Feb 12, 2014 2:45 PM

Then use the notes, money of exchange to pay down the interest? Created from the debt that was borrowed against the LEGAL Person, by admining it with money of exchange from corporate accounts? The death of a thousand cuts?

Really trying to connect all the dots here”. Protoplasm is melting. Feck.

I have no idea what you're talking about Bobis Youruncle

:(

I am referring to one of the first conversations I had with The Admiral, I am missing something, i do not know what it is, I am trying to figure it out. By drawing on the memories of what was communicated. It is important to grasp this fully for me. It was not just about establishing a currency but it was also about offsetting debt and a collapse of the current banking system” I am looking for clarity. I am asking my way out of confusion. I am thinking. I do not want to miss something vital. I am paying attention. :-/

Am I so emersed in private clubhouse rules” That I am missing the fucking point — This is my problem this morning. :-(

What's FSC Inc. ?

Maybe you're ADDING too many points ?? :/

SFC Inc Maximus Legis, is a corporation, and PIERRE DAOUST is president of that corporation :/

I am doing my best to ask a relevant question. And maybe, I am adding to many points, however still thinking, I am missing something vital” These were points discussed at an earlier time, that I did not quite grasp fully. I want to comprehend to understand. You know how you refer to the person in your back pocket? That is basically what I was was doing with the WE and ONE, I know it confuses people, that was not the intention it was to understand the use of titles and trusts” So maybe it is like surety” I have to comprehend what it is before I can use it as a tool”

Ask your question Bobis.....go, ask it :(

I thought I did already” What am I missing? I am confused.

Your explanation above is good, simple. However there is a component missing, it seems to me, I am trying to figure out, what that is.

OK, well, as soon as you find it, let me know !!! :D

Of course” :-P

I will be just be over here spinning like a top” :-P

Until then”

Yep, and while you're spinning, I'll relax and wait :D

Yes’ I know”. I do too much thinking, coming from a place where everything I knew was wrong” I am doing my best to fix that programming. Simplicity eludes me at times. One Lien is in, served and accepted, sitting back and waiting, as well, but in the meantime, I think and study.

The lien = Shovel, Over here. A shovel with value attached.

I plan to exchange what is dug” By using a private exchange that transcends borders. The surety is held in trust by some one else= corporate person” This whole process is not needed, unless I want to extract value from a thing that was attached to me at birth. 4days after. To offset huge debt created at that time and since” This is what the shovel is doing.

ah the banking thread. I am going back to basics this month. Is there a model we can look at to break down the mechanics, and identify roles? I will see what i can dig up.

I DON'T plan to exchange what was dug......but a corp is making an offer, SFC Inc, is making an OFFER :D

See I stop using the we and or one or the person in my back pocket in language for simplicity and ease of comprehension, of course it is all administrated by the duly authorized yada yada, in in my case. :-P

I always thought that we have the right to dictate what we want in exchange for our labour. The corporation was the bank that is used to exchange the legal tender into whatever we want. Can the corp not simply exchange legal tender into credit at any place of purchase for you and you just go in and pick up your shit?

I've heard weed and tail go a ways in some jurisdictions

Tommy Atherton. What are you suggesting?

now just get a gallon of gas or milk with some of them...

Why would I get a gallon of gas ???....you are COMPLETELY missing the point David Johansen, fully and completely.....

i am? how? dont you want to be able to trade them directly instead of converting them into other currency? like to buy a motorcycle, or boat, lumber, gold coins, milk, cheeze, bacon, ect... exchange for sitter time, plumber work, auto mechanic...

I would think the corp would just create credit at wherever you want shit from. You don't have to exchange anything for anything. The corp is doing it for you. Does that make sense, and does that stop one's affiliation with legal tender?

Ok, I'll say it again.... :(

PIERRE DAOUST will give ALL these dogecoin to Pete, because PIERRE DAOUST is Pete's slave.

And Pete, will do WHAT EVER THE FUCK HE WANTS with them.....

HELLOOSSSS !!!!!... :/

Pete, you still have to go get groceries and they do not accept dogecoin.

YET”

Yes. Yet. It will be really interesting to see how far and how fast people can change that.

It is happening. We will have the ability to create our own coin and with the etherum overlay it will be utilized any where.

It is here, it is happening, we are on the cutting edge of this new technology. It is already done with RFID bank cards and credits, it is not that much of a stretch to see it all integrated.

BUT. For now, to remove Cara as much as possible from legal tender, would it not make sense to have the corp do the transactions that require currency that is not cryptocurrency?

That is the beauty of it, the buddy still can handle legal tender as a currency exchange to deal with groceries and stuff, it says so in the charter :-)

Cara Small: Pete, you still have to go get groceries and they do not accept dogecoin.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ??? :/

Licensed by the charter”

ah, oh, if you mean that you dont actually exchange anything, but the trustee or company does, you just recieve the benefit from such thing occuring...

And WHERE DO YOU THINK I AM DOING GROCERIES ? ....Who is the OWNER of that grocery store.....what if he ACCEPT these fucking dogecoin ????

WHO CAN PROVE THE OPPOSITE... ???

Who has JURISDICTION over Pete to QUESTION these things ?? :/

Note to self, add groceries into charter”. :-)

i work at grogery store, him pay me in doge because him need to pass them on somehow, so i do his chores...

accepted for value.

