Mar 04, 2014 7:32 AM

I "LOVE" it, when you mention "ME" in one of your article, it makes me feel like a FRENCH FRY :D

Muhahahahaha!!!

Thanks Pete. :P (potato, french fry, you get it ? :/ )

Filing a "hurt feelings" report!

I "love" it, I said :/

CAN a "weaponized" woman remain ethical while serving your agenda?

:/

Ethics, Legal

The branch of philosophy that defines what is good for the individual and for society and establishes the nature of obligations, or duties, that people owe themselves and one another. In modern society, ethics define how individuals, professionals, and corporations choose to interact with one another.

The branch of philosophy has been HIJACKED in the past decades :D

"I have been shit on for my trouble", feels so familiar. Before I finished grade school most of my "friends" called me "gotta-be-different-Webb".

Accepted for value & consideration. .. under Supra Protest of course...... 100 chimps....that 10 % thing should be getting close shouldn't it Scott ??? I'd say it's about roughly nine percent @ the moment.....it does not matter who says it as long as two plus two equals four equeals the truth.....I value many.....

I think Cara wants to "Bunny Up" :D

Thank you Scott, I know this will sound weird, but after reading that article over and over, I "KNOW" now what money is. :/

The trick is reading Scott's article from bottom to top folks, try this, it will reveal the "secrets" of what Scott is trying to tell us, no kidding :) , or maybe only French dudes can do that, whatever :/

Seen by 60, "liked" by 19 - approval rating of 32%. Clearly the hours you spent writing this were only appreciated by a fraction of the people reading. Let's move on to writing limericks for cash.

No way! You can't do MATH. You're a GIRL! :P

31.66666666666667 % , sorry, I am into crypto-currency now :P

OH! And Pete Daoust steals the point! :D

Ok Pete, my expectation would be that if only 19 (31.666666%) people thought this had value, that the other 40 would at least offer some insight as to why they did not.

*41 :P

Ok Pete, my expectation would be that if only 31.66666666666667% of people thought this had value, the other 41 would at least offer some insight as to why they did not.

And what will we do with these "insights" ? :/

In truth, probably nothing. One lives in hope though that people's comments might provide some insight into what they understand, what they don't, how they have interpreted certain words or phrases, and what "approach" might be more educational or inspiring for future efforts.

insight from a newbie "fear of judgement"

No way! You can't do MATH. You're a GIRL! :P

That, Scott Duncan, amuses me in ways only you can fathom.

Fathom..... :D

You always do that..... :D .....all the time :D

She fathoms all the time?

Do you realize, on how many time I need to read your stuff, before I get a "little thiny" clue ? :D

But just look at how fantastic your vocabulary is now :D

That's just a French thing. It's not your fault, Pete. :(

I need to leave this PLANET, when I read Tara Duncan's stuff, I have to ESCAPE in the UNIVERS somewhere, and read it 10 times.....

Depth. Like the spud drop schtick....down & down further into the deep crevass....uh oh....I'm not going there.....I noticed the spud won too.... GO TEAM SPUD !!! :-)

Well, Ceit, I even wrote a freaking dictionary.....that is something :-o

Perhaps it's time to reinstate the "Word of The Day"! :D

OBJECTIVE REVIEW: Pete's Law Dictionary

PRO - The Frenglish is AWESOME in your dictionary, Pete! CON - I'm only mentioned ONCE? REALLY?

Fuck, I am busy Ceit, I manage 2 computers now, I could not even follow two threads, not that long ago :D

Did he just say that? I manage 2 computers?

Yep...

So....still all floppy in the mouth about team Clifford.....how's bubba keeping him ?? :-D

My dictionary Pete Daoust, has a picture of me in for AWESUM.

You invented a word for yourself?

2= Pete ....

How many times am I mentioned?

Tara raises a valid point; You see the words Pete Daoust defines, every day.

What jurisdiction of illiterate morons uses the "legal" term "AWESUM"?

Your "dictionary" seems to lose sight of what the word "dictionary" means.

It's my dictionary not yours...use your own dictionary mate :-D

Your idiocy blinds you to the point. I'll say it again; Your "dictionary" seems to lose sight of what the word "dictionary" means.

Liberty says it so its my truth....Daddy= Me=Awesum :-D

Now, I have no choice to STOP the production of Pete's Law Dictionary, and add POTATO in it :(

With a picture of Adam?

Concisely spoken & / or telexed.

One more time: The word DICTIONARY has a specific mandate. "My Dictionary" can only be possessive. Language is to communicate. Nothing else.

This returns to the previous question; What jurisdiction of illiterate morons uses the "legal" term "AWESUM"?

Team spud = Me....

POTATO jurisdiction ? :/

http://youtu.be/akbflkF_1zY

Adam Thomas: Drop your panties, Sir William! I cannot wait `till lunchtime!

I mean it!

...you fucking idiot.

My balls......

Remember how much I hate people who celebrate ignorance? It's not funny.

It's what allowed the crooks to take over.

I know Scott Duncan...this is the part that I don't attach to .....

And what part you "attach" to ? :/

You may CHOOSE to celebrate ignorance, but it's not a "right" in my realm. There are those in the "silent majority" here that actually USE this group as a refuge from the global celebration of ignorance. Don't piss in their pool.

Thanks Pete. i was just wondering what the mystery part is.

I'm still enabling their system to operate....I'm doing what I can to also help others to Disable their system exactly like you do Scott Duncan & Suil Eilie ....& Team Clifford.....& Trent Goodbaudy & many many others......sooooo......& the fact is I don't care if my friends have a sky Dad that sleeps with them @ night... I'm not going to argue stupid with stupid because I don't believe tgat shit....I believe in ME & MY BALLS.....FOLLOW NO MAN.....BUT I LISTEN TO Y'ALL. ..

Adam's `tard Jamboree seems to have distracted from the main point: Why am I only mentioned ONCE in Pete Daoust's Law Dictionary? ...and ONLY in the context of MY SEX LIFE?

I AM the postie....

Rule 34?

