Mar 20, 2014 5:20 PM

"YOU DO NOT ADD TO MY WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOTS!" I got that one a long time ago. It takes an ego to do shit like that !

ummm...oops

Authorized by Trust Seal.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Non+assumpsit

WHY DO YOU FUCKING IDIOTS THINK YOU CAN MAKE MY WORK "BETTER" WHEN YOU ARE ALL FUCKING MORONS!

Seriously, Derek Moran needs the living shit kicked out of him.

Its a NOTICE........

Do you ever see "Non Assumpsit" on a "Keep off the Grass" notice? No? GO FUCKING FIGURE!

Derek Moran needs the living shit kicked out of him.

Fuck, I have signed one in PURPLE, with a GOLD square, over the signature, and a yellow star at the left of the signature :P

Hahaha :-D

No, seriously, I never had to use Notice of Mistake so far :/

Cute. Now for the 4 or 5 people who think Pete is serious... He's not.

...idiots.

:D

Fuck! You can't be too sure these days. Such `tard. Much Stupid. So moron.

And for the 4 or 5 folks that thought I was serious......kill yourself :P

I endorse this.

If you could beat the living shit out of Derek Moran, for DARING to alter my work, you'd really be helping a lot of people out! :D

Is that an ORDER ?...Sir ? :D

May be, before too long. :/

I can't see Derek's post, I had to block him from my view, with a huge bunch of other fucktards, because I can be misled again, I know I can, that is the fun part of KNOWING who I am.

It will take me some time to have a solid grasp of that "ME", I just found out not too long ago, I really have to AVOID misleading stuff :(

And it's the BIGGEST job, so far, because misinformation is ALL around, every second of my life......i

I am LITERALLY bombarded with bullshit.....all the fucking time :(

"Unbelievable" :/

By Eamonn O B, Non Assumpsit, All rights reserved, In Good Faith.

That's what I had on my notice. My understanding of assumpsit at the time was one who assumes liability for another's debt. I didn't sign it... That's relating to the incident in which I received confirmation of their receipt of the notice and I then completed that bill and returned it, for which I still haven't had a reply (obviously that's a good thing)... Just the notice in future so. Live & learn...

But I have to admit that....

Everytime I administrate a public debt, I always attach an explaination letter, of what I do, and WHY I do it, with the completed remittance voucher, and I add this on the letter...

"If me, or anyone else, have led you to believe that I was one of your agent, and/or employee, and/or slave, that would be a mistake, and please forgive me".

And guess where I took that from :P

Scott Duncan reminds me of a Rinzai Zen Master, but without the whole belief thing, they are known for knocking the shit out of you in order to wake you up!

First time I hear about a Rinzai Zen Master, where have you learned about these things Tommy ? :D

Know everything and nothing. Be like water. Form and conform.

My zen master impression :-)

Rinzai Zen Master = sit down (meditate), don't do shit, and don't give a shit about anything.

Chinese Batman !!! :D

Bruce Lee knew how to kick the shit out of a man, in a very SPIRITUAL way.... :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!....

Ho, you mean "THINKING" :-D I do "practice" it a lot :-D

yep! and we wonder why the orientals kick our asses academically!

Nope, I do not wonder about "Orientals" kicking my ass in any ways :-P

ok!

ok, well I got my ass bell curved to the bottom by them!

Well, they "out number" you big time, there is that, How many of these "Orientals" there is ?

Which "rights" do you clueless ass-hats think you are reserving? The only one of THEIRS you can reserve...

ARE STATUTORY FUCKING RIGHTS!

YOU ARE NOT SMARTER THAN ME

YOU DON'T KNOW MORE THAN ME.

YOU DON'T HAVE IDEAS THAT ARE "BETTER" THAN MINE

YOU DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO "IMPROVE" WHAT I WRITE.

...AND WHEN YOU ASS-HATS TRY TO "PERSONALIZE" THESE THINGS, BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THAT I'M 'MEAN' TO YOU SO YOU WANT TO DETACH ME FROM THE RIGHT FUCKING ANSWER, YOU END UP LIKE DEAN!

STOP THINKING YOU ARE AS SMART AS ME. YOU AREN'T AND YOU NEVER WILL BE!

That it's why Rinzai Zen Masters rule the world...

Oh, wait, they don't! Nobility does, and they are actually doing a bit more than "meditation", by the looks of it. I guess some dominate, while others meditate.

It's just what I think. Don't be so Kung-Fu sensitive, Tommy, you might loose your "zen". :D

IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT YOU DON'T LIKE THAT I'M RIGHT! TOUGH SHIT! YOU ARE STUPID, AND I AM NOT! THAT IS REALITY! THAT MEANS THAT WHEN YOU MIX YOUR STUPID WITH MY RIGHT ANSWERS, YOU WILL GET THE WRONG ANSWER! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU DON'T LIKE ME. I'M STILL FUCKING RIGHT!

