The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 5

Jan 25, 2014 1:37 PM

Mathew Wolfe

Ok, at the risk of more arrogant, smart ass responses, I've got a few questions. The only way to lean is to ask right... So here we go. If I'm the AGENT for the principle or the sole authorized administrator; then all bills or charges are not for me, they are for the principle right? Or the AGENCY however you want to say it. If I'm acting as their agent then how do I send the agency the bill or charges? Secondly) if I'm the administrator of something I did not create, then that authority was granted to me correct? Someone have the analogy of a fed note, but that was GIVEN to me as well to administer for a designed purpose. Therefore, I only have the authority to administer as the creator of the (person) grants. Where can I find the terms or conditions? Lastly) how do I use this knowledge in court? I want results. I want to win. All of this theory is nice but if I can't back it up by real world application, then it's shit. Thanks for all the help, let the condescending arrogant comments roll! Lol

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 334
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 334 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 8

Eamonn O Brien

The whole system is commerce. In order to partake in commerce you need a person. All bills are addressed to whatever person was used to initiate the commercial relationship i.e. Mr. Mathew Wolfe...

The only right you have is the right not to contract with the person. Once you do contract with the person the t's & c's are outlined in government statute books or whatever commercial rulebook the person you are dealing with has set out.

The point is not to go to court Mathew. Win by staying at home. Most cases are civil in nature thus requiring a contract that usually doesn't exist. Put the burden of proof on them by demanding evidence that you are SURETY for the person relating to the charges...

I hope this helps... :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 334
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 334 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

If you contract with the trust that is government then statutes apply... Your signature is proof that you understand...

You don't need to operate in the public but they lie through omission leading people to believe that they must...

Find something you're good at and utilise it. Have you watched MONEY AS DEBT 3?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 335
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 335 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

I've found that working for myself in the private is half the battle. Not using their name or number...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 335 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 335 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Mathew Wolfe

No I haven't watched it yet. That's on my list of things to watch actually. I'm sure much if this stuff will be explained in that video... So I'll reserve any further questions until I've seen it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 336
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 336 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top