No, because him need to eat, for fuck sakes :P

Or you can pay with credits exchanged to deal in other currencies via your buddy”.

Dear Government,

PIERRE DAOUST has made $0.00 CAD in 2014.

Thanks :D

Government to PIERRE DAOUST:

Well, how did PIERRE DAOUST lived in 2014 ?

Me: He earned some crypto-currencies of some sort, which aren't REGULATED by you.

:P

And "ME" the Man, I drained PIERRE DAOUST......I took them all :P

MAN = SERVANT 3:)

Sorry dear government, but PIERRE DAOUST do not operate with your DEBT stuff no more..... :P

Government to PIERRE DAOUST:

Please Sir, can you tell us WHICH crypto-currency PIERRE DAOUST have earned in 2014 ?

Me:a little bit of ALL OF THEM !!!!!!....... :D

It sounds like accepting their jurisdiction = terms and conditions, and rules to me”

Unless my buddy does it”.

Government to PIERRE DAOUST:

Well, you will have to PAY income taxes anyway.

Me: No problem, swing me your SEXCOIN wallet address :D

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

:D :D :D

Fuck I am on the floor :D

Government to Pete: We have arrested Perre Doaust by placing a lien on him, for not following our rules, he is dead to you now”.

Up to you !!!!......what newspaper are you gonna make the LEGAL NOTICE about this ??? :D

And which journalist you want me to spread the news with ?? :D

I think it is called the government gazette or something, but we do not need to do the as we have sent you notice in the mail”. thanks in advance the government.

ALLRIGHT !!!!!.......can't wait to receive that NOTICE :D

We make the rules in our private clubhouse”. signed the government.

A arrest on the legal person can stop the legal person from engaging in commerce, If we can lien it, so can they.

I would LOVE them to do such a thing.......it will be AWESOME.....

Think about it Bobis, they would ADMIT PUBLICLY, that we are SLAVES... :D

It is their property after all”. It was given to you to hold as trustee, your are breeching the trust, and ignorance is no excuse signed the government, we are taking out property back.

Hi Pete, What is going on? I don’t know Robert Cormier personally but I do know OF him. I do know someone who does know him personally though - my sister’s ex boyfriend (Kyle Gingrich) lives next door to him and his son. :)

Ah shut up Lana Dukakis

Nothing is going on Lana Dukakis, I was just curious... :)

I for one, do not think you are who you say you are.

Bobis Youruncle, don't forget that I am here for the TRUTH.....that is my ONLY goal......the TRUTH......and if the government wants to spread the TRUTH......I have no problem with that, I really don't.. :)

Well good, the truth is; The legal person is vulnerable, if not protected by a lien.

lol Bobis: Claims somewhere up there that I am an INTERNATIONAL HIGH LEVEL SUPER SPY. :P

I just do not think you are who you say you are. That is all.

Yeah, please post a picture of you, with an holster Lana Dukakis.....PLEASE :D

I won't. I PROMISE PETE! :D

Lana, do you have a cell as we speak ??

cell phone

Lana Dukakis, do you have a cell phone on you ?

Helloosss !!!

Sorry. I was making tea. Yes I have a cell phone.

Ok, take a picture of you, with your middle finger pointed at Bobis Youruncle, and post it here..... :)

Please

Lana ?? :(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk_-XWpUFmU

Probalby had to go find that model that posed for original shot”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE

sorry I logged on and started reading and this song popped in my head.. Elmira ontario is a shit hole..

:D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! :D .....I really like his yellow shirt, I think I am going to get one like this :D

A fi fi shirt. :-D

Queen —. get it?

So Robert Cormier found a picture of a nice looking lady, he created a FB profile, using that picture, and re-enter this group through Derek Moran's invitation ??

Is that what it is ? :D

Helloossss !!!!.... Lana Dukakis, are you Robert Cormier ?? , do not lie :D

Bobis Youruncle I believe they have already put a lien on the Person (if married) through the marriage certificate? Is that not what you have come to understand through the past few days threads?

If you make an amendment to the marriage, the GOVERNMENT has no say. It's TRUST business now.

Amendment

The modification of materials by the addition of supplemental information; the deletion of unnecessary, undesirable, or outdated information; or the correction of errors existing in the text.

In practice, a change in the pleadings—statements of the allegations of the parties in a lawsuit—may be achieved if the parties agree to the amendment or if the court in which the proceeding is pending grants a motion for the amendment made by one party. A judgment may be altered by an amendment if a motion to do so is made within a certain time after its entry and granted by the court. The amendment of pleadings and judgments is regulated by state codes of Civil Procedure and the rules of federal civil procedure.

A constitution or a statute may be changed by an amendment.

A will, trust, corporate charter, and other legal documents are also subject to amendment.

Hey, I left this am during an intriguing drama over the Lana Dukakis pic, ????

That would not be an amendment Tommy, that would be something else !! :/

yes, i agree.

nullification

I don't think it's feasable......you would need the persmission of the Government, NO ?? :/

liening it would "amend it!"

But, changing the beneficiary, is something we can do, and changing the TRUSTEE too, I guess :D

9111-1111 Quebec Inc could become the TRUSTEE, and our children, the beneficiaries :)

And then, when this is done, LIEN the thing :D

9111-1111 Quebec Inc. far more trustworthy!

