The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 5

Jan 25, 2014 1:42 AM

Steve LemieuxSteeve Contributing Beneficiary

Court - Who is Trustee?

I’ve been to court more than I care to admit, back when I thought it was a good idea to “show them” what I knew. The results? How about jail time, a foreclosure (it took them 3 years to get it) and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on ATTORNey fees. When the money would run out, I’d fire the useless cunt attorneys and take the actions over myself (another useless cunt — I know”). I’ve had some small victories yes, but when the time came to “get actual remedy” nope. They’d crush me like a grape. I was SURETY and their LEDGER needed my blood to be squared up. I remember making hour long statements in court — for what?

It got to the point where I pretty much knew everyone at the Edmonton court house. File this, motion that, application for this — stand there ARGUING my points. Why did I most always LOOSE? Because when you MAKE STATEMENTS and/or ANSWER QUESTIONS/BE DEPOSED you are in DISHONOR and the justice will most ALWAYS side with his bar brothers (who also argue). There are ways to make the justices honest and neutral, but I have yet to achieve this in open court. I have the balls to assert it, but the opportunity has not come up. I’ve managed to stay the fuck out of there — THEY DON’T CARE and I NO LONGER CARE EITHER.

Next time I’m dragged into court in shackles, I will BE the notice of mistake, no need to FILE anything. That’s a promise and PUBLIC NOTICE, you can count on it. Should I go to fail, their will be repercussions. The trust holding LEGAL title to my juristic person will come forward and hold those public servants accountable. Isn't that’s what their bonds are for?

"THEY DONT FUCKING CARE". Let's look at that for a moment. That is indeed a FACT.

Why don't they care? Humm...

Is SURETY still presumed to be the fellow/TRUSTEE standing in THEIR courtroom?

Isn’t it a FACT that only TRUSTEEs go to jail?

Was a statement(s) made or a question answered which leads THEM to attach surety AND/OR jurisdiction to the fellow? Better think twice about that one” It is one thing to FILE the notice of mistake; it is another thing to ENFORCE the intent behind the notice of mistake. How bad do you NOT wish to be surety?

Statements = Dishonor

Being deposed = loss of Sovereignty = THEY get jurisdiction = you ARE the trustee

Since when do grantors and beneficiaries of TRUSTS obey commands? Is court NOT a constructive trust and is the legal person NOT a government created trust of which YOU are the beneficiary?

What would happen is THEY ALLOWED the fellow standing in the courtroom to NOT be surety? Who gets the bill? Is it the ATTORNey? And you THINK they are going to allow that to happen so easily?

I could go on and on, but at the end of the day, do you know who you are and do you know what YOUR RIGHTS ARE? Legal persons HAVE NO RIGHTS, THAT’s WHY THEY DON’T GIVE A FUCK.

So what are you gonna do? Yell, scream and moan like a little bitch? Cower before your enemy? Get yanked out the courtroom in total dishonor like the angry slave you appear to be?

Or are you gonna educate yourself and calmly ask questions designed to publicly EXPOSE what’s really going on in there? SURETY AND ACCOUNTING.

Who are you gonna be and what are you gonna do?

Anyway, that’s my 2 cents, take it or leave it. I certainly don't believe any of the above, it is all merely fiction jumbled in the pea sized abnormality in my head (at the moment).

Tomorrow, I'll make up some new bullshit for you to chew on...

PEACE

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 319
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 319 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_616320735070529
Unique Facebook User ID:
458370044339963
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 24

Chris Evan

Steve, I have asked ALL of the Accounting and Surety questions. I have asked all of the applicability questions. They are now REFUSING to answer ANY of my questions. I continue to say..."I cannot understand the nature and cause of these proceedings until my questions are answered." Guess what???? Then they proceed. I say Objection. They don't give a fuck. ooppp forgot to put that in CAPS

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 320
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 320 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

But they may if you take their house, remove there ability to function, bankrupting the fuckers” In my dream world”.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 320 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 320 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Steve Lemieux

Chris, what are your options? How can THEY move forward without answering critical questions and without your consent? Let's brainstorm - in a color-able manner so as to avoid controversy...

