Mar 17, 2014 4:38 PM

Oh....one more thing....when they said I couldn't write on the Kourt document, I asked if the Kourt thought I was some kind of a slave...then I said then why is the Kourt enforcing its will on me?

Imposing, not enforcing. :P

Is there any possibility they called the name again after recess?

Who cares? :/

Yup....I am sure they wanted to proceed to a trial. I don't see why and how the matter has not been settled really!

I asked if the Kourt thought I was some kind of a slave: WHAT WAS THEIR ANSWER TO THAT ? :)

none....then within...I would say 30 seconds, he called for a recess

:( so we don't know ? :(

We do not!

You should had FORCED them to answer that one :D

*have

Don't worry Chris Evan! I still think you're some kind of slave, even if the court's position is a bit ambiguous. :D

:D

uh-oh!!!

:D

Ha! It hurts all the way to the Caribbean!

But these CHARGES seems to be DIS-CHARGED now !! ...no ? :D

I think they are UNLESS there is a defect in the Instrument.

So now, what about sending them an INVOICE, for your time, I mean, you had to go there and everything.......ya know ? :/

Dear Kourt,

Thank you for given me the opportunity to administrate charges on the person, I happen to have in my pocket.

It was a great pleasure for "me" to do so.

here is an invoice for my time, in regards to this commercial affairs.

With Love.

BY:____________________________ Sole Authorized Admin for CHRIS EVAN

Peace :P

I sent the DA a $35,000 invoice in the other case already

When ?

2 months ago....as soon as I got them into default via Ceit's procedure

Have you followed up with a STATEMENT, and a NOTICE, and a FINAL NOTICE, and a DEFAULT NOTICE, and a LIEN ?

:/

Not yet!

Charges are still accruing at the rate of $1000 per day that the NAME is used

They need another invoice still!

That was just from when the CLAIM was made

Oh fuck, you got some administration shit in your hands :(

Sure do!

a 1000 per day for servitude to forms of your adversary, none of which is your fault

Anyway, I like the fact that one of my facebook friend is not a looser :)

I suggest, next time, make sure they answer that SLAVE question by a YES or a NO. :D

Just remember guys, you aren't Ceit Butler!

She was trained by Lou Manotti. She has access to ME 24/7, and she is no slouch in a courtroom on her own.

The Ceit method requires a COMPLETE understanding of what you are doing, and it does NOT forgive error.

You mean Ceit, the presumed MAMMOTH organization, or a queen of some sort ? :D

:O If used as a noun, slouch means an unimpressive incompetent person.

:D ....it's like "nice" .....she is NOT "nice" in court

What would have happened if you would have objected to his call for a recess? Force him to deal with the issue right now. Or would he just ignore you and run.

Let the "Speculation-fest" begin! :D

They run. They always run. Ask Lou Manotti.

let's say I have a BILL and it has been dishonored. I've sent proper notice, opportunity to cure and final notice of default. I then affirm an affidavit of obligation take my mail receipts and notices and create and register a notice of security interest. Lets say the security is $50.000.000.00, Where would I register this. Service Ontario says liens can only be registered for personal property that has been used as collateral to obtain a loan or that is being repaired or stored. If I want to lien The Chiefs of Police or say the Privy Council of Canada, and Justice Department, is that possible or do we go after the individual who endorsed false claims?

If they owe, you can lien. The end. Service Ontario can't say otherwise.

Is $50.000.000.00, is in fact, 50 millions ? :/

Thank You Scott Duncan, Yes Pete Daoust my lien will be in the 50 millions, how else do you get the bonding pulled and hold the individual accountable. anything less leave the MUNICIPALITY on the hook and thats more debt for them but more surety from the stupid

I see your point Aladdin Sane. I feel the matter was properly Administrated therefore I didn't care.

no its 50. you mean 50,000,000.00

heads are gonna roll!

At least you didn't have to go to these depths. This is sad. It was like reading an obituary: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/The_Canadian_Government_Free_Dean_Clifford_he_is_in_solitary_confinement_since_his_arrest/?pv=0

By the way, "GO SIGNERS, GO!"