Registering a LEGAL privillege on the marriage certificate :)

I believe the persons B/C arising from sons and daughters are considered "fruits of the union" and are likely liened as well.

Until they reach 18, I guess... :/

just to complicate matters.

I hope we are not going FULL RETARD here, me and you !! :D

Good thing I popped those suckers out BEFORE we were married!

I own the hat this week! may as well be the best "Fucktard" I can.

:D

Well. I don't see Scott saying anything yet. Maybe it's a good thing. Does anyone know if he is OK?

OK in what sense ? :D

Not MIA or dead.

MIA ??.. :/

Missing in Action.

Scott said to lien the kids b/c also. I am thinking it doesn't matter when they were born and whether or not you even are married. He was aware Tom and I were married when he gave us that info.

Tommy, your profile picture is really disturbing, just saying :(

supposed to be!

I can tell you he is handsome and tall and dark.

He won't want me to say much more.

;)

just for u pete

Im no Lana Dukakis

We aren't even sure Lana Dukakis is Lana Dukakis.

WOW!!..Tommy Atherton, much sexy, so handsome ?

gee thanks sailor

Back off Pete.

I am Captain :P

oooh "captain" even.

Tommy is King in our jurisdiction.

You guys don't really fit together, Tommy should be with a more sexy lady than you Cara

8|

That was a fucking joke, you two.......just in case you are packing her suitcases Tommy.... :D

He wouldn't dare.

HAHA!!!!......you think :D

hi Bobis Youruncle

Hellos

I am going to make some coffee”

Good idea :D

Take off the fucktard hats :-D

No, you just disapreared, so I could understand something :P

When you're around, everything become so fucking complicated :D

step 1: lien, step 2. take off fucktard hat. that easy Bobis Youruncle?

Just out of curiousity, has any one achieved finding liens on the Person they have, is that available?

you can do a search on ppsa.ca

I have not done a lien search before! hmm sounds fun

I did.....

may i ask what you found?

I have one for a car loan . Something I did notice with it, they don't put a removal date on it...so once the loan is paid off, I guess I would have to chase them down to remove it

I specifically mean on "THE PERSON"

oops me too haha

would one use the red ink numbers on the back, or "THE NAME" , or something else on the "BILL OF LADING"

My person's doesn't have numbers on the back of it....you use the name

how would one know how long the line up is for the lien on the "PERSON"

seems like it should be COMMERCIALLY available.

you find the line up when you do the search...see who else has liened the person

yeah, that makes me soo curious.

Name address and date of birth. That's all you need.

thank you

plural "you"

who is YOU? lol haha I'm a me :P

non-assumpsit

good evening scott, nice to have you join us :)

Yes.

Bobis wrote: "I think it is called the government gazette or something," Canada Gazette is what I think you are referring to.

What kind of brainless prat reads Canada Gazette?

:D

Not me” It is just something I know about.

Brainless prat :D .....HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Basically someone whos a major idiot, or is delusional and dumb. Acts against logic and thinks hes self-righteous. AKA: Major dumbass.

Fuck !! :/

I only give you THE BEST English lessons. It's good that you still see it :D

All Capital letter names have a security agreement in place already, something I discovered when they printed off 50 pages of Le Blanc's to search thru, when I went in live, and did a lien search prior to implementing lien. That is the original security created , 10 days after my berth. The lien we do on the All Capital letters name has supreme claim. It cuts to the front of the line. It is the supra protest of the situation. SUPREME Judgement = Lien.

See ??....I don't get fuckall of what you are saying again :(

The lien we do on the All....what the fuck is this suppose to mean ?? :(

The line you do is the king of the liens.

WHAT FUCKING LINE !!!

Um...

...actually Maritime Liens are higher.

Line of people making claims, Pete.

The NAME that is spelt with ALL Capital letters> JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC not Jason Fredrick Le Blanc. Ok, I stand corrected” maritime liens are higher

I made a mistake in spelling Pete> ^^^^^^^^ I am sorry. The correction is: The lien you do is the king of liens.

except for a maritime lien, of course

So now, not only you write in cryptic, but you make mistake in spelling ???

I am not out of the woods.... :(

Which is why Delaware is so important as maritime law is the standard. It would be the most supreme.

I am never cryptic on purpose, I really do my best to be clear. I do not know what else to do”.

Good thing you do... :(

I will just leave you to it then, as I seem to only confuse things.

Just write as if you were really reaaly stupid, like if you would have a very restricted vocabulary.....ya know the kind ??? :D

Scott Duncan is speaking of me? I don't read that gazette.

So if one could figure out how to administrate a MARITIME lien, such as being in a MARITIME jurisdiction (Delaware) then he who hold that lien hold the trump card. Whereas in CANADA or 1 of the PROVINCES one could only administrate a (blank) lien. Is someone willing to fill in the blank for me?

what is the ascending order of lien types, wow, whole other can of worms.

Not really. A claim is a claim.

Maritime Liens are simply given the most weight.

Respected weight? in this geopolitical zone?

that was a question, not sarcasm

In international law. The only one you should be concerned about.

