The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 9

Mar 16, 2015 4:17 PM

Jesus Martinez

In the case of ONTARIO, I think the COLLECTION AGENCY is a PERSON that provides a SERVICE of obtaining or arranging for payment of money owed to another person, and employs an INDIVIDUAL (AGENT) authorized/appointed to COLLECT that money, called COLLECTOR.

One is the "AGENCY" with SURETY, the other is an "AGENT" for "the agency."

It's curios that neither "money" "debt" "debtor" "service" "agency," nor "agent," are defined in the Act. So when the words "the agency", and others, are used I am not sure which AGENCY they actually mean. i.e. << “collector” means an individual employed, appointed or authorized by a collection agency to collect debts for the agency,...>> Which AGENCY? :D

Also, apparently a "collection agency" may only collect MONEY OWED. Again, "money" is NOT defined in the Act. It does not collect DEBTS, but SELLS a SERVICE of DEBT SETTLEMENT. :D

SO back to the question, <<WHY ARE "COLLECTION AGENCY" and "COLLECTOR" SEPARATE DEFINITIONS? >> Because they are NOT the same, for they exist and operate through AGENCY, and one is the AGENCY, and the other the AGENT.

As with everything else with "agency," the authority for these "collection agencies" comes a from an unknown, magical place. It's clearly defined as a SERVICE.