Chris ThorntonMar 12, 2014 6:35 PM

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME? That's the ONLY answer I am giving now :P

if anyone has any anything they would like to share or send me privately please email healthywarrior@unseen.is

My initial thought was express the waiver of public benefits, stating the obvious referenced in the notice of mistake and waiving the legal name.

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME?

^^^ Just wanted to 'like' that again

gay :P

not gay, festive.

I AM the sole AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the name, BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME?

we're still not answering his question the way he wants...

Affidavit of Affirmation sounds redundant to me.....what am I missing?

probably meant 'or' not of. perhaps he meant 'affadavit upon an oath or affirmation', as somthing witnessed/signed by a notary.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/affidavit

There are no synonyms in law! :P Affidavit, and affirmation must have their own legal definition.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/affirmation

Maybe CREATING an AFFIDAVIT, write the TRUTH, on WHO you are on it, and WHO you are not :D , and send that thing to that registrar general, and if ever he don't think what you've wrote is true, he might send back an AFFIDAVIT, saying to you, what's the REAL truth :D HAHAHAHA!!!! :D

But I get your point, Chris.

Hey, let's work on that affidavit? Let's see what we can come-up with. I'll start. I am ME. I am not YOU. My name is not of anyone's business. I am not a LEGAL NAME. I am the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the PERSON MACKXIMUS MINIMUS. I am NOT a/that PERSON, MACKXIMUS MINIMUS.. I have a PERSON, but I don't OWE that PERSON. I am NOT SURETY for the PERSON MACKXIMUS MINIMUS. PROOF of who is SURETY for MACKXIMUS MINIMUS, (state name here), is provided in exhibit A, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and/or SURETY BOND/PUBLIC RECORD. I am NOT a SLAVE to ANYONE. I DO NOT CONSENT to either voluntary servitude, and/or involuntary servitude. There is no authority to attach any LEGAL NAME, and/or ANY information, derived from a public document to ME. I will NOT buy any public debt back. As the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the PERSON MACKXIMUS MINIMUS, I will only discharge ALL public debts. Well, that's not all, but a start. Just ideas in my mind.

I will only discharge ALL public debts ... NNNOOOO :D I will only ADMINISTRATE these public debts, and send them back to its beneficiary, so they can present them to BANK OF CANADA, for complete discharge :P

The SURETY discharge the debt, not ME

But I am stealing your AFFIDAVIT :P

Take over, Captain! You get the idea.

Correct me if I am wrong here.....once we administrate enough debts, the 'national debt' goes away and the lien comes off the Treasury, thereby ending the receivership and restoring law....

I am NOT a SLAVE to ANYONE I am not a government AGENT, and/or a Government EMPLOYEE, and/or, I am NOT a SLAVE to ANYONE

Something like that, Chris :D

once we administrate enough debts, the 'national debt' goes away: That part, I am sure.....

Once the lien comes off, the original res of the original trust becomes our collective property...?

How can the lien come off ? :/

There are things from the NoM that definitively must go in the affidavit too.

It gets satisfied

How can it EVER be satisfied ? :(

When I'll die ?? :/

Huh?

Sorry Chris, I don't understand what you are saying :(

I concur. :/

HAHA!! :P

Yeah I know....and I am not typing it out.

Maybe later

Typing out what ? :/

Later....I am taking a nap

From what i remember- Robert Cormier followed this up with a comment on the 'ratification' of a trust, in which Scott replied with using the analogy of how if anyone noticed how they ask for "objections" first at a wedding before the bride-and-groom actually get MARRIED...

Here is the full thought from the other day........

We entrusted some stupid government to regulate and coin money AND manage some rights we had. For instance, handling Judicial matters dealing in Admiralty cases, protecting the waterways, etc (Constitution). When that trust collapsed in 1933, they took all the gold (Executive Order 6102) and now hold it in RECEIVERSHIP. They gave us CERTIFICATES that evidenced we have some stake in this RECEIVERSHIP. I have good reasons to think that they think they are holding some of our rights...and that they have the RIGHT to do that. So, if we Administrate enough debts, the lien that the Federal Reserve has on the PROPERTY IN RECEIVERSHIP goes away because we CANCEL that debt. If we all start using asset back currency (like cryptos), there will be no more LEGAL TENDER. And we will get our original Corpus back. (Of course, this is all based on the fact that we aren;t dealing with criminals) Doe this make sense now? Mackximus MinimusPete Daoust

All I can see is slavery, and everything else is just there to justify it. I have a problem "believing" in government, Chris Evan, for very obvious reasons. Give the Corpus back? I think you still are focusing on the wrong things. :/

I might be wrong, but that's how I think about it.

Ehh....maybe its stolen. But it explains a lot

You see how mind control is? You, somehow, have at least considered the possibility of mysterious strangers keeping "something" from you, this magical "corpus ". And it's now your turn to "solve" the mystery (by discharging enough debt), and "they" will hand "it" back to you. But is was "stolen". ??? Don't you see how fucked-up that is? :/

Chris, we were born without a "corpus", I think you will do just find without it. That's my point.

Its actually not keeping somthing from me....so much as the IDEA that this is what they are doing. I don't care about that shit...but I was making the point that I THINK this is what they are doing.

An example of an 'Assignment by Operation of Law,' is where a person goes bankrupt, all of his or her contractual rights are assigned to the trustee in bankruptcy. A similar situation, is where a person becomes incapable of managing her of his affairs due to a 'mental disability.'

Mackximus- PROOF of who is SURETY for MACKXIMUS MINIMUS, (state name here), is provided in exhibit A, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and/or SURETY BOND/PUBLIC RECORD.

(state name here) ?

typo

Should I send the affidavit to the Registrar General before the new trustee liens the name and records the PUBLIC NOTICE? or should I lien the name and include the PPSA info in the affidavit?