Note to self: *sigh* -Establish a Delaware corporation, at earliest convenience. The following is A metaphor for the confusion of being duped, most of my life. All points duly noted, perhaps at some point. i may even add some value, to the team... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Xp9hvTvPk

There may be no *I* in team, but there is a ME.

back to this marriage issue if i may: It is a private trust, perhaps very much like the private trust which is mainly discussed here where the person is liened by a corp. or "buddy" as Bobis Youruncle calls it. The difference here is that "Her Majesty" is the trustee rather than a corp.(of ones own creation) such as Quebec XXXXXXXXX. That is why "Her Majesty" has liened the persons in who comprise the Private Trust (marriage). (same shit different trustee) Now, let me put on my "fucktard" hat: to "amend" the "marriage" is the remedy. Removing the current trustee (Her Majesty) from their duty and creating a new ( Delaware corp.) to be entrusted with the duty of being trustee for the Private trust, for the "marriage" to be held in, would amend the marriage and thus nullify the current trustees lien claim on the persons, one would then lien the "marriage certificate" with the new corp. (perhaps from Delaware) get in line for the lien on the Persons as well, and one, whos person is "married", could be somewhat back out of COMMERCIAL vulnerability. One would think that removing an "un-trustable" trustee would be possible? or am i being a retard again?

Who is the GRANTOR ?? :/

And why not amend the beneficiaries as well :D

Well, I return to the model we are familiar with, substitute Her Majesty with Quebecxxxx, you/and or your parents were the Grantor of the Person, as you are the grantor of the "marriage" you are the beneficiary of the Person, as are you beneficiary of the marriage, the only difference is the Trustee is a party that is not trust-worthy. I believe cara and I were the Grantors, as well as the beneficiaries. I think it is good to be the beneficiaries of the marriage and with the settlor/grantor, if united, have the power to remove the trustee by virtue of it being in the best interest of the beneficiaries.? Just switch Trustees and the model works in our favor again.

I am NOT SURE here, but the state seems to be the beneficiary, in regards to that marriage contract :/

WHO got married ???....two PERSONS ?? , who are they ??, who OWNS these two persons ???

Two persons were married BUT WE signed the instrument to make that happen. Didn't they need us to grant their role as trustee?

the two PERSONS got married. hence the lien. The PERSONS are still not ours.

We are still the beneficiary of it though.

i "believe"!

:D

I am NOT sure... :P

It dosen't make sense...... in what capacity have you signed this thing Cara Small ??? WHO were you at that time ?? :D

Knowing what we know today, we would NEVER sign that thing....right ??? :D

I am hoping that the license/contract will shed some light on HOW we signed. And maybe it will answer some questions as to what roles were "played".

The copy we ordered, that is.

Knowing what I KNOW today, I would NEVER enter a fucking church without a gallon of gas :D

HAHAHAHA!!!!!.....

It actually demonstrates how we are the "sole authorized administrator" of the PERSON. We administrated a trust with our signatures for the PERSONS to be joined. So as we administrated the trust for our PERSONS, not having provided an alternate TRUSTEE, they were happy to be the DEFAULT trustee.

"I believe"

gotta go bang nails, au revoir

Have you signed like this ?? :/

BY:________________________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for TOMMY ATHERTON

Pete. We didn't even step foot into a church. The church definitely is not the problem.

I just did on the persons drivers licence. not that it did fuck all!

Ok, where were you got married ? ....city hall ? :D

No. A beach.

It was a "civil marriage"

Marriage commissioner did the ceremony.

I would like to have a chat with him now.

And WHY have you done that ?

It was great fun and romantic. We had a couple of our LONG time friends there. He asked.

I could kick myself in the teeth all day, regarding that question :D

I said yes.

Us too.

Fuck do I hate "me" :D

We ALWAYS tell our girls. Go ahead and get "married" all you like. Leave the government OUT of it.

Oh, me I am more busy on educating them on how to kick balls :D

It's an ART :D

It is what we were taught by mindless chimps who were taught by mindless chimps. Oh NO ONE messes with MY girls. They are NOT victims.

If they did. They would get seriously injured.

When moms would talk to me about abduction I would joke about my older daughter "Who would take her? She looks at strangers as if she would bite their nose off." Lots of adults have had issues with my older daughter because of that. I love her for it.

The younger one is more of a thinker.

Cara, there are serious dumb bastards out there, that can do whatever they want with ANY women......just saying, guns are the best defense........forget about a "look"... :(

It has worked so far. Yes I do hear you tho. Even playing ground is very important. But not taking away their power to choose their interactions with others is ONE way of avoiding those serious dumb bastards.

It starts very early. And no 2 year old runs around with a gun in hand.

:D

Well I haven't met one anyway.

That would be a good thing, it would clean up big time :D

I suppose. If I DID meet one, I may not live to tell about it as it would be by accident or because I didn't give them the candy they were screaming for.

I have good reasons to believe that the GOVERNMENT is the beneficiary, and the registrar general is the trustee, regarding that marriage certificate :/

The government is definitely trustee and surety for the certificate. They are the only signatory on the certificate. I am not sure that they are beneficiary tho. If they are, it would be a mistake that needs fixing. Perhaps that is what happened when the contract was signed. We "neglected" to name the beneficiaries and they acted AS trustee naming themselves as beneficiary. Is that what you are suggesting?

