The Tender For Law

Nov 16, 2013

Maximus Legis

Nov 16, 2013

Debt collection agency assholes in the United Kingdom tend to pass on uncollected alleged debts to other debt collection agencies. The result is when one has already secured agreement between the parties, one can still receive further annoying demands from a new debt collection agency. It is time consuming and fucking tedious to say the least to keep securing agreements every time this happens. Using the new demand as toilet paper, although sore on the butt, is the usual way of dealing with this. However, there is a new kid on the block and they seem to have a bit more tenacity and have been known to take court action. This happened to a friend of mine (I may have mentioned this briefly on here before) and he folded in court as he failed to implement all I had passed on to him. I know the claimant had no proof of claim and agreement between the original parties was indeed in place. Anyhow the defender fucked up in court. This agreement on the matter. Several debt collection agencies have tried and have ended up with shit stains on their paperwork, but I can see things about to repeat themselves. This fucker is going to need some attention but as my friend is a lazy twat and failed to educate himself for such eventualities I am going to help him one last time (because I'm a nice guy and hate bullies). It's my intention to send a one off notice (I can't be fucked doing a three part agreement giving them opportunity to cure etc as they don't fucking deserve it.) and it will go something like this. Send your agent or a retarded lawyer to my home (friends home) with the original non-defective debt instrument within three days of the date you receive this notice and I will settle the account in full. Failure to do so will result in your agreement that, 1. You have no claim. 2. Your claim may be fraudulent 3. You agree to pay me £5,000 damages for harming me with your false claim. You will be billed for damages to the amount of £5,000 payable immediately our agreement is in place. The alleged debt is around £6,000 and the reason damages is set at £5,000 is it's easy to collect in the small claims court up to a limit of £5,000The alleged debt is . The claim will be for an unpaid bill rather than for damages. My perception is an unpaid bill is easy to prove insofar as you billed them and the didn't pay it. I don't know if this makes sense but I'm trying to keep it simple and least time consuming. — Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1213 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 87

Kurnai Clans

Nov 17, 2013 2:22 AM

Kurnai Clans Not sure if I understand, but getting a handle on it!!! What's a debt instrument ? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1214 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:37 AM

Pete Daoust Oh...Maximus Legis, I know a nice method to administrate what these whoever they are, may send to persons your friends may happen to have in their pocket Muhahahahahaha!!!!! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1214 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:46 AM

Pete Daoust Oh, and I have one of these friend who "failed to implement all I had passed on to him"......in FACT, he is a fucking lazy bum .....so I said: Fuck off, don't EVER bother me again with YOUR problems...go find a lawyer next time — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1215 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 8:24 AM

Maximus Legis Hi Pete. It was the middle of the night here so I couldn't reply lol. It has been administrated with the original credit provider but this is a debt collection agency claiming to have taken over rights to the allege debt. They are the fourth company to make this claim so we don't reply. However this one is more aggressive and may take the bluff further what's your method for these types of assholes? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1215 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 8:27 AM

Maximus Legis Kumai A debt instrument in this case would be the original credit card agreement. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1215 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Kurnai Clans

Nov 17, 2013 11:10 AM

Kurnai Clans Okay "agreements" understand thank u — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1215 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Stuart Stone

Nov 17, 2013 1:43 PM

Stuart Stone According to UK clubhouse rules & a quote from Lord Denning, the original credit agreement is a security is a promissory note is a specie of money is to be treated as cash & the party whose signature appears on said credit agreement is the party thereto for value: The Consumer Credit Act 1974, section 189 defines a security as follows: “security ”, in relation to an actual or prospective consumer credit agreement or consumer hire agreement, or any linked transaction, means a mortgage, charge, pledge, bond, debenture, indemnity, guarantee, bill, note or other right provided by the debtor or hirer, or at his request (express or implied), to secure the carrying out of the obligations of the debtor or hirer under the agreement; The Administration of Justice Act 1970, Section 39 states: “mortgage” includes a charge… The Bill of Exchange Act 1882, Part 1(2) states: “Bill” means bill of exchange, and “note” means promissory note. Case Law: (see Jackson v Murphy [1887] 4 T.L.R. 92). "We have repeatedly said in this court that a bill of exchange or a promissory note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary" (see per Lord Denning M.R. in Fielding & Platt Ltd v Selim Najjar[1969] 1 W.L.R. 357 at 361; [1969] 2 All E.R. 150 at 152, CA) The Bills of Exchange Act 1882, Section 30(1) states: Every party whose signature appears on a bill is prima facie deemed to have become a party thereto for value. IF they claim to hold it, and you are the one (or your friend) signed it, instruct them to offset offset the charge against the agreed upon value of the credit agreement (credit limit on the card) & bill them for the amount outstanding...I currently have one in the works for the UK & have them in default and with a non response to an affidavit attesting to the above stated (now) facts...default judgement the next step on the list — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1215 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 3:48 PM