:D

RahahahahahahahahHahhahahahah .....funny shit Scott ....Mr. potato head & his big shiny balls.....who wants them :-D

I I still hate ye Scott...

Adam Thomas, you do nothing to "disable their system". Nothing at all. You are a mosquito; An annoyance to them, and a HUGE threat to you. Nothing you think, feel, and/or BELIEVE will change that reality.

Dean Clifford is a REVENUE SOURCE now, so he's HELPING the system.

Trent Goodbaudy SELLS his information, which should be a death-penalty offense. See Aaron Swartz. His kind, caused THAT.

Just because you are all a bit more aware than the majority, doesn't make me hate you all ANY less.

Hey Pete Daoust baby schnitzels....I was wondering if ye still trade in Nazi Notes still please mate ??

Nazi NOTES are for PERSONS, do I look like a PERSON ? :/

ALL of this is YOUR FAULT.

You're the rape victim who was TRULY ASKING FOR IT! Admits you were asking for it, and now "it's over".

Now you are upset that people think they can rape you at will, because you dress "like a slut"...and cry that it's your RIGHT to "dress like a slut", and piss and moan that you keep getting raped, and when you complain, everyone points to "that time I asked to be raped"...

Do you see how STUPID that sounds?

I get bonus points for the rape metaphor, I think :D

I agree 100 % Scott Duncan Sir.....with sum things ye mentioned but not all.....I certainly appreciate your most valuable time & knowledge.....but I AM making a difference coz I AM a mosquito in their system but mosquitos spread disease....

WAKE UP YOU FUCKING IDIOTS!

RahahahahahahahahHahhahahahah. ....lots of larfs for the rape thing....gulp....I think...

Mosquitoes are also squashed with NO consequence to you.

Go ahead, squash one. There's lots there! Do you care after? Is your life in ANY MEASURABLE WAY changed? No?

Well that's YOU vs. the Government.

Scott Duncan.......you scare me....I feel fear...are ye NOT also a huge threat to yourself ???

Good men don't need rules. There's a reason why I HAVE SO MANY.

You're the rape victim who was TRULY ASKING FOR IT! Admits you were asking for it, and now "it's over"

Everything is in there !! :-o

There's an old adage, Adam Thomas that starts, "When you find yourself in a hole..." There's another old adage that starts, "Never try to teach a pig to sing..." Your conversation is starting to annoy me. If you have something interesting or informative to say, now might be the time to insert it here. Otherwise, kindly shut the fuck up!

The "celebrating ignorance" profile is TOXIC, and must be treated with contempt. Adam, shut the fuck up.

"Game Over" !! ....Tara, I GET IT !!!! :D

Yes Pete Daoust, it is. THANK YOU for ACTUALLY LISTENING. My actions have already demonstrated how sincere that is.

Keep going, and you will become a VERY powerful man, who KNOWS WHAT TO DO WITH POWER.

THAT, is useful to me.

Max and Pete rock!!!!!!!!!! Ten quatloos on the newcomers.

Sorry guys, I have missed a few post, I was really focusing on "Everything is in there" and "Game Over" ....why do I need ALL the energy I have to really get these things ? :( Is it because I am getting old ? :(

I'll take that bet.

Sadly, historical data is not on your side.

Yes legal tender is our enemy. ..that's why I'm here....giving for free....but only telexing my Truth....not your truth Scott Duncan....but it is the same language that we all must know & talk & walk to our own freedumbs....& I personally have a long path to tread before I get salvation & it rips me apart daily as it does everyone else....Peace y'all

Yes Pete Daoust. Sadly it is. They never warn you about that.

True is True, Adam Thomas. There is no "your truth" and "my truth". Reality isn't affected by your imaginary "self-truths".

Feel thy hate Scott Duncan....feel it..

I say WHAT is TRUE... not "My Truth". The VERY CONCEPT is a lie. You actually believe "my truth" is a valid concept? You now know why ALL BELIEF IS EVIL.

TRUTH IS TRUTH. IT'S NOT OWNED.

WHY THE FUCK DON'T YOU IDIOTS KNOW THIS?

Well, that depends what zodiac sign Adam is..... ?

Perturbation time.....

Maybe he is capricorn :P

And you ALL know that these capricorn have their OWN truth :D

Aquarius Pete, you ?

SANTOS! SAVE US WITH ASTROTHEOLOGY! SURELY "HIS TRUTH" WILL SAVE US!

I have no idea ! :(

When I grow up I will become a fornesic scientist.

..."my truth, not your truth" - Seriously Adam Thomas, you have wasted your time here.

Fornesic :D

I'll catch killers. Tee hee?

That is my truth.

Hey Pete Daoust....I used to believe that & in sum ways I still do but it's a greater understanding of the universe......

That's EXACTLY what I see when I watch the blonde chick on CSI Miami.

That's why BELIEF IS EVIL, Adam! It wastes your brain, and stops you from knowing who you are.

It creates NO understanding of the universe. Want THAT? SAGAN or TYSON.

Why do I feel a sudden cold chill up my spine & now as I type its 26° Celsius but I have goose bumps.....

In the Chinese horoscope, I am a Horse in Fire, since I discovered this, I said fuck it, I gotta drive a Mustang :P

Bullshit "Astrotheology" pretends to be "knowledge" and preys on your inability to investigate further... it's easier to BELIEVE.

I believe in truth and light and the goodness of mankind. I believe all men are created equal, and that the same products should be the same price regardless of what store you're shopping in. This too, is my truth.

In 1 minute I'll delete this post as it is utter, unsubstantiated bullshit.

THAT is EVIL. "Astrotheology" is the byproduct of EVIL INTENT. Santos = Evil. Period. (Unless he's mentally ill. I doubt that)

<<Why do I feel a sudden cold chill up my spine & now as I type its 26° Celsius but I have goose bumps.....>>

Adam, that's a clear symptom of NOT shuting the fuck-up. Just sayin'.

:D

What can I say, it's IMPOSSIBLE to have this kind of reading in the newspaper .....where the fuck can I go ? :D

Sorry, I can't delete the post. I believe in that comment too much. God told me not to delete.