Yeah, a PETITION! Boy, that'll show 'em. I bet they're quakin' in their boots over there in Manitoba now...

when you PETITION,MOTION, ASK- you are BEGGING. So get on your KNEES when YOU do that kind of shit!

Who want to petition in here ? :-\

*wants :-D

Ho, sorry, I just saw Aladdin Sane's post.... :-D

It seems that the Kourt has issued an Arrest Warrant (although I have not been notified by the Kourt. The Registry of Motor Vehicles sent a Notice stating that)

did they include a # with the paperwork? lien it! photograph the letter and post it.

This tells me that they are hiding something and plan on railroading me if I go to the other Kourt on Apr 2. I think something needs to be filed ASAP in that matter. Thoughts on this?

a person I trust already liened that Docket Number.

is that warrant # the one you appeared for last monday? it is dated 2013 and apparently on a 'form' letter because it says your lic. could be suspended. yes it is a double jeopardy threat using the old warrant over again which should have expired 30 days after it was issued or sooner because they brought you in on it, but it is still good for 30 days. knowing you can't post a bail without signing an agreement, you should plan that they will attempt to hold you, so get your ducks in order. they probably shredded the documents you wrote on once they figured out what you did.

That is the DOCKET NUMBER of that case

i thought last monday you were in ipswitch, which was the warrant issued for not showing up in salem on the first issue, but you do have a date (?) april 2 for salem.

OH! what you did in ipswitch last monday must have worked and they cant bring it back up (?) maybe its closed. and this is a threat of warrant to show up in salem on the original first charge.

No...no no...you have it backwards. The Ipswich Warrant was cleared when they arrested ME on this Salem thing. Last Monday was Salem

Back in October

oh then this is pre emptive from/because of your leaving court last monday. you neglected to reserve ALL rights and accept none of the benefits. you need a script to follow each and every time you 'appear'. they came back from recess and you failed to return, so they issued (will issue) a bench warrant to have you brought back in.

It seems they are NOT very happy about one of their SLAVE'S behavior :D

They are getting out the WHIP :P

They still "believe" they are the MASTER of that PERSON, the presumption seems to be there, still.... mmmhhhh !!! :/

^^ Thats how I see it too

you need to bring the paperwork that specifically describes what it was that you did. they are claiming they have no idea what it was that you did, they will act as children "i dont know"... well you have to put it infront of them, then they can not say they dont know. you have to submit everything, they can claim they know nothing but what is in the file.

Have you cleared out that "signature episode" with them ? .....I mean IN DETAILS ?

I did David Johansen....EVERYTHING was written down

On the Notice of Mistake.

not on the NoM. you have to provide them with the info and cite where that info came from so they can investigate its validity. ok then you go back in there and tell them you do not understand, according to ... you honorably discharged the debt instrument and case should be closed. you however never gave them the chance to ask you what is your wish/will in the matter.

the recess was a reset to try to trip you up. you should have not left and been better prepared to handle the return from that.

So then that is evidence that this matter isn't settled?

It seems that there is still some PRESUMPTIONS floating in the air, somewhere :(

I am getting the same shit here, in a more relax way, but they are extremely resistant as far as traffic tickets....

well, from what i am reading, that book from 1909 bills of exchange (thank you to the person who provided that), page 100 supra protest, says about collecting on a contract by somone deceased or incompetant such as a person of unsound mind (aren't we all?)... or also a fictitious person... so any BoE with a ficticious 'person' is in fact invalid, and is not that the whole basis of our claim in ALL of these matters?

chris evan shulte is a ficticious person and the surety for ALL matters is the party who signed the document whom created the fiction.

the first warrant was the ipswitch case, this is the salem case mentioning a warrant. yah, i would say... you walked out, they cant do anything without you being there as everything HAS to be openly public which it was not because you left, so, yah, they will drag you back in inorder to conclude the matter, they have no other choice but to follow procedure.

thats why i said, get ALL your ducks in a row for this and go in there before they pick you up emptyhanded.

again, IMHO you need to get ALL this stuff taken care of first, get the suspension lifted, pay whatever you have to to get the license reinstated, then cancel the contract. otherwise it will allways be hanging over your head.