Maximus Legis Thanks Stuart. lots of information there. We have the original creditor in a tacit agreement as I said. We will just have to wait and see how much this fourth debt collector pushes. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1216 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:52 PM

Pete Daoust Hey, Mister debt collector Could you please disclose / reveal to me ALL methods available to administrate this debt you've sent to the person I happen to have in my pocket, which person I am the SOLE authorized administrator of. Thanks for your fast reply, I would like to administrate this debt as fast as possible BY:___________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for blabla — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1216 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:53 PM

Pete Daoust Now, I hope everyone knows in here that this debt collector have NO CHOICE to answer ????......everyone is with me here ?? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1216 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:54 PM

Pete Daoust And unfortunatly, he have to answer IN WRITING, and tell the — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1216 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 3:55 PM

Maximus Legis I like that Pete nice and simple and straight to the point. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1217 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:55 PM

Pete Daoust Now, he will try to CALL you, again and again and again — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1217 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 3:56 PM

Pete Daoust Oh, I know Maximus Legis, done it 7 times so far....AWESOME !!! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1217 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:00 PM

Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1217 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:07 PM

Maximus Legis The last time I dealt with this company they had a summons issued so we asked for copies of all paperwork they intended to rely on in court. They provided none but proceeded to court. They motioned for a judgement. Our defence was that there was no proof of claim. They motioned for a judgement saying we did not bring a defence. The sherrif agreed because our defence was not in the correct format and advised my friend get a lawyer. I told him to say that in law subject takes precedence over form but he chickened out and made a deal. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1217 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:11 PM

Pete Daoust They should not be ANY summons, defense, court, claims, motion, judgement or any of that crap — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1217 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:12 PM

Pete Daoust The only place where "judgement" should be mentioned, is when YOU default them — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1218 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:12 PM

Maximus Legis They were bluffing all the way Pete, if we didn't attend they would have got a default judgement. Once this one is out of the way I will administrate for the person in my pocket only. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1218 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:14 PM

Pete Daoust Great !!!.....because if you do a good administration DUTY, they will have to PAY you to go to court, and they won't have CHOICES, — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1218 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:14 PM

Maximus Legis I know, the mistake was not engaging them to get a default in our favour. as they were the last in a long list who just went away. If I administrated every time a new attack was made I'd be doing it full time on the one case. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1218 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:15 PM

Maximus Legis It was beofre my TTFL days too — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1218 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:22 PM

Pete Daoust But at one point, you will have to discharge that debt, by doing so, you prevent them from transferring the debt to another collection agency, well, they might try it anyway, but that would be FRAUD, and then, you will be able to INVOICE them very fast — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1218 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:28 PM

Pete Daoust If one of these fucktard, are trying to make YOU administrate a debt that was ALREADY administrate, you swing them a nice NOTICE, and an INVOICE, of $2000.00 for unnecessary administration fees. and then you send a STATMENT a NOTICE a FINAL NOTICE a DEFAULT NOTICE and then you LIEN these fuckers — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:29 PM

Pete Daoust I think I'll do a seminar on that too — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:30 PM

Maximus Legis Thanks again Pete, I'm beginning to see the light and the reason you are The Ace Administrator ! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:30 PM

Pete Daoust "How to Wack Collection Agencies" — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:32 PM

Pete Daoust If ever you receive ANYTHING from one of these fucktard, pm me, we'll go step by step together — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:33 PM

Maximus Legis Cheers Pete, very much appreciated — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:37 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack Maximus, did you default them with a non response to an affidavit? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:43 PM