It's a one-way trip. I'm the ONLY light to guide you. :P

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

QED

No wait...this just in...it was a dog that told me not to delete. I believe the dog spoke to me. In tongues, but not in a "Here Prince" kind of way.

Tara Duncan, there are times I suspect you are not entirely truthful with me...

That too is my truth. I learned this from Adam Thomas, who, by the way is AWSUM.

I still have a belief......sorry, I am having a hard time to eliminate it......can I share it here, and you guys promise not to laugh ? 8|

Yes Kate, Adam spells it AWESUM. But my interpretation of Adam's truth is now AWSUM. That way we can easily tell whose words we're using. Communication just got simpler.

NICE SAVE! :D

LOL

I have a painting done by a black fella of the Murray tribe.....it's about the dreamtime path the originals of the land have....fuck it....this pain runs deep within me.....fuck....you fucking scare the fuck out of me Scott Duncan....you are a scary smart deadly kunt......I fuckin love that shit .....which is why I still hate you with a passion. ....I noticed ye didn't mention Mick P in your dressing down....says a lot for his integrity. ..& mine. So thank you Scott. ...

We all use Scott Duncanisms....so theres that chimp shit Scott....keep punching :-D

So, you "hate" me, because I do what every Noble SHOULD do; Tell the truth.

You are saying I've HARMED you? What do I do to justify such hatred? I am clear of my hatred for you, and I take the time to explain JUST HOW you have harmed me. MY hatred is JUSTIFIED. Yours just seems to be whining.

You scare me Scott Duncan

Why?

Justify the fear.

...or is that just you whining?

I feel subjugated. ....trembling....in reality I think I've been programmed to love fear or hate fear & it confuses me

* crickets chirping *

...and this is somehow MY fault?

That's pretty "shoot the messenger" of you.

Wow, this is starting to seem a little too much like "Almost Human". I'm going to wander off and watch schlock.

Ye are a fearful Man Scott Duncan. ....I know this as truth......

It IS true. You SHOULD fear me. I can't be stopped... but only because you are WHAT you are, and don't know WHO you are, that makes that true. I'm just giving NOTICE. This is the world's warning from me. It always has been.

...but you can't think. Nothing YOU can do can stop me, and NOBODY has ANY defense against what I am building, or have caused to be built.

I need leaders, not crew. This is my last chance to get them. So...

LEARN TO LEAD LEARN TO INTELLIGENTLY FOLLOW or GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY

Confusion hardly equates to hate, Adam.

Yup....I give ye great value but I attach fear to your immense value. ...I know ye have a heart Scott & please I implore ye to not think that in reality if I was to ever meet ye I would not wish to punch ye in the head...it's not that hate....I can remember back last year to my dog Dora's death & your words about attachment.....this is hard...I struggle with detaching...fuck...just shoot me now please.

You aren't qualified to fear. You don't know WHAT to fear.

It's TOO LATE to fear me.

Yep.....you are AWE SOME Scott Duncan...I still back ye....there I just gave my value away & my power & now I'm back to square one again of hate :-P

I fear a continuing role as an expert quality assurance technician.

:-D

I don't want to stop ye Scott Duncan....never ever crossed my mind mate....I am grateful for your knowledge & everyone else's. ......yeg I'm getting your programming Scott, just keep punching a little harder coz its the only way I learned ....I learned to hate love & love hate ....I hate attaching to ego...what is @ the Cur of us all Tara Duncan & Scott Duncan??? Bare naked what the fuck are we ??? Our source is what ???

I feel your pain & I feel your rage & I feel your hurt....but I am attaching to wrong aren't I Scott Duncan ??? What is the source of you Scott ??? Is it human emotion & empathy or is it love ??? Or fear ??

I could not fathom what ye have experienced emotionally in your reality that I have been alluded to about ye Scott Duncan....which emotion do I trust Scott ???

Do your emotions deceive you Scott Duncan ???

The global answer to your questions is: None of your business, Adam Thomas.

I think always questioning your emotions (if you CAN) is a great practice.

Ok....thank you. Duly noted. P.S. it's none if your fucking business isn't it ?? :-D

Probably not. It was a thought I shared. That's all.

Questioning emotions ? via registered mail ? :-\

She's a girl. They do that. just ignore it. :D

Ha, ok...

Who let girls in? Don't we have rules and standards?

I thought I had infiltrated a gentlemen's club with a clever disguise.

Questioning you emotions is an interesting concept. That said, if you're constantly questioning your emotions would that, in and of itself, lead to an emotional response that should also be questioned? Please return to the start of this comment and re-read.

Emotions deceive do they not Tara Duncan Ma'am ??

Can I be a robot emotionally detached ??

Negative.

That makes me think of Tony Soprano, in the morning he would kill a man, then he would make a stop at home for a few slices of meat, and then go to see his psy to question his emotions :-D

If so please teach me how.

Hmmmmm. Maybe. Why would it lead to an emotional response? I am curious why you would say that. I have separated the two and am wondering if you are suggesting they are of the same. Questioning and emotion. I DO think that some emotions are powerful and useful at the right time, but I think I wouldn't want to make decisions about my actions just because I feel hurt, or just because I feel sad, or just because I feel horny. I am amazed at how my body CAN react without thought tho. Extremely useful tool. Maybe I am confusing reaction with emotion. Or vice versa.

Since I have stopped watching The Sopranos, I had lost 10 lbs, I had a great emotion because of that, but then, ChiefRock General started this chiken nuggets event, so I gain back these 10 lbs, another fucking emotion hit me :-(

Your emotions are a byproduct of you THINKING WRONG and VALUING THE WRONG THINGS. That will ALWAYS produce bad data.

To deceive, you must INTEND to deceive. Emotions are a RESULT, not a guide. They CAN'T "deceive". You're just stupid.

Haha! Good thing I think it through then. I'd be a disaster.

If you think logically, I don't see how you could be guided emotionally.

