The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 9

Feb 04, 2015 5:44 PM

Scott Duncan

Pete Daoust has been following this.

Now a "ruling" has come, and now the government had ORDERED MEDIA to NOT REPORT IT!

Committe for Monetary and Economic Reform v. Canada - Federal Court

decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

[1] This is a motion under Rule 51 of the Federal Court Rules, SOR/98-106 [Rules], appealing the Order of Prothonotary Aalto dated 9 August 2013 [Decision], which struck the Plaintiffs’ Amended Statement of Claim [Claim] without leave to amend.

Read Comments 18

John Affidavit Fernandes

the Claim seeks a declaration that the Defendants’ officials are: wittingly and/or unwittingly, in varying degrees, knowledge, and intent, engaged in a conspiracy, along with the [Bank of International Settlements, Financial Stability Board, and International Monetary Fund], to render impotent the Bank Act, as well as Canadian sovereignty over financial, monetary, and socio-economic policy, and in fact by-pass the sovereign rule of Canada, through its Parliament, by means of banking and financial systems, which conspiracy and elements of such tortious conduct are set out, in inter alia, Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc. [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959”

Scott Duncan

How about MORE THAN A CURSORY FUCKING GLANCE! What good is a "cursory glance"? You REALLY think "cursory glance" is going to help you?

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT, GET THE FUCKING SKILL TO UNDERSTAND IT!

David-Paul Sip

I skipped to the end to read the decision. My mistake. I should not have commented until I had the time to read through the entire trancript. Why is Rocco Gallatti taking this on I wonder. He seems to be a lawyer fighting the good fight for everybody. There are no exceptions to the rule that all lawyers are lying sacks of shit and yet "judge a man by his actions" seems appropriate here.

Pete Daoust

Why is Rocco Gallatti taking this on I wonder...

I think that he thinks it's the RIGHT thing to do......and/or, PUBLICITY, he might thought that this would have brought him lots of publicity....

But since I am not in his head, I can't be too sure... :/

Back to top