bat i should tell them if they want me to work for them i expect some compensation. otherwise i am to busy. or do i HAVE a duty to administrate for the 'person', OR can i just pass that off to the party who is surety for the person?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 729
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 729 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Isaiah WhitneyEli Weakley

Yeah I don't think it's an approach I'd take. But say you didn't reply in the time given and they try to hassle you ask for proof of timely delivery or something along those lines. They can't prove shit!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 729
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 729 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

And more to David's "pointed" question, here "in" CANADA/Canada, you can't be compelled to sign for anything.

Which bring's me to the question, IN commerce, why would you service yourself?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 730
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 730 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Paul O'SheaPol O Se

I've used this method on a number of occasions and its worked fine. -- I am in recei--pt of your letter dated bla bla bla -----------. You are a third party interloper. I-- have no contract with you, any further correspondence ----will----incur a fee of 10 million euro------------------------. All rights reserved---------------

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 730
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 730 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top