Liberty, just kissed her Dad & said she loves me & that I'm Awesum.....this is my source off my universe in reality. .... So Scott, ye are from the fruit of the very low hanging poisonous tree the Nobility & the Noble lie....why should I give my trust away to you ??? Because ye have stated thay ye hate us all....but do ye really intend us harm by you stating your emotional agenda of hate??? I don't want to be hated by no one....

Too bad.

No raindrop is ever blamed for the flood, but I claim the right to hate the rain that caused it.

So what happened to the spud ???

http://youtu.be/3FQCOlymAZo

Do ye hate the Nobility Scott ???

No. I disagree with the position that ruling you is my birthright. I don't hate them.

If I won't play by the clubhouse rules, I get kicked out of the club.

How so & why please Scott ???

Yup....

Exercise time :-D

Pfffft. Clubs. They are always so cliquey.

There's no reason to "hate" them. If they want to exploit ignorance, that's not my problem. It's not my business. I don't care what happens to ANY of you.

Teaching YOU is my means to HARM those who dared harm ME and interrupt my PERFECT LIFE.

That is the thing you don't get, Adam. You, and EVERYONE ELSE HERE are aware of the Noble Lie, because you were a victim of it.

When it happened to ME, it was because I was being stiffed for my bills. I pay MINE, you pay YOURS.

I keep MY side of contracts, you keep YOURS. See how simple that is?

When I REMINDED the government of this, I became a victim. I am now obligated to enforce the breach clauses in that contract. This is not negotiable.

My life was PERFECT. Not pretty good. Not REALLY GOOD... PERFECT. I wanted for NOTHING and could do ANYTHING. I WAS FREE! [ NOTE: Make NO mistake; I KNEW I was one of the few people on the planet with a PERFECT life. I took what I needed, and used all I took. I was ALWAYS aware that my life was PERFECT and mentioned it DAILY. I did not live off of your labour. ]

...you don't get to take that from me and NOT expect blood to spill. To the parties that did it, I say that if you thought otherwise, you are mistaken. I have BILLIONS of trained pre-programmed chimps, just DYING for "corrective lenses", and when they come for YOU, just remember the bullshit lies I am expected to accept:

They're just doing their job. There was a "court order". It's all "perfectly legal".

...and they WILL come for you.

Mutual benefit. :)

They've never stopped coming for me Scott.....never.....not real smart I know but am I one to run away from them when reality says not to run but stand & fight & be a Man...but no one wins in this exchange. ...the queen looks like the only winner to me but please correct me if I'm wrong ??

The Queen is BROKE. I thought everyone knew that. She's a "Ward of the State" now.

Call that "rich" if you want, but...

Hahaha :-D

I hear she's still got value with her false teeth out :-D

Santos' "Devils".

http://youtu.be/-1nsEtjqPg8

Santos Bonacci, has great value to me Scott, I am slightly interested in the stars & yes the pseudo-science behind it all....but he don't believe in no sky daddy. ...he was greatly deceived like I was also but his first meeting was one of head fuckery for me & I AM grateful for his level of knowledge in many areas of life....he has an honorable enough name for me.....I indorse a lot of what Santos has to say but not all of what he says.....I ACCEPT him as a friend....& I can't wait for his party. ...alcohol freeee...

<<Your emotions are a byproduct of you THINKING WRONG and VALUING THE WRONG THINGS. That will ALWAYS produce bad data.

To deceive, you must INTEND to deceive. Emotions are a RESULT, not a guide. They CAN'T "deceive". You're just stupid.>>

I had come to the conclusion that "emotions" are in the opposite direction of logic. When I observe nature, I can't see "emotions". You can clearly see the hand of man there, then.

Just like a computer program, our brain has been programmed. ALL of it. Not one single cell has an original thought.... yet. That's reality. So, our "programming" works with the input of words, and images. We are programmed to assign and/or subtract VALUE to these words, and images. Our "intelligence" is the accumulation of all that bullshit.

If you can program to assign VALUE to the wrong things, like for example "emotions", that would be sufficient to guarantee an ERROR in the thought process. No logic involved. That will keep some smarter people happy, for sure, and the parasites alive, and kicking. "Emotion" over logic and/or reason rules today.

Scott is programming us. BUT he has given disclosure from the beginning. He has not lied about his intentions. Whoever is still here, better know that there is a reason why all that "legal" bullshit was taught to us in the beginning, even thou the group is clearly about MONEY.

Adam, if you still see "value" in what Santos, and the Astrocrazoologists have to "say", you don't belong in this group. Think about what I'm saying. Then connect that to this:

<<LEARN TO LEAD LEARN TO INTELLIGENTLY FOLLOW or GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY>>

You see Adam Thomas, when one gets to know what money is, one starts having contempt for people that live off other's people's ENERGY. MY ENERGY.

By being here, and commenting a million times, and yet no one single drop of substance, you are robbing me of MY ENERGY (and everyone else's), and the ability to acquire KNOWLEDGE without having to sift piles of shit-stains about how are you "trembling", and what not.

So I will ask you to please get with "the program", or I will ask to the administrators myself to get rid of you. And I have pages of evidence to back-up my claim. So, please, "simmer down now"...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH_Js_5SpB8

I just need to rebuild my trust again amongst others. My program needs re-booting & a new program installed.....I indorse what ye say Max, but a friend to me is a gift to me....I will not allow myself to hate my friends that have a different belief.....if they cause me harm then I cause them harm but that's the wrong program too isn't it? ? I "BELIEVE" you Scott Duncan......I apologise for interference during transmissions. ...continue with programming. A perfect life.....weaponized wummin..... Liberty or death.

So Scott, if you are programing us. Then please tell me what would a human be like if not programmed? Or is such a thing possible because from MY programing tells me, we all change and adapte to our life experiences.

But without the evil entent of the Nobility or your intent to manipulate as well (with consent in both cases), what are we suppose to be like?

Do you have this information?

I'm just thinking about my children and doing homeschooling and all, makes me wonder if you would have a clue at the kind of education or (whatever the word may be) that would be a good path for them versus what the Nobility is getting.

Great question Janick Paquette & twas also on my mind.... Your allegory of the future Scott Duncan, looks like what please ???