So if we were the beneficiaries of the PERSONS, prior to MARRIAGE, and through MARRIAGE ("the lawful union of two PERSONS") the PERSONS were unionized, would we still not be beneficiaries, but now unionized. Only now , from an accounting perspective, one secures the other. They, the trustees, are still the party with surety. They benefit only if there is conflict between the parties, then the trustees have a duty to act in the best interest in the two parties DIVORCING (a separation of PERSONS), making sure the split of the PERSONS is to the benefit of both parties. Lots of Administration. If "Her Majesty" were the Beneficiary, then why are you running around being the Sole Authorized Administrator for the PERSON, as you are administrating ideally for the beneficiary. I believe we are the Settlors of the Private Trust, as we give all value, still, to the unionized PERSONS.

Ok, here is my take on this...... A private TRUST has been formed.

Cara granted CARA into it, and Tommy ganted TOMMY into it

The government have LIENED this new person CARA "AND" TOMMY.

So the government IS the beneficiary of that TRUST.

And the government appointed the government as TRUSTEE of that trust.

That is HOW it goes in my French brain :-D

Now, the logical thing to do would be, to fire the government as a trustee, and get PERSON we trust to be the trustee, and that new trustee will change the beneficiaries.

:-D

I think the government liened TOMMY and CARA out of COMMERCIAL activity as they became a new entity TOMMY/CARA together, but I am going verify this with my lien searches.

What ?? :-\

Could one not make a strong argument that it is a conflict of interest to TRUSTEE that PRIVATE TRUST?

And what a "strong argument" will do ? :-\

fuck all

:-D

Is a PRIVATE TRUST a EXPRESS TRUST? I am starting to look up procedure on how to remove a TRUSTEE from a PRIVATE TRUST. I may be chasing UNICORNS AND RAINBOWS HERE. FUCKTARDIN OUT!

I am pretty sure a private trust IS a private trust :-D

GOING TO ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF "union" tonight. hope all you TTFL ers have a night of pleasure with your partners or self.

Lien the name: on the thing, game over, they are fired. I thought you were supposed to take off your fucktard hats?

I like your method best Bobis Youruncle so long as it is effective.

There is ALREADY a lien on this CARA AND TOMMY person :-\

I believe there is a lien on the B/C persons, but not the marriage instrument.

So Bobis Youruncle is saying lien the Marriage Instrument.

I believe you are WRONG :-D

k

It is not my method, I learned it here.

He said "that thing" so who knws ?

Lien search this weekend, that will verify.

Bobis Youruncle love to name things with other words than the word that thing is suppose to be named with....

You lien the ALL CAPS NAME” sin number and accounts Associated with = write everything in the general collateral place on the forms and or document. The financial statement of the lien, when you fill out the forms , they have this place on them for this informations. ALL property associated with it, all titles and holdings, the complete estate. That is what. Thing = everything associated with the ALL Capital letters NAME that the slave has. It is all part of the package by doing that one simple lien. The government is a trust, there is no person to stand for them. You as the vessel with one sole on board and holder of the certificate, as such you have first right to do anything with it as holders in due course. There is already a security agreement in place on everyone, some have bankruptcies , some have late child payment things on them, those who do not have those have the one that created the birth certificate. By doing this process, it kills a revenue stream = no money for them and credit for the trustee of the private trust. and keeps all property safe in private. It is effective, I have done it, I am doing it I think, I can see myself doing it some more. Game over- Government Fired.

It will say : Security agreement or one of the other things stated in the above post. There will also be a registration number, IT DOESN'T MATTER ABOUT ANY OF THIS OR SECURITY AGREEMENTS FROM PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS, YOU GET TO GO FIRST, THE ONE YOU FILE WITH BE SUPREME, YOU ARE ADMINISTRATING IT. GAME OVER - GOVERNMENT FIRED.

I HAVE 50 PAGES OF THIS INFORMATION ON ABOUT 200 LEBLANC'S, I HAVE VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE TO THESE FACTS. THE CONCLUSIONS, WERE PONDERED ON FOR MANY HOURS.

SCOTT TOLD ME THESE THINGS AND WROTE ALL OF THIS INFORMATION HERE, SOMEWHERE.

I HAD TO THINK ABOUT IT ALL.

Cat got your tongues ?

Correction for the above posts. You = the duly authorized trustee corporation.

Bobis Youruncle thankyou once again for laying it all out. I really want to understand why i do what i do, not just what to do.

The why = I wanted to create a private safe place. The lien is a tool to do that, very effectively. The why is the freedom to live mY life without third party interlopers who think and believe it thier right to harm me. Putting things on In to a private safe place, is the only thing that makes sense to me. If I want the interlopers to see that they cannot profit from any interaction with private property being held in Trust. The why is it cuts of profit, NO profit = no interest in this vessel for commercial purposes. A LIEN IS THE *FUCK OFF BECAUSE THAT'S WHY*, PART. TO ALL UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY INTERLOPERS. Make sense. Lein = stop sign to government = they are fired, that is fucking why. Psst”

Use the word *believe* in a sentence one more time and I will put you on ignore forever. Serious. This is a simple tool used in commerce to claim it. To Take It. To cut them off from profiting and keeping yourself safe. That is the fucking why.

All through a duly authorized guy.