Or call Scott Duncan, 416-XXX-XXXX, I don't remember the last 7 digits :P

yah, i second that. this is outside of our scope to handle without him.

Funny....I did that just before I read that Pete Daoust

Yes.

Good thing !!! :D

And so, what did Scott said, Chris .... :D

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Come on Chris, share the nuggets, it's because of ME if you called, I sent you some telepathic shit, with my spirit thing......come on !!! :D

Peace Man... :D

I have bought $3000.00 worth of CD's from this Eckhart Tolle guy, to achieve that kind of shit.....mmmmmmmooooouuuuuhhhaaaaaaaa !!!!.....that was the sound I have made with my mouth, to reach your spirit, and plant the IDEA of calling Scott Duncan.....

He told me exactly what we already know!!! Notify them through the corporation of a Lien and Fraud. When they come get me ask "By what authority do you attach a NAME derived from a Public Document to me?" 40 times is the record!

:D

That's ALL, no magical ink color and shit ? :(

YAH....RED VOID

Please, share the NOTICE you will create.....please :D

Do you have to send notice through the corp because the corp has already liened the person?

yes

Ah right....

He said "Don't accept the charges...VOID"!

Which is the one thing I thought I did wrong actually.....

In other words, you've treated it as a DEBT, instead of a CHARGE ? :/

Fuck... :(

Charge

To impose a burden, duty, obligation, or lien; to create a claim against property; to assess; to demand; to accuse; to instruct a jury on matters of law. To impose a tax, duty, or trust. To entrust with responsibilities and duties (e.g., care of another). In commercial transactions, to bill or invoice; to purchase on credit. In Criminal Law, to indict or formally accuse.

An encumbrance, lien, or claim; a burden or load; an obligation or duty; a liability; an accusation. A person or thing committed to the care of another. The price of, or rate for, something.

Debt

A sum of money that is owed or due to be paid because of an express agreement; a specified sum of money that one person is obligated to pay and that another has the legal right to collect or receive. A fixed and certain obligation to pay money or some other valuable thing or things, either in the present or in the future. In a still more general sense, that which is due from one person to another, whether money, goods, or services. In a broad sense, any duty to respond to another in money, labor, or service; it may even mean a moral or honorary obligation, unenforceable by legal action. Also, sometimes an aggregate of separate debts, or the total sum of the existing claims against a person or company. Thus we speak of the "national debt," the "bonded debt" of a corporation, and so on.

Regardless, I am only the lawful holder in due course. yes? SOMEONE was charged and SOMEONE owes a debt.

:-o

I don't HOLD that shit ? :( I am not even sure I can HOLD anything :/ well.... :D

Pete Daoust....I will DEFINITELY share the notice before I send it. I am done with stupid shit....check that. I am leaving the stupid shit in the past. :-D Still working out the kinks in that

How about on a sheet is: Page 1. Notice of Intent and Liability; and on the "private side" Page 2. a notarised sealed Notice of Intent and Liability. So that the adjudicator can't turn the file over without being noted privately. ?

Why would I do that?

brauns is thinking to much, but it wouldnt hurt none if on the back of every sheet of paper issued by the company to be in faded light grey, a copy print of the fee schedule. just like on the back of the town excize tax form/remittance.

Why would I do that?

See....I have given them the SURETY BOND. THEY feel its their right to enslave ME. I don't see why ANYTHING other than a NOTICE stating such and WHY they don't have that right is necessary. The rest is all FREEDUMB crap. I am not interested in conversing and negotiating and titting and tatting with these criminals. I only want to be left alone.

ok, i see/hear what your saying. just that all i meant was that the back of a piece of paper be marked, even with simply, 'turn over', like a watermarked picture.