Hey Mackximus Minimus....why be nice or pleasant & then attach a threat backed with fear right @ the end of your question posed to me ??? Your program is still incorrect..... Ye allude to pages of shit stains from me that ye will use against me if need be....that is a Threat that I do not fear Mackxi....I've copped that threat my whole life so try sumthing new & Original & prove to me that ye have an original thought of your own.....I been threatened my whole fucking life so keep that shit up ok....leading by example there Mackxi....

Also, please define

"...and they WILL come for you."

and the word VICTIM in this sentence.:

"When I REMINDED the government of this, I became a victim."

Janick. I think you asked a great question about raising children to not be programmed. It is something I have struggled with for the whole of my motherhood. One thing I can say is never stop them from asking questions and if you can't answer something, with facts to back it up or real knowledge on the subject, then say "I don't know." Sometimes I tell my daughters what I THINK and then we look into it. But I try to never assert something that I was only "taught" or "told" was so (now). There was a while in time when I DID teach them what I believed. Erasing all belief, ALL, is the only thing that has helped me be a better mother.

I don't know I am ever going to get ALL belief to stop rearing it's ugly head, but I no longer use the word and anytime it creeps up in conversation I get annoyed at the waste of time. If I can erase beliefs and encourage my daughters to keep asking questions, only settling for verifiable fact, at least I am not forcing MY stupid programming down their throat.

My one daughter is still in the fool system and the other is doing her own thing at this point. They were never told they had to accept whatever the teachers were spewing and were allowed to question ANY (including my own) posing authority. Of course this sets them up for some "attention". We stand behind them at these times as long as they didn't harm anyone and feelings don't really count. At the least they don't warrant discipline. Discussion, but not discipline.

I would like to hear what some one like Scott thinks about this subject, but I don't blame him for not delving into that area. I DO know that he will agree that ALL BELIEF is evil.

Dear Pete. I tried to do paragraphs, but as soon as I hit enter, they disappeared. Time to LEARN.

I hear you on that one Cara! Same approach here. I also am looking at The Trivium and Quadrivium (7 liberals arts), but am wondering if it's just another programing thing.

It's logical from what I read but then again my logic is programmed so, my compass is sort of going bisurk now! :/

I just think Scott would be a good way to reset that compass. :)

Janick Paquette: There are LOTS of "unprogrammed" people. ChiefRock Sino General, is a good example.

He and I are the EXACT OPPOSITE end of the scale. I'm nobility. He's Native. We're BOTH right.

Why is that? Think about it.

Please define "scale"?

So if I understand correctly,you are both right because you do not use your "so called" powers to use the people of this land.

Our reasons WHY are the same too.

...it's just in your collective natures, to harm us.

that is wrong....you are using us Scott! :/

Yes.

I've never lied about it.

so what is your "scale"

You are here because I tell the truth. My motives are irrelevant. You want truth. I give it. Transaction complete.

I'm curious as how you see this

You are not qualified to see as I do.

ok then, I want truth about the "scale" you are referingto

what would qualify me?

Ten years as my student MIGHT get you to the point where I can answer. You are just too old and think too much wrong shit. It's part of what the nobility steals from you.

That's the tragic part, and the only real empathy I feel for ANY of you; None of you really know what we stole.

and why can't you tell us?

I know :P

In fact you don't even know we took some of the things we did. You just don't use them...

...which is the same think I'm deploying NOW. I steal parts of your computer for MY needs. You won't notice. I'll even PAY you and give you free internet!... but you will NEVER grasp what it is I'm "buying" from you.

Same thing was done to YOU, only my plan isn't evil.

below is the most recent example of what I think Scott is talking about when he says "...and they WILL come for you." The October Crisis 1970; The invocation of the act took place at the same time as the widespread deployment of Canadian Forces troops throughout Quebec and in Ottawa, under separate legislation, giving the appearance that martial law had been imposed, although the military remained in a support role to the civil authorities of Quebec. The police were also enabled with far-reaching powers, and they arrested and detained, without bail, 497 individuals, all but 62 of whom were later released without charges.

So can all they/you took can be restored in our children in some way?

No. We don't program your children. YOU do.

what is your view on the Trivium and Quadrivium teachings?

That's how we work. We get OTHERS to inflict the ACTUAL evil.

ok! So how can we deprogram ourselves to not transfer this to our children if you are programing us to your advantage?

Man! Being a slave is a full time job! :P

Janick Paquette, you need to stop hunting in the past for science.

We've learned more in the past 10 years, than we have in all of HISTORY. The knowledge is NOW, not in midieval times.

PAST is a GUIDE POST, not a HITCHING POST.

Thanks! Long hours gained right there!

What about the Pineal Gland? Is that rubish like the left hemisphere nad the right hemisphere of the brain... you posted not long ago?

or is that part of what you took from us?

NONE of your answers lie there. These things aren't for you. they are for professional name-callers, and fraud artists trying to SELL knowledge.

Notice I hold ALL people who SELL knowledge, in the utmost contempt. See if you can figure out why.

because they are not Nobility?

Because if they are selling it = not true?

or money racket?

The nobility took something so precious, that they wiped the ability to know what it is, from you, over 300 years ago.

THAT is what hurts. You will NEVER know. I was just born among the people who did it, and when I protested that we are stealing something we haven't the right to, I was told it'd be cruel for you to know otherwise.

...sadly they are right.

So you are telling me that this is NOT reversable, I mean what they took from us and that is why we will never know?

Or is it because it is impossible to stop them from doing it to us in the future?

Yes Janick Paquette, that is what I am telling you. It is NOT reversible. Neither is MY programming. You don't get to UN-LEARN what I teach. You just don't.

I already covered this.

And so does the Nobility know what they took from us or was everything erased 300 years ago? (last question on the topic, I promis) :P

Ask as many as you wish, Janick.

Yes we ALL KNOW. We STILL know, because like the Maidsafe network, WE know the VALUE of what we are stealing.

Truth be told, if we pay you 50 dollars a month for you to use our internet service... we're robbing you blind. You might as well be picking coco beans for Hershey :D

So THAT's why we are worth something on the market! :/

YUP!

