The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 5

Feb 07, 2014 10:48 PM

Pete Daoust

"decentralization of Law" :D ......

Andreas M. Antonopoulos - Live - Coinscrum - Alternative Stage - London

youtube.com

Andreas M. Antonopoulos - Live - Coinscrum - Alternative Stage - London Recorded By IamSatoshi - Audio By Aaron couples - London, February 2014 http://www.ia...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 39
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 39 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 22

Eamonn O Brien

Lets say a small community uses a certain coin. A man needs x amount to build a house and the builder wants to be paid in said coin.

So he needs a loan. He goes online and finds someone with quite alot of coins so he asks for a loan. Whats stopping the lender applying interest just like a current bank would?

See I'm finding it hard to realise the difference between what is in place now regarding banks and how it will work online...

If people made the change tomorrow from Euros to Dogecoin, some people will have lots and others will have none and nothing of value to offer in order to obtain some...

It'll take alot more thought for me to grasp it... In the meantime, here's Mr. Conway Twitty...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2aeRg_yMSE

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 40
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 40 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

The way I see it Eamonn, there is that option to do that but it is just that, AN OPTION. The thing is, that is where the rest of us step in. If the rest of us step in and lend at no interest then you have a choice. The Idea behind dogecoin is a currency based on generosity. So if I lend you the currency for nothing then you pay it back. Deal done. If you then donate to me for the use of your money then so be it. A thank you. Or maybe it only comes with a set fee. All options, but you get to decide. And all the while, we are all equal under the law. A law based on contract. A contract that is public.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 41
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 41 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

At the moment people tend not to labour to save for that £300,000 house... A loan comes at some point and the house is used as collateral. If x amount of people donate altcoins so someone can put a roof over their head, do the lenders have the right to take said house when the borrower doesn't pay them back?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 41
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 41 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

How does that differ from the current system? I'm being objective for the sake of trying to understand, not because I don't agree with it...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 41 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 41 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Phillip Prater

The people are different. The system is different with the transparency. I recall Scott Duncan saying something like do or die and you have no idea what we have been robbed of and how much of it. I could be wrong in all of this. If I am I will gladly clean up my stain shit.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 42
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 42 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Cara Small

The biggest difference I see is that instead of asking a few big loan sharks "Which of you will lend me money to build a home?" and having a hired group of thugs to enforce that you give them WAY more than you borrowed because you can't pay it all at once, you can now ask many to help and if you don't pay them back, they just simply will not trust you ever again. No big banksters and no mindless policy enforcement to run around intimidating people. Of course you should still be careful what you ask for, and most people will still want something in return for what they lend. It will be direct and there isn't just a few at the top sifting all the gain off of the many at the bottom.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 42
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 42 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Howard PosehnAladdin Sane

Eamonn, I farmed and mastered a trade, Tinsmith. I, over the years became good at other trades as well, plumbing, carpentry, electrical, roofing, paper and wire for stucco, a handyman type. If you were here, I would work for you for coin. I think that I could make other tradesmen see the Value in this too. What I'm saying here is that many of us have the skills to build and are willing to accept a NEW currency system free from all the thieving hands of parasites with psychopathic armed thugs collecting. Whether it is building with wood, concrete, steel, computers or minds, the opportunity is there NOW, and I want to work with it. As far as the loan for the house, if it was just hard times and the future looked good ahead for you, I would not be worried if I lent some coin. I would have had more than I needed and it does me no good sitting idle, so pay me when you can again. If you just flat out refuse, then you really should sell the house to clear the debt and get back to the Fiat system, RFN! Just kidding! Common sense would prevail in this new system. Imagine THAT!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 42
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 42 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top