QED !! :-)

<< A Mathmeticians way of saying "I win">>

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Q.E.D.&defid=1349485

http://www.fucksthepuppy.com/ :P

Why ?

I don't give a shit about sexy stuff, :P

I think you mean MORON not moran !!

<<I don't want to get all Yoko Ono about it...>> Awesome! :D

DO YOU SEE "NON ASSUMPSIT" AND A SIGNATURE IN A FUCKING NO PARKING SIGN? NO?

THEN WHY WOULD YOU FUCKING PUT IT ON ANY FUCKING NOTICE?

<<SOMEBODY SHOW ME THE BILL! 1: Demand PROOF that you owe. A BILL or a SIGNED INVOICE will do. They never produce one 2: SET THE TERMS THROUGH NOTICE (Do not sign it! A notice of NO PARKING or KEEP OFF THE GRASS is not signed; neither should yours be) Return ALL paper to them REGISTERED MAIL, along with NOTICE. Signing attaches a NAME to the RESPONSE. Surety is assumed. No Name No signature No Surety You want to send a "keep off the grass" notice, not write a love letter and/or become pen pals.>> Scott Duncan, Golden nuggets notes, The Best of.

Fuck...Fuck...Fuck...Fuck...Fuck. Fucking stupid protoplasm....Fuck..Fuck!!!!!!!!

If they never provide a bill, how does one administrate for discharge/what would one do next?

Walk away?

Ask again, call them everyday, and ask for the bill, tell them it's IMPORTANT for you to take care of this, and record ALL CALLS :P

The Persons we have, received notice a set-off officer from CRA will now take any tax-refunds to the person in order to set-off debt for Property Tax. No Bill from Minister of Finance for Property Tax although the Sole Authorized Administrator has Demanded one. Round and round we go!

It was interesting because the one letter that came was threatening action against the property (which of course we answered). This notice is simply saying they will take off anything they owe the person through income tax credits to balance the debt. "On behalf of the Ministry of Finance". Would this be third party interloping?

Yes.

So is ANY LAWYER.

Hmmmmmm. Send notice back AND fee schedule/buy in option for third party interloper is what I am thinking.

Cara Small, in other words, they are saying that there is some debts that aren't administrated ?

Fuck, tell them you absolutely want to administrate these :/

Yes. We have asked for the bill from the original party. We think this notice was sent before they even received our correspondence. Along with sending notice back to third party, we will demand a bill again from the original party.

I am not inviting/allowing/accepting CRA to do anything on behalf of the ministry of finance tho.

Dear CRA,

I am the SOLE AUTHORIZED administrator for the person named PIERRRE DAOUST, inscription number 119XXXXXXXXXX, and SIN no. 26X-XXX-XXX.

It came to our attention recently, that CRA may have some PUBLIC debts addressed to the person I happen to have, and these PUBLIC debts are not administrated.

PLEASE, send these debts to that person” address as soon as possible, so we can administrate these debts.

If we do not receive any PUBLIC debst from you, in the next 30 days, we will UNDERSTAND that this were false rumors, and there is no existent debts concerning the person I happen to be the SOLE administrator of, named PIERRE DAOUST —.blablablabla”.

With PEACE.

BY:_______________________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST Inscription no. 119XXXXXXXXXX SIN: 26X-XXX-XXX

:P

Hmmmm. So you are saying to request the bill through them now? Why?

No, I am saying to tell CRA, or ANYONE, that you WANT to administrate ANY debts for the person you happen to be the sole authorized admin for....if debts exists... :/

In other words, do the OPPOSITE of what everyone is doing, BEG them to receive debts, so you can ADMINISTRATE these debts, tell them you HATE having a slave in your pocket that has DEBTS pending :D

The debt isn't with CRA. It is with Property Tax. We ARE begging for a bill from them. I just don't see why I would want to ALSO ask for the SAME debt from CRA.

Sorry, I thought it was from CRA, sorry madame :)

Pete is saying NOTIFY the CRA they can't ACT on the person you have in your pockets behalf. Only the SOLE AUTHORISED ADMINISTRATOR can. Apparently these people think they are AUTHORIZED to do it for you. Or they are atleast trying. :-D

The notice was from CRA. The debt they are speaking of, is from Property Tax. I think they realized we aren't buying the debt back and are trying a different route rather than send us a bill.

Ok, funny shit !!!! :D

What prevent me from creating a Bill of Exchange ? Scott :/

Like this one for example....

http://www.ray-corporation.com/images/credit.png

Interesting question Pete. We were discussing that last night. Could a corporation create a bill, as above, WITH instruction on how to administrate?

I was more thinking about "ME", creating a Bill of Exchange, in the case of one of these fucktards that refuses to supply one for me to complete it.... :/

If I want to THINK as a creditor, for that person, I can't see anything wrong with it... :/

I see. We were thinking of creating a bill trough the corp for what WE value ourself at per hour and providing the person, to whom the bill is addressed, instruction on administrating. Just curios how that would play out. But I am first interested in your question.