So even if you are not agreeing with what THEY are doing, you choose not to tell us what they/you stole from us?

Or because you can't?

The whole fucking "ME", has been stolen from "ME", and I had NO IDEA, and when I say, I JUST WANT TO BE ME, I can't, because I don't HAVE that "ME", it's gone......stolen, but now I know where it is......and I want it back, and I see a little bit of resistance, ... :)

either or it a choice in my book! :/

Hey Pete! Where have you been? :)

I understand what you are saying Pete but that is from an administration point of view.

I know it has a huge impact on our daily lives but...

Maybe I didn't clarify enough the "what" they took.

Scott, was what they took part of - our physical bodies or was it - administrative - brain control - or all of the above?

The "WHOLE ME", has nothing to do with an administration point of view, it has to do with the "WHOLE ME"

In reality, I have ALL THE POWER, if I am "ME", but it was stolen :(

The supremacy of GOD, is "ME" Janick Paquette, LITERALLY "ME"

Make no mistake on this....

But do you know who is your ME?

You mean, do I know who I am ? :D

Please define GOD?

Yes.

...MEANWHILE, here in reality. :P

Please define GOD? : "ME"

easy for you to say Scott! you won't answer my last question! :P

Any objections ?? :D

no! Looks good on this side! Just checking if there was a GOD I had missed somewhere! :P

Scott, just in case you didn't read it...

So even if you are not agreeing with what THEY are doing, you choose not to tell us what they/you stole from us?

Or because you can't? :)

Fuck, Janick Paquette, I just TOLD you twice... :(

I can't. When YOU figure out how to make a 4 year-old understand advanced calculus, you let me know, and I'll use THAT method to teach you. :P

Windows can't mount an ext4 filsesystem, no matter HOW you try.

Linux does it easily. And it can mount the windows filesystems too. It's just a better operating system. Windows is "one-size-fits-all".

I'm Linux. You're Windows.

You need to PURGE your OS and replace it. You can't keep windows, if you want to do REAL computer shit. :P

You are much the same as the computers around you.

You need to PURGE your OS and replace it. You can't keep windows, if you want to do REAL computer shit.

It never really been installed correctly/completely, in my case :P

Too many mothers :D

I just had Linux UBUNTU installed in my computer.

if that was a litteral thing!

If not then... :/

so you can use my computer all you want, I guess, right Scott? :P

It wasn't. It was a parallel metaphor. YOUR BRAIN runs "windows" - A Nobility made, one-size-fits-all, closed-source, bug-ridden operating system.

The Nobility runs "Linux" in their brain. Nothing is hidden. We share the successes. We correct mistakes, and we implement/exploit new technology as it comes out.

It's very clever really. :D

...that really does sound better when other people say it. :/

Yeah! It does! :/

You'd think more people would, then...

I should have said... It would! :/

"Yes we ALL KNOW. We STILL know, because like the Maidsafe network, WE know the VALUE of what we are stealing."

So we were all equal once and a few decided to change the rules of the universe?

That's it in a nutshell.

I know I don't grasp the least bit of what Scott is saying, but even if I think wrong, I'd say it'd be more about our freedom, our collective power, which we abdicated, and by wiping out our dignity we don't even question that shit... We just roll over when asked to if we believe we can get anything in exchange, while they are living at our expense.

The whole fact that we've been programmed to always ask for permissions, that we live a life of permissions with licenses, tolerating and accepting that they rule over us and we willingly pay them to get every single bit of our rights back, we pay them to live, we pay them to act like unqualified programmed ignorant chimps who have been trained to say PLEASE, THANK YOU and to accept it...

Belief makes that we tolerate nobility and religions and government etc... George Carlin told it best : Teach your children read, teach them to question what they read, to question everything, especially authority.

In fact, without our consent, they just don't get to profit from our energy and our value, which is what even restricted has lead us to where we are, and them where they are... And suddenly, I think about the exponential function... Without every single one of us, and over all those generations before us, supporting their scam acting like slaves, they just can't exist.

The first thing I told Pete when we talked about building dedicated computers for crypto's was : Man, that's creating an international army of sleeping ninja cells right there, ready to wake up all at once and fight together with enough power to do some serious damage...

People who use Windows, KNOW something is VERY wrong with it. ALL of you do, and have for decades. You just don't know how to articulate it.

You will discuss your shared experiences in your own ways, but you just live with them. You don't know enough to even see the problems... but you know they are there, and if you mention your concerns to Micro$oft, they will simply deny it, or call you "mentally ill". Sound familiar?

Will Bed is furiously running in the right direction. :D

So we just have to say no! Change our situation administratively Get the knowledge to walk the talk and try to stop this "asking permission" syndrome Will so brightly stated?

HAHAHA!!!.....we could "rename" this thread as "The Québécois Thread" :D

I like it!!! :D

And here we are speaking english! :/

Scott, I don't have a girl scout kit but I thank you very much for your time! ;)

I can fix that for you Janick Paquette, I can send you that "kit" via registered mail :D

I'm sure you can Pete Daoust! I never doubted you! ;)

I've been running in that direction for years, Scott Duncan... Only I valued even more of the wrong things then (including a girlfriend and a few friends) which were a ball and chain to me... Then I met Pete and ended up here. And I wish I had even more time to painstakingly read every single post of yours... but I'm slowly getting there... Thanks for pushing me, and all of us, in the right direction ;)

And to the Qc'ers in here, that's why most canadians hate us... We have "questioning authority" in our blood... They say DNA transfers physical but also intellectual characteristics... They carry the british monarchy legacy while most of us carry genes from "illegal" people who were dumped here to some sort of get rid of...

My ancesters were lawmen, reporters and religious, they founded the PARTI PATRIOTE and were jailed as dissenters... The entire movement against the church crimes here in Qc, that's my family too...

I just know My great grand mother was Irish! :P

Irish are a bit belligerent too, arent they ;)

"DNA transfers physical but also intellectual characteristics". Wasn't that the experiment where flatforms were fed to other flatworms? Hopefully that's not where you're going with that.