You become the Traffic controller, You hold the stop sign.

At least your buddy does, fuck.

Well if you are CURRENTLY married, you are CURRENTLY fucked. It's a bill of lading that secures your PERSONS in the same way Rogueupport has secured Tara and My "PERSONS".

You need the government's PERMISSION to disolve the "bill of lading". We only require the SHAREHOLDER'S permission...and they're WAY nicer than the government.

If both parties lien their names, then wouldn't that take the surety out of the equation?

That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".

I think, this marriage has to be fixed, before I proceed with the legal privillege on the person named PIERRE DAOUST :/

*….That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

Means that a duly authorized trustee must do it. It means, if you as the legal person = slave in pocket, do it, you are creating a conflict of interest. The legal person came first, the duly authorized trustee, Liens that via the ALL CAPITAL Letters, spelling of the name. The lien is the tool that puts you in front of the Governments claim on the marriage, The lien is the superior claim as title holders of the certificate created at the birth of the marriage. It isolates that marriage certificate in commerce, making it unlawful for the government to trespass. The Lien simply fixes this problem. Keeping ALL PROPERTY CREATED AND OR DERIVED FROM THE TITLES SAFELY HELD IN TRUST, AND ADMINISTERED BY SOME ONE ELSE, BECAUSE IT IS NOT MINE. IT IS SIMPLY A CATCH 22 FOR THE GOVERNMENT WHEN ALL DONE IN PRIVATE, BY SOME ONE WE HAVE TRUSTED. ONCE ALL THIS IS DONE, PROPER PUBLIC NOTICE PUTS YOU IN THE FRONT OF THE LINE, SO, A PPSA DOES AAAAALLLLLLL OF THIS. SIMPLE. IT TAKES THE CERTIFICATES VALUE AWAY, THEY STILL HOLD IT AS A TRUSTEE” COPY HOLDER ( LOOK IT UP).

CATCH 22

PUBLIC NOTICE = LES PENDENS.

YOU HAVE TO THINK. no way around it. :-)

You mean Lis pendens I guess.... ?

As "suit pending." ?

It means, if you as the legal person = slave in pocket, do it, you are creating a conflict of interest.

Who in the fuck, would think of liening the person, using the person ?

I have done this guys, When Scott told me about all of this, when I first arrived here, and yes I was invited after meeting up with them. The concept I got, the mechanics- I discovered by trail and error and thinking and doing, you are benefiting from those experiences based now, on the knowledge I learned here. A trust created is the highest form of law, they recognize this and treat it accordingly = Hands off all private property.

Scott Duncan wrote this....

*….That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

And I am SURE he didn't meant liening your name with your nam... :/

I respect that Bobis, but you did not had to deal with a marriage certificate on the way, we are trying to figure out the PROPER method to do it, with that FUCKING marriage certificate on the fucking way :D

I have no intentions of doing something and make MISTAKES, I have plenties of MISTAKES to deal with, and don't want to add to ii... :)

Pardon me that was a mistake Please forgive me, I am sorry. Yes Les pendens. Puts the corporation first. A private corporation has the authority to damage the security via the lien process. It has the authority vested in it by private charter, which is its license to operate privately. And it is recognized by their business model = legal.

To me, so far, the only LOGICAL thing to do, is to AMEND that marriage TRUST, by changing the TRUSTEE, and make 9111-1111 Quebec Inc as a trustee, and changing the BENEFICIARIES, and put our kids there....and us, me and Nadine.....

BUT I AM NOT FUCKING SURE at 100%..... :(

The birth certificate is the same thing, a certificate created by another party. This would apply, mistakes are always correctable. It was a mistake to think any of this was mine in the first place, it was a mistake for my parents to sign me over to the government via birth certificate,The lien fixes all these mistakes. It is the most potent weapon.

Scott Duncan, can you HELP please, I am fucking turning around and around in the same shit hole here, and it starts stinking and I will definitely blos a fucking fuse over this :(

*To me, so far, the only LOGICAL thing to do, is to AMEND that marriage TRUST, by changing the TRUSTEE, and make 9111-1111 Quebec Inc as a trustee, and changing the BENEFICIARIES, and put our kids there....and us, me and Nadine.....

BUT I AM NOT FUCKING SURE at 100%….. *

The lien does this. It is how to do it, it is the answer.

^^^^^^ you make that all part of the original trust agreement , then the corporation enforces these things by the lien, that is it.

turning around and around = I will just be spinning over here” Me, I will just relax over here and wait :-D

:-D

I know this because I have done it. It works, the marriage certificate is part of the trust and As such, they are enforced by the lien, the principles transfer, perfectly.

OK, so WHY Scott Duncan wrote this ?? :(

*….That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

psst” The response my company received from the registrar general confirms all of this. it is an acceptance of the private terms of the private charter.

Because you have to do it thru someone else *YOU* can't do it. It took me a long time to think thru layers of shit, layers of meaning in many forms, the is why english is so fucked and effective for this stuff, the same word can have different meanings, he does not lie to us. There is still meanings behind these things and Scott chooses his words very carefully” *YOU CANNOT DO IT* Corporation in trust has too” The lien rebuts all of it.

Proper Process puts the trustee first, puts its interests first in line, cuts in front of them, you have a V. I. P. Pass, a special privilege.

based on a private charter = license to do these things.

