The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 5

Feb 10, 2014 3:24 AM

Tommy Atherton

Question: Who would be the most appropriate party to have NOTICE: that the carrier has delivered the Name to the Beneficiary, and that the Beneficiary and/or Sole Administrator is rescinding the PERSON from public commerce (as soon as he ,(sui juris), gets a few more enemas) . The Administrator for the PERSON and/or The carrier requires payment for services rendered: if this payment (fuckin huge, you know for all the trouble!) cant be "paid" (of course it can't) a commercial lien shall follow. I am "leaning"(play on words here) towards the registrar general, in the province of issue? Would a "notice to agent is notice to principle, notice to principal is notice to agent" cover that angle of this getting to the proper party? (or am i ,like totally, being retarded here?)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 7, page 831
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 7, page 831 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.