The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 5

Feb 15, 2014 12:35 AM

Tommy Atherton

So if we were the beneficiaries of the PERSONS, prior to MARRIAGE, and through MARRIAGE ("the lawful union of two PERSONS") the PERSONS were unionized, would we still not be beneficiaries, but now unionized. Only now , from an accounting perspective, one secures the other. They, the trustees, are still the party with surety. They benefit only if there is conflict between the parties, then the trustees have a duty to act in the best interest in the two parties DIVORCING (a separation of PERSONS), making sure the split of the PERSONS is to the benefit of both parties. Lots of Administration. If "Her Majesty" were the Beneficiary, then why are you running around being the Sole Authorized Administrator for the PERSON, as you are administrating ideally for the beneficiary. I believe we are the Settlors of the Private Trust, as we give all value, still, to the unionized PERSONS.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 7, page 746 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 7, page 746 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.