Maximus Legis We defaulted the original creditor with a notice of conditional acceptance. Which to boil it right down said provide the original paperwork for examination and we will pay if all is correct and if they didn't respond with it the agreed the debt didn't exist. after 10 days we sent a notice of dishonour and opportunity to cure. After 10 more days a Notice of Default saying their non response constituted a tacit agreement the debt did not exist. There was a bit more to it than that but no affidavit. Like I said this was befor my TTFL days. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1219 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:45 PM

Maximus Legis They all gave up, but I know this most recent guys are more tenacious as evidenced by the simons for my previous friend. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:46 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack You need to send an affidavit... like the one I posted (somewhere lost in here) — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:46 PM

Pete Daoust I am not saying your way is wrong, in fact, I had to administrate shit from 2 collection agencies for a CORP. I happen to be to CEO of......I just asked for an invoice, and promise them I would write a check as soon as they send an invoice, and it passes the APPROUVALS...... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:47 PM

Pete Daoust I defaulted them, both of them, — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:47 PM

Maximus Legis If I could have stood in court and dealt with the sheriff I feel I could have defended even at that stage. My friend had answers to all the sheriff's bullshit on a pad prepared by me but foled like a wet serviette. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:48 PM

Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

https://www.facebook.com/groups

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:49 PM

Pete Daoust But for debts sent to the person I happen to have in my pocket, I use the ASKING system, which is easy, efficient and fast....and then I discharge the debt, to make sure it won't come back... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:49 PM

Maximus Legis The problem we have in this country is repeated attacks from collector after collector for the same alleged debt. This ones ignored our paperwork and went to court. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:49 PM

Pete Daoust No court is needed for that shit, no defense is needed..... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1220 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:51 PM

Pete Daoust When you'll start INVOICING them, or telling them you have good reasons to BELIEVE they are commiting fraud, they'll go away like cocaroaches — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:51 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack This is what I mean, to send them an affidavit that they will not rebut would provide evidence they cannot prove their claim. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:52 PM

Maximus Legis We did an affidavit before appearing in court to say there was an agreement in place with the original debtor and put it in with the defence and asked for the claim to be struck out on that basis, but like I said the court ignored it and said our defense was not in the right form/at. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:53 PM

Maximus Legis Beverly see above. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:53 PM

Pete Daoust If they PERSIST and INVITE you to a court, well you have to be paid for that, so you send them an invoice, and ask to be paid UP FRONT, if they REFUSE to pay, you can't go to the BUSINESS meeting they've invited you in — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:54 PM

Pete Daoust Sorry, Beverly can't see my posts, she decided to left me on my own — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:54 PM

Maximus Legis we billed them before court and had the bill in front of the sheriff, but again he said you may have a good defense but get a lawyer. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:54 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack But that does not evidence they cannot prove their claim... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:54 PM

Maximus Legis they brought nothing to court Beverly, nada. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:55 PM

Pete Daoust Maximus Legis, if you do it EXACTLY how I do it, you will WIN..... of claim, they produced none even at the court stage. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1221 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:55 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack That affidavit has worked for me every time within a private negotiation... they cannot prove their claim. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:56 PM

Pete Daoust YOU DON'T NEED A FUCKING PROOF OF CLAIM — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:57 PM

Pete Daoust You just need to know ALL methods available to ADMINISTRATE that debt *sigh* — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:58 PM

Pete Daoust This is BUSINESS regarding DEBTS.....who cares about a fucking proof of claim ? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:58 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack The court is PUBLIC, and the agreement you've put in place is PRIVATE. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 4:58 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack they don't SEE each other... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 4:58 PM

Pete Daoust Stop FIGHTING and start ADMINISTRATING.....fuck — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 4:59 PM

Maximus Legis That's why it failed so Pete's way will be the method next time — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 5:00 PM

Pete Daoust You light up a candle, in your office, put some nice relaxing music, and ADMINISTRATE......easy !!! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Nov 17, 2013 5:00 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack Yes, better to settle with the SOURCE... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 5:01 PM

Pete Daoust Oh, and some coffee, don't forget the coffee pot — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1222 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Steve LemieuxSteeve Contributing Beneficiary

Nov 17, 2013 5:02 PM

Steeve Contributing Beneficiary Debt collectors=Ask for proof of claim Look in my notes for the following: DEBT COLLECTOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL REMEDY DEMAND Edit them as needed. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 5:04 PM