Me too, I am first interesting in my question :D

And the treasury has posted something VERY similar to what you posted Pete Daoust....They called them 'bogus sight drafts'.

I am not arguing its right or wrong....because I don't know....

So a Notice has three party ? :-\ A drawer A drawee A payee (beneficiary)

Hahaha.....it dosen't make sense :-P

Its inchoate, but yes. It can have terms and conditions. Isn't that what they are for?

Ehhhh....nevermind. That might be some free dumb shit that was stuck in my brain

So when Dean would tell us to adapt the text in our own words so it would be more like something we might say... that wasn't a good thing! :(

And so copy\paste is a good thing cause, good is good no matter how many times the gouvernement receives cpies of it! right?

Just remember the number one rule Janick...

speak clearly, if you speak at all; carve every word before you let it fall. - Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. I am only beginning to see the artistry of Scott Duncan's documents. This thread has helped me become aware that fucking with his documents is like smearing a Rembrant with finger painting. I now understand "shitstain," Apologies!

Oliver Wendell Holmes was an over-rated blow-hard who has nothing of use to say.

He was a piece of shit, made out to be of "value". You all have heard of his famous "you can't yell fire in a crowded theater" statement, when discussing the limits of free speech. What nobody mentions, is that he was putting the publishers of a Yiddish newspaper in jail, for daring to write, in a language that most Americans COULDN'T READ, that America should not be involved in the Great War (WW1).

The sack of shit JAILED them. Quote Hitler. I'd have more respect for you :P

I only found value in the quote, not the man

I really think I'll start a book on Pete's greatest quotes :D

In a few hundred years, I will rock !!! :D

"If you don't BUY it, you don't have to PAY for it"

Pete's quote No. 1

"When a DEBT is offered, Offer a DEBT in return, it will make you FREE" :P

I offered CRA some debt, maybe their "set-off" officer may become a good guy to know? hahaha.

What's an "offset" ?

What does that mean ? :/

Offset

A contrary claim or demand that may cancel or reduce a given claim; a counterclaim. A kind of bookkeeping entry that counters the effect of a previous entry.

setoff (offset) n. a claim by a defendant in a lawsuit that the plaintiff (party filing the original suit) owes the defendant money which should be subtracted from the amount of damages claimed by plaintiff. By claiming a setoff the defendant does not necessarily deny the plaintiff's original demand, but he/she claims the right to prove the plaintiff owes him/her an amount of money from some other transaction and that the amount should be deducted from the plaintiff's claim. (See: offset, affirmative defense)

What's the USE of these two words, WHY should I use them ?, why do I see this SETOFF words so often, and I NEVER use it ? :(

Am I missing something ? :(

Heelloosss ? :/

guess?; I would think two parties that do commerce together could agree to exhange goods and/or services simply "off-setting" (cancelling) what each other owes to each other until a certain time, at which time one party would "square" up with the other, It seem co-operation would be needed?

ooops, I used "off set" in attempt to define off set

Agreeing to EXCHANGE stuff ? ....no need to to off set, and/or set off anything in this scenario ? :D

perhaps for the accounting of exchanging?

As long as it stays for posts, I have no problem with it :D

I know what you mean Tommy, but when two parties AGREE to EXCHANGE stuff, no one owes to no one, I may have to adjust the INVENTORY on the stuff, but if no INVOICE is created, no offsetting is needed......I think, :)

I was referring this to a debt, I can only see a debt being discharged, I can't figure out OFFSETTING a debt, unless two debts exist, one from each other parties, and for that, two invoices are needed.........that's what I think anyway, I may be wrong though :/

And the two invoices need to be of the same amount :D

Anyway, just thinking outloud, no big deal ;)

I dont mind, I won't hold you accountable to my understanding.

As i dont have one.

But I am still curious of WHY folks uses this "offset" word so often :D

Got my interest this week!

Well Scott Duncan, I've been thinking about it, and maybe Derek just wanted to HELP a friend ? :D

Ya know !!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :D

Pete, why do these invoices have to be of equal value? If PIERRE owe less than the invoice you send for PIERRE, can you not accept a loss in order to close the account?

I may be thinking wrong, but It seems that if money is owed by PHILLIP to FAMILY SUPPORT and they have suspended his license for one year to "pay" his debt, he may bill them for 24hr x 365 days x hourly rate. The total amount would be more than PHILLIP owes. And since they are not going to send that total to PHILLIP the first time, give them a bullshit buffet of send a check and remove the suspension OR if I don't receive a check, It will be understood that there is no longer any debt due to the offset and the account is closed and that the suspension is lifted.

Oh....this "offset" word again !! :-o

The debt has been ADMINISTRATE, by the sole authorized administrator, for complete discharge via the SURETY of the PERSON to whom the debt was sent to. So the matter is SETTLED.

:P