Since the beginning of this group, it's CLEAR that PIERRE DAOUST can't registered a legal privillege on PIERRE DAOUST, since the beginning it is clear as ice that a CORPORATION has to do that.........

When Scott Duncan wrote this, I never ASSUMED that he said PIERRE DAOUST liening PIERRE DAOUST.....it is assumed that ....a corp. would do it

*….That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

He said *YOU*”. It is not an assumption, it is statement. You means what?

"YOU" mean an ORGANIZATION :D

And an ORGANIZATION can be a CORPORATION :P

And by deduction.....a Man can't lien fuck all, PIERRE DAOUST can't lien PIERRE DAOUST.......so fuck, what's left ???

A CORPORATION and/or AN ORGANIZATION.....so "YOU" is one of these :D

I can THINK too Bobis Youruncle, but I suck in cookings :(

Spin away” I will talk to you later. The lien works on anything, if done properly, by the methods contained here. Who is going to rebut the lien? They can't = the government, no person to stand for it. All property is then safely held in a private jurisdiction - under corporate charter = private law and the ability to say * fuck off that's why*

You = man, man = servant, servant = ass fucking. A corporate you under charter is a whole different man it is the servant of the trust, the enforcer by administration. In it's own private clubhouse. That repels all interlopers, not authorized by charter.

From the Interpretations act: Powers vested in corporations

21. (1) Words establishing a corporation shall be construed (a) as vesting in the corporation power to sue and be sued, to contract and be contracted with by its corporate name, to have a common seal and to alter or change it at pleasure, to have perpetual succession, to acquire and hold personal property for the purposes for which the corporation is established and to alienate that property at pleasure; (b) in the case of a corporation having a name consisting of an English and a French form or a combined English and French form, as vesting in the corporation power to use either the English or the French form of its name or both forms and to show on its seal both the English and French forms of its name or have two seals, one showing the English and the other showing the French form of its name; (c) as vesting in a majority of the members of the corporation the power to bind the others by their acts; and (d) as exempting from personal liability for its debts, obligations or acts individual members of the corporation who do not contravene the provisions of the enactment establishing the corporation. Marginal note:Corporate name

(2) Where an enactment establishes a corporation and in each of the English and French versions of the enactment the name of the corporation is in the form only of the language of that version, the name of the corporation shall consist of the form of its name in each of the versions of the enactment.

Remember the maxim of law - to include something is to exclude all others.

From the interpretations act: “person” — personne — “person”, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;

So *YOU* cannot do it, the Trustee needs to = corporation.

The only thing recognized is the corporation and its liability is limited to what it says in the charter. And that is a private matter” Catch 22

Fuck Bobis Youruncle :(

*….That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

WE ALL KNOW THAT SCOTT WAS NOT SAYING "YOU" as a MAN or the PERSON......fuck, we ALL knew he meant the fucking corporation :(

Nope, I didn't, that is not my take, I do not make assumptions about this stuff. When *YOU* is applied it has always meant an attachment to surety, the corporation takes this attachment via lien, it can legally damage the security. I can't because of the standing as trustee in their jurisdiction, a private trust is a private jurisdiction, that is recognized. It has the power to lien it, it says so in the private charter, it is law. it is legal. It is what they do, we reverse it and tell them to take a flying fucking leap. He said all of that to make us think about it” Is my reasoning in this. I have thought about the WHY, and as a result and taking these actions, this is where I am now. I DID NOT ASSUME and or PRESUME anything, I learned about it and then figured it out.

Ok, so what did he meant by saying this ?

*….That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

The lien makes us next in line - true, the public notice puts us at the front also true. It is the rebuttal of that first in line thing.

The government is not a person - it is a trust. That means there is no actual body to protest.

It is the way it works. I do not know what else to say. i am being as simple as I know how.

I know this to be true.

Pete. I think the question you are asking was part of a conversation Scott and I had. If I remember correctly, he was saying that putting a lien on THE NAME was "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".

So you must lien the MARRIAGE cert.

The corp must lien the marriage certificate ?....is that what you mean ?? :/

If the you is the corporation in trust.

YES!

YES

So WHY did you used "YOU" ?? Cara Small

I am leaving, for a 30 minutes car ride, with RUSH on the radio, extremely loud

Bye.....

Hmmmm. I think, Pete, you are correct asking that to be clarified. You=corporation in that statement I made.

YOU = surety.

The corporation must lien the MARRIAGE cert.

Accounting and Surety, always”

Maybe this will help Pete. I am sorry for using words in a way that confused Pete. I will try to be more careful when speaking to/with Pete.

I do be careful and am conscious of this. I respect him and do not want to cause any confusion. I do my best to answer the why of the situation. The programming and beliefs create the confusion, not the knowledge. My own thinking has been my best and worst asset in this process. My beliefs and thinking fucked me many times. A break through is coming when the confusion, seems to be hampering at times. All I can say is: Stay on target and it will come.

I was not speaking of Bobis Youruncle in my statement. I speak for me.

Just being clear again.

I thought it was a good statement, I realize it was not for me. Cara Small My comment was in support of it. I do not want to confuse anything, this is important. Is all :-)

I really do not use these, hurt feelings reports, anymore.