Pete Daoust Maximus Legis, don't read that shit — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 5:05 PM

Maximus Legis Haha, thanks Steve but I did all that and it still went to court. Going to apply Pete's method next time lol . Bye for now — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Steve LemieuxSteeve Contributing Beneficiary

Nov 17, 2013 5:05 PM

Steeve Contributing Beneficiary You don't have a contract with the debt collector - put the burden of proof upon them — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 5:06 PM

Maximus Legis Read further up Steve. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 5:06 PM

Maximus Legis Definitely leaving now, back later. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 6:20 PM

Maximus Legis Okay Pete. I have a gut feeling this collection agency will take this to court like the last time. I think we will need to start administrating before they do that as it's always best to be ahead of the game. I was going to pm you but there quite a few on facebook with the same name. Can you pm me so we can start a chain of contact please — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 6:42 PM

Pete Daoust We won't start a "chain of contract", we will letteraly write the LAW 1). You have received that Bill of Exchange, with a debt attached to it, which seems to be addressed to MAXIMUS LEGIS. 2). I am the SOLE authorized ADMINISTRATOR for MAXIMUS LEGIS, inscription number XXXXXXXXX (BC number) and INTEGRITY, and I am sure you will help me with the same INTENT. 4). First, I WISH to know, all methods available to "me", to administrate and discharge that debt sent to the person MAXIMUS LEGIS, inscription number XXXXXXXXX 5). As per the Bill of Exchange Act, I have good reasons to believe you need to disclose ALL methods available to "me" to correctly administrate this debt, on that Bill of Exchange number XXXXXXX Since this seems to be a serious matter, you have 30 days to produce an answer. By:_______________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for: MAXIMUS LEGIS Inscription Number XXXXX 123 street bla bla — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1223 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 6:52 PM

Maximus Legis I must have a look at Bills of Exchange Act for the United Kingdom (Scotland) — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1224 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 6:53 PM

Maximus Legis http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/45-46/61... here it is, I doubt if it differs much from your country. I will go through it when I have some time. Bills of Exchange Act 1882 www.legislation.gov.uk An Act to codify the law relating to Bills of Exchange, Cheques, and Promissory Notes. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1224 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 6:54 PM

Pete Daoust That would be a GREAT idea — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1224 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 6:54 PM

Maximus Legis Haha I know lol. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1224 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 7:47 PM

Maximus Legis Ok, reading these fucking things is all new to me. Is the following what they should be disclosing as a method of settlement? The maker of a promissory note by making it— (1)Engages that he will pay it according to its tenor; (2)Is precluded from denying to a holder in due course the existence of the payee and his then capacity to indorse. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1224 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 7:48 PM

Pete Daoust Maximus Legis, what they should do or not, is none of my fucking business — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 7:49 PM

Maximus Legis Ok, I'm trying to overthink it — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 7:50 PM

Pete Daoust No, you are trying to do THEIR JOB, — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 7:50 PM

Maximus Legis Understood Pete — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 11:25 PM

Maximus Legis I have received a piece of paper demanding payment of money for THE PERSON MAXIMUS LEGIS. I don’t know what it is. I have received several in the past year from various companies demanding the same amount. As Sole authorised administrator for MAXIMUS LEGIS I require you to clarify what this paper is, which person made it in order to demand the money and have them sign it so I know who will be held liable in case of fraud and for billing purposes for any unnecessary administrative duties I carry out. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 11:26 PM

Maximus Legis Just messing around and trying to get into your way of thinking Pete — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 11:36 PM

Pete Daoust Well....that is NOT the way I think.... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 11:38 PM

Pete Daoust I know very well what those papers are about.....I am just ASKING what methods are availables to administrate them..... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1225 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 11:40 PM

Pete Daoust And IF I get an answer, I'll pick the one I see fit If I din't get an answer, I'll choose from the ones I am aware of, and they will have to live with it — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1226 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 11:40 PM

Maximus Legis I was reading the BOE act and it said the bill must be signed. If not it must have a corporate seal. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1226 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 11:41 PM

Pete Daoust Yeah....I signed 7 of them — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1226 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Nov 17, 2013 11:42 PM

Maximus Legis They like to make these Acts/statutes as confusing as possible dont they? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1226 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Nov 17, 2013 11:58 PM

Pete Daoust Confusion and Controversy is their game — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1226 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.