Personally, I would inundate them with QUESTIONS structured to expose their BULLSHIT. Make it fun, it's gonna go down anyway.

Mr justice, can you please explain what is going on in this courtroom here today?

Am I not entitled to be heard in a fair and impartial manner?

Why are you ignoring everything I have asserted respective to this action to date? Is it just me or are you actually showing favouritism towards the plaintiff? Do you have something against me, the beneficiary creditor and accommodation party for the defendant?

Is it legal for you to DEEM SURETY upon a bone fide beneficiary?

Mr justice, what does a beneficiary and creditor such as ME have to do to be recognised as such in this court?

NOTE: At this point, I’d consider addressing the peanut gallery with something like — “Does anyone in this courtroom have any fact, evidence or testimony REBUTTING the presumption that I am the Grantor AND beneficiary of the constructive trust taking place here today?” — “No?” — “Let the record show that NO ONE in this courtroom has rebutted the presumption that I am the true grantor and beneficiary of this trust and that I STAND as such”

Or you could keep asking questions until they finally buckle or drag you away. Keep this in mind — How can they pin surety on YOU if you ONLY ask questions? THEY CANÂT. Sure they can ignore you and totally trample you over but when it comes down to it, THEY have violated the public trust and SOMEONE should be held accountable for that. No?

More Questions: Mr justice — is that NOT a TRUSTEE’s robe you are wearing? Then are you NOT the trustee in this action? Are you trying to delegate YOUR duty on to ME? Did you NOT swear an oath of office pledging your commitment to protect beneficiaries like me?

Hammer the justice with questions — Mr justice, can you please explain how you can legally DEEM me the surety in this action when I clearly DO NOT CONSENT to such a liability? What kind of court is this?

Is this legal? How can this be legal and lawful? Is that NOT an act of contempt against the people, whom I consider myself a part of? What KIND of DUE PROCESS is this?

See - I told you I’d come up with more bullshit for you to chew on today.

;)

PEACE

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 321 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 321 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Steve LemieuxSteeve Contributing Beneficiary

Remember:

Questions=YOU STAY IN HONOR Questions=THEY CANNOT ATTACH SURETY AND/OR JURISDICTION TO YOU

THEY are pirates with a bag of tricks. YOU are smarter than them. Ask the right questions and watch them squirm.

I've told crowns to shut the fuck up more than once in open court - "Can you PLEASE answer the questions or keep quiet?" if they keep talking -> repeat louder as many times as it takes. Eventually he WILL shut the fuck up.

Once you know this in your heart, court becomes MUCH LESS intimidating. I promise.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 322
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 322 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

...you guys are moving a little slow in the whole "getting a fucking clue" thing, though. At this rate, you will be saying in about 10 years, "We need to collapse the economy and start a war"....and I'll have already done it.

I'm not concerned about it. I'll accomplish that, with or without your help, people. At the moment, claims of "collapsing the economy and start a war" is just nothing but the crazy rantings of some weird computer guy with boats (which is ALSO what I want) but all of you range from "he's nuts but has some good points" to "holy fuck, this guy is going to do it", depending on how much work you put into actually reading what I say. This makes you vulnerable.

Already the governments know what I'm doing, but they are a little lacking in the "how" knowledge to do anything to stop me. They find out too late.

The next thing to happen is that people like you will be detained and released. You will be questioned about... ME. I know how frustrated government workers act. You hear me talk about the idiocy of government workers, but even I was unaware of how stupid they were. I fully expected HALF of the things I've set up over the past 20 years to be discovered and neutralized... They found ONE ...and that was an accident. They don't even grasp what they neutralized.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 323
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 323 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Pay attention to what Steve writes here. Right now the Powers That Be, are a little booty-bothered about Ukraine and that shit giving people ideas over here. That will pass soon enough, and they will focus on ME again.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 323
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 323 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I'm not here to "instruct". I never have been.

I am here serving my own agenda, and NOTHING ELSE. I have never made a secret of that.

...and it's Admiral, not Captain. :P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 323 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 323 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.
Back to top