You and your FUCKING mugs :D

Nah Tara Duncan ... We quebec'ers also don't take ourselves too seriously ;)

Here, here Will! :P

Janick Paquette, Read this article then re-read this quote from above. http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/03/5-year-olds-can-learn-calculus/284124/

"Scott Duncan I can't. When YOU figure out how to make a 4 year-old understand advanced calculus, you let me know, and I'll use THAT method to teach you."

Did THAT help YOU at all?

GREAT. Now just purge the bullshit you have now, so there's room.

I'll read that later...thanks Dino! :)

Dino, that is exactly what I was looking for! This is the type of teaching that speaks to me! Thank you so much!

Funny, not, how everytime I would read the word Calculus I thought it was another word for Math in english.

Like Scott said ... word we think we know, but don't know! :)

did you reread the quote?

Do you grasp the significance of the CAPITALIZED words?

Quote: "When YOU figure out how to make a 4 year-old understand advanced calculus, you let me know, and I'll use THAT method to teach you."

Scott Duncan does not mince words and always says exactly what he means to say.

Yes.

What happened to the spud ? They put the word "me" & "you" into "Us" Good Will Jefferson.

They then stole us creating zero....we lost the wholiest of whole holes in ourselves.

Buck - 0 - FIVE Re-Bo_Ot.

How many of these "Weaponized women" have this alleged programming that ye say have this supposed "Invincibility" & "Perfect life" & their whole universe is just "Choate" or AwEsUm please Scott Duncan & /or Tara Duncan ??? I AM intrigued by this supposed world where everything is wrapped in marshmallows and life cannot get any more perfect and wummin do not attach value to wrong all the time.....I need to meet these ladies & see and touch their perfe c ted world of complete Wholeness.

Are you just throwing names around or is their a reason im mentioned in that post above?... Am I the spud?

Do these "Weaponized women" have nothing but purity of heart @ the Cur of them ??? Do they always use these skills for the betterment of humanity ??? Or for darker intent that is materially wanting in material particulars ?

Nope. It's a spud schtick meme troll thing....used when trolling

Yeh ok..you're the spud now will Good Will Jefferson.... :-D

Yea im one hot potatoe :)

Leaders that are Lead....by a wummin or ?

I think so Dino!

First, I don't think advanced calculus can be tought to a 4 year old (from what I read)

YOU:

You is usually a second person pronoun.

However, in formal English, the indefinite pronoun one can be used in the third person to refer to an indeterminate person.

In informal usage, English speakers often replace one with you.

THAT:

In the Old English language that was spelled “t. It was also abbreviated as a letter Thorn, —, with the ascender crossed, ? ( OE thaet.png ).

In Middle English the letter Ash, —, was replaced with the letter a, so that that was spelled “at, or sometimes “et. The ascender of the — was reduced (making it similar to the Old English letter Wynn, ?), which necessitated writing a small t above the letter to abbreviate the word that ( ME that.png ).

In later Middle English and Early Modern English the — evolved into a y shape, so that the word was spelled yat (although the spelling with a th replacing the — was starting to become more popular) and the abbreviation for that was a y with a small t above it ( EME that.svg ).

This abbreviation can still be seen in reprints of the 1611 edition of the King James Version of the Bible in places such as 2 Corinthians 13:7.

------------------

So I guess what we should read should be:

If ONE can teach a 4 year old how to do advance calculus, which is not likely, you let me know, and I'll use MY method to teach you."

I must be way off.... I don't know, I guess! :/

oops! So that's what that button does.

But will he notice? :p

I get it Tara! :/ Better luck next time, right?

For Star Trek fans it's like the Tantalus field. I have a button.

Ooh, ooh, can I have a button too?! :D

Yes, Kate you can have a button.

Yay! :D

Yippee!

It's a slow night on The Tender For Law... :p

Ah! Got it! Thanks Ceit!

Do you Janick, do you really?

A button ???... :/

Oh, by the way, it's PIERRE DAOUST's birthday today, that is weird !! :/

Should I make a cake ? :D

The cake is not "real" !!! :D

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

The cake is a lie :D

Here's a piece of cake, Captain ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pSlu2okpqM

Oppss....that's what I wanted to say Ceit Butler, the cake is a lie :/

It better be chocolate.

In-choate-te-late...... nom noms...Happy anniversary Pete D baby schnitzels

It's NOT my birth date Adam Thomas, it's PIERRE DAOUST's birth date, mine was feb. the 19th.....helloosss !!!! :/

PIERRE DAOUST was created, on march the 6th, according to its CREATOR (Government). I was 16 days old when that happened :/

Happy NAME's day!

Alleged candles :D , can you make a mug out of this Kent Barrett ? :D

It's a PERSON, Brauns Orig Libau T?lis, not a NAME, it has a name, but it's NOT a freaking NAME :P

The day the government created PIERRE DAOUST, "ME" was stolen from "ME", I became something else than "ME", and a very controversial / confused life began... :(

And 46 years later, Scott Duncan appeared :D

Muhahahahaha!!!!! :D

That is fucking deep folks, you won't read that kind of stuff in newspapers :-o

:D

That's the best so far :D

The analogy of Linux and Windows means WE have been infected with a serious VIRUS interacting with our programming.

The VIRUS is a narrative infected by the NOBLE.

In the narrative you get to stay safe. But you can't be free.

In the narrative... You can't be free. You have to follow the rules of the narrative. If you follow the rules of the narrative in your head, you will follow anything.

You don't need a narrative in your head to tell you how to be human. You were human from birth. The conditions were imposed afterwards. That is what you are slave to the conditions. Everyone's narrative will vary.

When you are free anything goes. Anything can happen and you direct that if you are self directed instead of narrative directed.

They don't want free, they don't know what it is and if they knew how hard it is the word would never be uttered from their mouth. And that is why its mostly absent in this conversation.

To BE free; not talk about free. Give a person one moment of self responsibility and they blame you for it. Emotional arrest. Like a teenager who 'had to clean thier room by themselves."