I file a fucking lien and enforce it.

lien search underway, I first searched the PERSON, I checked the PROVINCE of the PERSON'S "birth" although the PERSON has been commercially active (dumb shit to limit) In an other PROVINCE. Anyone know if I clicked correctly? $20.00 bucks a pop, do not wish to fuckup too much.

You go to lien place or do it online. You say I would like to do a lien search on the NAME Please. They Say sure..here it is. Security Agreement will come up ( THIS IS THE Security agreement created by my birth, for me aug 24” I week after my actual birth It also confirms no other liens, Like child support and or bankruptcy) YOU ONLY NEED TO DO ONE IT WILL TELL YOU IF YOU ARE LIENED OR NOT. And you are already so you move on to file your lien via corporate person in trust. Then you are done that part lien is done” It would be good to put a value on the lien. That is up to you to find out or determined for yourself. As the govt has no standing and no person can dispute in Private place. It can be up to you how much, I picked a value that they attached to the thing they created. Value is accounted for by lien. YOU as accountant, determine that.

One search covers it.

see what is sent back

from on-line search

You speaky engly? Wtf?

I am not familiar with "engly"

How about fecktard? BE clear, what are you asking? If you did the lien search, you should have results immediately. What does it say?

I have only been sent back a "search request confirmation" no information as of yet.

sorry Bobis Youruncle, I did the lien search through the on-line PPSA site, as stated above, no information have I received as of yet, only a confirmation that I have requested a lien search.

Oh. Ok. I did mine, live in memorex, I received the results right away. They wold not accept my payment method at the time on line. Well I guess you have to wait till monday when some one is there to process it” Or check your inbox” I do not know about that. If you have confirmation of search, but no results. It looks like monday for you then. I really do not know. I am not their administrator” :-D

I suspect it is due to the day of week as well. Thanks Bobis Youruncle I can communicate with clarity, but I cant seem to help being a Fecktard, it is normally due to ignorance leading to mistakes, please forgive me.

Don't worry, I had my ass kicked over the same shit. :-D

yeah, I knew ignorance would be corrected here. I find it all in good intent, many have been very helpful already.

No malice, here at all. :-) Lie to me, and it is a different story.

Terms accepted!

Bobis Youruncle where you say: "I picked a value that they attached to the thing they created." where is that valued to be found, is it in the lien search i have yet to recieve?

Nope, now the fun begins :-D

of course, why would that info be at hand. The trustee of that info has it on the books somewhere i take it!

so I must be of standing to require that information.

Bobis Youruncle you have been diligent student, respect!

Yes, the corporation is the only person that can have standing, in this matter. Do not forget you can amend the lien anytime. I made some mistakes and corrected them as I went, As understanding was achieved. It was not until recently that I completed all of this. The info I received was from the finical institutions depositors act. Which I cannot find my copy” Gail Marie may have one kicking about. The government has no standing to dispute any value attached. Everything learned here was applied, as the goal was for me is to offset all debt, created by the security instrument attached to the vessel, as the original security agreement which = the value of the one share we are issued as citizens and given the bond to hold as cargo. The lien is the receivers certificate of the bankruptcy of the legal person or the ALL CAPS NAME, that is being used without authorization once lien is in place. So the corporation becomes the receiver of this value. It is the equitable value of the one share” That was the value of the LIen our trustee filed. You can do a lien search on the person that was assigned to me thru this legal thing, if you had the required info and see on paper what the corporation, in which one share is owned by the sole shareholder, is now worth. It is a substantial sum. I am in the process of creating the credit to account for this sum. We at Bob uncle are Not quite there yet. Have some more process to do. I have spent a year on this as well as learning other things, crypto currency and such. I had to learn all of it to do this.

"a substantial sum" I do suspect myself, and as for the MARRIAGE lien, it would be that x2.

I do not know that information, reasoning would follow that but until its verified, I do not know it. I think, you may be correct.

http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/sc-1985-c-51/latest/sc-1985-c-51.htm Financial institutions depositors compensation act,

See heres the thing” You could put any value on the lien and they cannot do anything about it, it is a private matter for one, two it is up to you to account for how you came to that value. Acting as Chief whatever. No one has any standing other than the corporation in private. So once you turn everything over to the trust for safe keeping. It is safe and valuable as well. You appease it for yourself ( corporate self), Then”. Bob is your Uncle. :-D

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/625945354108067/

Hahahaa 404 error I wonder why :-D

Financial Institutions Depositors Act ^^

My take on the value, is that if they, GOVERNMENT, put a value on it for a certain sum, one would want their trustees to put a sum of value beyond that value, as it would still be of interest for a party to get in line for a lien.

They cannot it is private property. :-)

Right.

Hey Lana Dukakis, no worries, you can come back here, and tell the truth, if you are Robert Cormier, it's no big deal, you won't get banned for that, I promise... ;)

We will just laugh a bit, that's all :D

It won't be able to see my posts” :-D

Lana Dukakis, you will have to show up at one point and tell the truth !!! :)

Adam Thomas

Yup....still reading....is what you're looking for in refrence to the roles of the creator/ grantor/ claimant/ creditor / drawer / authorized administrator ???

Me, I am not looking for anything. I am clear, maybe others would benefit from this clarification. I do not know.