They can't live without these constructs, these narratives. You have a narrative, you are no longer free. You have to step to the tune of the narrative. And everyone's narrative is different. When you are free you don't have to. You do whatever it is within your means to do responsibly. A notion that founded this country but was quickly abandoned because people like the idea of others being responsible for them. Everyone take care of everyone else. There's the confict, the opposing values.

Narratives. Everyone has a different narrative and everyone scratches and fights to make sure their narrative is most important.

That's reflected conflict in this immediate society. Conflict between those who want to be free, to experience the human experience, and those who only want the narrative of the human condition.

Freedom means you have to become SELF RESPONSIBLE. You begin to understand no narrative should contain you.

To be free means no one is responsible for you. For your emotions, for your physical welfare. So you becomes responsible is you. Only you. A free person waking up in the morning blaming someone or some empire for anything, something....isn't freed. That's a narrative, a story about one's condition. To justify it.

Someone who says they have to go by a narrative in their head isn't free and consumed by the VIRUS.

But if you don't want to be free from even the constructs in your head. You don't want to be free. And that's okay. There is no safety in freedom, no comfort, and a lot of hard work. It's easy much easier to be a slave to the narrative in your head because you don't have to do anything. But you'll be a slave to anything if you are a slave to your own narrative.

Someone will take care of you. A bunch of dysfunctional people will band together and be dysfunctional. That's what we have now. When people say the bank and the government is impugning on their freedom, they are really saying "The bank and the government is infringing on my expectation that someone will take care of me.'"

WE KNOW THESE AS THE NOBLE ONES.

Thank you for that Vito! :)

Vito, more than 10 paragraphs, and I still don't understand... what the fuck were you trying to say? A narrative? Nobles? I'm lost... :/

:D

...how does this get me laid?

As if you need any help :p

Hey, I only make it LOOK easy.

I'm starting to wonder, is it possible that anyone WITHOUT A PERSON actually IS NOBILITY ? Just a fuckin poor noble because the exponential function made that our parents were kept poor while the ones "in the know" were actually getting richer and richer ? And that's why they dont tolerate any non citizen until they actually ASK FOR citizenship (submission) / Social Insurance Number and all that shit from them ?

Or is my mind spinning out of control right now ? Because I know it's spinning beyond belief !

Keep spinning :D

:(

I have good reasons to believe that the "Nobles" all have Holdings, and they ALL administrate public debts the way I do :P

Maybe BETTER than me :D

SURELY better than me :D

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

I love to get that strange idea that the PUBLIC debt and interests are actually covering their PRIVATE expenses... And I mean "LITERALLY"...

Fuck me how could that even be possible / work out ???

Expenses ?......no, you mean their FORTUNE :/ ...I guess

Yeah... Fuckin chimp must learn to pick the correct words :(

Meanwhile in the house, one of my several daughter broke up with her johnny boy, or gerry, or jimmy, I am not too sure, and she made that ART :-o

Should I say something ? :/

Fuck, this is almost a picture of Ceit Butler !!

Can I get one of those ? Please ?

Hmm...I'm trying to decide if that's a compliment :p

Me too ! :D

Wooaahh.....Pete....

Dark emotions are festering in her head...but nice art :-)

Ok, please someone correct me if I am wrong in my interpretation of what I just read above.

1- Private debts do not exist. 2- Public debts do not exist. 3- All because, allegedly, money is a fiction. 4- Reality states that if 2 + 2= a FICTION, tgen (then?) the more fictions one has, the more amount of "Soles of Men" "ye have"... ok. 5- "Soles" can be apparently collected as a hobby. 6- Satan, apparently, exists. 7- Debts are "in your head".

Very consistent with everything taugh in here, Adam Thomas. The Admiral must be really proud. You've been using your time well. You sound kind of like... Adam of Gaia? Very... Astrocrazoologist.

Adam, this is simple.

I just practically quoted you. Is my interpretation CORRECT, or am I lying?

Which of the 7 points, you believe I gave a false interpretation?

What is it that you believe I am "struggling with", Adam?

Maybe you know things that I don't know, and I'm missing something. So you may use this opportunity to teach the rest of the group the VALUE that you believe provide to this group.

Answer the simple questions. Logic over emotions (or bullshit), Adam Thomas. That NEVER fails.

And please, don't "tremble" when you write to me. It makes me uncomfortable.

Adam, do you know that if you DON'T answer the simple questions posed, you will be OFFICIALLY letting everyone know I am CORRECT about my interpretation of your bullshit, and that you are LYING?

So, I will help you by repeating what I had observed you wrote (is not like is gone, everyone can still read it, duh!) You said:

1- Private debts do not exist. 2- Public debts do not exist. 3- All because, allegedly, money is a fiction. 4- Reality states that if 2 + 2= a FICTION, tgen (then?) the more fictions one has, the more amount of "Soles of Men" "ye have"... ok. 5- "Soles" can be apparently collected as a hobby. 6- Satan, apparently, exists. 7- Debts are "in your head".

Which of these seven points IS/ARE NOT what YOU said, if any, Adam? Very simple.

Adam Thomas, are you drunk ?

Scott Duncan - Menard's response to quatloos forum www.facebook.com/robert.menard.52/posts/841859965829086 Robert Menard Recently I posted a short discussion on the appearance of bias in court stating that the shared belief in some magical imaginary entity which had granted both the prosecutor and the judge their power was the bias itself. I addressed only one aspect of the ruling, and truthfully that was all I read, and my comments were meant to address that point and only that point. Then my attention was drawn to something SMS Mowe posted on the Quatloos forum. (They like to stalk my FB page and then discuss it and me.) Many of the posters there (like arayder) can only resort to constant personal attacks, and attempting to have any meaningful dialogue there is like trying to have a grown up discussion in a Chucky Cheese. SMS Mowes however I would be willing to converse and engage with, as they seem quite intelligent, and are usually logical and dignified in their approach. In any event reading their post brought to my attention some more passages from the previous ruling which I would like to bring to your attention and comment upon in places.

Bumping these to the top for the newbies.

:D

...since I could only "like" it once.

http://www.zazzle.ca/alleged_candles_coffee_mug-168876667696217018

.